Further details emerge on Philippine CBDC project

Korea’s Content Industry: Thriving Amidst Global Tech Advancements and Ambitious Plans“The global competition driven by the Internet and network platforms, artificial intelligence (AI), the metaverse, blockchain technology, and other unprecedented advancements in content technology is ushering in a new era,” Director Jo Hyun-rae of the Korea Creative Content Agency (KOCCA) said in his speech during the 10th annual South Korea Cultural Contents Forum at the Josun Palace Hotel in Seoul on Wednesday, where authorities from various agencies gathered to discuss the prospects, challenges, and hopes for the nation’s content industry.Photo by Ethan Brooke on UnsplashImportance of creative foundations and collaborative effortsJo emphasized his belief that the industry should be built on a foundation of creative talent, rich infrastructure, and financial resources, saying that the agency is actively pushing projects to provide production and financial support in the face of limited resources.“I believe that the creativity and spirit of ambition in our content industry, along with the support and efforts of our people, government, and media, including the Financial News, are shaping the status of K-content today,” he said.Growth and government initiativesAccording to the Ministry of Culture, Sports, and Tourism (MCST), the Korean content industry has seen remarkable growth over the past decade. Last year, the size of the industry exceeded KRW 148 trillion (approximately $111 billion), a growth of about 70% compared to ten years ago.Last year’s content-related exports also amounted to $13.3 billion, far surpassing the $10 billion scale of secondary battery exports and $8.1 billion in home appliance exports. “The Ministry recognizes the economic importance and potential of the content industry and is actively promoting comprehensive support measures to utilize it as an instrument of our national strategy, just like the semiconductor industry,” said Park Sung-won, Vice Minister of the MCST. He also mentioned plans to boost governmental support to encourage active investment in the industry and stimulate the creation of globally competitive works.“Even amid an overall economic downturn, the growth of K-content exports continues, which plays a significant role in our economy,” said Byun Dong-shik, President of local news outlet Financial News. “In light of this forum, I hope that the Korean cultural content industry, and our nation’s economy as a whole, can take another quantum leap forward.”

South Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC) is set to exclude stablecoins from the list of digital assets corporations will be permitted to trade under forthcoming corporate crypto trading guidelines, according to a report by Herald Business.Photo by DrawKit Illustrations on UnsplashThe guidelines will outline the conditions under which listed companies and registered professional investment firms can buy and sell digital assets for investment or treasury management purposes. As regulators move to prevent speculative or indiscriminate investment in the early stages of opening the market to corporations, they have opted to limit the scope of permitted assets. Consequently, U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoins such as USDT and USDC are expected to be excluded from the approved list. Authorities plan to release the trading guidelines after the Digital Asset Basic Act is finalized. This move partly reflects regulatory constraints: stablecoins are not currently classified as cross-border payment instruments under South Korea’s Foreign Exchange Transactions Act. The law requires payments and receipts involving such instruments to be processed through authorized foreign exchange banks, leaving stablecoins outside the regulated framework. Companies seek stablecoins for FX hedgingThis exclusion, however, does not entirely prevent companies from trading stablecoins. Firms can still access them through overseas channels, including external wallets like MetaMask or over-the-counter platforms operated by exchanges such as Coinbase. Currently, South Korean companies cannot open corporate crypto accounts domestically, making it difficult to use digital assets for formal trade settlement. Nevertheless, payments in stablecoins are sometimes still handled through individual or offshore accounts. Given these workarounds, some listed companies with large international trade exposure have petitioned regulators to allow stablecoins under the proposed corporate investment guidelines, according to people familiar with the matter. Advocates argue that stablecoins like USDC can be easily traded on exchanges and track the U.S. dollar in real time, making them a highly effective tool for managing foreign-exchange risk. As the industry awaits this regulatory clarity, the impact is already rippling into the traditional financial sector. Kbank—the banking partner of Upbit, Korea’s largest crypto exchange—recently debuted on the KOSPI benchmark index after two previously failed attempts to go public. According to Bridgenews, Korea Investment & Securities initiated coverage on March 6 with a “neutral” rating, noting that regulatory uncertainty and rising lending competition could limit the bank's near-term growth. However, the brokerage added that the lender’s valuation could improve if it successfully expands its crypto business alongside clearer regulations. Baek Doo-san, an analyst at Korea Investment & Securities, noted that Kbank’s valuation could see re-ratings if the Digital Asset Basic Act and policies promoting the stablecoin industry are implemented quickly. He said that despite potential overhang risks, faster policy progress could drive multiple expansion, adding that the bank could then be valued in line with its peers’ price-to-book ratios. Survey shows persistent market fearThese shifting regulatory sands come at a time when the broader crypto market remains under pressure. According to a weekly survey of South Korean investors conducted by CoinNess and Cratos last week, 24% of respondents expect Bitcoin to rise or surge this week, up from 10.3% in the previous survey. Another 28.1% expect the market to move sideways, compared with 25.5% a week earlier, while 47.9% predict a decline or sharp drop, down from 64.2%. Although bullish sentiment has ticked upward from the previous week, bearish expectations still dominate the overall landscape. When asked about broader market sentiment, 43.4% of respondents said they felt fearful or extremely fearful. About 35.4% described sentiment as neutral, and only 21.2% reported feeling optimistic or extremely optimistic. With safe-haven markets facing renewed uncertainty amid geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and Iran, the survey also explored how a potential correction in South Korea’s stock market might affect cryptocurrencies. The largest share of respondents, 39.7%, believed it would be negative for crypto. Meanwhile, 23.6% said it would benefit Bitcoin exclusively, 23.4% felt it would be positive for the broader crypto market, and 13.3% expected it to have no impact. 

