Thai regulator takes action against deceptive crypto ads

Wallets belonging to the defunct Japanese Bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox have transferred over 140,000 Bitcoin (BTC), valued at approximately $9 billion, to an unknown address.  Sell-off fearsThis significant movement began in the early hours of Tuesday morning in Asia, marking the first such transfer from Mt. Gox’s cold wallets in over five years. Julio Moreno, head of research at CryptoQuant, initially confirmed that 12,239 Bitcoin had been transferred from Mt. Gox over the course of an hour. A short time later, he provided an update on X, stating:"All coins have been transferred to a new address." Despite market disquiet, the prevailing view which subsequently emerged is that the transfer is believed to be part of a plan to distribute assets back to creditors before the October 31, 2024 deadline. Alex Thorn, head of research at Galaxy Digital, shared his perspective on X, suggesting that most of the transferred Bitcoin would likely be held by creditors rather than being sold on the open market. Despite these reassurances, the market reacted negatively for a time. Bitcoin's price dropped by 1.4% since the start of Asian trading hours, falling to a low of $67,680 from a Monday high of over $70,000.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashNo Bitcoin FiresaleTo quell fears of a massive Bitcoin sell-off, Mark Karpeles, the former CEO of Mt. Gox, addressed the situation on X. He stated: “As far as I know, everything is fine with MtGox. The trustee is moving coins to a different wallet in preparation for the distribution that will likely happen this year. There is no imminent sale of bitcoins happening." Rehabilitation trustee Nobuaki Kobayashi also issued a press release, clarifying that no sale of Bitcoin or Bitcoin Cash (BCH) had taken place. He assured that the group was "managing bitcoin and bitcoin cash in a secure manner." Wallet activity reveals that these movements were executed through thirteen transactions. A test transaction worth $3 was made on May 20, followed by another smaller transaction of $160 early Tuesday. The remaining transactions varied from $1.2 million to $2.2 billion worth of Bitcoin. Bitinfocharts data shows that all of Mt. Gox's Bitcoin has now been consolidated into a single wallet. A long road to repaymentIn September 2023, Mt. Gox’s trustee announced that the repayment deadline had been extended by 12 months to October 31, 2024. It looked like repayments were imminent in November. However, those communications referenced cash repayments rather than the distribution of Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash. Some cash repayments had started in December 2023. Speculation in January that the bankruptcy estate would begin the distribution of Bitcoin led to market fears of the impact that would have on the Bitcoin unit price. The extension provided a longer timeframe for preparing the distribution of assets to creditors. Mt. Gox, launched in 2010, quickly rose to prominence, becoming the largest Bitcoin exchange by 2013, handling 70% of all Bitcoin trades worldwide. However, the exchange faced a dramatic downfall in early 2014.  It suspended trading and stopped all withdrawals after losing hundreds of thousands of Bitcoin in a hack. Subsequently, the site went offline, and the company filed for bankruptcy protection after losing over 800,000 Bitcoins. Creditors have been waiting for repayment ever since.

