'Heroes of Mavia' token airdrop follows entry into crypto gaming sphere

The Legal Future of South Korea’s Crypto Industry: Necessary Legislation and SystemsA recent National Assembly symposium organized by South Korea’s Digital Asset Policy Forum brought experts together to discuss the challenges and prospects of the implementation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act at the National Assembly Members’ Office Building in Seoul on Tuesday.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashInternational modelsReferences were made to global examples, such as the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) — the world’s first standalone virtual asset legislation enacted in the EU — which ensures transparency, disclosure, authorization, and supervision of crypto-asset transactions. However, unlike the capital market, MiCA does not impose regular disclosure reporting requirements or corrections on them. Firms in Japan, on the other hand, are asked to provide disclosure under autonomous regulation through the Japan Virtual and Crypto Assets Exchange Association (JVCEA).Notably, in its recent Policy Recommendations for Crypto and Digital Asset Markets Consultation Report, the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) states that it is “seeking to encourage optimal consistency in the way crypto-asset markets and securities markets are regulated within individual IOSCO jurisdictions, in accordance with the principle of ‘same activities, same risks, same regulatory outcomes’.” This principle refers to the concept that any crypto-asset activity that has a similar function and poses similar risks to those in the traditional financial system — such as operating a trading platform or providing custody services — is subject to regulation that ensures equivalent outcomes, as defined by the UK Parliament.The IOSCO report also suggests that crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) should disclose information regarding ownership and control of crypto-assets, issuer and business-related information, issuer management teams, transaction history and operational description of crypto-assets, token ownership concentration, transfer protocols, and a given CASP’s treatment of the client crypto-assets and their respective rights and entitlements during events like hard forks and airdrops.Hurdles to overcomeExperts at the forum reflected these considerations in their sentiments. Han Suh-hee, a lawyer at Barun Law Firm, emphasized that it is important to determine what kind of information should be disclosed. She argued that it is necessary to discuss to what extent information about virtual asset issuers should be disclosed and whether mandating firms to disclose their financial and business conditions is efficient.In particular, Han underlined the need to consider the differences between virtual assets and stocks when establishing a framework for the disclosure of virtual assets holdings. Unlike stocks, virtual assets possess distinctive characteristics like their borderless and decentralized nature, unclear issuer backgrounds, and the ability to conduct peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions.Lee Han-jin, a lawyer at Kim & Chang Law Firm, added that the enactment of Korea’s Virtual Asset User Protection Act was aimed at establishing a system directly targeted at regulating virtual assets and virtual asset service operators (VASPs) — a significant development from the Financial Transaction Reporting Act, which had until now been the only legal framework responsible for regulating VASPs along with other entities like casino business operators. Virtual assets are now subject to a more systematized regulatory approach.However, he said that the Virtual Asset User Protection Act still has its setbacks because it is undergoing a two-stage legislative process. Lee criticized the fact that the same definition of VASPs outlined in the Financial Transaction Reporting Act had been brought over, which limits their identity to transaction intermediaries, wallet operators, and custodians while overlooking their other roles like crypto management, crypto deposits, and crypto collective investments.Lee also pointed out another weakness: the scope of prohibition on using undisclosed information and market manipulation is broader in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act than in the Capital Markets Act. He argued that enforcement decrees should stipulate the definition of insiders and exceptional cases when deliberating on the prohibition of insider virtual asset trading.Lee thus emphasized the need for a clear definition of virtual assets in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, as it is yet unclear whether they are objects or assets. All things considered, he believes there must be a law that can encompass blockchain-based decentralization, outline the similarities and differences between digital assets and financial products, and accommodate new services that utilize smart contracts.“We are in the process of creating a regulatory system similar to those being adopted in other countries based on their respective markets,” said Lee Seok-ran, head of the Financial Innovation Bureau at the Financial Services Commission (FSC). “Unlike the stock market, which is equipped with regulations to prevent fraudulent transactions and misconduct, virtual assets are traded on multiple exchanges, so we are considering how to interpret unfair trading activities and conduct market surveillance.”She explained that the commission is prioritizing user protection measures and subordinate regulations. “I believe we will be able to create a system for subordinate regulations on disclosure once an overall global trajectory is established. But before that happens, we are working on guidelines for defining unfair trading activities with regulators and the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA).” Unfair trading activities associated with virtual assets include not only those conducted on exchanges but also under other circumstances.The FSC officer said that the financial authority is set to establish legal criteria to distinguish cases such as false statements in white papers of crypto projects. She added that enforcement decrees will define both the conditions for restricting deposits and withdrawals on crypto exchanges and the corresponding limits.

