Etherscan expands through Solscan acquisition

Ethiopian Investment Holdings, the largest sovereign wealth fund in Africa, has announced the signing of a memorandum of understanding (MoU), which is suspected to involve a deal on Bitcoin mining. Deal uncertaintyTaking to LinkedIn on Feb. 15, the sovereign wealth fund outlined details of a partnership with Data Center Service, a subsidiary of Hong Kong’s West Data Group. Separately, Kal Kassa, CEO of Ethiopian operations at Hashlabs Mining, posted on the X social media platform, outlining that it was a stakeholder in the project and that it involved Bitcoin mining. The matter lacks full confirmation however, given that Kassa subsequently deleted his post while the sovereign fund’s statement falls short of mentioning Bitcoin mining. Once verified, the project would signify a substantial investment of $250 million. It’s understood that the investment would be directed towards the establishment of state-of-the-art infrastructure tailored for data mining and artificial intelligence (AI) training operations within Ethiopia.Photo by Kelly on PexelsExploiting abundant energy resourcesA key component of this venture may involve the setup of Bitcoin mining operations utilizing Canaan Avalon miners. This initiative would align with Ethiopia's broader strategy to capitalize on its abundant energy resources to attract international investment and stimulate economic growth.Ethiopia has about 5,200 MW of installed generation capacity, 90% of it coming from hydropower and the remainder from wind and thermal sources. While the official confirmation from the government is pending, the ambitious project has sparked both excitement and skepticism within the industry. Concerns linger regarding the energy-intensive nature of Bitcoin mining and its potential strain on the local electricity supply, an issue of particular relevance in a nation where energy accessibility remains a pressing challenge for many. Bloomberg reportEarlier this month, a report from Bloomberg highlighted Ethiopia as being a new haven for Chinese crypto miners. Following the imposition of a mining ban in China in 2021, many operations were redeployed overseas. Kazakhstan in particular was a popular choice. The Eurasian country wasn’t prepared for the influx, leading to power blackouts.Hashlabs Mining co-founders Jaran Mellerud and Alen Makhmetov both featured in the article. Mellerud outlined the difficulty, stating:“Firstly, countries can run out of available electricity, leaving no room for miners to expand. Secondly, miners can suddenly be deemed unwelcome by the government and be forced to pack up and leave.”Makhmetov outlined that he had a 10 MW facility in Kazakhstan which still sits idle today as curbs and taxes enforced in Kazakhstan on miners “basically killed the industry.” Despite these difficulties in Kazakhstan and China's official ban on cryptocurrency trading, the legalization of Bitcoin mining in Ethiopia in 2022 has spurred a notable influx of Chinese miners seeking new investment avenues. Ethiopia will need to be mindful of the difficulties experienced in Kazakhstan. With that, the Ethiopian government's move towards regulating cryptographic products, including mining activities, reflects a measured yet optimistic approach towards harnessing the economic potential of Bitcoin mining. This regulatory framework aims to strike a balance between fostering sector growth and safeguarding the country's energy security and environmental commitments.  

South Korea’s FIU Faces Staffing Cuts Amid Crypto ChallengesThe Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), a department operating under the South Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC), is downsizing its Virtual Asset Inspection Division, reducing its members from nine to seven, as reported by the local news outlet Etoday. The FIU has faced chronic understaffing for several years, and with the cryptocurrency market expanding and issues accumulating, there is growing concern within the industry about the possibility of a regulatory and supervisory gap.Photo by JEONGUK — on UnsplashTemporary division’s tenure extensionMeanwhile, the FIU seeks to extend the tenure of the temporary virtual asset inspection division, currently scheduled to operate from September 16, 2023, until June 30, 2024. Presently, this division comprises one rank 4 officer, four rank 5 officers, three rank 6 officers, and one rank 7 officer. However, the upcoming organizational changes will involve the removal of one rank 5 officer and one rank 6 officer. Moreover, the two temporary employees (one rank 5 and one rank 6), assigned specifically to examine and analyze financial transactions related to virtual assets, will be reduced to a single rank 5 officer.Understaffing and budget issuesAfter several years of grappling with staffing shortages, it appears that a decision has been made to actually reduce the overall number of FIU personnel. Last year, when the NPC of the National Assembly reviewed the budget of the FSC, it pointed out the shortage of FIU personnel. According to the NPC’s report on the FSC, as of 2022, the FIU’s capacity was 83 staff members. However, the current number stands at only 68, which includes 34 individuals who have been seconded from other agencies. Additionally, there are an additional 13 personnel whose positions are not represented in the organizational chart.The FIU’s spending on labor costs has consistently been lower than that of the FSC’s headquarters each year. Between 2017 and July 2022, the FIU used, on average, 83.71% of its allocated budget for labor costs. In contrast, the FSC had a higher average utilization rate at 89.2%. The NPC pointed out that this discrepancy is largely due to staffing imbalances between the two organizations, suggesting that a reevaluation of staffing levels may be necessary.The FIU has long been considered a less popular unit within the FSC. In recent years, the situation has become particularly challenging for the Virtual Asset Inspection Division, which has been swamped with various problems. This has led to a general reluctance among FSC staff to join this particular division.A person familiar with the matter told Etoday that departments within the FSC focusing on financial policy areas like insurance, banking, and capital markets have traditionally been the go-to choices for those aiming for promotions. However, the source added that there’s been a recent shift: more officers are now showing interest in joining the FIU, often with an eye toward transitioning into related industries after retirement.MOIS hesitant on permanent staffingMeanwhile, the Ministry of the Interior and Safety (MOIS) has been reluctant to make the FSC’s Financial Innovation Bureau and the FIU’s Virtual Asset Inspection Division permanent fixtures. While the FSC argues that solidifying these divisions would necessitate a larger staff and budget, the MOIS is holding back. According to another source, the staffing issue isn’t exclusive to the FIU; the FSC as a whole is understaffed. Despite the FSC’s desire to expand its workforce, the MOIS remains unwilling to approve the additional resources.Crypto professionals are worried that financial regulators are cutting back on staff even as challenges within the sector continue to mount. An official from a virtual asset exchange voiced frustration, pointing to the contrasting approach in neighboring Japan. The official noted that Japan is actively pushing to advance its Web3 sector by not only establishing a dedicated virtual asset department within its Financial Services Agency, but also by forming specialized task forces to address specific challenges. The official finds it baffling that Korea, on the other hand, is downsizing departments that tackle these important issues.

