The Philippines Forging Crypto Reg. Path US Could Learn From
The Philippines has demonstrated best practice in operating a sensible regulatory framework relative to cryptocurrency while the United States has erred by engaging in regulation via enforcement while responding after the horse has bolted in relation to a string of crypto company collapses. That’s according to Robert De Guzman, Head of Legal Compliance at Philippines-based cryptocurrency exchange Coins.ph.
In an opinion piece published in Forkcast News on Tuesday, De Guzman lays out his view as to what’s required in terms of regulation, while drawing comparisons between the application of regulation relative to crypto in both jurisdictions.
The need for “sensible” regulation
De Guzman believes that the crypto industry’s recent failures are a wake-up call for the whole sector. Losses of billions of dollars affected Celsius Network, BlockFi, Voyager Digital, Genesis, and FTX, and led to Silvergate, Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), and Signature banks’ collapse in a week. To maintain consumers’ trust, he believes that sensible regulation is necessary for the crypto exchanges dealing with digital assets.
The legal compliance expert cites the FTX collapse. FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried’s empire was among the largest collapses. FTX pretended to support regulation, but its true nature was an offshore exchange for global clients. Nonetheless, some businesses act on their regulation support by acquiring licenses and complying with central bank audits in the countries of operation.
State-level and industry-level regulation
The crypto industry being open to self regulation is one element of the solution, he says. Regulators must proactively protect their consumers from scams and business failures, not just clean up the mess after millions of people have been harmed.
Regulatory failures
De Guzman points the finger at reactionary regulatory action. Regulators filed charges against crypto industry founders after their collapse. Previously, they missed the problems of the largest companies. FTX, based in the Bahamas, was mismanaged, and American regulators only responded after customer issues. Regulations by enforcement, preferred in several countries, wait for failure to happen before taking action. Over-regulation through enforcement pushes platforms offshore, where Wild West-type environments thrive, with clear consequences.
Regulators in some countries focus on surface-level questions, like which tokens should be considered securities, while others, like in the Philippines, prioritize execution-level details to protect consumers. Anti-money laundering measures and custody are core issues, with the G-7’s Financial Action Task Force’s Travel Rule likely to be more strictly applied. Active regulation and audits are needed to ensure financial platforms act responsibly with customer deposits. Basic rules need to be put in place through a licensing regime, followed by regulation of market practices like commingling of assets, self-dealing, and trading against customers.
The Philippines sensible approach to regulation
The Coins.ph legal guru holds out his home country as exemplary in terms of its approach to regulation. The Philippines’ regulatory regime requires a virtual asset service provider (VASP) license to operate a crypto exchange, as well as additional licenses for other services. The country’s central bank, BSP, directly regulates all crypto exchanges and expands its crypto regulations to adapt to market needs. KYC processes in the Philippines require recognition of valid ID documents from across 82 provinces.
Additionally, the BSP expects the industry to cooperate in quarterly audits where they share balance sheet information and disclose digital assets in hot and cold wallets. Regulators in the Philippines are proactive and knowledgeable about the crypto space, which sets a sensible framework based on customer protection.
