SK C&C to Spearhead Establishment of Korea’s First Alternative Trading System

Crypto Exchange HTX Reports $8 Million Hack Over WeekendCrypto exchange HTX confirmed on Monday that it fell victim to a hack over the weekend, resulting in losses amounting to 5,000 ETH ($8 million).HTX stakeholder Justin Sun, Founder of layer one blockchain TRON, disclosed the breach via an X post. In a series of subsequent X posts, Sun assured users and stakeholders that the exchange had promptly covered the losses, and current user deposits remained secure. He also emphasized that the platform was operating normally despite the security incident.Photo by GuerrillaBuzz on UnsplashHacker incentiveThe TRON Founder also extended an offer to the hacker responsible for the breach. He proposed a 5% reward for the return of the remaining funds, a figure notably lower than the 10% often offered to hackers in similar situations. Additionally, Sun dangled the possibility of a job at the exchange. That’s an unusual response to a cryptocurrency hack and one that had one commentator speculating upon the notion that the hacker belonged to the notorious North Korean Lazarus hacking group, pondering the prudence of such a move.Data from DeFi data aggregator DeFiLlama revealed that Seychelles-based HTX, formerly known as Huobi, witnessed nearly $10 million in outflows, with a remaining $2.73 million in customer deposits as of the latest data.Hacker’s identity may be knownThe hacker, who received a series of messages from an address identified as an HTX hot wallet by Nansen, was presented with a stark choice. The messages, written in both English and simplified Chinese, claimed to have uncovered the hacker’s true identity and urged the return of the stolen funds to the address 0x18709E89BD403F470088aBDAcEbE86CC60dda12e. In return, HTX offered a 5% “white hat bonus” valid until October 2, 2023. If the funds were not returned by that date, law enforcement would be involved, the message warned.The hack came shortly after Justin Sun shared a promotional video in which he depicted himself defeating a hooded figure symbolizing a hacker “shorting crypto” with a single punch while on a spaceship journey to what appeared to be Mars.Insolvency fearsOn Tuesday, Sun outlined that the exchange had established a “SAFU” (Safe Asset Fund for Users) fund for platform users. However, taking to X on Monday, Adam Cochran, Managing Partner at Cinneamhain Ventures, claimed that there was a likelihood that the HTX business is insolvent. Cochran maintains that available data suggests a shortfall in crypto holdings relative to HTX users' assets.Travis Kling, Founder and Chief Information Officer of Ikigai Asset Management, went one further on X, stating:”Not “probably”. Huobi is insolvent.”Kling, a long-time critic of Binance, went on to suggest that if Huobi were to collapse, that event would likely lead to Binance unraveling also.HTX originated in China and nowadays maintains offices in Singapore, Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong, and the UK. It has long been speculated that Justin Sun has a controlling stake in the HTX business. Sun has denied that assertion, instead suggesting that he is a member of HTX’s “Global Advisory Board.”

South Korea’s ruling Democratic Party has set up a new task force to accelerate the creation of a clear regulatory framework for stablecoins, aiming to unify competing legislative proposals ahead of government guidelines expected in October. According to Etoday, the nine-member group, chaired by Representative Lee Jung-moon of the National Policy Committee, is composed of lawmakers from three key parliamentary committees. Its primary objective is to consolidate the party's position on digital asset policy and coordinate with the Financial Services Commission (FSC) to establish a definitive rulebook for the burgeoning sector. Lee stated that the task force would work to harmonize multiple stablecoin bills already circulating within the party, noting that there was mounting pressure from both regulators and the private sector. He explained that government agencies had urged swift legislative action, while financial institutions and exchanges preparing to launch won-pegged stablecoins were waiting for regulatory certainty.Photo by SC Jang on UnsplashRegulatory debate over capital standardsA central point of contention for the task force will be establishing appropriate capital requirements for stablecoin issuers. Current proposals vary in scope, with suggested thresholds ranging from 500 million won (approximately $358,000), a figure intended to encourage fintech innovation, to as high as 5 billion won (about $3.58 million) to prioritize investor protection. The committee is tasked with striking a balance between fostering market growth and ensuring financial stability. Seoul's initiative reflects a broader global movement toward formal oversight of fiat-backed digital currencies. The U.S. passed its GENIUS Act for stablecoins in July, while the EU has implemented its Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation. Similarly, Japan amended its Payment Services Act in 2023 to restrict stablecoin issuance to licensed banks and registered financial firms. Former White House crypto advisor’s inputThe push for clear rules has drawn keen interest from industry leaders. Speaking at Korea Blockchain Week 2025 in Seoul, Bo Hines, chief executive of Tether USAT, stressed the regulatory clarity provided by the GENIUS Act in the U.S. According to ZDnet Korea, he noted that his company's new dollar-backed token, USAT, is designed for full compliance with U.S. law, featuring one-to-one reserves and audits by top-tier accounting firms to attract institutional investors. Hines, a former digital assets adviser at the White House, clarified that USAT is intended to serve the regulated U.S. market, complementing Tether’s flagship product, USDT, which has a global user base exceeding 500 million. He also discussed Tether’s view of South Korea as a key market, pointing to the significant USDT trading volumes there. Hines encouraged the country to adopt comparable stablecoin standards and expressed optimism that it would move toward a more open and efficient global financial network. With the FSC’s guidance approaching, the Democratic Party’s task force is working to reconcile differing legislative proposals. The resulting framework will shape the pace at which stablecoins move from pilot projects to an established part of South Korea’s financial system. 