South Korean internet giant Naver has announced that it is monitoring and removing blog posts that promote unregistered virtual asset service providers (VASPs).Photo by Pixabay on PexelsUnregistered status makes promotions illegalAccording to Digital Asset, a Naver official said the practice reflects the fact that unregistered VASPs are subject to criminal penalties, meaning advertisements or promotional content related to them could potentially violate the law. This marks the first instance of Naver publicly confirming its stance on advertising for unregistered crypto platforms. The official noted that this measure had already been implemented before the financial regulator issued a press release in December warning of the illegality of such activities. In December, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission (FSC) said that referral activities promoting unregistered VASPs through blogs and social media constitute an illegal crypto business. The regulatory clarification prompted influencers on platforms such as Telegram and YouTube to discontinue referral promotions related to these exchanges. Google Play to remove unregistered exchangesIn a parallel move, Google has revealed plans to cease support for unregistered crypto exchange apps on its Google Play Store. Google Korea said the decision was made voluntarily to align with its operational policy of complying with regulations in different jurisdictions. As a result, unregistered platforms will be removed from the Korean market in accordance with the FIU's regulatory rules. Beyond marketing restrictions, scrutiny of crypto exchanges is intensifying as the FSC moves to strengthen oversight. The regulator is reportedly devising a rule that would hold platforms liable for hacking incidents under a strict liability framework, meaning liability could be imposed even in the absence of negligence. According to MTN News, the financial authority is considering penalties of up to 10% of a platform’s revenue for such incidents. However, industry participants have argued that the proposed regulation is excessively harsh. One crypto industry source highlighted the disparity, pointing out that the potential 10% fine is more than three times higher than the maximum 3% penalty imposed on traditional fintech companies. Traditional finance eyes stablecoinsAmid this regulatory tightening, the traditional financial sector is positioning itself within the stablecoin segment. Banks are reportedly discussing whether to seek permission to offer yields on stablecoins, provided these fiat-pegged assets are issued by bank-led consortia. Citing industry sources, Electronic Times Internet reported that the Korea Federation of Banks (KFB) recently held a closed-door meeting with member institutions. The agenda focused on a coordinated response to upcoming regulations governing won-backed stablecoins, which form part of the second phase of South Korea’s digital asset legislation. Discussions included a review of the KFB’s ongoing research into won-backed stablecoins, commissioned to McKinsey & Company. The report, currently at its midpoint and scheduled for release in early February, will examine the feasibility of bank-led stablecoin issuance and explore potential use cases. This move is widely seen as an effort by the banking industry to secure customers and liquidity early on, while protecting its competitive advantage as a group of traditional lenders. The push by traditional financial institutions into stablecoin-related sectors is becoming increasingly concrete. According to another MTN News report, Shinhan Securities has formed a strategic partnership with Etherfuse, a tokenization platform that converts real-world assets (RWAs) into digital tokens. The partnership aims to collaborate on the issuance of "stablebonds" backed by government bonds. The planned issuance will use the ticker KTB, with Shinhan Securities acting as a brokerage responsible for securing and managing the underlying assets rather than serving as the issuer. Similarly, Hana Financial Group has established a stablecoin consortium including BNK Financial Group, iM Financial Group, Standard Chartered Bank Korea, and OK Savings Bank. According to local media outlet News1, the participants plan to raise funds to establish a special-purpose company that will later issue a stablecoin.These developments come as financial authorities move to use legislation to restrict early-stage stablecoin issuance to consortia in which banks hold at least a 50% stake plus one share, citing concerns over market stability.