Alchemy Pay Gearing Up for Expansion into South Korea

Former FTX COO Finds New Role at Sino GlobalConstance Wang, previously known for her executive roles at FTX, has recently joined crypto venture capital firm Sino Global Capital.That’s according to sources Bloomberg cited in a recent report as being familiar with the matter. Wang held the role of Chief Operating Officer at FTX and was also the Co-Chief Executive Officer of FTX Digital Markets, the affiliate of the now-defunct crypto exchange, which was based in the Bahamas. Her responsibilities at FTX included overseeing global business expansion, token listings, and public relations and marketing.Following the collapse of FTX and its sister trading firm Alameda Research, Wang has reportedly spent a significant amount of time in China, according to an undisclosed source.Sino Global Capital, founded in 2015 by Beijing-based American investor Matthew Graham, had revealed its early investment in FTX after the exchange’s collapse. The management team stems from a background in consulting, Wall Street, private equity, government, and corporate spheres. A year prior, the venture capital firm launched a $200 million fund with FTX as a key investor. Sam Bankman-Fried, the Founder of FTX, expressed gratitude for Sino Global’s support, stating that they believed in the FTX vision from the beginning and assisted in making it a reality.Photo by Henry Kobutra on UnsplashLawsuitGraham was quite public in his support of FTX and Sam Bankman-Fried. He appeared frequently on podcasts, always explaining that the FTX founder was a genius. On investing in FTX and in projects in general, Graham stated repeatedly that Sino Global maintained a high level of due diligence. Most of the leading venture capital investors in FTX (including Sino Global) have been subject to class action lawsuits filed by creditors. It’s claimed that many of these investors didn’t simply invest capital but also got involved in actively marketing what turned out to be a fraud.In January, the court-appointed management team overseeing the FTX bankruptcy proceedings sought permission to subpoena Wang and other former executives of the company. Court filings indicate that Wang has not been accused of any wrongdoing in relation to the collapse of FTX or Alameda.Prior to her tenure at FTX, Wang briefly worked at the crypto exchange Huobi in Singapore as a Business Development Manager. She also spent two years as an analyst at Credit Suisse.New rolesIn recent months, other former FTX employees have also reappeared in new roles. Amy Wu, who left Lightspeed Venture Partners to lead FTX Ventures, announced her joining Menlo Ventures, one of the oldest venture firms in Silicon Valley. Brett Harrison, former President of FTX US until his sudden resignation in September 2022, has founded a startup with plans to provide a “GPT-4-powered trading algorithm code generator.”The transition of Constance Wang and her fellow FTX alumni into new positions at face value seems like a logical progression. However, all of the FTX c-suite executives remain under ongoing scrutiny. Having brought charges against Bankman-Fried, Caroline Ellison, and Nishad Singh some months ago, Southern District of New York (SDNY) Attorney Damian Williams stated clearly that more arrests would follow.

According to India’s Finance Ministry, Binance and a number of other virtual asset service providers (VASPs) are not tax-compliant in India. Cases of tax evasion detectedNews of this matter emerged via written answers, published on Dec. 2, provided in response to parliamentary questions which had been put to India’s Finance Minister, Pankaj Chaudhary. The minister confirmed that a “few cases of evasion of Goods and Services Tax (GST) by cryptocurrency exchanges and investors” had been detected. The document goes on to list 17 crypto entities who are currently being investigated on that basis, with Binance being the most well-known among them. Notable Indian exchanges listed include WazirX, CoinDCX and CoinSwitch. Chaudhary included details of cases booked against these exchanges. In Binance’s case, it was required to pay 722 crore Indian rupees, which amounts to around $85.2 million. While Binance doesn’t appear to have incurred penalties, in the case of WazirX, the exchange had an assessed tax shortfall of 40.51 crore Indian rupees ($4.78 million), but after fees and interest, it was provided with a demand for 49.19 crore Indian rupees ($5.8 million). CoinDCX and CoinSwitch were also assessed with a demand for 20.86 crore Indian rupees ($2.46 million) and 19.38 crore Indian rupees ($2.28 million), inclusive of penalties and interest. In the case of WazirX, CoinDCX and CoinSwitch, the exchanges have had to pay an additional 21%, 24% and 37% respectively in fees and interest over and above their original tax liabilities.Photo by Naveed Ahmed on UnsplashPrevious tax and regulatory issuesTo date, the Finance Ministry has recovered 122.3 crore rupees ($14.4 million) as part of these investigations. Binance has as yet not paid the funds demanded by the authorities. It emerged in August that India’s Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (DGGI) had imposed an $86 million tax demand on the company, with Binance contesting the assessment. The global crypto exchange platform had previously paid a $2.5 million fine for having engaged with Indian customers despite not having been approved by the authorities to trade within the country. After a number of months during which it didn’t trade within the Indian market, in August Binance regularized its standing and gained approval to trade. In a request for comment on the matter from Cointelegraph, a Binance representative stated: “We continue to work closely with regulatory authorities and attend necessary hearings to address any concerns and questions. Binance remains responsive and cooperative and is committed to addressing all necessary tax inquiries.” The company recently hired UK-based accounting and business advisory firm Grant Thornton to assist with accounting, tax and audit preparedness. In the case of WazirX, a spokesperson said that “GST law on cryptocurrencies was not clear in India,” and that on this basis, the company found itself being assessed for non-payment of the applicable taxes.