Cebu Meeting of FSB Highlights Crypto RisksThe Regional Consultative Group for Asia of the Financial Stability Board (FSB) has highlighted the risks implicated by crypto assets in a series of meetings held on Thursday and Friday in Cebu, the Philippines.The FSB is an international body with a mandate to monitor the global financial system, as well as make recommendations in respect of that system. The agency was established by the G20 group of countries in April 2009, replacing its forerunner, the Financial Stability Forum.Photo by John Alvin Merin on UnsplashA regulatory framework for cryptoThe two-day event focused on non-bank financial intermediation (NBFI) in Asia and the development of an effective global regulatory framework for crypto-assets. It discussed recent developments in financial markets, together with their regional impact.In opening remarks, Philippine Central Bank Governor, Felipe Medalla, stated: “Crypto, the biggest issue there is, whether we like it or not is quite a lot, especially younger people who are actually gambling. They have huge losses, our view right now. Well, you’re there, it’s your problem and the regulation becomes strict the moment crypto meets banking.”International participants highlighted the need for the development of an effective global regulatory framework for crypto-assets. Particular concern exists with regard to the potential for systemic risk in relation to crypto and a potential overflow into the traditional financial system.Earlier this year, the FSB proposed a complete regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, with the report having been originally submitted in October of last year. Among its key components is the imposition of tighter controls. It proposed the guiding principle of “same activity, same risk, same regulation” for crypto assets, mirroring the approach taken for traditional financial assets.Global approach to taming cryptoThis approach has proven to be problematic for people working within the digital assets space. Many of the core facets of cryptocurrencies are entirely different to anything we see in traditional finance. Trying to frame crypto within an existing approach and standard has been perceived by many to be akin to trying to fit a square peg in a round hole.It’s not the FSB's role or place to affect policy directly. That responsibility lies with policymakers and regulators in each individual country. However, the organization is seeking to influence those individuals and entities in the hope that they will employ its suggested regulatory framework.Klaas Knot, Chair of the FSB and President of the Dutch Central Bank, provided this view on crypto: “We will come up with a global regulatory framework. It also only makes sense to regulate this from a global perspective. Because, nowadays you can take a server and put it anywhere in the world and start issuing these digital assets.”From Knot’s take, it’s clear that governments and central bankers are cottoning on to the fact that individual nation-state regulation is futile to an extent where decentralized innovations like cryptocurrency are concerned. Others such as European Central Bank (ECB) President Christine Lagarde and Mark Branson, President of German financial markets regulator BaFin, similarly have called for a globally enforced regulatory approach over the course of the past year.Ongoing struggleWhile regulation can be helpful, particularly when it comes to the points at which crypto meets the traditional system, there’s no doubt that this emerging innovation will disrupt the conventional system to some degree or other. That may place an incentive before central bankers and governments to try and stymie the further development of digital assets.While a truly global approach to regulating digital assets could retard development of the sector, there is rarely total consensus among world governments on a single issue. Therefore, by its very nature, crypto, and the digital assets sector will likely continue to develop regardless. It’s more a question of how long that process takes.