FOBLGATE gears up for the launch of real estate security tokens

Animoca Brands, a Hong Kong-based Web3 company focused on blockchain gaming and NFTs, has signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with DayDayCook (DDC) Enterprise Limited in a deal that will see Animoca allocate up to $100 million in Bitcoin with that capital to be exposed to yield enhancement strategies operated by DDC.Photo by Erika Fletcher on UnsplashBitcoin treasury strategyIn a press release published to its website, Animoca Brands claimed that the deal accelerates the Bitcoin accumulation strategy pursued by DDC. Back in May, DDC Enterprise, a Chinese company listed on the Nasdaq in the U.S. while headquartered in Hong Kong, became one of many Nasdaq-listed companies recently to add Bitcoin to its balance sheet.  At that time, it made a symbolic initial 21 BTC purchase, bearing in mind the leading digital asset has a supply cap of 21 million BTC. The company has set out an ambitious plan to build up a Bitcoin treasury of 5,000 BTC over the course of three years. DDC Founder Norma Chu described the development as a “pivotal moment.” ‘Pristine monetary asset’On this occasion, Chu described the partnership with Animoca as a “transformative step,” reflecting the companies’ “shared vision to accelerate Bitcoin’s role as a pristine monetary asset.” As part of the partnership, Animoca Brands Co-Founder and Executive Chairman, Yat Siu, will join DDC’s Bitcoin Visionary Council (BVC). The company established the BVC recently in order to put strategic leadership and guidance in place so that DDC’s Bitcoin-related treasury operations are conducted in accordance with industry standards so as to maximize value creation in the long term. Siu said that the arrangement enables Animoca Brands “to enhance the value of [its] blockchain technologies and maximize the value of [its] Bitcoin holdings.” Commenting further on the partnership, he added: “We will focus on developing strategies to enhance Bitcoin’s value proposition, leveraging DDC’s commitment to advancing corporate Bitcoin treasury solutions." Siu told Cointelegraph that Animoca Brands' belief in the abilities of the DDC founder played a large part in the company establishing the partnership. He said that her background and experience enable her to “bridge the East and West to successfully navigate markets on both sides of the planet,” adding that “she has good appeal and connections to the Chinese market, one of the largest for crypto adoption, while also running a NASDAQ-listed company.” On BitcoinTreasuries.net, a Bitcoin treasury data hub, DDC is listed as 47th in terms of corporations globally that have adopted a Bitcoin treasury strategy, ranked by the amount of Bitcoin that they have accumulated. The website suggests that DDC currently holds 368 BTC, valued at approximately $43.2 million. Following its initial purchase of 21 BTC in May, the company followed up with the acquisition of 38 BTC in June. On July 1, it announced that it had raised $528 million to expand its Bitcoin holdings, with confirmation of a further purchase of 230 BTC by July 7.