China’s former central bank governor has warned that speculation in stablecoins could threaten financial stability, Bloomberg reported, citing a post from the Beijing-based think tank CF40 Research. His remarks run counter to calls from some economists and industry figures for a yuan-backed stablecoin as the U.S. advances its digital-asset policy agenda. Zhou Xiaochuan, who led the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) from 2002 to 2018, delivered the comments at a closed-door meeting in mid-July. He argued that China’s payment rails—spanning third-party platforms, the central bank digital currency (CBDC), digital wallets, and clearing infrastructure—are already highly efficient, leaving little scope for stablecoins to deliver meaningful cost savings. He also rejected the premise that conventional cross-border payments come at steep costs. Zhou identified price manipulation driven by speculative trading as the chief risk to financial and asset markets, adding that current safeguards in the U.S., Hong Kong, and Singapore remain inadequate.Photo by Mitchell Luo on UnsplashOnshore controls push yuan stablecoins offshoreAny debate over a yuan-linked token must also contend with China’s currency structure. The onshore yuan (CNY) is subject to strict capital controls and limited cross-border convertibility, while the offshore yuan (CNH) trades more freely. As a result, any prospective yuan stablecoin would likely reference the CNH; pegging directly to the CNY would conflict with Beijing’s capital rules. An earlier Reuters report has indicated that Beijing is weighing whether to authorize a yuan-pegged stablecoin to promote international use of the currency. Analysts caution that such a token would almost certainly be confined to offshore markets, even if regulators proceed. U.S. sets federal guardrails for stablecoinsMeanwhile, policy moves in the U.S. are gathering pace. In July, President Donald Trump signed the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act into law, creating a federal framework for stablecoins. A White House fact sheet says the law requires issuers to maintain 100% reserves in liquid assets such as U.S. dollars or short-term Treasuries and to publish monthly disclosures on reserve composition. The administration has argued that dollar-backed stablecoins could bolster demand for Treasuries and reinforce the dollar’s reserve-currency role. Hong Kong has emerged as comparatively receptive to digital assets. The special administrative region’s Stablecoins Ordinance entered into force on Aug. 1, establishing a licensing regime to oversee Hong Kong dollar–backed stablecoins. Earlier this month, CMB International Securities, a subsidiary of China Merchants Bank, became the first Chinese bank-affiliated institution to offer trading in Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Tether (USDT). Industry voices are also pressing the case for stablecoins. At the WebX conference in Tokyo on Aug. 25, Binance co-founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) argued that CBDCs are becoming obsolete, while stablecoins—typically backed by real assets—enable wider transactions and are gaining market traction. He said CBDCs remain rarely implemented due to limited demand and suggested China appears more open to stablecoins after years of tighter oversight, pointing to Hong Kong’s efforts to build an ecosystem. Potential PBOC stimulus may lift cryptoChina remains a consequential force in global crypto markets. A recent report suggested that potential PBOC stimulus could fuel an altcoin rally. With China accounting for 19.5% of global GDP, shifts in its monetary stance are seen as important drivers of worldwide liquidity. Following July data showing a 0.1% month-on-month decline in retail sales, a 0.4% rise in industrial production, and an uptick in unemployment to 5.2%, analysts expect measures to support growth. Any additional liquidity could flow into risk assets, including cryptocurrencies, potentially pushing digital tokens toward new highs. 

Viver Boosts Business Expansion with Blockchain IntegrationViver, a luxury watch trading platform and subsidiary of Dunamu, which operates the Upbit cryptocurrency exchange in South Korea, is gearing up to expand its business by securing operating funds and implementing blockchain technology to enhance the transparency and security of trades.Photo by Caramel on UnsplashIn particular, designated services in which Viver plans to incorporate blockchain technology include the management of transaction history and the authentication of buyers and sellers, which can be used for watch appraisals and guarantees.“We do not plan to introduce services incorporating blockchain right away this year, but we are exploring ways to bring Dunamu’s strengths in blockchain to Viver,” the platform explained.From acquisition to nurturing growthAfter its establishment in February 2021, Viver was soon acquired by Dunamu, which injected KRW 9.5 billion (approximately $7.2 million) into the company on June 30 of that same year.Since then, the platform has been receiving continued financial support from Dunamu. It received KRW 2 billion in operating funds last year and an additional KRW 5 billion last Wednesday through board approval. In total, Viver has received approximately KRW 16.5 billion in funding from Dunamu over the past two years. “We decided to inject these operating funds to facilitate business growth,” Dunamu explained. The company also filed for trademark rights to Viver in July.This move contrasts with Dunamu’s actions in the first half of the year, where it divested its entertainment subsidiary, rrr Entertainment, for KRW 3 billion and its video production subsidiary, Knowmerce, for KRW 2.7 billion.In its first year of establishment, Viver recorded a net loss of approximately KRW 433 million, followed by a net loss of KRW 3.8 billion in 2022. While it has not yet achieved a turnaround in financial performance, the platform is facing promising outlooks as it has witnessed a substantial tenfold increase in its user base over the past year. Furthermore, since the launch of the service in August last year, the number of products directly listed by sellers as of July this year spiked nearly thirty times, with monthly trade count and transaction volume increasing almost fifteen times.Solid leadership and the beginnings of monetizationViver’s efforts to grow as a commerce service have been led by CEO Moon Jae-yeon and Chief Operating Officer Seo Hee-seon. Moon is known for his expertise in the management of commerce platforms through his experience working at eBay Korea and Coupang. Seo has similarly worked at notable companies such as BGF Retail, Interpark, eBay Korea, and 11th Street.Since Tuesday, Viver has started implementing service fees, signaling its move toward monetization. While transaction fees are still free due to an ongoing promotional event, order management fees are set at 2%, and sellers are now responsible for shipping costs.“Since our platform facilitates brokered trades, there are costs involved in order management, shipping, and our own evaluation and diagnostics processes. We have started charging fees for some of these costs so we could provide an improved trade experience,” Viver explained in regard to these changes.Viver also has its own magazine section, where it recently unveiled a special article for its 100th issue outlining its most popular and expensive high-end timepieces.