Hong Kong Lawmaker Explores Digital Asset Links With Mainland

Two Russian nationals have been referred to prosecutors in South Korea for allegedly facilitating the illegal transfer of roughly 58 billion won ($42.2 million) to Russia using USDT, a U.S. dollar-pegged stablecoin. According to a report by KBS News, the Seoul branch of the Korea Customs Service (KCS) announced the charges on May 22, citing violations of the country’s Foreign Exchange Transaction Act. The suspects, a man and a woman both in their 40s, reportedly operated an unauthorized money exchange business to carry out the transactions.Photo by Polina Tankilevitch on PexelsOver 6K transactionsAuthorities suspect the pair of repeatedly using USDT to conduct cross-border transfers between South Korea and Russia. From January 2023 to July 2023, the duo allegedly completed 6,156 illegal remittance transactions, either sending funds abroad or receiving payments on behalf of others, totaling the full 58 billion won in question. Investigators revealed that the two suspects, who hold permanent residency in South Korea and have overseas Korean status, used the messaging app Telegram to solicit clients. When transferring money to Russia, they reportedly collected funds via kiosks in convenience stores that allow users to send money without a bank account. The collected cash was then used to purchase USDT to complete the remittances. According to customs officials, the suspects would either send the cryptocurrency directly to a crypto wallet specified by the customer, or forward it to accomplices in Russia. These accomplices would then convert the crypto to cash and distribute rubles to recipients through local channels. Illicit crypto use by businesses The operation also handled export payments for South Korean businesses. The suspects reportedly accepted payments from Russian importers on behalf of Korean used car dealers and cosmetics exporters. In these cases, associates in Russia would collect ruble payments from importers, convert the funds into USDT and send the cryptocurrency to contacts in Korea. The funds were then exchanged for Korean won and deposited into the accounts of the businesses. Customs officials believe that the group’s services became particularly appealing after the start of the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022. In the wake of U.S. and international sanctions against Russia, legitimate financial channels for cross-border transactions became restricted, prompting some companies and individuals to turn to illegal alternatives. The Korean export companies involved in these transactions have been fined. The Seoul Customs Office emphasized that illegal money exchange operations are often exploited for criminal activities such as drug trafficking, voice phishing and gambling. In response, the agency committed to stronger enforcement and pledged to spare no effort in combating unlawful financial operations. Scams grow inside the borderThe surge in crypto-related financial crimes in South Korea extends beyond cross-border transactions. According to a recent report by Maeil Business Newspaper, Kakao Pay—a local mobile payment platform—has detected around 70,000 cases of malicious apps linked to virtual assets over the past month. Of those, 80% were associated with Ponzi schemes, where fraudsters lure victims with promises of high returns before disappearing with the funds. A Kakao Pay spokesperson noted that new forms of security threats are emerging alongside the rapid growth of the crypto market, adding that the company is prioritizing the development of stronger security systems. 

Research Finds Over 90% of Korean Cryptos Prone to Pump-and-Dump SchemesThe Korea Institute of Finance (KIF) has released a report revealing that 91.3% of South Korean-issued cryptocurrencies, known as “kimchi coins,” are prone to pump-and-dump (P&D) schemes. These schemes involve intentionally spreading false information on social media platforms to manipulate token prices. This is done with the intention of selling the tokens at artificially inflated prices.Photo by Maxim Hopman on UnsplashP&D prevalenceThese manipulative practices were frequently observed during the rapid growth of the cryptocurrency market from 2020 to 2022. Previous research papers indicate that P&D schemes commonly occur on multiple crypto exchanges and typically unfold within a time frame of 10 minutes. It has been observed that cryptocurrencies with lower liquidity and smaller market capitalization are particularly vulnerable to becoming prime targets for these schemes.Korean market and global marketThe Korean cryptocurrency market stands out with its significant number of cryptocurrencies listed on a single exchange, including kimchi coins. This distinction becomes evident when comparing it to the global market. In the Korean market, the top 10 global cryptocurrencies, ranked by their market capitalization, account for 59% of the total market share. Meanwhile, in the global market, they represent 84.9%. This contrast indicates that the Korean market has a larger proportion of alternative coins, also known as altcoins, which are more susceptible to pump-and-dump schemes and other manipulative activities.According to a survey conducted by the Financial Services Commission in the second half of 2022, there were a total of 625 listed coins (excluding duplicate listings), with 389 (62.24%) of them being listed on a single exchange. Among these single-exchange listed cryptos, 223 were kimchi coins, which is equivalent to 57%.OHLCV data analysisIn this KIF paper, research analyst Baik Yeon-ju delved into abnormal price patterns within the Korean cryptocurrency market. She analyzed the hourly Open-High-Low-Close-Volume (OHLCV) data of kimchi coins in October 2021. The study revealed that out of a total of 16,560 hourly price and volume observations, approximately 4.7% exhibited characteristics consistent with P&D schemes. Baik noted that 91.3% (21 of the 23) observed kimchi coins witnessed such movements.Legislative effortsMeanwhile, it is encouraging that the South Korean National Assembly passed the Virtual Asset User Protection Bill during its plenary session on June 30. This legislation, set to go effective in July next year, aims to provide protection for customers’ assets in the virtual asset space. The act not only establishes regulations to combat unfair trading practices but also enforces penalties for non-compliance.Call for further measuresHowever, Baik suggested that policies should be further strengthened to enhance investor protection within the crypto market. In order to achieve this, she proposed the implementation of a monitoring system for virtual asset service operators (VASPs) and the allocation of inspection and investigation personnel, as well as technical resources. It is also necessary to address potential conflicts that may arise with the Act on Real Name Financial Transactions and Confidentiality, particularly if the data required from VASPs falls under the classification of financial transaction information and personal information.Furthermore, considering the lack of transparency surrounding many altcoins regarding their projects and exchange listings, Baik suggests that the upcoming second virtual asset bill should tackle this issue by regulating the issuance and disclosure of these cryptocurrencies. Additionally, she highlighted the importance of conducting research based on empirical data to detect abnormal transactions. This approach enables the recognition of existing issues and the acquisition of concrete evidence, which serves as a credible basis for policymakers to enact relevant legislation.

