Proposed stablecoin legislation advances to Hong Kong’s Legislative Council

Web3 Cybersecurity Firm Zyber 365 Raises $100M in FundingZyber 365, a pioneering Web3 startup that combines AI, Web3, and cybersecurity, has recently secured $100 million in funding from the UK-based SRAM & MRAM Group.Photo by micheile henderson on Unsplash$1.2 billion valuationThe substantial investment places Zyber 365’s valuation at an impressive $1.2 billion, while marking a significant milestone for the company, underscoring its promising trajectory.Although now headquartered in London, the company’s origins stem from India with a set of Indian founders, while the firm continues to maintain its strategic operational base in India.The company was founded earlier this year by Pearl Kapur and ethical hacker Sunny Vaghela. The startup stands out for its groundbreaking approach to cybersecurity, offering a decentralized and cyber-secured operating system that upholds the core tenets of environmental sustainability.Indian nucleus of operationsNotably, Zyber 365 has earmarked India as the nucleus of its operations, aiming to harness the nation’s tech talent and vibrant ecosystem to fuel its growth. The recent injection of capital will likely play a pivotal role in amplifying Zyber 365’s expansion initiatives, bolstering its technological capabilities, and cementing its global market presence.The SRAM & MRAM Group, no stranger to the tech investment landscape, has previously demonstrated its confidence in innovative startups. In a similar vein, the group invested $100 million in another India-centric blockchain startup, 5ire, in July of the previous year, valuing it at an impressive $1.5 billion.Broad Web3-based product rangeZyber 365’s portfolio spans a wide spectrum of Web3 products, including Layer-0, Layer-1, and Layer-2 blockchains, decentralized identities, data analytics, a software development kit, a web browser, and even non-fungible token (NFT) marketplaces and initial coin offering (ICO) capabilities.These offerings can be seamlessly integrated as part of a comprehensive Web3 ecosystem or employed as standalone applications tailored to specific user requirements.Sunny Vaghela, the Co-Founder and Chief Product Officer (CPO) of Zyber 365, expressed his enthusiasm about the infusion of capital. He emphasized that this financial boost positions the company to expedite the development of its Web3 and AI products, thereby enhancing its presence in the dynamic tech landscape.Vaghela underscored how Zyber 365’s inventive approach to cybersecurity and its commitment to pioneering technologies set it on a remarkable path toward industry leadership.Mahendra Joshi, Director of the SRAM & MRAM Group, echoed Vaghela’s sentiments, lauding Zyber 365’s exceptional team and disruptive technology. Joshi’s confidence in the investment’s potential to drive outstanding growth and success in the coming years reflects the industry’s anticipation of the startup’s continued evolution.In an era where cybersecurity and innovation are paramount, Zyber 365’s substantial funding from the SRAM & MRAM Group heralds a new phase of growth and advancement. Venture capital investment in the digital assets space has contracted significantly since the last bull market. However, as this deal demonstrates, there are signs of green shoots emerging.With its cutting-edge technology and strategic focus on Web3 and AI, the startup has an opportunity to reshape the landscape of cybersecurity while solidifying its status as an industry trailblazer.

