Finger Labs to leverage Web3 services for Dream Ladders’ college entrance briefing

Korean Assembly Mandates Crypto Disclosure Amidst Lawmaker’s ScandalThe Korean National Assembly’s plenary session passed amendments to a couple of acts today that mandate lawmakers and senior government officials to report their cryptocurrency assets, according to news agency News1.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashAmendments to two actsIn an afternoon session, the National Assembly passed two amendments: one to the National Assembly Act and another to the Public Service Ethics Act.The amendment to the National Assembly Act, which had been approved by the Special Committee on Political Reform on Monday, specifically addresses the issue of cryptocurrencies and their potential conflict of interest for lawmakers. Likewise, the amendment to the Public Service Ethics Act, which had been approved by the Public Administration and Security Committee on Monday, imposes a requirement on lawmakers and high-level civil servants to disclose their cryptocurrency holdings.Mandatory crypto disclosureConsequently, starting from the 22nd National Assembly, lawmakers will be obligated to disclose their cryptocurrency assets. Additionally, the current 21st National Assembly will be required to disclose the cryptocurrencies they held and traded between the beginning of their term and May 31 of this year, with the disclosure deadline set for the end of June.A lawmaker’s crypto scandalThese legislative actions were prompted by allegations surrounding lawmaker Kim Nam-kuk, who was purportedly in possession of 800,000 WEMIX tokens from January to February of last year, potentially valued at up to 6 billion KRW (around $4.5 million). Concerns were raised regarding possible insider trading and conflicts of interest due to Kim’s ownership of these tokens.

KakaoBank to Conduct Routine Due Diligence on Crypto Exchange CoinoneKakaoBank, one of South Korea’s Internet-only banks, is set to conduct a routine due diligence examination on cryptocurrency exchange Coinone from May 8 to 9, according to crypto media Digital Asset.Photo by Markus Winkler on UnsplashThe mobile bank told Digital Asset that the forthcoming due diligence is unrelated to either the alleged illicit token listings involving former Coinone employees or the exchange’s sole relisting of the WEMIX token in February, which had been delisted from major Korean crypto exchanges due to questionable information about the token’s circulating supply.In Korea, crypto trading platforms supporting Korean won trading are legally obligated to obtain real-name bank accounts from a bank. Last August, KakaoBank signed a one-year contract with Coinone to provide such accounts to the exchange, and the bank will need to decide whether it will extend the contract before August this year.A Coinone official said that the exchange has not undergone any routine due diligence checks from KakaoBank since the contract was signed last year.The upcoming examination is expected to address concerns stemming from rumors that KakaoBank might reconsider its contract with Coinone in light of the bribery scandal that involved two former Coinone personnel and two brokers.

Regulatory crackdown as Hong Kong authorities act against crypto entitiesIn a recent move, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong has issued a public warning against suspected virtual asset-related frauds involving HongKongDAO and BitCuped, marking a significant crackdown on deceptive practices in the crypto space.The action taken by the SFC in conjunction with the Hong Kong Police Force was outlined in a notice published on Wednesday. The notice stated:“The SFC suspects HongKongDAO may be disseminating false and misleading information about itself and its business through online channels.”In relation to BitCuped, it stated: “The SFC notes that BitCuped claims on its website that ‘Laura Cha’ and ‘Nicolas Aguzin’ serve as its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer respectively, when in fact none of them has any affiliations with BitCuped.”Photo by Teodor Kuduschiev on UnsplashHongKongDAO’s alleged misinformationOperating under the name “Hong Kong Digital Research Institute,” HongKongDAO has faced accusations of disseminating false and misleading information. The SFC expressed concerns about the claims made by HongKongDAO, including assertions of licensing by the SFC, engagement in regulated activities since July 2020, and bids for a “Hong Kong Digital Currency Exchange Licence” related to the government’s stablecoins framework.The SFC contends that these claims are unfounded and could potentially mislead the public into believing that HongKongDAO’s services are officially sanctioned and legitimate.HongKongDAO seems to manage at least two Telegram groups, one in Chinese with over 10,000 members and the other in English with over 1,700 members. Within these groups, there appears to be a promotion of the purported “market” price and future market value of the HKD token, enticing investors to make purchases.Allegations of BitCuped false affiliationsSimultaneously, BitCuped has been accused of making fraudulent claims to enhance the credibility of its operations. The company falsely asserted affiliations with prominent figures Laura Cha and Nicolas Aguzin, claiming them as its chairman and CEO, respectively. However, the SFC has refuted these affiliations. Laura Cha is the Chairman of Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX), while Nicolas Aguzin is the Executive Director and CEO of HKEX.Taking proactive measures, the SFC has requested the Hong Kong Police Force to block access to the websites of both HongKongDAO and BitCuped. Cease and desist letters have also been issued to the operators of these websites, demanding the cessation of the sale of HKD Tokens offered by HongKongDAO.Series of crypto scamsFollowing the JPEX fraud allegations in September, Hong Kong faced another cryptocurrency exchange scandal involving Hounax in November. With at least 145 police reports filed and a sum of over HK$148 million ($19 million) involved, affected investors expressed frustration at what they deemed a slow response from regulatory bodies.These incidents have reignited discussions about the need for more robust cryptocurrency regulations in Hong Kong. The city’s aspiration to become a global hub for crypto innovation and adoption faces challenges due to a lack of clear and consistent regulation, leaving investors vulnerable to fraud and manipulation.In light of these developments, the SFC emphasized the importance of public caution regarding investment opportunities that seem too good to be true. The regulator urged vigilance against social media and instant messaging platforms where individuals, not investment professionals, might lure unsuspecting investors.