NBC and AliPay collaborate to enable enhanced cross-border payments

The Need to Distinguish Between Security and Non-Security Virtual AssetsWith the recent enactment of the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill in South Korea, there is a need to lay out criteria for determining whether virtual assets qualify as securities, says Kim Ja-bong, a senior research fellow at the Korea Institute of Finance, in his report titled “The Implications of Determining Which Virtual Assets Constitute Securities and Investor Protection” released on Saturday.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashThe implications of the Virtual Asset User Protection ActThe Virtual Asset User Protection Act — which will take effect in July of next year — aims to protect customer assets, establish regulations against unfair trading practices, and enforce penalties. Notably, it will target virtual assets that are not securities, deeming it necessary for regulators to determine if virtual assets qualify as securities or not in order to enforce the bill. Assets with characteristics of securities will fall under the jurisdiction of the Capital Markets Act.Therefore, if the Virtual Asset User Protection Act does not provide sufficient investor protection, issuers may be incentivized to issue non-security assets rather than security assets to avoid the regulations of the Capital Markets Act. This further necessitates the act of distinguishing between virtual assets that are securities versus those that are not.Determining if a virtual asset is a security or notThere are two approaches to do this, according to Kim: the passive approach, which avoids considering a virtual asset as a security whenever possible, and the active approach, which treats a virtual asset as a security whenever applicable.He argues that it is better to focus on whether an investment contract qualifies as a security if it is considered an investment contract, rather than simply selecting a specific approach.Furthermore, the nature of virtual assets renders them unbound by national borders, so it is necessary to establish assessment criteria that correspond with international standards, such as those used in the US and Europe.This is especially important because if the criteria differ from international standards, there is a risk of domestic investors suffering damages due to an issuer’s pursuit of regulatory arbitrage between countries.Equitable recognition and potential for security tokensAccording to Kim, the importance of determining whether virtual assets are securities lies in ensuring that security tokens receive the same recognition and trading treatment as traditional securities such as stocks. With such a measure, security token offerings can serve as an efficient and reliable method for raising funds. Although there may be concerns that such a regulation may hinder the development of virtual assets, it may well be an opportunity for security tokens to be qualified and trusted as high-quality financial instruments just like existing securities, Kim claims.Even for virtual assets that are not considered securities, there are many types of assets that are financial in nature, such as e-money tokens — therefore, it is necessary to actively protect investors in non-security virtual assets through financial regulations such as reinforcing disclosure obligations, which is being done in the EU through the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA).Empowering regulators for enhanced investor protection and market integrityKim underscored that investor protection and healthy growth of the virtual asset market are made possible mainly through expanding regulators’ authority to protect economic interests and prevent damages. The author also suggested institutional reforms that grant regulators substantial authority, which would enhance their ability to protect investors effectively and provide compensation for damages.He added that regulators should also have the authority to enforce liability for damages or impose civil penalties for unfair trading practices conducted using classified information.

South Korean retail investors are pulling back from cryptocurrencies after months of falling prices, rotating capital into domestic equities in a sharp reversal from last year’s trading boom, according to a report by Bloomberg.Photo by Timothy Ries on UnsplashCrypto prices have declined since October, leaving many individual traders nursing heavy losses. In January, trading volumes on local exchanges have dropped roughly 65% year-on-year. By contrast, trading value on the KOSPI, the primary benchmark index of Korea's stock market, has surged 221% over the same period, reflecting a decisive shift in retail risk appetite. Korean investors—who had heavily favored volatile altcoins—are now reallocating funds into domestic and overseas equities, particularly artificial intelligence and robotics stocks. Brokerage margin balances have surpassed 30 trillion won ($20.8 billion), suggesting speculative capital has migrated rather than disappeared. South Korea has long been one of the world’s most retail-driven crypto markets, with individual investors playing an outsized role in price formation and trading volumes. The recent downturn, however, has exposed the risks of a market concentrated in smaller tokens. The rotation back to equities has also coincided with political momentum around boosting the stock market, including President Lee Jae-myung’s pledge to push the KOSPI toward 5,000. Ownership limits spark debateAs retail enthusiasm cools, regulatory questions are moving to the forefront. A debate has emerged over potential limits on major shareholders’ stakes in crypto firms—a proposal that has stirred controversy over governance and competitiveness. According to MoneyToday Broadcasting MTN, Democratic Party lawmaker Min Byoung-dug recounted a recent dinner conversation in Seoul in which Eric Trump, the second son of U.S. President Donald Trump, reportedly reacted skeptically to the idea. Trump was said to have questioned whether such ownership restrictions would be conceivable in the United States. Supporters argue that ownership caps could strengthen oversight and reduce excessive concentration of control in crypto firms. Critics warn they could deter investment and weaken Korea’s position in an increasingly competitive global market. Innovation continues despite slowdownEven as crypto volumes shrink, financial innovation tied to digital assets is pressing ahead. Decentralized exchange Lighter said on X that it will support perpetual futures contracts linked to major Korean equities. The products include exposure to Samsung, SK Hynix, and Hyundai, as well as a KOSPI index-based contract with 10x leverage. The move reflects a broader convergence between crypto platforms and traditional financial assets.  Regional competition intensifiesKorea’s regulatory direction is also being watched across Asia. Speaking at the Consensus Hong Kong, lawmaker Johnny Ng said the city could draw lessons from South Korea and the United Arab Emirates in shaping its crypto framework. According to CoinDesk, he noted that the UAE has established a robust regulatory structure with dedicated oversight, while Korea operates a government body tasked with supervising crypto activities. As financial centers compete to attract crypto businesses, clarity in regulation has become a strategic differentiator. For now, Korea’s crypto market appears to be recalibrating rather than collapsing—with retail traders retreating, policymakers debating guardrails, and new leveraged products testing the boundaries of innovation. Whether this marks a transition toward a more mature phase or merely a pause in speculative fervor may depend on how the country balances investor protection with growth. 

Lotte Data Communication launches NFT donation campaign for children’s rehab centerSouth Korean IT service company Lotte Data Communication is running an NFT donation campaign dedicated to building a children’s rehabilitation center on its NFT marketplace KottonSeed, according to local newspaper The Herald Business on Friday.Photo by Markus Winkler on UnsplashNFTs for charitySponsored by the South Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Korea Disabled People’s Development Institute, the non-profit organization Todag Todag and Hanam City’s Disabled People Family Support Center, the donation campaign will run throughout this month, rewarding every participant with one free “Good Seed NFT”. For each NFT distributed, Lotte Data Communication vowed to donate KRW 1,004 ($0.77). In Korean, the number 1,004 has the same pronunciation as “angel.”The company explained that the project aims to go beyond using NFTs simply as a form of virtual assets, but rather inspire a spirit of giving by showcasing the various ways that NFTs can be used. KottonSeed will also partake in more donation campaigns incorporating Good Seed NFTs in the future to contribute to this objective.“Through this donation campaign, we wanted to demonstrate that there are no limits to the use of NFTs. We hope this becomes an opportunity for many people to feel that positive influences can reach even the places that tend to go unnoticed in our daily lives through NFTs.”Bringing NFTs to various sectorsKottonSeed — currently a beta service — offers NFT marketplace and wallet services that support blockchain networks like Ethereum, Polygon and Klaytn and a variety of payment methods, making it easy for anyone to buy, sell and own NFTs. Lotte Data Communication has been making strides to increase KottonSeed’s presence in the NFT market since its launch earlier this year. It has been incorporating NFTs into various sectors such as proof of participation in activities, product promotion, sports marketing and environmental, social and governance (ESG) efforts.