Ethiopia may be embracing Bitcoin mining with new data mining partnership

A legislator in the Philippines has put forward a bill that, if passed and enacted, would see the Southeast Asian country establish a Bitcoin reserve consisting of 10,000 BTC. The proposed bill was filed with the House of Representatives as House Bill 421. Its proposer is Congressman Miguel Luis Villafuerte, a representative of Camarines Sur’s 5th district since 2022. Villafuerte also served as governor of the same province on two occasions, gaining recognition for becoming the youngest individual to assume the governorship in the Philippines.Photo by Michael Förtsch on UnsplashDrawing on developments overseasPrefacing the bill with an explanatory note, Villafuerte draws on developments related to Bitcoin in the United States. He drew attention to U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell having referred to Bitcoin as “digital gold,” while pointing to a bill in the U.S. proposed by Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis to create a strategic Bitcoin reserve in the U.S., with the support of U.S. President Donald Trump. The bill itself, if passed and enacted, would provide a mandate to Banko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), the country’s central bank, to acquire 2,000 BTC on an annual basis over a period of five years. According to Villafuerte’s proposal, that would result in the Philippines amassing a reserve of 10,000 BTC. 20-year minimum holding periodFollowing the achievement of this accumulation, the bill sets out that the leading digital asset would be locked in trust for a period of 20 years for the benefit of the country. A provision is included to establish a procedure that would enable the purchase schedule to be adjusted if a need arose to do so due to prevailing market conditions. Upon completion of the 20-year holding period, the proposed legislation calls on the central bank to present a report to Congress with recommendations as to whether Bitcoin should continue to be held or if some of the holdings should be sold off on a gradual basis. Following the expiration of that initial 20-year period, the governor of the central bank cannot recommend the selloff of more than 10% of the holding over any two-year period. Proof of reservesIn terms of sovereign nations, an early mover with regard to Bitcoin has been El Salvador. It became the first nation to establish Bitcoin as legal tender, while also establishing a Bitcoin reserve. However, the Central American nation has been criticized with regard to a lack of transparency surrounding that reserve. In the case of Villafuerte’s bill, the proposed legislation includes a requirement for the central bank governor to establish a system of quarterly proof of reserve attestations. It calls for attestations to be performed by an independent third-party auditor with expertise in auditing digital assets.The proposal comes as a number of nations are understood to be exploring the establishment of a strategic Bitcoin reserve. In April, a parliamentarian in Sweden proposed adding Bitcoin to the Nordic nation’s foreign exchange reserves. The Swedish parliament is set to debate the notion of a Bitcoin reserve next month. Meanwhile, Switzerland’s central bank has reportedly gained exposure to Bitcoin through a $253 million shareholding in Bitcoin treasury firm Strategy.

Study Places Hong Kong as Leader in Crypto ReadinessHong Kong, according to a recent study conducted by Forex Suggest, has emerged as the leading jurisdiction worldwide in terms of its readiness for cryptocurrencies. The study evaluated various factors such as the number of blockchain startups per 100,000 people and the density of crypto ATMs in relation to the population.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashZero capital gains taxThe attractiveness of Hong Kong for investors in the crypto space stems from its advantageous tax policies. The study noted that Hong Kong does not levy capital gains taxes on cryptocurrency, making it an appealing destination for crypto enthusiasts. The United States and Switzerland secured the second and third positions, respectively, in the rankings of the most crypto-ready countries.In recent times, Hong Kong has actively embraced investments from digital asset companies and is poised to implement new regulations for the industry. Effective from June 1, the city’s new rules aim to establish Hong Kong as a global hub for digital assets. These regulations permit licensed cryptocurrency trading platforms to offer services to retail investors while incorporating measures to safeguard individual traders.Global crypto firms are gearing up for that new licensing approach, carving out separate corporate entities in order to meet the regulatory requirements which the Hong Kong regulator, the Securities Futures Commission (SFC), has set. Another Hong Kong regulator, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), is also opening up to embrace digital asset innovation through a pilot project implicating the tokenization of real world assets.Regarding the number of blockchain startups, Hong Kong boasts three startups per 100,000 individuals, securing the second position globally. Topping the list is Switzerland, with an impressive count of 12.9 blockchain startups per 100,000 residents, amounting to a total of 1,128.The study also highlighted that countries such as Hong Kong, Switzerland, Panama, Portugal, Germany, Malaysia, and Turkey impose the lowest taxes on cryptocurrencies. These nations exempt individuals from capital gains taxes on profits derived from cryptocurrency trading.Crypto ATM proliferationWhen considering the prevalence of crypto ATMs, Hong Kong ranks third globally, with two ATMs per 100,000 people, totaling 149 ATMs. The United States takes the top spot with nearly 34,000 crypto ATMs, but when normalized to the population, it has 10.1 ATMs per 100,000 individuals.Regressive measures in USIn contrast to Hong Kong’s favorable environment, regulators in the United States have intensified their efforts to tighten regulations on cryptocurrency exchanges, leading many within the industry to advocate for clearer guidelines. Consequently, several exchanges are exploring jurisdictions that offer more favorable conditions.Forex Suggest emphasized that the report’s findings were based on extensive data analysis, taking into account factors such as tax regulations, legislation, the presence of blockchain startups, and the level of interest in cryptocurrencies. Each jurisdiction received a normalized score out of 10 for each factor, and the overall rankings were determined by averaging these scores.Hong Kong’s position as the most crypto-ready jurisdiction in the world showcases its commitment to fostering innovation and becoming a global leader in the digital asset space. With its advantageous tax policies, growing number of blockchain startups, and forthcoming regulations, the autonomous Chinese territory is solidifying its position as an attractive destination for businesses and investors in the cryptocurrency space.

