Gate Ventures, Boon Ventures launching $20M crypto fund

Philippine Police Warns of Play-To-Earn DangersThe play-to-earn gaming trend has not only captured the enthusiasm of gamers but has also raised concerns among authorities, prompting a closer examination of the risks inherent in cryptocurrency gaming schemes. The Philippine National Police Anti-Cybercrime Group (PNP ACG) has issued a warning about the potential dangers associated with these enticing gaming models, shedding light on some of the hidden complexities and vulnerabilities within this developing ecosystem.Play-to-earn gaming takes on added significance in the Philippines as it was in the southeast Asian country that the first breakthrough play-to-earn game, Axie Infinity, took hold during the pandemic. Axie Infinity is a metaverse game crafted on the Ethereum blockchain, inspired by the world of Pokemon. Under its play-to-earn model, players are required to acquire a minimum of three Axie characters to embark on their gaming journey.Photo by iSawRed on UnsplashHighlighting game costsHowever, the PNP ACG has raised a red flag concerning the financial commitment demanded from players, with an upfront investment potentially reaching $300. This stands in stark contrast to the traditional gaming industry, where user expenditures tend to average around $100.The PNP ACG’s warning echoes the ethos of cautious investment practices in the crypto sphere. While the security of the underlying blockchain technology may be robust, the operational components of the gaming engines and marketplaces require careful scrutiny. By implication, just as investors are advised to thoroughly research ecosystems and founders before engaging in cryptocurrency investments, gamers must exercise the same due diligence before diving into play-to-earn platforms.BCP partnershipAs part of a broader movement towards fostering the adoption of Web3 technologies in the Philippines, the Department of Information and Communications Technology (DICT) has partnered with the Blockchain Council of the Philippines (BCP). This alliance aims to harness the potential of blockchain startups to serve the public good, reflecting a commitment to sustainable growth and innovation within the sector.It is essential to emphasize that the focus on Axie Infinity doesn’t go so far as to label it a scam. Rather, it spotlights the larger concerns surrounding market volatility and accessibility barriers encountered within certain play-to-earn crypto games. The history of Axie Infinity itself underscores the vulnerabilities faced by such platforms, as exemplified by a significant hack that led to the loss of $622 million in user funds.Iterative improvementAs the gaming and crypto industries continue to intertwine, the path ahead involves careful navigation and a shared responsibility among gamers, developers, and authorities to ensure a secure and enriching experience for all stakeholders. In the overall scheme of things, the advent of Axie Infinity, and the play-to-earn model more broadly, has been a positive development when viewed as an iterative step towards the use of blockchain in gaming.Many in the blockchain gaming space have since expressed the view that the play-to-earn model can be improved upon for the benefit of gamers and developers alike. Blockchain-based gaming developers are now concentrating on engaging gameplay rather than trying to lead primarily with an emphasis on earning through playing.

