XPLA Welcomes Mobile Game Idle Ninja Online on Its Mainnet

Hong Kong Authorities Block Access to JPEX Amid Ongoing InvestigationDubai-headquartered crypto exchange JPEX has been under intense scrutiny in Hong Kong over the course of the past week due to issues experienced by Hong Kong users in withdrawing funds from the platform. In the most recent twist to the saga, authorities in the Chinese autonomous territory have now blocked access to the JPEX website and mobile application.Photo by Tao Yuan on UnsplashCutting off service accessThe firm published a statement on Wednesday, outlining this latest sanction, while protesting that the move had been unreasonable. It appears that the authorities requested local telecommunications providers to block access to the company’s online platform.The measure follows ongoing enforcement actions initiated by local law enforcement agencies, which have led to the detention of at least 11 individuals and the seizure of assets related to the case. The scandal has also had implications for the crypto sector as a whole, as local regulators are now looking once more at regulation and determining if there’s a need to tighten regulatory measures as a consequence of JPEX’s failings in Hong Kong.VPN recommendationIn its statement, JPEX stated:“Since September 13, 2023, the SFC [Securities and Futures Commission] has suddenly made a series of accusations against our platform’s operating model and promotional methods, which we vehemently resent as they were made without investigation or review.”In response to the blocking of their platform, JPEX has encouraged users to utilize virtual private network (VPN) services to access their services. The exchange sought to reassure its user base, stating: “Here, we strongly reiterate that, even in the face of such oppression and unfair treatment, our platform will continue to operate as usual. Users can log into our mobile application or operate on our web version using VPN applications like Surfshark.”The investigation into JPEX was initiated following warnings from the SFC regarding false or misleading statements made on social media by crypto influencers and the trading platform relative to a trading license application.On Sunday, JPEX announced that it had suspended certain operations and increased withdrawal fees due to an ongoing liquidity crisis, triggering an influx of complaints from users. As of Monday night, the police had received a total of 1,641 complaints, with claims amounting to approximately HK$1.19 billion ($152 million) in assets involved, as revealed during a police briefing on Tuesday.DAO Stakeholders Dividend PlanIn response to these developments, JPEX unveiled plans for a “DAO Stakeholders Dividend Plan.” Under this initiative, JPEX users will have the opportunity to convert their assets on the platform into DAO stakeholder dividends at a 1:1 ratio.The exchange intends to distribute 49% of the DAO Stakeholder dividends, with an estimated total value of approximately 400,000,000 USDT available for subscription and conversion. Additionally, JPEX plans to offer repurchase options one year and two years after the program’s launch.New users who subscribe to the DAO stakeholder dividends will enjoy double payouts, and they will not be required to bear all the operational responsibilities of the platform. This move is seen as an attempt by JPEX to address the concerns of its user base and navigate the challenges it currently faces.The situation surrounding JPEX remains fluid, with ongoing investigations and regulatory actions continuing to unfold.