DeFiance Capital Secures Interim Victory in Dispute With 3ACSingapore’s DeFiance Capital, a Web3 and crypto investment firm, has notched up a small triumph in its ongoing $140 million legal clash with failed Singaporean crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC).Photo by Sasun Bughdaryan on UnsplashFavorable rulingAccording to a statement provided via a Medium blog post by DeFiance Capital Founder and CEO Arthur Cheong on Tuesday, the High Court of Singapore has delivered a favorable ruling for the firm, endorsing its preference for jurisdiction in Singapore, rather than the British Virgin Islands, which had been advocated by 3AC.The tussle between 3AC and DeFiance Capital centers around the ownership of certain assets. The liquidators appointed by the British Virgin Islands Court, from Teneo, assert that these assets essentially belong to 3AC’s creditors. However, DeFiance Capital argues vehemently that these assets must be partitioned and returned to its stakeholders.Struggle over assets and jurisdictionAt the heart of the matter are assets totaling $115 million, encompassing digital currencies and non-fungible tokens (NFTs), which currently remain under the control of DeFiance Capital. Additionally, there are 69 SAFE (simple agreement for future equity)/SAFT (simple agreement for future tokens) agreements linked to 3AC. Although Teneo places the collective worth of these assets at roughly $141 million, DeFiance Capital’s estimation is more conservative, pegging it at around $120 million.Beyond asset ownership, jurisdiction has become a pivotal point of contention in the legal discourse. DeFiance Capital has steadfastly advocated for legal proceedings to take place in Singapore, where it operates, as opposed to the British Virgin Islands. The recent ruling from the High Court of Singapore lends support to this stance, challenging Teneo’s argument.DeFiance articulated its position, asserting: “Our position was that all the important witnesses and documents are in Singapore and the dispute ought to be heard by the Singapore Courts to ensure all relevant evidence would be available.”With the court’s decision aligning with DeFiance’s jurisdictional preference, the firm hopes that this development will pave the way for more substantive engagement between the parties, rather than being embroiled in procedural wrangling. The firm believes that this will allow the focus to shift towards addressing the core issues at hand.Business riftThe genesis of this legal saga dates back to 2020 when DeFiance was established as part of the 3AC group, operating autonomously under the stewardship of its founder, Arthur Cheong. The rift escalated in February 2022, when Cheong declined 3AC’s proposal to relocate to Dubai, eventually leading to the formation of two Singapore-based firms in May of that year.Furthermore, in the same month, DeFiance extended a loan of $35 million worth of USDC to 3AC, effectively becoming a creditor. Complications arose when 3AC’s founders transferred legal rights related to DeFiance Capital, a transaction that remained incomplete as 3AC filed for bankruptcy.In light of the ongoing dispute, 3AC asserted that DeFiance’s assets should be harnessed to settle its debts. However, DeFiance firmly stood its ground, upholding its ownership claims over the assets.With liquidators advocating for resolution in the British Virgin Islands — a move that DeFiance rejected due to its Singaporean management ties with 3AC — the stage was set for the legal clash that has now taken a notable turn with this recent court ruling.