South Korean lawmakers are moving to seize control of the nation’s stalled second phase of digital asset legislation, aiming to bypass months of interagency gridlock and introduce a comprehensive regulatory framework by January. The legislative acceleration comes as Seoul races to align with global standards following the implementation of the U.S. GENIUS Act in July, a shift that has intensified pressure on local regulators to formalize oversight of the crypto sector. According to a report from the Maeil Business Newspaper, the ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) plans to introduce the Digital Asset Basic Act as a lawmaker-sponsored bill rather than wait for a government submission. The procedural move is intended to ensure that formal deliberations can begin during the February provisional session. Lawmaker Kang Jun-hyeon, a DPK member of the National Policy Committee, told reporters on Dec. 11 that relying on the government’s timeline would jeopardize passage of the bill in the first half of next year. Kang cited points of disagreement among the parliament, the government, and industry stakeholders. Among the authorities, in particular, a standoff between the Bank of Korea (BOK) and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) over monetary policy and issuance authority has been a key source of delay.Photo by Lauren Seo on UnsplashDraft sets ‘major’ stablecoin requirementsAt the heart of the legislation is a new classification system for stablecoins. The government delivered its draft for the Digital Asset Basic Act to DPK’s Digital Asset Task Force, outlining its intention to classify won-denominated stablecoins exceeding a certain issuance threshold as “major digital payment tokens.” According to Blockmedia, citing sources familiar with the closed-door briefing to the task force, these assets would fall under a rigorous oversight framework developed in consultation with the central bank. Under the draft rules, issuers would be required to maintain 100% reserves, prohibited from making interest payments to holders, and obliged to submit detailed issuance plans to the FSC. Foreign-issued stablecoins would only be permitted to circulate domestically if the issuer establishes a local branch. Although the government ultimately submitted its draft to the DPK, the delivery was delayed by two days, missing the Dec. 10 deadline set by the party. Officials attributed the postponement to unresolved interagency disagreements. The central bank had argued that any issuance should require unanimous approval from all relevant agencies, including itself, but the government agreed to involve the bank only when a token is designated as “major.” The Bank of Korea continues to advocate for a bank-led consortium issuance model, highlighting the coordination challenges that have complicated the bill’s preparation. Supply thresholds emerge as fault lineCritics warn that the proposed regulations could inadvertently tilt the market against domestic innovation. Analysts argue that if the threshold for the "major" designation is set too low, new won-based issuers may face compliance costs that could undermine their business viability before they reach meaningful scale. They added that setting the bar for entrenched dollar-backed issuers such as USDT and USDC is also complex, given that their combined global issuance already exceeds $250 billion. Market participants said concerns about triggering the “major” designation could prompt Korean issuers to cap supply to avoid heightened scrutiny, effectively stifling growth from the outset. Despite these concerns, political will to close the policy vacuum is hardening. The DPK intends to move the legislation forward on its own timetable, incorporating the government’s input but steering the process through parliament. Lawmaker Kang emphasized that while numerous issues remain, the task force aims to narrow the debate to a few essential questions before the bill’s planned introduction in January. Industry representatives have largely welcomed the clearer timeline, viewing the move as a necessary step to reduce uncertainty as the global crypto sector comes under more formal regulatory oversight.