KuCoin Dismisses Notion of a Layoff Plan

China’s former central bank governor has warned that speculation in stablecoins could threaten financial stability, Bloomberg reported, citing a post from the Beijing-based think tank CF40 Research. His remarks run counter to calls from some economists and industry figures for a yuan-backed stablecoin as the U.S. advances its digital-asset policy agenda. Zhou Xiaochuan, who led the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) from 2002 to 2018, delivered the comments at a closed-door meeting in mid-July. He argued that China’s payment rails—spanning third-party platforms, the central bank digital currency (CBDC), digital wallets, and clearing infrastructure—are already highly efficient, leaving little scope for stablecoins to deliver meaningful cost savings. He also rejected the premise that conventional cross-border payments come at steep costs. Zhou identified price manipulation driven by speculative trading as the chief risk to financial and asset markets, adding that current safeguards in the U.S., Hong Kong, and Singapore remain inadequate.Photo by Mitchell Luo on UnsplashOnshore controls push yuan stablecoins offshoreAny debate over a yuan-linked token must also contend with China’s currency structure. The onshore yuan (CNY) is subject to strict capital controls and limited cross-border convertibility, while the offshore yuan (CNH) trades more freely. As a result, any prospective yuan stablecoin would likely reference the CNH; pegging directly to the CNY would conflict with Beijing’s capital rules. An earlier Reuters report has indicated that Beijing is weighing whether to authorize a yuan-pegged stablecoin to promote international use of the currency. Analysts caution that such a token would almost certainly be confined to offshore markets, even if regulators proceed. U.S. sets federal guardrails for stablecoinsMeanwhile, policy moves in the U.S. are gathering pace. In July, President Donald Trump signed the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act into law, creating a federal framework for stablecoins. A White House fact sheet says the law requires issuers to maintain 100% reserves in liquid assets such as U.S. dollars or short-term Treasuries and to publish monthly disclosures on reserve composition. The administration has argued that dollar-backed stablecoins could bolster demand for Treasuries and reinforce the dollar’s reserve-currency role. Hong Kong has emerged as comparatively receptive to digital assets. The special administrative region’s Stablecoins Ordinance entered into force on Aug. 1, establishing a licensing regime to oversee Hong Kong dollar–backed stablecoins. Earlier this month, CMB International Securities, a subsidiary of China Merchants Bank, became the first Chinese bank-affiliated institution to offer trading in Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Tether (USDT). Industry voices are also pressing the case for stablecoins. At the WebX conference in Tokyo on Aug. 25, Binance co-founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) argued that CBDCs are becoming obsolete, while stablecoins—typically backed by real assets—enable wider transactions and are gaining market traction. He said CBDCs remain rarely implemented due to limited demand and suggested China appears more open to stablecoins after years of tighter oversight, pointing to Hong Kong’s efforts to build an ecosystem. Potential PBOC stimulus may lift cryptoChina remains a consequential force in global crypto markets. A recent report suggested that potential PBOC stimulus could fuel an altcoin rally. With China accounting for 19.5% of global GDP, shifts in its monetary stance are seen as important drivers of worldwide liquidity. Following July data showing a 0.1% month-on-month decline in retail sales, a 0.4% rise in industrial production, and an uptick in unemployment to 5.2%, analysts expect measures to support growth. Any additional liquidity could flow into risk assets, including cryptocurrencies, potentially pushing digital tokens toward new highs. 

The Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB) and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) are charting new regulatory territory with the release of a comprehensive consultation paper outlining their proposal to accept and regulate fiat-referenced stablecoins (FRS) within the Chinese autonomous territory.Photo by Ben Cheung on PexelsConsultation processThe proposal has been published to the FSTB website in the form of a consultation paper titled “Legislative Proposal to Implement the Regulatory Regime for Stablecoin Issuers in Hong Kong.” Separately, the HKMA has published a press release on the topic. This development seeks to establish a regulatory framework for stablecoin issuers and address associated risks. The consultation period is scheduled to conclude on Feb. 29 of next year. At the heart of this legislative proposal is the requirement for companies actively marketing the issuance of FRS to the public of Hong Kong to obtain a specific local license from the HKMA. The proposed criteria for obtaining this license are robust and include key elements such as maintaining reserves “at least equal to the par value” of all circulating stablecoins. This measure ensures that stablecoins remain fully backed, contributing to their stability and reliability. The legislation also places a strong emphasis on the segregation and secure safekeeping of reserve assets, enhancing the protection of users’ funds and preventing misuse. Furthermore, issuers will be mandated to provide transparent disclosure and regular reporting, fostering accountability and transparency within the stablecoin ecosystem. It is noteworthy that the proposed regulations explicitly exclude algorithmic stablecoins from obtaining an HKMA license, underlining a preference for stablecoins with solid reserve backing. No doubt the spectacular collapse of the UST algorithmic stablecoin in 2022 has informed the Hong Kong regulator’s decision to exclude consideration of algorithmic stablecoins in this instance. Need to establish Hong Kong presenceTo underscore their commitment to regulatory compliance, stablecoin issuers seeking an HKMA license will also be required to establish a registered office in Hong Kong. This office must have a chief executive, senior management team and key personnel in place, aligning with Hong Kong’s efforts to ensure that all activities related to stablecoin issuance are conducted responsibly. The proposed licensing regime for FRS aligns with Hong Kong’s broader strategy to foster the growth of the Web3 ecosystem within the region. Christopher Hui, Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, highlighted the significance of this move, stating: “With the implementation of the licensing regime for VA trading platforms from June this year, the legislative proposal to regulate FRS is another important measure facilitating Web3 ecosystem development in Hong Kong.” Market competitionBack in February, the HKMA signaled its intent to regulate stablecoins when it issued a discussion paper considering various regulatory approaches. Competition is on an upward trajectory relative to stablecoin issuance and use. In June, Hong Kong-based qualified custodian First Digital Trust announced that it was gearing up to launch "First Digital USD," a U.S. dollar-backed stablecoin regulated in Asia rather than the United States. Leading stablecoin issuer Circle has been active in furthering its product offering in Asia during 2023. It successfully attained licensing approval in Singapore while in Japan, it joined forces with SBI Holdings in an effort to propel further growth of its USDC stablecoin within the Japanese market.

Ant Group Restructuring With Implications for BlockchainAnt Group, an affiliate company of Chinese conglomerate Alibaba, is understood to be undertaking a significant restructuring that could have broader implications for the digital asset industry.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashPotential IPOAccording to a recent report published by Bloomberg, the company is contemplating a separation of its blockchain and database management services, as well as its international business, from its core financial operations in China. It’s being speculated that the move is a precursor to Ant Group’s application for a financial holding license in China. Furthermore, it could be part of a bid to revive its suspended initial public offering (IPO) in Hong Kong.The company had been under regulatory scrutiny from the Chinese authorities over the course of the past three years. That investigation culminated in a hefty fine of 7.12 billion yuan ($995 million). The consequences of that regulatory investigation have taken a toll on the company’s valuation, plunging from a peak of $280 billion before the IPO cancellation in 2020 to a current estimated value of $79 billion.Blockchain business implicationsBy pursuing this restructuring, Ant Group seeks to refocus on its core financial services within China. It’s unclear what the outcome will be for non-core businesses such as blockchain-based ventures. Potentially spinning these businesses off could unlock hidden value in blockchain-related activities. However, such a move would also raise questions regarding the future of these non-core businesses and their potential impact on the broader digital asset industry.AntChain, the blockchain technology developed by Ant Group, holds a prominent position in China, being widely adopted across various sectors. Should Ant Group decide to spin off or divest this business, it could significantly alter the blockchain landscape in the country.Originally introduced as “Ant Blockchain” in 2017 alongside Alipay, AntChain expanded its services to provide blockchain-as-a-Service (BaaS) to Ant Group’s partners in 2018. In mid-2020, Ant Group took a step further by transforming Ant Blockchain into a separate entity and rebranding it as AntChain. Besides blockchain solutions, AntChain is also actively involved in developing Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT), risk control technologies, and other value-added tech services.The wide adoption of Ant Group’s blockchain technology has played a pivotal role in promoting blockchain implementation in China. Last year the company unveiled a blockchain storage engine called Letus, as a mechanism to lower storage costs of blockchain networks. Another project saw it partner with a Malaysian investment bank in an effort to develop a crypto trading and portfolio management app. These are individual instances of the company’s varied activities in the blockchain space.Any alterations to its blockchain operations could impact the pace and scale of blockchain adoption in the country. While the Chinese authorities have discouraged crypto trading and mining, they have very much encouraged blockchain development.The restructuring appears to be a response to the increasing regulatory pressures in the fintech industry. A further tightening of regulations on blockchain operations for fintech companies might potentially hinder innovation and growth in the sector.Most likely the guiding hand of the government in China will have a material effect on how these blockchain-based businesses develop in the event of an Ant Group restructuring that would see them being spun out.