Thailand has taken steps to tighten controls on digital asset mule accounts and overseas crypto peer-to-peer (P2P) platforms in an effort to combat cybercrime.Photo by Growtika on UnsplashLegislative amendmentsOn April 8, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), a local regulator, published a statement explaining that the Thai cabinet has passed a resolution approving a number of amendments to the Southeast Asian nation’s digital asset business law and its cybercrime law. The regulator asserted that the amendments are designed to “strengthen measures against cybercrime and mule accounts, enhancing the security of public financial transactions and improving the effectiveness of combating online scams.” The amendments won’t become effective until such time as they are published in the Government Gazette of Thailand, an official public journal that acts as a primary source for Thai law. Mule accountsOne aspect that has been addressed is the enhancement of measures taken in an effort to block digital asset mule accounts. Criminals utilize mule accounts in an effort to launder the proceeds of crime.  While this happens with conventional bank accounts, it is also now happening with digital asset exchange accounts and digital asset wallets. Accounts may have been established for legitimate purposes but later fall under the influence of criminals who utilize them for money laundering. According to a report by the Bangkok Post last month, the Thai SEC had been collaborating with the Thai Digital Asset Operators Trade Association (TDO) and digital asset businesses in order to formulate these new measures.  The standard was also established following consultation with the Bank of Thailand, the Cyber Crime Investigation Bureau, Central Investigation Bureau, the Anti-Money Laundering Office and the Thai Bankers' Association. It is hoped that these enhanced mechanisms will lead to earlier detection of unusual customer behavior, enabling the authorities to intervene at an earlier stage to block mule accounts.Going forward, the regulator will collaborate with the TDO in monitoring and evaluating implementation of the new measures. Individuals who allow their digital asset accounts to be used by criminals will face up to three years' imprisonment and a fine of up to 300,000 Thai baht ($8,765). Blocking P2P platformsAnother change is being implemented in respect of offshore crypto P2P platforms. The objective of that particular measure is to deter and prevent the use of such platforms by investors within Thailand.  It’s envisaged that the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society will now be enabled to move more swiftly in blocking website and application access to these foreign P2P platforms. Such offshore platforms will be deemed to be attempting to solicit local investors if they offer payment options in Thai baht, provide online services or applications using the Thai language or if they accept payments through Thai bank accounts. Earlier this month, Thai law enforcement raided five unlicensed crypto firms. The raid led to the arrest of 11 individuals, charged with illegally operating e-money services related to enterprises responsible for a combined $29 million turnover.