RBI Official Encourages Indian Banks to Adopt BlockchainIn a recent conference organized by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), Deputy Governor Mahesh Kumar Jain highlighted the importance of adopting innovative technologies like artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain to ensure sustainable growth and stability in the country’s banking sector.Speaking at the RBI-hosted event for directors of Indian banks last week, Jain emphasized the need for effective corporate governance, governance structure, and risk management strategies to tackle future challenges arising from technological disruptions, evolving customer expectations, and cybersecurity threats.Photo by rupixen.com on UnsplashLeveraging AI and blockchainThe recommendation to leverage AI and blockchain technologies aligns with India’s digital transformation goals and the desire to enhance customer experiences while investing in cybersecurity measures. Jain advised Indian banks to prepare for the future by focusing on digital transformation, exploring innovative technologies like AI and blockchain, and seeking collaborative opportunities with other industry players. He also emphasized the importance of upskilling the workforce to meet the demands of the digital era.Inconsistent approachThis proposal comes at a time when the Indian government’s stance on cryptocurrencies remains ambiguous. While India has been exploring the introduction of a central bank digital currency (CBDC), the Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill, 2021, which aimed to establish regulations for digital currencies, has not been legislated.According to the RBI’s annual report, which was published on Tuesday, the central bank is progressing with its retail central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilot program, with plans to expand the number of banks involved, the use cases, and the number of locations. It had expanded the scope of the project to involve one million citizens, but it’s looking to broaden that user base also. In contrast, the country’s approach to decentralized cryptocurrency has been contradictory, sometimes banning it and at other times, allowing it.It is noteworthy that India’s neighbor, Pakistan, has also recently announced plans to train one million IT graduates in AI by 2027, with potential applications in weather prediction, agriculture supply chain optimization, and health services transformation.The RBI’s recommendation to adopt AI and blockchain technologies reflects the growing recognition of their potential benefits for the banking sector.Embracing tech innovation in bankingBy embracing these technologies, Indian banks can enhance efficiency, automate processes, and strengthen security measures. The adoption of AI and blockchain has the potential to transform various aspects of banking, including risk management, fraud detection, customer service, and transaction processing.While India continues to navigate the regulatory landscape surrounding cryptocurrencies, the central bank’s focus on AI and blockchain signals its commitment to embracing technological advancements and preparing the banking sector for the future. As India’s financial ecosystem evolves, the adoption of these technologies can empower banks to offer innovative services, streamline operations, and provide secure and efficient financial solutions to customers.The RBI’s emphasis on digital transformation, AI, and blockchain paves the way for Indian banks to explore new avenues for growth and resilience. As the country progresses on its digital journey, the adoption of emerging technologies will play a pivotal role in shaping the future of the banking sector and contributing to India’s overall economic development.

Upbit procures ISO 22301 certificationDunamu, the blockchain and fintech firm that operates South Korea’s largest crypto exchange Upbit, announced Wednesday (local time) that Upbit has obtained the ISO 22301 certification, an international standard for security and resilience that evaluates a company’s business continuity management system (BCMS) based on its ability to protect against and respond to disruptive events. The firm disclosed that it acquired the certification from the U.S. International Accreditation Service (IAS) on Nov. 6.Photo by John Salzarulo on UnsplashNavigating risk managementMore specifically, the ISO 22301 certification evaluates a company’s ability to maintain uninterrupted and stable business operations through the prevention, response and recovery in the event of accidents, man-made or natural disasters and more. It offers several benefits for companies, such as proof of compliance with legal requirements, which serves as a marketing advantage, and the prevention of large-scale damage.To obtain the certification, companies must prepare in advance for unexpected disruptions by analyzing the level of impact that such events can have on business operations and the amount of time needed to recover, then put relevant policies in place to facilitate recovery. To maintain the certification, enterprises must also undergo an annual follow-up audit and a renewal audit every three years.Commitment to business resilience“We obtained the certification to protect user assets and provide safe services that do not stop in the face of external influences,” Dunamu said, emphasizing its commitment to enhancing service reliability and protecting investors. “We will not stop our efforts to become the most trusted cryptocurrency exchange.”Upbit has previously acquired other ISO certifications, such as the ISO 27001 for information security; the ISO 27017 for information security in cloud computing; and the ISO 27701 for privacy management. The exchange also obtained ISMS-P in 2021, a certificate administered by Korea’s Ministry of Science and ICT and Personal Information Protection Commission for information security and personal information management.