Finger Labs Embarks on Web3 Content Distribution Project through NFT Marketplace Xclusive

Despite reports emerging on Monday that it had invested in Array, an algorithmic currency system, Singaporean state-owned conglomerate and global investment firm Temasek has denied any such investment.In a very brief statement published to its website on Tuesday, Temasek stated:“We have seen news articles and a tweet from Array about Temasek’s investment in it. This news is incorrect. Temasek has not invested in Array and we have no relationship with them.”CoinTelegraph had taken to reporting the claim on Monday. The article had outlined a $10 million investment by the Singaporean state investor into Array, the developer of an algorithmic currency system that relies upon smart contracts and artificial intelligence. Reputational lossIf it had been true, such an investment would have been seen as a positive for the crypto space as it would be indicative of a renewed appetite for crypto-based projects from the giant Southeast Asian investor.Temasek was a key investor in failed cryptocurrency exchange, FTX. In November 2022, the company had to write down its entire investment of $275 million into the fraudulently managed exchange business. To an onlooker, a $275 million write-down may seem like an extraordinary loss.However, given that the Singaporean investing behemoth has a $403 billion dollar portfolio, the loss represents just 0.09% of that portfolio, hardly making a dent in the health of the company.The greater loss for Temasek relative to the FTX collapse has been reputational. Top tier venture capital investors like Temasek, who had otherwise been assumed to be the most diligent of actors in the professional investing world, were all sharply criticized for failing to identify the extent of the mismanagement and fraud that had occurred at the now bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange. Bogus ClaimsIn fairness to those who had reported the fake news, they were acting on information that Array had put out into the ether and as of yet, has not corrected. At the time of publication, the project’s website features a list of renowned investors including Temasek. Alongside Temasek, Array claims to have obtained investment from Standard Chartered, Coinbase Ventures, Spark Capital, Khosla Ventures, The Blackstone Group, Binance Labs, Sequoia Capital and a16z.In the case of Binance Labs, a spokesperson for the venture arm of the global exchange told The Block that it is not an investor in the project. To further dispel the claim, Temasek took to Twitter, stating:”Fake news about Temasek’s investment in @Array_Protocol. We have seen news articles and a tweet from Array about Temasek’s investment in it. This news is incorrect. Temasek has not invested in Array and we have no relationship with them.” Further instances of misinformationThe misinformation follows a similar scenario that played out with OPNX, a newly launched platform that offers spot and futures trading, alongside the ability for investors to trade bankruptcy claims.A couple of weeks ago, the platform, which had been founded by Kyle Davies and Su Zhu, the key executives behind failed crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital, asserted that it had the backing of some notable investors. Almost immediately, venture capital and market maker DRW and venture capital firm Nascent denied that they were investors in OPNX.

Suspected Malicious Activity Drains AnySwap Tokens via Multichain ExecutorAccording to an on-chain sleuth known as Spreek, a person is using the Multichain Executor to drain tokens associated with the AnySwap bridging protocol.Multichain is a cross-chain routing network, established and maintained by a Chinese developer team. It supports in excess of 25 blockchains and more than 1,100 tokens.Photo by Marek Piwnicki on Unsplash$100 million outflowThis revelation comes after abnormal outflows of over $100 million from Multichain bridges on July 7, which were flagged by the Multichain team. Spreek’s report via Twitter on July 10 states that the Multichain Executor address has been draining anyToken addresses across multiple chains and transferring them to a new externally owned account (EOA).Evidence provided in the report includes an Ethereum transaction, 0x53ede4462d90978b992b0a88727de19afe4e96f0374aa1a221b8ff65fda5a6fe, which called the “anySwapFeeTo” method on the Multichain Router: V4 contract. This transaction resulted in approximately $15,275.90 worth of anyDAI being minted on Ethereum, sent to the Multichain Executor, burned, and exchanged for the underlying DAI backing the asset.The funds from these transactions were sent to the following address:0x1eed63efba5f81d95bfe37d82c8e736b974f477b. Similarly, on the BNB Smart Chain (BSC), the Multichain Executor used the anySwapFeeTo function to convert $208,997 worth of anyUSDC into Binance-pegged USDC and sent them to the same address. Additionally, 50.80 anyBTC, equivalent to $39,251.43 at the time, was converted into Binance-pegged Bitcoin and sent to the address.In total, approximately $263,524.33 worth of tokens were sent to this address through the anySwapFeeTo method. Spreek suggests that this behavior could be part of the protocol’s normal functioning. However, a different account engaged in similar activity the day before and ultimately sold the drained tokens, indicating malicious intent.Potential exploitSpreek theorizes that the attacker may be exploiting the anySwapFeeTo function by setting fees to an arbitrarily large amount, allowing them to drain users’ funds. The function apparently permits setting any value, enabling the address to choose the total value of the token held in that anyToken.The Multichain incident has puzzled blockchain analysts, as it remains unclear whether it resulted from an exploit or if it was simply large token-holders moving their funds between networks. The mystery began on July 7 when over $100 million worth of tokens were withdrawn from the Ethereum side of Multichain’s bridges and transferred to wallet addresses with no prior transactions. This represented the majority of funds held on each bridge.Hack or rug pullThe Multichain team labeled these withdrawals as “abnormal” and advised users to stop using the protocol. However, they have not disclosed the source or nature of the anomaly. In response to the incident, stablecoin issuers Circle and Tether froze some of the addresses involved in the suspicious transactions. Chainanalysis, a blockchain analytics firm, has commented that the incident appears more like a hack or rug pull rather than a migration.Adding to the complexity, the Multichain team has reported that their CEO is missing, and they have shut down certain bridges due to losing access to some of the network’s multi-party computation network servers. There have been various concerns relative to Multichain since May. The situation continues to evolve, with ongoing investigations and efforts to mitigate any potential damage caused by the suspected malicious activity.

