SK Securities introduces fractional investment service with three partners

Turkey, a significant player in the global cryptocurrency market, has been anticipated to introduce comprehensive crypto-related legislation in 2024. Despite initial announcements suggesting an early rollout, the specifics of the anticipated regulatory framework remain pending, leaving stakeholders in anticipation. Currently, Turkey operates with limited crypto regulations. While some measures exist, such as those imposed by the Central Bank and the Ministry of Finance’s financial intelligence unit, others remain informal, such as guidance from the Capital Markets Board. These regulations primarily focus on prohibiting certain activities and implementing anti-money laundering (AML) measures.Photo by Dima Rogachevskiy on UnsplashAnticipated reforms and their purposeThe forthcoming legislation is expected to address various aspects of the crypto market, including licensing requirements for exchanges, investor protection measures and taxation. The aim is to align with international standards, potentially aiding Turkey in exiting the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF) "gray list." The regulations aim to enhance investor protection, especially in light of past incidents like the collapse of the Thodex exchange, while also providing a legal framework for crypto taxation. Timing of implementationDespite expectations for an early introduction, the exact timeline for the enactment of the crypto legislation remains uncertain. Industry observers speculate potential connections between the legislation's timing and Turkey's efforts to exit the FATF's "gray list." While some anticipate a release by mid-year, others suggest a delay until later in the year, underscoring the complexity and importance of the regulatory reforms for Turkey's crypto ecosystem. 

India’s judiciary turns down plea to formulate a crypto regulatory frameworkThe Indian courts have declined a consideration targeting the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading, following a plea which had been brought to court by a petitioner.Photo by Naveed Ahmed on UnsplashBeyond the court’s purviewIndia’s Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Chandrachud, recently confronted a petition urging the establishment of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrency trading. According to a local media report, the bench, which included Justices JD Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, dismissed the plea, emphasizing that the demands presented were legislative and thus beyond the court’s direct action purview. This decision points to the judiciary’s recognition of its constraints in crafting laws, particularly in intricate domains like cryptocurrency.The petitioner, Manu Prashant Wig, a former director at Blue Fox Motion Picture Limited currently in custody due to allegations of cryptocurrency fraud, sought relief through a public interest litigation (PIL) for crypto trading regulations in India.The Economic Offence Wing (EOW) of the Delhi Police accused Wig in 2020 of deceiving investors with promises of high returns from crypto investments, involving 133 reported victims of the scheme. Despite this, during the hearing, the Supreme Court advised Wig to pursue legal remedies through appropriate channels, specifically for bail, underlining its inability to issue directives under Article 32 of the Constitution for legislative matters.Judiciary criticize governmentWhile the judiciary has found that it cannot act itself in putting in place a crypto regulatory framework, the Supreme Court has been critical of the government’s inaction on the matter. In July, India’s highest court criticized the Indian government for its failure to establish clear cryptocurrency regulations.Interestingly, while the government hasn’t acted locally, it has been making efforts to drive regulation at an international level instead. The status of cryptocurrency trading in India remains uncertain, with the country developing a regulatory framework influenced by recommendations from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB), potentially leading to legal legislation within the next several months.Prime Minister Modi called on authorities internationally to establish a worldwide regulatory framework. At the recent G20 summit, it appears that member states did reach agreement on such a framework.The Supreme Court’s dismissal of the PIL marks a clear distinction between judicial and legislative responsibilities. As India moves closer to formulating a comprehensive crypto regulatory framework, this decision reinforces the imperative for legislative action to address mounting concerns and interests in the crypto market.Awaiting legislative actionThe outcome of these developments is keenly awaited by investors, legal experts and the crypto community, poised to shape the future landscape of cryptocurrency trading in India. The decision signifies the judiciary’s acknowledgment of its limitations and highlights the necessity for a legislative approach to effectively navigate the intricate landscape of cryptocurrency regulation.In this evolving scenario, the verdict amplifies the importance of a well-defined regulatory framework. As the world’s most populous country grapples with the delicate task of balancing innovation and investor protection, the Supreme Court’s decision places the ball firmly in the legislative court.

Sega Curbs Interest in ‘Boring’ Blockchain GamingJapanese video game behemoth Sega Corp., once an advocate for blockchain gaming, is reevaluating its involvement in the sector as the global crypto industry continues to face challenges.In a recent interview with Bloomberg, Shuji Utsumi, the Co-Chief Operating Officer of Sega, revealed that the company will withhold its major franchises from third-party blockchain gaming projects to protect the value of its content.Photo by Pat Krupa on UnsplashHalting blockchain game developmentAdditionally, Sega is temporarily halting the development of its own blockchain games. These decisions mark a significant shift for the 60-year-old gaming studio, which previously joined other industry players in exploring the potential of blockchain technology to enhance game appeal. However, the recent collapse of the digital currency market has dampened enthusiasm for such initiatives.While Sega withdraws from blockchain gaming, it does plan to allow external partners to utilize its lesser-known characters, such as those from Three Kingdoms and Virtua Fighter, for non-fungible tokens (NFTs). NFTs serve as digital asset ownership certificates.Sega’s intention to venture into the NFT community drew criticism from some gamers who viewed crypto technology as environmentally harmful. Utsumi emphasized the importance of creating enjoyable gaming experiences and expressed his skepticism about the “play-to-earn” model associated with blockchain games, describing such games as “boring.”Reservations on Web3 adoptionIn addition to the uncertainties surrounding blockchain gaming, Utsumi expressed reservations about the adoption of Web3 technology in Sega’s upcoming “super game” initiative. This initiative involves the release of high-budget online multiplayer games starting in 2026. Sega is currently assessing whether the technology will gain traction in the gaming industry before committing to its implementation.Sega’s strategic shift reflects a broader cooling trend relative to the Web3 concept, which implicates an internet built on blockchain technology. Despite attracting significant investments in the past, Web3 has faced criticism and diminishing interest from major players like Ubisoft.However, Sega will continue to offer its lesser franchises to several blockchain games that will be announced later this year. The company also plans to invest hundreds of millions of yen in related projects, as the technology still holds value in enabling the transfer of characters and items between different games. Sega remains open to further involvement in blockchain gaming as the technology matures.Big brand cautiousnessUtsumi acknowledged that the views expressed by blockchain advocates may seem extreme to many in the video game industry. Nevertheless, he recognized the importance of risk-takers who pioneer new technologies, referring to them as the “first penguins” who should not be underestimated.Sega’s cautious approach reflects the need to strike a balance between innovation and maintaining the core aspects of enjoyable gaming experiences, while closely monitoring the evolution of blockchain and Web3 technologies in the industry.It’s also likely that the gaming sector’s most coveted brands will remain cautious on blockchain gaming while newcomers like Animoca Brands can better afford to be the risk takers that drive blockchain gaming forward. Earlier this week, Animoca’s Co-Founder Yat Siu said that he was bullish where blockchain gaming is concerned.