NH Bank Establishes Consortium to Build Security Token Ecosystem

Korea’s DAXA Prohibits Relisting of Delisted Cryptos for a YearThe Digital Asset Exchange Alliance (DAXA) in Korea will prohibit the relisting of cryptocurrencies delisted from its member exchanges for a year, according to Korean media outlet Edaily.©Pexels/Jan van der WolfDAXA’s arbitrary regulationSome criticize this regulation, arbitrarily created by DAXA, which consists of five major Korean cryptocurrency exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax), as this rule poses a significant impact on crypto issuers and investors.In fact, a blockchain industry insider said that when cryptos are designated by DAXA as a risky asset, their operators receive a notification from the group that relisting is possible after a year once delisted. So far, assets that have been delisted or designated as such are WEMIX, PCI, BASIC, SRM, and OMG.Coinone’s relisting of WEMIXDAXA added this stipulation, as it faced criticism for the absence of relisting regulations in its guidelines when Coinone, one of its members, exclusively relisted the WEMIX token. This raised doubts about the self-regulation of the industry because DAXA had decided the delisting of WEMIX on the grounds that the information on its circulation supply was unreliable.Crypto enterprises are complaining about DAXA’s devising of strict penalties when delisting processes are not transparent. DAXA has stated that a consensus has been reached for the first draft and it will be continuously revised.Stronger DAXA presenceThe Korean crypto industry forecasts that this regulation will empower DAXA’s presence in the crypto scene, considering that its members are responsible for 98% of the domestic trading volume.Experts note that DAXA needs to establish fairness and transparency in order for it to gain trust as a self-regulatory body. Park Yong-beom, Chairman of the Korea Society of Blockchain, said rules on listing and delisting have to be fair and transparent, and if market participants find them unconvincing, it would undermine the credibility and authority of the self-regulatory body.In an interview with Economic Review, Former KB Kookmin Bank CEO Lee Kun-ho suggested that DAXA should prioritize market vitalization and ecosystem strengthening. He believes that instead of focusing on market management and supervision, DAXA should concentrate on enhancing investor protection.

Hong Kong Enticing Crypto Firms from Mainland ChinaIn the wake of various scandals and high-profile bankruptcies, some governments have shunned the cryptocurrency industry, but Hong Kong is instead embracing mainland China crypto companies, urging them to relocate to the city in a bid to bolster its status as a financial hub.©Pexels/RODNAE ProductionsEmbracing cryptoAfter enduring an exodus of bankers amid a China security crackdown and stringent COVID curbs, Hong Kong is now making a concerted effort to revitalize its finance sector by embracing crypto. Top Hong Kong government officials, including Chief Executive John Lee, have voiced their support, and the city is planning to hold 100 crypto-related conferences and lavish parties throughout April. Hong Kong is “very serious about building an international virtual asset center,” said Xiao Feng, chairman of Hong Kong crypto exchange HashKey, which drew 13,000 people on the first day of its Hong Kong Web3 Festival, the most significant conference of the month.HashKey obtained a license to operate in Hong Kong last November, making it one of two licensed crypto exchanges in the city, alongside rival exchange OSL. Xiao told Reuters that many people in the crypto industry had initially assumed that Hong Kong would inevitably adopt the same regulations as mainland China. However, the government is now emphasizing that Hong Kong operates under the “One Country, Two Systems” framework and enforces distinct laws.SkepticsDespite this, many remain skeptical of Hong Kong’s promise of a stable regulatory regime on cryptocurrencies. One crypto venture capitalist, who spoke to Reuters on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of the matter, expressed concern over China’s crypto ban, which still looms large in the background. “If Hong Kong can suddenly claim to be crypto-friendly, that switch can be flipped off just as quickly should things become challenging,” he said.Crypto licensing interestNevertheless, at least 10 companies with Chinese founders, including OKX, Bybit, and Huobi, have announced or are planning to announce their bid for licenses in Hong Kong. These firms, which have exited countries like Canada and the UK, are among the sponsors of the most glamorous Hong Kong parties this week. Bybit held a private dinner for industry heavyweights, and OKX reserved a rooftop venue overlooking Victoria Harbour, where guests could enjoy a stunning view.At one event on Tuesday, Tron founder Justin Sun, addressed a mainly Chinese-speaking audience, stating, “I can’t believe that we are having such conferences on Chinese soil.” Sun has been charged with fraud by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), but he argued that the charges lacked merit and accused the regulator of targeting crypto players. “Hopefully, one day, we will have such events in Shanghai and Beijing,” he remarked.Despite the lingering concerns, Hong Kong is committed to establishing itself as a leading finance hub in the cryptocurrency industry and is sparing no effort to achieve its goals.

US Treasury Sanctions Gaza-Based Crypto OperatorThe Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the United States Department of the Treasury has imposed sanctions on a crypto operator allegedly linked to the Palestinian militant group Hamas.The move by OFAC comes as a result of greater scrutiny of terrorist financing following an attack by Hamas on Israel in early October, in which a number of Israelis lost their lives.Photo by Karolina Grabowska on Pexels“Buy Cash Money and Money Transfer Company”The entity targeted by these sanctions is a Gaza-based virtual currency exchange known as the “Buy Cash Money and Money Transfer Company.” It is operated by Khan Yunis, a resident of Gaza. According to the Treasury Department, both the exchange and Khan Yunis are alleged to have ties to Hamas. Ahmed M.M. Alaqad, the owner of the business, has also been named in the sanctions.The primary objective of these sanctions, as stated by the Treasury Department, is to disrupt the sources of revenue for Hamas. The attack on Israel served as a trigger for these actions. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen emphasized the determination to prevent Hamas from raising funds for further acts of terror and violence against the people of Israel.This includes imposing sanctions and cooperating with international allies and partners to identify, freeze, and seize any assets related to Hamas in their respective jurisdictions. Yellen stated:“The United States is taking swift and decisive action to target Hamas’s financiers and facilitators following its brutal and unconscionable massacre of Israeli civilians, including children.”Crypto sector riskIt’s not the first time that crypto platforms have been implicated where terrorist financing is concerned. Earlier this year it emerged that Bitfinex Turkiye, the Turkish local exchange business of global crypto platform Bitfinex, was alleged to have been used for the purposes of money laundering by Hamas. Additionally, leading crypto platform Binance has found itself facing similar allegations.In the immediate aftermath of the recent attack, Israeli authorities moved to close down accounts they claimed were linked with Hamas on crypto platforms like Binance and elsewhere. The Israelis have continued where they left off in this respect, with a report emerging earlier this week that over one hundred accounts on Binance have been ordered to be shut down, with a further two hundred accounts facing scrutiny.While crypto may not account for a sizable proportion of terrorist financing means, these events open up a point of attack for those who oppose the further roll-out of decentralized money and systems.Fighting illicit finance through sanctionsNotably, the US Treasury has been employing sanctions as a tool to cut off financial support to entities suspected of being involved in terrorism or other illicit activities. In a similar vein, earlier in October, the Treasury announced sanctions against crypto wallets associated with Chinese chemical manufacturers, concurrently with an indictment from the Department of Justice related to the production of the drug fentanyl.Earlier this year, blockchain analytics firm Elliptic indicated that most Chinese suppliers of fentanyl precursors were accepting payments for the illicit material in cryptocurrency.It’s worth mentioning that this move by OFAC not only targets Hamas but also includes other entities allegedly connected to the Buy Cash Money and Money Transfer Company, including an al-Qaeda affiliate and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).