Japan Set to Tighten Crypto AML RulesJapan is working on tightening anti-money laundering (AML) rules relative to digital assets shortly. That’s according to a report by local media outlet Kyodo News.The stricter enforcement measures will take effect from June 1. The objective is to include the tracing of cryptocurrency asset transactions into the legal framework relative to AML, and in that way, bringing the application of AML in Japan into line with global standards.Photo by Louie Nicolo Nimor on UnsplashTravel ruleIn December of last year, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), a global money laundering and terrorist financing watchdog based in Paris, France, deemed that the approach taken to crypto-related AML in Japan fell short of international requirements and best practice.Specifically, it’s the FATF’s “travel rule” that the Japanese are about to implement. Otherwise known as FATF Recommendation 16, the travel rule is a set of guidelines devised to prevent both terrorist financing and money laundering.The measure puts an onus on all crypto companies to screen all crypto transactions that exceed the value of $1,000 or a variance of this amount based on implementation by each FATF member state. As an example, in the United States, the FATF travel rule is being implemented with transaction monitoring being applied on transactions to the value of $3,000 and above.Once identified, the crypto firm must record details of the transaction and communicate that information, including both sender and recipient data, to the authorities. That would involve the sender and receiver’s legal names, their account numbers, and addresses. Relevant transaction activity includes exchanges between one or more forms of digital currency and the transfer of virtual assets.G7 alignmentThe move follows a decision taken at a Japanese cabinet meeting on Tuesday, as a direct response to FATFs recommendations. Following discussions earlier this month, the intergovernmental political forum of the G7 group of countries indicated its support for the FATF’s call for the establishment of the travel rule as a global standard. Japan is currently leading the group through its G7 presidency and likely wants to align with the views of its international peers.The country had been moving towards travel rule implementation in the past but in a less decisive way. Two years ago, Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) requested virtual asset service providers (VASPs) to implement the travel rule. In a self-regulatory approach in 2022, the country’s Virtual Currency Exchange Association issued a recommendation for members to apply the rule.Those approaches lacked teeth, leading to a cabinet decision to amend existing legislation late last year and this more recent move to apply and enforce the rule.Regulatory frameworkWhile Japan may not be top of the class in terms of AML regulation relative to crypto, it is a forerunner in terms of crypto regulation generally. It was the first country in the world to suffer a serious crypto-related failure when the Mt.Gox cryptocurrency exchange collapsed in 2014.The fall-out from that collapse led to the Japanese introducing more stringent regulations although it took until 2017 to get them implemented. As a consequence, when the next major collapse occurred, the fall of FTX in November 2022, the Japanese have fared much better than investors located elsewhere. Regulation meant that a separate Japanese entity, FTX Japan, was established. It had to adhere to stricter conditions, meaning that FTX Japan customers have been allowed to withdraw their funds since February while their international counterparts must undergo a much longer process to recover their funds.