China has inaugurated a new center in Shanghai dedicated to the international operation of its central bank digital currency (CBDC), the e-CNY, the People's Bank of China (PBOC) recently announced. The hub also launched three specialized platforms for cross-border digital payments, blockchain services, and digital assets, according to state-run Xinhua News Agency. The initiative is a key part of China's strategy to promote the digital yuan's adoption beyond its domestic borders. This effort aligns with a broader trend among BRICS nations, which have increased their use of the Chinese yuan for trade settlements. A Crypto Briefing report indicates that yuan-denominated payments accounted for roughly 24% of the bloc's trade transactions in early 2025.Photo by Edward He on UnsplashDifference between digital yuan and stablecoinsThe e-CNY, which functions without needing a bank account, is designed for daily uses like retail shopping, salary distribution, and transportation fares. While it cannot be converted into foreign currencies, its cross-border capabilities are being explored through the mBridge project, a multinational effort coordinated by the Bank for International Settlements. In contrast to the state-controlled e-CNY, privately issued stablecoins, blockchain-based tokens pegged to fiat currencies like the U.S. dollar, are also gaining traction. These digital assets, backed by reserves such as U.S. Treasury bills, are widely used for faster and cheaper cross-border payments and remittances. Hong Kong established a clear regulatory framework for stablecoins on Aug. 1, setting high standards for potential issuers. However, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has stated that it does not expect to grant the first licenses until early next year. Yuan stablecoin in KazakhstanRecently, the HKMA had to clarify the status of stablecoin issuance in the region. According to the South China Morning Post, the monetary authority issued a statement refuting social media reports that the first offshore yuan-pegged stablecoin had been launched in Hong Kong. The company involved, AnchorX, later clarified on X that its yuan-pegged digital asset, AxCNH, was launched in Kazakhstan under a license from the Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA). Despite its launch outside of Hong Kong, the AxCNH stablecoin is seen by some as part of Beijing's broader ambitions. Yang Guang, the CTO of Conflux, which provides technical expertise to AnchorX, told Reuters that the Sept. 17 launch represents an effort to leverage blockchain technology for international trade. Yang suggested that Beijing would likely support such initiatives if they facilitate commerce, noting that offshore yuan stablecoins could be issued without direct sign-off from China's central bank. Market analysts view China’s latest initiatives as part of a broader, multi-pronged strategy. Augustine Fan, head of insights at digital asset platform SignalPlus, described the stablecoin project as “another venue or trial to push the use of the offshore yuan,” adding that it also reflects the government’s cautiously positive stance toward blockchain technology. China’s stablecoin ambiguityAt the policy level, signals remain mixed. A Caixin report indicated that Chinese digital platforms, state-owned enterprises (SOEs), and financial institutions in Hong Kong may face restrictions on stablecoin and broader crypto activity. In addition, branches of SOEs and major banks are unlikely to seek stablecoin licenses in the region. The English version of the Caixin article remains accessible, but Cointelegraph observed that the Chinese-language version has since been taken down.At the same time, official engagement is visible. The National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), a vice-ministerial institution under the Ministry of Science and Technology that oversees the National Natural Science Fund, earlier announced grants for research on stablecoins and the development of cross-border monitoring frameworks. According to the South China Morning Post, the foundation launched the study in response to concerns that unregulated circulation of private stablecoins, particularly those pegged to the U.S. dollar, could weaken capital controls and pose risks to the yuan. A clearer policy direction is expected once the results of this research are available.