CoinNess soars to 2nd among news apps in Korea amid bitcoin ETF frenzy

The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) plans to roll out a new structure for its central bank digital currency (CBDC) operations, moving the digital yuan into a deposit-based role within the commercial banking system beginning Jan. 1, 2026. Lu Lei, a deputy governor of the PBOC, announced the update, marking a new direction after nearly a decade of pilot programs. According to a report by FTChinese, the move fits into Beijing’s broader economic planning, as authorities seek to reinforce China’s role in global finance while containing risks tied to loosely regulated digital activity. The deputy governor said China will continue to run the digital yuan under a two-tier system, with the central bank responsible for rules and infrastructure, while commercial banks manage wallets, payments, and compliance. He added that the arrangement is designed to prevent banks from being sidelined and to limit shadow banking risks associated with digital payment platforms outside the regulated system.Photo by Eric Prouzet on UnsplashDigital yuan transactions top $2.3TThe announcement comes as use of the digital yuan, known as the e-CNY, continues to rise. By late November 2025, the system had handled 3.48 billion transactions with a total value of 16.7 trillion yuan ($2.3 trillion). There are about 230 million personal wallets and 18.84 million corporate wallets. Beyond domestic use, the e-CNY is being positioned for international trade. Lu pointed to progress on mBridge, a cross-border payments project involving multiple central banks. The platform has processed 4,047 transactions worth the equivalent of 387.2 billion yuan ($55.3 billion), with the digital yuan accounting for about 95.3% of the settlement value. The deputy governor also sounded a note of caution on private-sector innovation, saying the rapid growth of digital assets and stablecoins could complicate the conduct of monetary policy. He said central banks need to ensure that new payment tools do not undermine macroeconomic stability or allow money to circulate beyond regulated channels. Hong Kong to license crypto dealers, custodiansAs Beijing moves to strengthen its state-backed currency framework, Hong Kong is also tightening oversight of the crypto market. On Dec. 24, the city’s Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB) and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) released their conclusions on proposed legislation to regulate virtual asset dealing and custodial services. Following the implementation of the Stablecoins Ordinance in August, regulators are now moving to require firms offering crypto dealing or custody services in Hong Kong to obtain licenses and operate under regulatory supervision. They also began seeking feedback on whether to extend oversight to virtual asset advisory and management providers, with the proposed framework modeled on existing securities market rules. In a separate development underscoring the contrast between state-backed and decentralized digital currencies in the region, reports this month pointed to a sharp drop in Bitcoin network activity linked to mainland China. BTC hashrate drop seen amid China mining changesKong Jianping, CEO of Nasdaq-listed Web3 infrastructure firm Nano Labs, said on the social media platform X that the global Bitcoin network’s hashrate fell by about 100 exahashes per second, or roughly 8%, around Dec. 15. He attributed the decline to the shutdown of an estimated 400,000 mining rigs, mainly in Xinjiang. A lower hashrate means less computing power is securing the network, reducing competition among miners that validate transactions. China has maintained a broad ban on crypto trading and mining since 2021. Industry outlet Wu Blockchain said the reasons for the latest shutdowns were unclear. 

Dubai Tempts AI and Web3 Enterprises With Subsidized Commercial LicensesDubai has demonstrated over the past twelve months that it has its sights set on becoming a regional hub for innovation, and we have further evidence of that strategy today with news that the city is now enticing artificial intelligence (AI) and Web3 businesses with an unprecedented offer — commercial licenses at a 90% subsidy.Photo by Aleksandar Pasaric on PexelsAI and Web 3.0 CampusThe focal point of this strategic move is the Dubai AI and Web 3.0 Campus, a burgeoning tech haven designed to foster innovation and collaboration. The campus recently unveiled its decision to heavily subsidize licenses for companies choosing to establish a foothold within the city, publishing details of the move on Monday via a press release. The issuance of these licenses falls under the auspices of the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC), underscoring the city’s determination to attract global talent and diverse investment opportunities.Mohammad Alblooshi, CEO of DIFC’s Innovation Hub, expressed confidence in the power of this initiative, stating:“We are confident that by granting these licenses, we will attract more global talent and investment to the region and create a culture of collaboration and innovation.”The Dubai AI and Web 3.0 Campus is geared up to cater to its prospective denizens, equipped with cutting-edge AI lab facilities, comprehensive training programs, essential hardware support, and accelerator initiatives.All enterprises setting their sights on seizing the opportunity presented by the 90% subsidized commercial licenses are required to follow an application process.Crypto trading licensingDubai’s tech evolution extends beyond AI and Web3 realms. The city has been proactive in granting operational licenses to cryptocurrency exchanges, marking yet another stride toward its tech-driven future.In a recent development, Nomura’s crypto arm, Laser Digital Middle East, secured an operational license from Dubai’s Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (VARA). This coveted license empowers Laser Digital to provide broker-dealer services and manage virtual asset investments within the emirate.The progressive regulatory approach taken in Dubai has led to crypto exchanges such as Bybit, choosing the city as the location for its headquarters. In June MENA-focused digital assets platform BitOasis became the first crypto company to be awarded a broker dealer license by the Dubai regulator.The regulatory approach taken in Dubai is proving to be progressive yet firm. The emirate hasn’t made the mistake of opting for ineffective light touch regulation that would attract the wrong type of crypto startup.That’s evidenced by the response of VARA to the establishment of the OPNX exchange within its jurisdiction. OPNX was founded by Su Zhu and Kyle Davies, the founders of failed Singapore-based crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC). VARA issued the business’ founders with a reprimand earlier this year, for establishing a crypto-related platform in Dubai without having obtained a crypto trading license.Dubai’s willingness to embrace innovative technologies, coupled with its strategic initiatives and progressive regulation, is propelling it to the forefront of the global tech revolution. As it beckons AI and Web3 pioneers with enticing subsidized licenses and facilitates the growth of the cryptocurrency ecosystem, Dubai is carving a unique niche as a hub of technology and innovation and exploiting the potential growth opportunity that presents as a consequence.

