3AC Founder Secures Restraining Order in Singapore

UAE Accelerates Cross-Border Payments with JPMorgan’s OnyxFirst Abu Dhabi Bank (FAB), the largest bank in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), has ventured into the world of blockchain technology through a partnership with JPMorgan and its Onyx blockchain.Photo by Kamil Rogalinski on UnsplashFast tracking cross-border transactionsInternational financial transactions have long been afflicted by intricate procedures and snail-paced response times. These challenges have been particularly acute when it comes to cross-border payments. In response, FAB will utilize JPMorgan’s Coin Systems in order to expedite and streamline such cross-border payments.Powered by blockchain technology, JPMorgan’s Coin Systems advocates for swift transfers and settlements through a secure, distributed ledger. This collaboration between FAB and JPMorgan’s Onyx division was announced via a press release published on Tuesday (local time).The initiative represents FAB’s efforts towards leveraging cutting-edge technology, while improving and redefining the customer experience. While the initial testing phase was a success, it’s merely a prologue to FAB’s broader plans to utilize the technology for global transactional banking.With assets totaling AED 1.1 trillion ($312 billion) as of mid-2023 and laudable ratings from Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch, FAB maintains a significant presence in banking in the Middle East region.Onyx blockchainJPMorgan launched its Onyx blockchain in 2020 as a permissioned blockchain network. It is understood that the network processes daily transactions to the value of between $1 billion and $2 billion through partnerships established with banks in the Middle East, Europe, and India. Among the services offered by Onyx Digital Assets are tokenized US treasury bonds and mortgage-backed securities alongside its JPM Coin.JPMorgan is not alone in terms of top-tier banks and financial services firms who are delving into the world of blockchain. Rivals such as Citi announced its Citi Token Services product offering in September. It’s a blockchain-based service that utilizes tokenized deposits for the purpose of trading and providing liquidity.Meanwhile, payments firm Mastercard announced that it was performing testing on its Multi Token Network in June. For its part, JPMorgan has also been a participant in Singapore’s Project Guardian, a collaborative initiative led by the Monetary Authority of Singapore in conjunction with the financial services sector, centered on asset tokenization.Bahrani partnershipThis latest collaboration follows hot on the heels of JPMorgan’s partnership with another Middle Eastern bank last month. Bank ABC, which is headquartered in Bahrain, became the first Middle Eastern bank to utilize JPMorgan’s Onyx Coin Systems for faster cross-border payments.That initiative also had the support of Bahrain’s central bank. At the time of the launch of the collaboration, Central Bank of Bahrain Governor Rasheed Al Maraj stated:”After working closely with JP Morgan and Bank ABC over the past two years to experiment with cross-border commercial transactions between Bahrain and the US, leveraging the JP Morgan Coin System, we are pleased to witness the soft launch of this innovative banking solution by a Bahraini-based bank.”

Despite reports emerging on Monday that it had invested in Array, an algorithmic currency system, Singaporean state-owned conglomerate and global investment firm Temasek has denied any such investment.In a very brief statement published to its website on Tuesday, Temasek stated:“We have seen news articles and a tweet from Array about Temasek’s investment in it. This news is incorrect. Temasek has not invested in Array and we have no relationship with them.”CoinTelegraph had taken to reporting the claim on Monday. The article had outlined a $10 million investment by the Singaporean state investor into Array, the developer of an algorithmic currency system that relies upon smart contracts and artificial intelligence. Reputational lossIf it had been true, such an investment would have been seen as a positive for the crypto space as it would be indicative of a renewed appetite for crypto-based projects from the giant Southeast Asian investor.Temasek was a key investor in failed cryptocurrency exchange, FTX. In November 2022, the company had to write down its entire investment of $275 million into the fraudulently managed exchange business. To an onlooker, a $275 million write-down may seem like an extraordinary loss.However, given that the Singaporean investing behemoth has a $403 billion dollar portfolio, the loss represents just 0.09% of that portfolio, hardly making a dent in the health of the company.The greater loss for Temasek relative to the FTX collapse has been reputational. Top tier venture capital investors like Temasek, who had otherwise been assumed to be the most diligent of actors in the professional investing world, were all sharply criticized for failing to identify the extent of the mismanagement and fraud that had occurred at the now bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange. Bogus ClaimsIn fairness to those who had reported the fake news, they were acting on information that Array had put out into the ether and as of yet, has not corrected. At the time of publication, the project’s website features a list of renowned investors including Temasek. Alongside Temasek, Array claims to have obtained investment from Standard Chartered, Coinbase Ventures, Spark Capital, Khosla Ventures, The Blackstone Group, Binance Labs, Sequoia Capital and a16z.In the case of Binance Labs, a spokesperson for the venture arm of the global exchange told The Block that it is not an investor in the project. To further dispel the claim, Temasek took to Twitter, stating:”Fake news about Temasek’s investment in @Array_Protocol. We have seen news articles and a tweet from Array about Temasek’s investment in it. This news is incorrect. Temasek has not invested in Array and we have no relationship with them.” Further instances of misinformationThe misinformation follows a similar scenario that played out with OPNX, a newly launched platform that offers spot and futures trading, alongside the ability for investors to trade bankruptcy claims.A couple of weeks ago, the platform, which had been founded by Kyle Davies and Su Zhu, the key executives behind failed crypto hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital, asserted that it had the backing of some notable investors. Almost immediately, venture capital and market maker DRW and venture capital firm Nascent denied that they were investors in OPNX.