Cebu Meeting of FSB Highlights Crypto RisksThe Regional Consultative Group for Asia of the Financial Stability Board (FSB) has highlighted the risks implicated by crypto assets in a series of meetings held on Thursday and Friday in Cebu, the Philippines.The FSB is an international body with a mandate to monitor the global financial system, as well as make recommendations in respect of that system. The agency was established by the G20 group of countries in April 2009, replacing its forerunner, the Financial Stability Forum.Photo by John Alvin Merin on UnsplashA regulatory framework for cryptoThe two-day event focused on non-bank financial intermediation (NBFI) in Asia and the development of an effective global regulatory framework for crypto-assets. It discussed recent developments in financial markets, together with their regional impact.In opening remarks, Philippine Central Bank Governor, Felipe Medalla, stated: “Crypto, the biggest issue there is, whether we like it or not is quite a lot, especially younger people who are actually gambling. They have huge losses, our view right now. Well, you’re there, it’s your problem and the regulation becomes strict the moment crypto meets banking.”International participants highlighted the need for the development of an effective global regulatory framework for crypto-assets. Particular concern exists with regard to the potential for systemic risk in relation to crypto and a potential overflow into the traditional financial system.Earlier this year, the FSB proposed a complete regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, with the report having been originally submitted in October of last year. Among its key components is the imposition of tighter controls. It proposed the guiding principle of “same activity, same risk, same regulation” for crypto assets, mirroring the approach taken for traditional financial assets.Global approach to taming cryptoThis approach has proven to be problematic for people working within the digital assets space. Many of the core facets of cryptocurrencies are entirely different to anything we see in traditional finance. Trying to frame crypto within an existing approach and standard has been perceived by many to be akin to trying to fit a square peg in a round hole.It’s not the FSB's role or place to affect policy directly. That responsibility lies with policymakers and regulators in each individual country. However, the organization is seeking to influence those individuals and entities in the hope that they will employ its suggested regulatory framework.Klaas Knot, Chair of the FSB and President of the Dutch Central Bank, provided this view on crypto: “We will come up with a global regulatory framework. It also only makes sense to regulate this from a global perspective. Because, nowadays you can take a server and put it anywhere in the world and start issuing these digital assets.”From Knot’s take, it’s clear that governments and central bankers are cottoning on to the fact that individual nation-state regulation is futile to an extent where decentralized innovations like cryptocurrency are concerned. Others such as European Central Bank (ECB) President Christine Lagarde and Mark Branson, President of German financial markets regulator BaFin, similarly have called for a globally enforced regulatory approach over the course of the past year.Ongoing struggleWhile regulation can be helpful, particularly when it comes to the points at which crypto meets the traditional system, there’s no doubt that this emerging innovation will disrupt the conventional system to some degree or other. That may place an incentive before central bankers and governments to try and stymie the further development of digital assets.While a truly global approach to regulating digital assets could retard development of the sector, there is rarely total consensus among world governments on a single issue. Therefore, by its very nature, crypto, and the digital assets sector will likely continue to develop regardless. It’s more a question of how long that process takes.

Chinese Prosecutors Issue Warning on NFTsIn recent days, China’s top procuratorial agency, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate of China, issued a warning alongside some guidelines on non-fungible tokens (NFTs).The Supreme People’s Procuratorate is the highest office in China charged with the mandate of upholding legal integrity, safeguarding citizens’ rights, and where necessary, conducting criminal investigations. In a statement published on Monday, the agency set out an advisory, together with additional recommendations, pertaining to NFTs.Photo by Markus Winkler on PexelsNFT status in ChinaWhile all and sundry are aware of a multi-year crack-down by the Chinese authorities on crypto in recent times, exemplified by a ban on crypto trading and the operation of crypto mining facilities within the country’s borders, the status of NFTs has been discussed to a much lesser degree.NFTs remain legal within the country. When the crypto trading ban came into play in 2021, much of the local industry connected with that trading activity disappeared. However, in its place, a newly emergent trend came to the fore in the form of NFTs. With cryptocurrencies perceived as being high risk and sanctioned by the authorities, attention turned to NFTs and there has been a surge of adoption of the digital collectibles within China as a consequence.NFT risksThe procuratorial agency highlighted a number of attributes as well as risks in relation to NFTs in the report that it published. The agency finds the issue of ownership of NFTs as a troublesome one. It cites the fact that NFTs can be replicated and distributed at will on this basis as being particularly problematic. The legitimacy of the right source of the work itself is the decisive factor for the healthy and orderly development of digital works NFT transactions,” it states.It appears that the agency, like many in traditional professional circles before them, have a difficulty recognizing the model of asset ownership that NFTs incorporate. That ownership is not defined by civil law or in accordance with centralized systems but by simply the possession of the requisite private key pertaining to a given NFT within a decentralized system.Blockchain, not cryptoThe agency acknowledged that NFTs do present a novel application of blockchain technology. This is not surprising as while there might be an ongoing clampdown on decentralized cryptocurrencies in China, officials at a national level and in numerous instances within regional administrations, are demonstrating a strategy of leveraging blockchain technology for the betterment of the Chinese economy in the future.Public prosecutor Wang Xia-fen, one of the authors of the report, stated: “It’s widely recognized that digital collectibles have the potential to protect intellectual property rights, boost content creation and enrich the digital economy.” Wang encouraged public prosecutors to “find the distinction between real innovation and criminal activities” where NFTs are concerned.The upshot of its report though, is that the procuratorial agency is uncomfortable with the similarity of many of the attributes of NFTs when compared with decentralized cryptocurrencies. It issued a warning on that basis, emphasizing a need for risk assessment to be carried out and further consideration of the legal risks that are implicated.