Top

Binance Labs clarifies involvement in SkyArk Chonicles’ latest funding round

Web3 & Enterprise·January 30, 2024, 3:02 AM

SkyArk Chronicles, a Singapore-based Triple-A gaming platform, recently announced the completion of a $15 million funding round that it suggested was led by Binance Labs, the venture arm of the leading global crypto platform. Binance has subsequently moved to clarify that it is not involved in the latest funding initiative.

https://asset.coinness.com/en/news/c78415d17df84a47e844d4503cffea9a.webp
Photo by Laurin Steffens on Unsplash

Backed by Binance since 2021

The gaming ecosystem, which has enjoyed the backing of Binance since 2021, expressed excitement about the successful completion of the funding round. On Jan. 12, SkyArk posted on social media platform X, suggesting that Binance led the recent funding round but the project has since deleted that post.

 

The post mentioned the participation of more than 40 institutions in the funding round, including Vividthree Productions, a Singapore-based company. It didn’t disclose the amount it claimed was invested by Binance Labs at that time.

 

The announcement also highlighted contributions from other notable entities in the NFT and gaming space, such as GuildFi Global, Jambo Technology and BreederDAO. Additionally, individual investors like LayerZero CEO Bryan Pellegrino, Tangent Ventures Co-Founder Wangarian and Story Protocol CEO S.Y. Lee were all claimed by the project to have made noteworthy contributions to SkyArk's funding initiative.

 

Binance Labs denial

However, recent developments have introduced an element of uncertainty. Binance Labs, in an X post on Monday, distanced itself from SkyArk Chronicles' latest funding round. Contrary to the earlier announcement, Binance Labs clarified that it did not participate in SkyArk's $15 million funding round earlier this month. The venture arm reiterated its sole investment in SkyArk during the Incubation Season 3 program in 2021.

 

This clarification from Binance Labs raised concerns about the accuracy of SkyArk Chronicles' earlier announcement, leading to SkyArk posting to confirm the information supplied by Binance. That post states:

 

“We are very sorry for the miscommunication and appreciate the clarification from Binance Labs. We remain focused on making SkyArk a success and will continue working hard to achieve our vision.”

 

Community reaction

The saga has caused some concern within the community, underscoring the need for transparency in the cryptocurrency and gaming industries. Web3 and NFT consultancy firm Vader Research commented on the development, stating:

”SkyArk didn’t raise a new private round at all. They circulated the 2021 funding round announcement as if it recently occurred and used that to raise $11m from the public.”

 

In a subsequent post, Vader added that Binance still has considerable leverage where SkyArk is concerned, as it retains the right to decide whether to list the SkyArk token on the platform.

 

SkyArk Chronicles had a history of collaboration with Binance, dating back to 2021 when Binance selected SkyArk Studio for its prestigious Incubator Program Season 3. Out of over 1,000 applicants, SkyArk Studio was one of the nine teams chosen, emphasizing its potential in the blockchain and gaming space.

 

In a follow-up post on Monday, SkyArk co-founder Kelvin Chua expressed his gratitude to Binance for its support over the past three years. The gaming platform, led by seasoned professionals in traditional mobile games, aspires to revolutionize the gaming sector worldwide. Their focus on launching Fully-On-Chain and Only-Assets-On-Chain games sets them apart, with a commitment to incorporating NFTs seamlessly into various gameplay styles.

 

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Aug 28, 2023

Dunamu Loses Lawsuit Seeking $19M in Corporate Tax Refunds After Venture Status Removal

Dunamu Loses Lawsuit Seeking $19M in Corporate Tax Refunds After Venture Status RemovalDunamu, the operator of South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency exchange Upbit, lost a 24.8-billion-won (approximately $18.7 million) corporate tax lawsuit, according to local news outlet The Korea Economic Daily. This legal action emerged after Dunamu was removed from the list of registered venture firms in December 2018. The Seoul Administrative Court ruled that since Dunamu was no longer a venture, it was not eligible for the associated tax benefits.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashLosing venture statusIn September 2017, Dunamu obtained certification as a venture company from the Ministry of SMEs and Startups. However, this certification was revoked in December of the following year. This revocation was due to an amendment to the Enforcement Decree of the Venture Businesses Act in October 2018, which resulted in the exclusion of “blockchain-based crypto asset trading and brokerage” from the venture business classification. Consequently, the withdrawal of this certification rendered the company ineligible for government tax incentives.Tax refund request deniedIn August 2020, Dunamu took action by formally requesting a refund of KRW 24.8 billion in taxes previously paid to the tax office. The foundation of its claim rested on its entitlement to venture company tax benefits up until the corporate tax period of 2018. However, its request was turned down, leading Dunamu to escalate the matter by initiating an administrative case against the tax authorities, following an unfavorable decision by the Korean Tax Tribunal.Meanwhile, an amended version of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Taxation Restrictions, which excluded cryptocurrency-related industries from benefiting from tax reductions, went into effect in January 2019. Pointing to the effective date of this act, Dunamu argued that the company should be entitled to benefits applicable up until the corporate tax cycle of 2018. Furthermore, Dunamu highlighted its legal action, which had led the administrative court to suspend the effects of the venture company certification revocation from December 31, 2018, to January 18, 2019.Court’s stanceDespite these arguments, the court rejected Dunamu’s argument and upheld that tax relief could not be granted for the tax year encompassing the date of the removal of its venture status. Additionally, the court affirmed that the tax authorities’ decision was valid since the venture status had been revoked in 2018, regardless of the amended Taxation Act’s implementation.In disagreement with the court’s ruling, Dunamu has filed an appeal against the decision.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Feb 07, 2024