The South Korean National Tax Service (NTS) is reportedly in the process of setting up virtual asset accounts for its district offices. This initiative is aimed at confiscating and liquidating the digital assets of individuals who fail to pay their taxes. This move comes after the creation of similar accounts by public prosecutors' offices, leading to speculation in the crypto industry that virtual asset accounts will soon be allowed for corporate entities as well.Photo by Nataliya Vaitkevich on PexelsDirect confiscation of virtual assetsA report by the local news outlet Etoday today has revealed that each district office of the NTS is working towards establishing a virtual asset account. This development will empower the tax agency to directly sell virtual assets confiscated from tax delinquents. Previously, the NTS would freeze the accounts of overdue taxpayers at Korean cryptocurrency exchanges, compelling them to convert their assets into Korean won. These funds were then confiscated by the NTS. The new initiative is set to streamline the process, enabling the tax authority to directly confiscate virtual assets without the intermediary step of conversion to Korean won. Speaking about this development, an NTS officer said that as each district office director holds the authority to collect taxes from taxpayers with overdue payments, it's necessary for each office to have its own account. Prosecutors’ Offices’ Upbit and Bithumb accountsThe crypto industry views this development as a potential step towards allowing the creation of virtual asset accounts for corporate entities, starting with government agencies. In December, the prosecutors' offices established their entity accounts at major cryptocurrency exchanges Upbit and Bithumb. Since then, the prosecution has utilized these accounts to sell confiscated virtual assets, aiming to recover funds that had not been collected.  An official from a cryptocurrency exchange indicated that the South Korean government is currently focusing on allowing entities that serve the public good to own virtual asset accounts. This approach is seen as the starting point, with expectations that the trend will gain momentum in the future. The official added that it's rare for the government to provide blanket permissions from the outset, suggesting a gradual and cautious approach to the integration of virtual asset accounts.Money laundering concernsMeanwhile, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission (FSC), along with other financial regulators, has remained silent on the matter of virtual asset accounts for corporate entities. This reticence stems from concerns with the financial authority that the introduction of corporate crypto accounts could potentially lead to money laundering and the creation of slush funds. An official from the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee said that they have not received any comments from the financial authority in response to inquiries about plans to allow such accounts for corporate entities. The current law doesn’t prohibit corporate entities from trading virtual assets. However, under the auspices of the financial authority, banks have refrained from offering real-name accounts to corporate entities. This policy has been a point of contention within the crypto industry. Advocates argue that allowing corporate accounts could mitigate issues of market manipulation and challenge the dominance of Upbit in the Korean cryptocurrency market.  The official from the cryptocurrency exchange pointed out that the financial authority does not have a clear legal basis for prohibiting the creation of corporate crypto accounts. They suggested that the regulator should develop clearer guidelines and enforce these rules for corporate entities. More serious discussions in AprilMore serious discussions about the introduction of corporate crypto accounts are anticipated to take place in April, following the conclusion of the general election. Last month, the main opposition party, the Democratic Party of Korea, made election promises to open the crypto market to institutional investors. Meanwhile, the ruling People Power Party has been quietly deliberating on virtual asset policy. Despite these political movements, earlier reports indicate a disconnect between the political parties' efforts to relax crypto regulations and the financial regulator's stance. Meanwhile, Hwang Seok-jin, a professor at Dongguk University’s Graduate School of International Affairs and Information Security, expects to see a conclusion on the permission of corporate crypto trading by the end of this year. He said that there has been ongoing discussion about the approval of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and that allowing the trading of such funds requires the ownership of virtual assets by institutions.