FTX, the failed cryptocurrency exchange founded by Sam Bankman-Fried, has taken legal action by filing a lawsuit against four former employees of Salameda, a Hong Kong-based affiliate closely linked to the exchange’s former CEO.According to a Delaware bankruptcy court filing in the United States on Thursday, the lawsuit alleges that five individuals exploited their personal connections to prioritize their asset withdrawals from FTX during a period of uncertainty regarding the exchange’s stability. The defendants in question are Salameda’s former employees — Michael Burgess, Matthew Burgess, Kevin Nguyen, and Darren Wong — as well as Michael and Matthew’s mother, Lesley Burgess, and two companies: 3Twelve Ventures and BDK Consulting.Photo by Bermix Studio on Unsplash Preference period clawbackThe critical withdrawals occurred within the 90-day period leading up to FTX’s bankruptcy filing on November 11, commonly referred to as the “Preference Period.” Under US law, customers who withdrew their crypto assets during this timeframe could potentially face lawsuits from the exchange’s creditors seeking to recover these funds, a process known as a “clawback” under bankruptcy regulations.The total value of these suspicious transfers is estimated at $157.3 million, with more than $123 million of that sum withdrawn after November 7, 2022. Michael Burgess is alleged to have received around $73 million of these illicit withdrawals.The lawsuit claims that the individuals leveraged their connections within FTX Group to ensure preferential treatment over other customers. In a specific accusation, Matthew Burgess is said to have engaged other FTX Group employees to expedite certain withdrawal requests from his FTX US exchange accounts while falsely representing the accounts as his own. 11th hour withdrawalsIn this way, Burgess and the other four defendants managed to get funds out when most other FTX customers couldn’t. The final withdrawals were executed only hours before FTX.com suspended all withdrawals on November 8, 2022, according to the lawsuit. As one commentator on X put it, “FTX employees were manually reviewing large withdrawals & pushing some ahead.”The legal filing also delves into the significant profits the defendants reportedly accrued from trading cryptocurrencies in the months leading up to FTX’s collapse. Even after their apparent departure from the FTX Group, Michael Burgess, Nguyen, and Wong actively traded through entities such as 3Twelve and BDK, with monthly trading volumes ranging from $100 million to $400 million.A noteworthy aspect of this activity is that their trading capital was allegedly derived from the FTX Group. The court filing goes on to claim that “Burgess, Nguyen and Wong received substantial transfers of digital assets and fiat currency from exchange accounts associated with FTX Group entities, including approximately 13.1 million FTT sent to Darren Wong, more than 1 million SOL sent to Michael Burgess, and nearly $4 million USD for ‘bonuses’ between Michael Burgess, Nguyen and Wong.” Retail clawback riskThis legal battle and the allegations against the former Salameda employees are being watched closely by other FTX bankruptcy stakeholders. The FTX Debtor has suggested that it will pursue clawbacks vigorously. That has concerned former retail customers who managed to withdraw assets in the final days before the platform collapsed. Equally, it is a worry for current FTX creditors who may have withdrawn some but not all of their assets before the exchange was shuttered.

Terraform Labs Co-Founder Indicted in South KoreaTen individuals linked to the Terra USD collapse have been indicted in South Korea on charges associated with violations of capital markets law, including the Co-Founder of Terraform Labs, Daniel Shin. That’s according to a report published by Bloomberg on Tuesday.©Pexels/Donald TongTwo of the ten were charged with breach of trust while the remaining eight, including Shin, were charged with illegal trading. Prosecutors confirmed that all of the charged individuals have ties to Terraform Labs, the company responsible for developing the Terra protocol, and the Terra USD (TUSD) stablecoin and Luna cryptocurrency which collapsed in 2022.It’s understood that the ten individuals were also accused of illegal disclosure of clients’ payment information and the embezzlement of corporate funds. The authorities have claimed that the ten individuals are responsible for causing “astronomical damage” to investors. They estimate that all ten of them took 463 billion won, around $347 million, in profit.Business interestsShin co-founded Terraform Labs with Do Kwon in 2018. He left the project in 2020, long before its spectacular failure in 2022. However, he would have profited considerably from the project. Prior to co-founding Terraform Labs, Shin had founded lifestyle commerce company TMON in 2010. Two years later, he founded venture capital and private equity firm, Fast Track Asia while in 2017 he was a founding partner of another venture capital and private equity firm, Bass Investment.He remains involved in all of those other businesses. Furthermore, Shin founded integrated payments firm PortOne Global in January 2020, immediately upon exiting Terraform Labs. He remains CEO of PortOne Global today.$185 million frozenOn Tuesday, the Seoul Southern District Prosecutor’s Office outlined that it had frozen assets to the value of 246.8 billion won, approximately $185 million, belonging to those that it has brought charges against. South Korean authorities had previously acknowledged a difficulty in seizing assets related to Terraform Labs Co-Founder Do Kwon. It’s understood that a transfer of funds from Do Kwon to a prominent South Korean law firm is being investigated. Otherwise, the search for funds has led them overseas where it’s understood that Do Kwon purchased real estate in his mother’s name in the United States in a bid to evade asset confiscation.Free pending trialShin remains at liberty pending trial. Back in December, a South Korean court turned down a request to arrest him on the basis that he wasn’t likely to destroy evidence and wouldn’t pose a flight risk.That hasn’t proven to be the case where his former colleague Do Kwon is concerned. Do Kwon fled to Montenegro where he was recently charged with having entered the country on false documents. Both South Korea and the United States have formally applied for his extradition. In the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has sued both Do Kwon and Terraform Labs. Terraform Labs subsequently submitted a request to the courts in the US to dismiss the lawsuit, claiming the SEC lacks jurisdiction.