Chinese City Unveils Plan to Develop MetaverseThe city of Zhengzhou in China recently announced a set of policy proposals aimed at supporting the growth and development of metaverse companies in the region. These initiatives, introduced by the municipal government, include the establishment of a dedicated fund worth 10 billion yuan ($1.42 billion) to facilitate the advancement of the metaverse industry.Photo by Jéan Béller on UnsplashDraft policy proposalsAccording to the government’s draft which was published on Wednesday, metaverse companies that choose to relocate their headquarters to Zhengzhou will have the opportunity to receive a startup capital investment of up to 200 million yuan ($28.34 million). In addition, these companies will be eligible for various other benefits, such as rent subsidies, to help facilitate their operations.It’s worth noting that the policy extends beyond companies with headquarters in Zhengzhou. Any company engaged in metaverse-related use case development within the city, regardless of their headquarters location, can apply for funding. Projects certified as viable by the municipal government can receive up to 5 million yuan ($710,000) in financial support.While the specific date for fund allocation has not been disclosed yet, the municipal government of Zhengzhou has outlined its long-term vision for metaverse development in the city. It anticipates that metaverse-related industries in Zhengzhou will generate an annual revenue exceeding 200 billion yuan ($28.34 billion) by the end of 2025.Stimulating metaverse developmentThese policies apply to local enterprises operating in two distinct areas. Firstly, research endeavors focused on metaverse-related technologies, such as virtual reality, augmented reality, and brain-computer interfaces, are eligible for support. Secondly, the utilization of metaverse technologies in real-world industries, including education, entertainment, and commerce, can also qualify for funding.In addition to the dedicated fund, the government of Zhengzhou plans to collaborate with other governmental agencies and investment firms to secure an additional 50 billion yuan ($7.08 billion) in funding. This funding will be allocated to support various metaverse-related development projects. Furthermore, the city intends to provide cash rewards to metaverse companies upon their listing on China’s primary stock exchanges, aiming to incentivize growth and market participation.The comprehensive plan encompasses crucial technologies in the metaverse industry, such as blockchain, next-gen computer rendering, human-computer interfaces, and artificial intelligence. Furthermore, it strives to establish a digital asset market leveraging non-fungible token (NFT) technology.Broader metaverse strategyZhengzhou joins a growing list of Chinese cities and provinces that aspire to become leaders in the country’s metaverse development. The metropolis of Shanghai, located in the southeastern region, is actively pursuing its own metaverse aspirations. It predicts that its metaverse industry will achieve annual revenues of 350 billion yuan ($49.6 billion) by the year 2025.Elsewhere in China, there has been plenty of activity relative to Metaverse development. Zhengzhou belongs within Henan Province, and at a provincial level, administrators established a metaverse fund earlier this month. Around the same time-frame, Alibaba Cloud, the cloud division of the Chinese e-commerce giant, partnered with layer one blockchain project Avalanche with a view towards creating a metaverse launchpad.As the metaverse continues to evolve and gain prominence worldwide, it will be intriguing to observe the progress and impact of the policies implemented by Chinese cities like Zhengzhou. The concerted efforts to foster metaverse development reflect a broader global trend of recognizing the significance of virtual environments and their potential to reshape various aspects of society.

Terraform Labs Co-Founder Daniel Shin Denies Wrongdoing in LUNA CollapseShin Hyun-seong, popularly known as Daniel Shin, has refuted accusations against him related to the $40 billion collapse of the stablecoin TerraUSD and its companion token, LUNA, according to a report by local news outlet Newspim. He presented this defense during his initial trial at the Seoul Southern District Court on October 30 (local time).Shin co-founded Terraform Labs, the company responsible for issuing TerraUSD and LUNA. His co-founder, Do Kwon, is currently serving a four-month prison sentence in Montenegro for passport forgery.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashProsecution’s allegationsKorean prosecutors allege that since 2018, Shin and his colleagues have concealed the fabricated nature of the “Terra project.” By manipulating trades and releasing misleading information, they purportedly misled investors into thinking the project was successful. It’s believed they sold off their tokens before the LUNA crash in May 2022, earning KRW 462.9 billion ($343.3 million) from these activities. They are suspected of personally taking KRW 376.9 billion from this amount.Prosecutors are focusing on Shin as the potential orchestrator of the LUNA crash. They speculate he began selling LUNA tokens around when Terraform Labs launched the Anchor Protocol in March 2021. This DeFi protocol increased the popularity and value of LUNA tokens. Before the crash, Shin is alleged to have gained at least KRW 154.1 billion.Defense argumentHowever, Shin’s legal team countered by asserting that Shin had cut ties with Kwon in 2020. They argued the decline of TerraUSD and LUNA was due to Kwon’s mishandling of the Anchor Protocol and an external attack, neither associated with Shin. Regarding the exploit, Terraform Labs has pursued legal action in the United States Southern District of Florida, claiming that American market maker Citadel Securities played a part in undermining TerraUSD in May 2022.Defending Shin, his lawyers emphasized that at the inception of the Terra project, there were no legal guidelines specifically for cryptocurrency transactions. Additionally, unlike Do Kwon who kept fleeing abroad, Shin willingly came back to Korea and has been cooperating with the investigation. They also noted he received only 32% of the 70 million LUNA tokens initially promised. Regarding classification, they stated LUNA isn’t legally recognized as a security.Shin’s lawyers further argued the prosecution hasn’t clearly identified victims or adequately outlined the components of fraud in this case. They said the prosecution’s case hinges on viewing LUNA as a security. However, Shin’s legal representatives maintained that under the Korean Capital Markets Act, LUNA isn’t a security, making its trades non-fraudulent.To counter a US court ruling the prosecution presented — that a token is a security — Shin’s defense highlighted that the verdict is from a lower court and remains contested. Earlier, prosecutors had cited a ruling from the United States Southern District Court of New York, which classified the XRP tokens sold to institutional investors as securities.