Japan Set to Tighten Crypto AML RulesJapan is working on tightening anti-money laundering (AML) rules relative to digital assets shortly. That’s according to a report by local media outlet Kyodo News.The stricter enforcement measures will take effect from June 1. The objective is to include the tracing of cryptocurrency asset transactions into the legal framework relative to AML, and in that way, bringing the application of AML in Japan into line with global standards.Photo by Louie Nicolo Nimor on UnsplashTravel ruleIn December of last year, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), a global money laundering and terrorist financing watchdog based in Paris, France, deemed that the approach taken to crypto-related AML in Japan fell short of international requirements and best practice.Specifically, it’s the FATF’s “travel rule” that the Japanese are about to implement. Otherwise known as FATF Recommendation 16, the travel rule is a set of guidelines devised to prevent both terrorist financing and money laundering.The measure puts an onus on all crypto companies to screen all crypto transactions that exceed the value of $1,000 or a variance of this amount based on implementation by each FATF member state. As an example, in the United States, the FATF travel rule is being implemented with transaction monitoring being applied on transactions to the value of $3,000 and above.Once identified, the crypto firm must record details of the transaction and communicate that information, including both sender and recipient data, to the authorities. That would involve the sender and receiver’s legal names, their account numbers, and addresses. Relevant transaction activity includes exchanges between one or more forms of digital currency and the transfer of virtual assets.G7 alignmentThe move follows a decision taken at a Japanese cabinet meeting on Tuesday, as a direct response to FATFs recommendations. Following discussions earlier this month, the intergovernmental political forum of the G7 group of countries indicated its support for the FATF’s call for the establishment of the travel rule as a global standard. Japan is currently leading the group through its G7 presidency and likely wants to align with the views of its international peers.The country had been moving towards travel rule implementation in the past but in a less decisive way. Two years ago, Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) requested virtual asset service providers (VASPs) to implement the travel rule. In a self-regulatory approach in 2022, the country’s Virtual Currency Exchange Association issued a recommendation for members to apply the rule.Those approaches lacked teeth, leading to a cabinet decision to amend existing legislation late last year and this more recent move to apply and enforce the rule.Regulatory frameworkWhile Japan may not be top of the class in terms of AML regulation relative to crypto, it is a forerunner in terms of crypto regulation generally. It was the first country in the world to suffer a serious crypto-related failure when the Mt.Gox cryptocurrency exchange collapsed in 2014.The fall-out from that collapse led to the Japanese introducing more stringent regulations although it took until 2017 to get them implemented. As a consequence, when the next major collapse occurred, the fall of FTX in November 2022, the Japanese have fared much better than investors located elsewhere. Regulation meant that a separate Japanese entity, FTX Japan, was established. It had to adhere to stricter conditions, meaning that FTX Japan customers have been allowed to withdraw their funds since February while their international counterparts must undergo a much longer process to recover their funds.

India’s judiciary turns down plea to formulate a crypto regulatory frameworkThe Indian courts have declined a consideration targeting the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading, following a plea which had been brought to court by a petitioner.Photo by Naveed Ahmed on UnsplashBeyond the court’s purviewIndia’s Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Chandrachud, recently confronted a petition urging the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading. According to a local media report, the bench, which included Justices JD Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, dismissed the plea, emphasizing that the demands presented were legislative and thus beyond the court’s direct action purview. This decision points to the judiciary’s recognition of its constraints in crafting laws, particularly in intricate domains like cryptocurrency.The petitioner, Manu Prashant Wig, a former director at Blue Fox Motion Picture Limited currently in custody due to allegations of cryptocurrency fraud, sought relief through a public interest litigation (PIL) for crypto trading regulations in India.The Economic Offence Wing (EOW) of the Delhi Police accused Wig in 2020 of deceiving investors with promises of high returns from crypto investments, involving 133 reported victims of the scheme. Despite this, during the hearing, the Supreme Court advised Wig to pursue legal remedies through appropriate channels, specifically for bail, underlining its inability to issue directives under Article 32 of the Constitution for legislative matters.Judiciary criticize governmentWhile the judiciary has found that it cannot act itself in putting in place a crypto regulatory framework, the Supreme Court has been critical of the government’s inaction on the matter. In July, India’s highest court criticized the Indian government for its failure to establish clear cryptocurrency regulations.Interestingly, while the government hasn’t acted locally, it has been making efforts to drive regulation at an international level instead. The status of cryptocurrency trading in India remains uncertain, with the country developing a regulatory framework influenced by recommendations from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB), potentially leading to legal legislation within the next several months.Prime Minister Modi called on authorities internationally to establish a worldwide regulatory framework. At the recent G20 summit, it appears that member states did reach agreement on such a framework.The Supreme Court’s dismissal of the PIL marks a clear distinction between judicial and legislative responsibilities. As India moves closer to formulating a comprehensive crypto regulatory framework, this decision reinforces the imperative for legislative action to address mounting concerns and interests in the crypto market.Awaiting legislative actionThe outcome of these developments is keenly awaited by investors, legal experts and the crypto community, poised to shape the future landscape of cryptocurrency trading in India. The decision signifies the judiciary’s acknowledgment of its limitations and highlights the necessity for a legislative approach to effectively navigate the intricate landscape of cryptocurrency regulation.In this evolving scenario, the verdict amplifies the importance of a well-defined regulatory framework. As the world’s most populous country grapples with the delicate task of balancing innovation and investor protection, the Supreme Court’s decision places the ball firmly in the legislative court.