Korean financial authority to heighten oversight on token listing with new guidelines

South Korea Embarks on Wholesale CBDC Pilot ProgramAiming to pave the way for a future-oriented monetary infrastructure, South Korean financial agencies announced a plan on Wednesday (local time) to pilot a central bank digital currency (CBDC). This trial is designed to evaluate its practical use in real-world scenarios.The Bank of Korea (BOK), alongside the Financial Services Commission (FSC) and the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), has been working with the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) from the inception of this project’s blueprint. Together, they plan to partner with multiple commercial banks to successfully carry out this initiative.Photo by Y K on UnsplashWholesale CBDCThe test will concentrate on a wholesale CBDC designed for transactions and settlements between financial institutions. This concept is akin to how commercial banks use reserves in their central bank accounts for transactions and settlements.Meanwhile, banks will introduce tokenized deposits for public use within the CBDC network. These payment instruments will circulate securely within the new monetary infrastructure built by the BOK and managed jointly with the FSC and the FSS.The pilot of this cutting-edge monetary infrastructure is poised to set the stage for the introduction of diverse, innovative payment and financial services that stand out from current offerings. This effort will also lay the groundwork for newer financial products, like security tokens, to be traded with greater safety and efficiency.Participation from citizensThe test aims to complete its Proof of Concept (PoC) through technical trials in simulated settings. Furthermore, a select group of citizens will be given the opportunity to engage in specific use case tests, letting them experience firsthand the advantages of the emerging digital payment methods. This project will significantly contribute to the future research and development of CBDC infrastructure.The Korean financial authorities have engaged in in-depth discussions regarding policy matters leading up to the test. To ensure alignment with existing laws, only banks will be involved in this initial phase. Decisions on expanding the test will come later, after a thorough evaluation of relevant policy considerations after the trial.The agencies will continue working to ensure that transaction tests involving citizens are conducted with sufficient user protection measures under the existing legal framework.Moreover, from the outset of the test’s preparation, the BIS offered insights from its research and development experiences with CBDC systems. In particular, members from the BIS’s Innovation Hub and the Monetary and Economic Department provided technical advice on designing and constructing a CBDC network. Stemming from their discussions, the BIS and the BOK jointly released a report highlighting the test’s importance and its intricately crafted model.This trial is a step towards identifying the best CBDC model suited for Korea’s financial and economic landscape. It’s important to note that the test doesn’t necessarily indicate a complete rollout of a CBDC or the final version of a CBDC network.Moving forward, the BOK, FSC, and FSS will form a collaborative working group. They’ll work hand-in-hand with pertinent ministries and entities, including the Ministry of Economy and Finance, to ensure a seamless execution of the test. Their technical partnership with the BIS will also remain ongoing.The selection process for a system developer began on October 4. Later this month, there will be an informational session for companies and banks engaged in the project. By the end of November, the financial authorities will unveil information regarding the banks involved and the specific use cases slated for testing. Public involvement is anticipated to start in the fourth quarter of next year.

The Korea Association of Game Industry (K-GAMES) – the body responsible for overseeing and nurturing the country’s successful gaming industry – released its 2023 Global Game Policy and Legislation Study on Tuesday (KST) in collaboration with the Korea Creative Content Agency (KOCCA).Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashThe report summarizes gaming-related regulations and laws in six Western European countries – the United Kingdom, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, Spain and France – including those on standard terms and conditions, the protection of minors, personal privacy, payment and more. "Through cooperation between public and private sectors, we have been able to achieve tasks like collecting information and securing databases on overseas gaming markets by country and continent," said Kang Shin-chul, President of K-GAMES. "We will continue to contribute to the development of the domestic game industry," he added. Regulatory landscapeThe study found that operators in the specified countries are not required to obtain special licenses, appoint local representatives, or set up servers in order to operate a gaming business in their respective countries. It also details country-specific requirements, such as in Germany, where the use of content that glorifies or justifies Nazi-related symbols or actions is prohibited. A closer look at Belgium’s stanceInterestingly, the report revealed that the regulation of randomly distributed in-game items varied by country. The UK, Germany, Spain, the Netherlands and France have no legal restrictions on such items, but the UK and the Netherlands have recommended that information on the odds of winning them in games of chance should be disclosed before a player obtains or opens an item. Meanwhile, Belgium has implemented a regulation that prohibits paid games of chance for stochastic items altogether due to its laws regarding gambling. However, there are no regulations on Play-to-Earn (P2E) games unless they constitute gambling, which is also true of the other five countries. Minting game items into NFTs is also not subject to oversight in all six nations unless they are considered financial instruments. There are also no standard terms and conditions set by Belgium’s national government for gaming services, which are instead governed by the European Union’s (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). 

OKX announces delisting of 26 trading pairsCryptocurrency exchange OKX has made a significant announcement regarding the delisting of more than 20 trading pairs, with a view towards its ongoing maintenance of strict listing criteria and performance monitoring. This decision will impact a considerable number of trading pairs across various cryptocurrencies, with the process scheduled to commence later this week.OKX outlined details of this recent trading pair purge in a statement published to its website on Monday. Among the trading pairs set for removal are CELO-USDC, AXS-USDC, APE-BTC and the HNT-USDT trading pair, which will be delisted on Nov. 10. Notably, Bytom (BTM), a Chinese crypto project, which has experienced a substantial 46% drop in value since Monday, is also among the tokens to be delisted.The exchange is advising users to manage their assets accordingly in preparation for the changes. Withdrawals for these tokens will cease on Jan. 10, 2024. During this transitional period, OKX recommends that users cancel any open orders linked to the impacted trading pairs to avoid automatic cancellations, which could result in processing delays.Photo by Maxim Hopman on UnsplashSAITAMA delistingDeposits for the affected tokens, including HNT, BTM, and SAITAMA, were halted by OKX on Nov. 3. SAITAMA, an Ethereum-centric ERC20 token, is the primary payment medium on the Saitama platform. There were mixed reactions to the delisting of the coin. One community member took to X, stating:“I will say I do think it isn’t cool for OKX to delist #Saitama considering we didn’t get on there for the reasons specified of delisting. The listing was won through hours of Spaces and helping people get VPNs to win a contest. Regardless of what the market is doing we won fairly.”Another Saitama project supporter took a more pragmatic view, stating:“Delisting Is a tragedy? I don’t think so. What did the OKX listing for the token price? What is the difference between holding or selling with or without okx? Volume was too low, and this isn’t a news, so they will delist. They will relist again….#SAITAMA”OKX has embarked upon several initiatives over the course of 2023 in an effort to further the user proposition offered by the platform. From a marketing perspective, the company took the decision in October to retire the Okcoin brand, rebranding its various sub-platforms instead to OKX.The Seychelles-incorporated company indicated in September that it expects to have secured a virtual asset service provider (VASP) license in Hong Kong by June of next year.Delisting banksTokens are not the only items to be delisted by the exchange recently. Alongside competitor Bybit, the company decided to delist sanctioned Russian banks Tinkoff Bank and Sberbank from its peer-to-peer exchange platform.This move by OKX reflects the exchange’s efforts towards maintaining a high level of integrity and performance. Listing coins that fall below a minimum acceptable level of liquidity and trading volume can leave them much more exposed to the risk of manipulation. By adhering to stringent listing criteria and promptly addressing issues, the company is making a greater effort towards maintaining a position as a trusted and secure trading platform for cryptocurrency enthusiasts and investors.