Seoul Labs’ Web3 launchpad SLUSH attracts investors

The joint virtual asset crime investigation unit of the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors' Office announced the arrest of three executives from South Korean cryptocurrency yield platform Haru Invest, according to a report by local news agency Yonhap. They are accused of embezzling cryptocurrencies valued at over 1 trillion Korean won ($750 million).Photo by niu niu on UnsplashFraud lawsuitThis development comes after approximately 100 investors filed a fraud lawsuit in June against the executives of Haru and Delio, another Korean crypto lending firm.  The three leading executives of Haru, one aged 44 and the other two aged 40, are facing fraud charges for failing to return cryptocurrencies deposited by around 16,000 customers.Misleading promotionsInvestigations uncovered that Haru Invest was offering misleading promotions for its products. Despite assurances that it utilized a risk-free, diversified investment strategy to manage user assets, Haru Invest predominantly allocated the majority of these assets towards concentrated investments from March 2020 to June 2023. Haru Invest had garnered attention from crypto investors, promising an annual return of up to 12%.  Subsequently, on June 13, Haru halted the withdrawal of digital assets without prior notice. The platform is currently in the midst of bankruptcy proceedings.  Delio, having allocated some of its assets with Haru, also came under public scrutiny that same month when it ceased withdrawals just a day following Haru's questionable action.

PantherTrade applies for Hong Kong trading licensePantherTrade (Hong Kong) Limited, a subsidiary of Futu Holdings, had been reported last month as being in the process of preparing a licensing application to trade in Hong Kong. According to recent reports in local media, it appears that the company has now submitted such an application to the Hong Kong authorities.Photo by Simon Zhu on UnsplashKey appointmentsThis move aligns with the broader trend, as a total of six companies have submitted applications to the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong. It’s understood that PantherTrade submitted its application on Nov. 15. The move follows a similar application made by Hong Kong-based Meex Holdings on Oct. 12.Key strategic appointments within PantherTrade underscore the company’s vision for its virtual asset trading venture. Chen Zhihu, former Investment Director at Huobi Asset Management (Hong Kong), has joined as a director. The corporate establishment of PantherTrade in March also saw the addition of Hong Yimin, while the initial director, Fang Xingzhi, has a background with Jingdong Securities Co., Ltd.Interest from mainland ChinaRegulatory attention has intensified on PantherTrade and another applicant, Yax, affiliated with Tiger Brokers employees, according to reports from Nikkei Asia. Yax is another platform with mainland China ties, which was reported in October as intending to apply for a license to trade within Hong Kong.It’s understood that the local entity of Chinese enterprise blockchain firm OK Group, OKX Hong Kong FinTech Company Limited, submitted its own trading license application on Nov. 16.Licensing uptakeHong Kong’s regulatory environment has undergone a significant shift, with the city granting the first licenses to cryptocurrency companies under a new framework in August of the current year. The regulatory changes, effective in 2023, allow retail investors to trade crypto on exchanges licensed by the SFC. Importantly, the city has removed the restriction on crypto trading, no longer confining it to professionals with a minimum of $1 million in bankable assets.This regulatory evolution is part of Hong Kong’s broader strategy to position itself as an international hub for cryptocurrencies. The city aims to attract fresh capital and talent, especially in the aftermath of the pandemic. The licensing race among virtual asset trading platforms signifies a pivotal phase in Hong Kong’s vision to lead the digital asset industry in Asia.There had been some short-lived concern that momentum was moving against Hong Kong’s efforts to further the Web3 sector when it emerged recently that crypto derivatives platform Bitget was exiting the Hong Kong market and abandoning efforts to secure a trading license. That concern dissipated when Bitget’s motivations became clearer, following BGX, a related Bitget entity, making an investment into BC Technology Group, the owner of the already Hong Kong-licensed OSL exchange.PantherTrade’s application for a virtual asset exchange license in Hong Kong adds momentum to the city’s evolving crypto landscape. The strategic hires and the broader industry trend highlight the growing significance of Hong Kong in the global digital asset arena. As the regulatory framework becomes more conducive, the city aims to foster innovation and become a key player in the international crypto space.

Blockchain Deposit Insurance Corporation (BDIC), an emerging crypto insurer based in Florida in the United States, with corporate headquarters in Bermuda, has disclosed that it is preparing to launch its cryptocurrency insurance platform.Photo by Kindel Media on PexelsStarting point in AsiaIn a press release published on Feb. 11, BDIC outlined that the launch would take place in Q2 2025, with its crypto insurance underwriting service commencing in key Asian markets to begin with.  The company has chosen Asia as its starting point, where it feels crypto adoption continues to build momentum. With that, it specified Hong Kong, Singapore, Japan, Taiwan and South Korea as target markets.  While the initial launch will take place in Q2, the company foresees having expanded into Southeast Asia by Q4 2025. Broader service coverage will follow across the greater Asia-Pacific (APAC) region by 2026, with particular emphasis on entering the Hong Kong market. Company CEO Jeffrey Glusman cited a growing demand for crypto wallet security across Asia. He underlined the growing crypto adoption rate in the region, suggesting that this will encompass 300 million users by 2028. Insurance essential for mainstream adoption Speaking about the product offering more generally, Glusman said that the crypto sector has reached a critical inflection point. With that, he believes that “institutional-grade insurance solutions are essential for mainstream adoption.” He added: “BDIC introduces a new paradigm in digital asset protection, using advanced risk assessment algorithms and real-time monitoring to safeguard users’ holdings.” Token launch The company is also planning to launch a native token for its platform, “BDIC Coin,” in Q2 2025. The purpose of the token launch will be to power the BDIC Foundation Reserve Fund, a reserve which will be used for the purposes of premium payments and claim settlements. Furthermore, the token will enable holders to participate in governance voting relative to the project. BDIC claims that it has established compliance protocols and a whitelist in order to provide for a robust and equitable tokenomics structure. Glusman believes that the timing of BDIC’s launch couldn’t be better. A recent report by information services company GlobalData corroborates his view. The report, published on the back of a GlobalData survey, outlined that only 10.8% of crypto holders worldwide have insurance in place for their digital assets.  The survey data suggests that 41.9% of non-policy holding respondents would purchase such insurance given the opportunity, while a further 26.2% were open to the idea. Theft or hacking of digital assets was perceived to be the most important risk to cover in a digital asset insurance policy in the case of a quarter of respondents. The number of insurers offering crypto-related insurance remains limited. However, it would appear that there’s a significant growth opportunity for firms like BDIC, based on the survey data. While there might be a growth opportunity, there are also challenges. Nischal Shetty, founder and CEO of WazirX, an Indian crypto exchange platform that suffered a $230 million hack in 2024, described the difficulties encountered by the company in trying to get insurance when interviewed last August. He stated: “We tried to get insurance in the past, but we did not get any provider who would be willing to insure these assets. It's not an easy process.”