Hong Kong’s SFC appeals to digital asset investors to verify licenses

As Hong Kong approaches the culmination of the Securities and Futures Commission's (SFC) deadline for cryptocurrency exchanges to seek licenses, the regulator issued a reminder to investors about the potential risks associated with trading on unlicensed platforms.Photo by Jarrod Erbe on UnsplashUrging cautionIn a notice released on Monday, the SFC emphasized the importance of engaging exclusively with SFC-licensed virtual asset trading platforms (VATPs) to ensure investor protection. With only one month remaining for exchanges to apply for a license under the city's virtual asset regulation, the SFC urged investors to exercise caution when dealing with platforms that have not yet received approval.The SFC suggested that investors check the list of regulated platforms, which it maintains on its website. Within the notice, the regulator outlined that in the past, some platforms have claimed to be regulated entities when they were not compliant platforms and not adhering to existing regulations within the Chinese autonomous territory. The advisory comes after the fallout from a high-profile fraud incident involving the JPEX trading platform last fall, resulting in substantial losses of $192 million. Growing list of VATP license applicantsLast month, four additional crypto exchanges, including the KuCoin-affiliated HKVAEX and Singapore-based Bybit, joined the list of official VATP license applicants. The SFC began publishing this list in response to the JPEX scandal, underscoring the importance of regulatory compliance in the cryptocurrency sector. Hong Kong's virtual asset regulation, enacted as an amendment to the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance last year, stipulates that companies engaged in selling or marketing cryptocurrencies to Hong Kong residents must apply for a license by Feb. 29. Those failing to do so must cease business operations in the city by May 31. Currently, OSL and HashKey are the only licensed exchanges in Hong Kong, having received an earlier voluntary license that was later upgraded to include retail investors. These exchanges are operating under an interim solution permitted by the SFC, allowing retail investors to trade on their platforms. Setting a high barWhile 14 companies have formally submitted license applications to date, Patricia Ho, General Counsel for blockchain company Scroll, told the South China Morning Post (SCMP) that the stringent requirements set by Hong Kong have led to a selective process. Ho explained that the city has intentionally set a high bar for application submission, resulting in only the most committed and resourceful entities progressing to the application stage. Last month, it emerged that the SFC had acted to bolster investor protection by introducing a minimum insurance requirement of 50% for licensed crypto exchanges that handle customer funds. It is also planning to introduce a regulatory framework relative to crypto over-the-counter (OTC) trading desks. The SFC is also monitoring individual crypto projects, as last week, the regulator issued a stern warning to those behind the offering of the Floki and TokenFi staking programs. As the deadline approaches, Ho anticipates potential enforcement actions against smaller platforms operating in legal gray areas. Larger platforms, on the other hand, have already begun restricting access from Hong Kong. 

news
Policy & Regulation·

Aug 21, 2023

Senior Gyeonggi Officials Required to Declare Virtual Asset Holdings by Sept 1

Senior Gyeonggi Officials Required to Declare Virtual Asset Holdings by Sept 1The Gyeonggi province of South Korea is requiring officials of rank 4 or higher to report their cryptocurrency holdings from today until September 1. This move is in line with the amended Public Service Ethics Act, set to take effect on December 14, which will require senior government officials to declare their virtual asset holdings.Photo by Mathew Schwartz on UnsplashRevised code of conductThe nation’s most populated provincial government announced today the finalization and implementation of revisions to the employee code of conduct. These changes intend to prevent government employees from exploiting their official positions for personal financial gains. Before finalizing these changes, the province had sought public feedback on the amendment until July 25.In May, Gyeonggi Governor Kim Dong-yeon convened a meeting to call for devising a plan that encourages public officials under financial disclosure requirements to declare their virtual assets. He emphasized the importance of proactive measures in this regard.On August 14, the provincial government presented guidelines on virtual asset reporting, detailing the reporting process, content requirements, and penalties for false submissions.A move towards transparencyLee Seon-beom, the Head of Gyeonggi’s Investigation Office, explained that this initiative is designed to alleviate the public’s concerns over virtual assets. It also aims to promote transparency among officials, ensuring they avoid unlawful accumulation of wealth.

news
Loading