Shanghai Court Recognizes Unique Traits of BitcoinThe Shanghai Second Intermediate People’s Court has added a layer of legitimacy to Bitcoin despite China’s prevailing anti-crypto stance.In a recently published report, the court recognized digital currencies such as Bitcoin as being unique and non-replicable. It went further still in singling out Bitcoin as being distinct from the thousands of other cryptocurrencies that are currently in existence.Photo by Zhou Xian on UnsplashSun chimes inThe significance of this development has caught the attention of Justin Sun, the Founder of the TRON blockchain network, who took to the X social media platform (formerly Twitter) to share insights from the report. Sun wrote:”The Second Intermediate People’s Court of Shanghai believes that with the development of internet technology, digital currencies represented by Bitcoin possess uniqueness and non-replicability.”Legal attributesDelving deeper into the report’s content, it becomes evident that the court was engaging in a discussion about the legal attributes of Bitcoin and how judicial decisions should be approached in cases involving cryptocurrencies.One striking aspect of the report is how it acknowledges the usage of cryptocurrencies in illegal financial activities, such as illicit fundraising. In this instance, the court has indirectly acknowledged the financial nature of cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, despite the fact that a ban has been in place on trading Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies since 2021.That said, the report also notes that due to the regulatory stance on cryptocurrencies, the legal attributes of digital currencies remain ambiguous, creating challenges in their judicial handling. Despite some courts attempting to disregard the “monetary” and “property” attributes of digital currencies, these efforts have proved unsuccessful.Inherent characteristicsRegarding the monetary attribute, the courts still identify the sale price of digital currencies in their judgments. When it comes to property attributes, these courts struggle to ignore the inherent property value presented by digital currencies during legal proceedings.While acknowledging Bitcoin’s decentralized nature and lack of centralized control, the article still underscores its “major functions of currency,” such as scalability, circulation, storage, and means of payment, making it a global currency.Future implicationsThe legal opinion expressed by the Shanghai court provides a notable boost to the legitimacy of Bitcoin and other digital currencies. It asserts that these tokens undeniably possess value, even if the People’s Bank of China chooses not to formally recognize them.Moreover, the court’s inclination toward classifying cryptocurrencies as personal property aligns with another report from the Chinese courts as well as rulings in other jurisdictions, such as Singapore. Similarly the Shanghai court acknowledges that Bitcoin can be acquired through various means, including mining, inheritance, and buying and selling.The court’s recognition of the enduring value of cryptocurrencies echoes the sentiment that value is a collective human judgment. In this respect, the Shanghai court’s perspective aligns with the reality that many Chinese citizens continue to use digital currencies as a medium of exchange despite the existing ban.The Shanghai court’s unintentional validation of Bitcoin’s unique attributes and value may have broader implications for the legal status and recognition of cryptocurrencies in China and beyond. This latest development could contribute to a more nuanced approach to cryptocurrency regulation and legal interpretation in the future.