Hong Kong's spot Bitcoin ETFs experience first daily outflows 

JPEX Exchange Scandal Sees Crypto Regulation Under Scrutiny in Hong KongWhile Hong Kong has been developing steadily as a crypto sector hub, the focus in the Chinese autonomous territory has turned towards regulation after a recent scandal involving an unlicensed cryptocurrency exchange.Photo by Ihor Saveliev on UnsplashOngoing investigationYesterday we reported on some arrests relative to problems experienced at crypto exchange JPEX. The fallout continues on Tuesday, with the Hong Kong police now understood to have arrested eight individuals, including social media influencers who promoted the exchange and JPEX employees, on allegations of fraud. This illicit activity in and around the JPEX exchange has affected over 1,600 investors, implicating more than $150 million in assets.JPEX, in response to mounting pressure, announced the suspension of trading on its platform. In a statement, the exchange mentioned ongoing negotiations with third-party market makers to address liquidity shortages. However, JPEX also accused an unidentified third-party market maker of maliciously freezing funds, further complicating the situation.Politicians and regulators speak outResponding to the incident via a press conference on Tuesday, Hong Kong’s Chief Executive, John Lee, emphasized the significance of investing in virtual assets through licensed platforms. Lee stated:“This incident highlights the importance that when investors want to invest in virtual assets, then they must invest on platforms that are licensed.” He also pledged that the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) would closely monitor the situation to ensure investor protection.Elizabeth Wong, the Head of the SFC’s fintech unit, revealed that an investigation was underway to determine whether JPEX had violated anti-money laundering laws. The SFC had already declared JPEX unlicensed, prompting numerous complaints from investors who were unable to withdraw their virtual assets or experienced unexplained reductions in their balances.Assets frozenHong Kong authorities have taken decisive action against those involved in the scandal. They have frozen bank accounts valued at 15 million Hong Kong dollars ($1 million) and seized three properties valued at 44 million Hong Kong dollars. The police have reported receiving 1,641 complaints related to JPEX, involving a staggering $1.2 billion Hong Kong dollars. By last Wednesday, the SFC had received in excess of 1,000 complaints and at that point, they notified the general public.The JPEX scandal has drawn attention to the need for stronger cryptocurrency regulations in Hong Kong, a region that has become attractive to cryptocurrency firms since mainland China banned cryptocurrency transactions in 2021. In mainland China, trading cryptocurrencies on foreign exchanges from within the country remains illegal.Hong Kong’s response to cryptocurrency regulation has evolved. Beginning on June 1, the SFC started accepting applications from cryptocurrency exchanges, allowing licensed operators to serve retail investors, provided they understand the associated risks. Previously, only professional investors had access to such exchanges. Currently, only two exchanges in Hong Kong, OSL Exchange and Hashkey Exchange, have received approval to operate.As Hong Kong reevaluates its approach to cryptocurrency regulation, the crypto sector will hope that it strikes a balance between fostering innovation and protecting investors from fraud and market manipulation.

Su Zhu, the co-founder of the now-defunct Singaporean crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC), raised some eyebrows within the crypto community recently, having shared unconventional thoughts on his time spent in a Singaporean prison. Zhu's arrest took place in October of last year in Singapore, where he was apprehended while attempting to flee. Liquidators of 3AC had tipped off police in the city-state that Zhu was going to Changi airport, a number of days after they had secured a court order against him for failing to cooperate with their efforts to wind up the company. Alongside his business partner, Kyle Davies, Zhu was sentenced to four months in prison for contempt of court following a committal order.Photo by Christian Lue on Unsplash‘Enjoyable experience’Clips from an unreleased podcast were published on social media on Monday, in which Zhu referred to his time in prison as an "enjoyable experience overall." In the video podcast, Zhu expressed gratitude for his incarceration, even going so far as to claim that he had the "best sleep" of his life while behind bars. Zhu suggested that everyone should have the opportunity to experience prison at least once, believing it to be a beneficial and enlightening experience. He provided insights into his daily life during incarceration, emphasizing the simplicity of entertainment and drawing parallels with activities from "ancient days." The disgraced crypto boss discussed the routines and privileges within the prison facility, including access to ample reading material, opportunities for exercise and a structured diet. He highlighted the ability to read books and engage in physical activities like push-ups during his time in prison. What particularly impressed Zhu was the quality of sleep in the prison environment. He also found a sense of connection with his ancestors through the use of mats instead of beds. Crypto community responseCrypto users on various platforms responded with mixed feelings toward Zhu's philosophical insights. Some viewed his perspective with skepticism, while others found humor in the apparent contrast between his experiences and traditional notions of imprisonment. Taking to the X social media platform, pseudonymous crypto restructuring lawyer "Wassielawyer" wrote:”Singapore prison is widely regarded as one of the shittiest prisons you can find in a first world country. And the man made it sound like a 5-star mindfulness retreat everyone needs to go on in order to revitalize mind, body and soul. Man is blessed with a superpower…” The hedge fund collapsed in June 2022, resulting in over $3.5 billion in losses for investors, making it one of the largest hedge-fund trading losses ever. Zhu and fellow 3AC founder Kyle Davies have been active online over the course of the past year, despite their whereabouts largely remaining unknown during that time. The duo have launched a new crypto exchange and bankruptcy claims platform called Open Exchange (OPNX). However, their troubles continue, as liquidator Teneo seeks to recover $1.3 billion directly from the founders, alleging misuse of investor funds after 3AC became insolvent. In September, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) prohibited both from floating regulated investments for nine years. Teneo has estimated a 46% recovery rate in respect of creditor claims.  

Cross Trading of LUNA Tokens Uncovered on Three Korean Crypto ExchangesAccording to a report by the Maeil Business Newspaper on Wednesday, it was discovered that cross trading of LUNA tokens took place on three South Korean cryptocurrency exchanges: Bithumb, Coinone, and GoPax.Three crypto exchangesAn indictment by the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office against Terraform Labs co-founders Do Kwon and Daniel Shin, along with interviews conducted within the cryptocurrency industry, revealed that Bithumb, Coinone, and GoPax were involved in cross trading LUNA tokens with a combined value of $598 million. Specifically, Bithumb accounted for $224 million, Coinone for $299 billion, and GoPax for $74 billion.The prosecution has confirmed that cross trading continued until the end of February 2022, a period marked by significant demands for virtual asset legislation from both the market and academia. Despite widespread calls for regulations to curb unfair trading practices, these instances of cross trading went undetected.Classification of LUNAMoreover, it is reported that legal punishment for the $598 million worth of cross trading is challenging unless LUNA tokens are officially recognized as securities by the court. Under the Korean Capital Markets Act, only cross trading involving tokens identified as securities can be subject to penalties as a form of market manipulation.During a plenary session of the National Assembly’s Legislation and Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, Justice Minister Han Dong-hoon made a statement suggesting that LUNA tokens could be considered securities due to their backing by real-world assets. However, he said that this distinction might not apply to other tokens.On April 25, the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office indicted Shin and others as accomplices to Kwon, assuming that LUNA tokens were indeed securities. This case now revolves around whether the prosecution can successfully establish the classification of LUNA tokens as securities during the trial, making it the central issue in the case.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashCrypto investor protection legislationLast Thursday, the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee approved a bill known as the “Virtual Assets User Protection Act,” signaling an accelerated legislative process. However, there are arguments suggesting that the definition of cross trading should be further clarified in either the legislation or enforcement decree.A representative of a law firm specializing in virtual assets stated that the implementation of the User Protection Act would take another year even after its promulgation, making it challenging to retrospectively penalize cross trading practices that had already occurred.