Korean Banks Look into Safer Crypto Investment Amid Wealth Management Growth

South Korean authorities will require homebuyers to disclose funds originating from cryptocurrency sales, a move aimed at increasing transparency in the nation's tight real estate market. The new rule is part of a wider government effort to address housing affordability, which is particularly pronounced in Seoul, and to integrate digital assets into its regulatory framework. The change, announced on Sept. 7 as part of new housing supply measures, will alter the mandatory funding plan submitted during property transactions. Proceeds from digital assets will be listed as a distinct category, similar to funds from stocks or bonds. Officials are also expanding loan disclosure requirements to include business loans and overseas borrowing, closing potential financing loopholes.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashImpact of asset volatility on property valuesThe policy follows growing evidence that volatility in assets like cryptocurrency can spill over into the property market. A 2024 study cited by Maeil Business Newspaper highlighted that both the COVID-era stock rally and Bitcoin's 2023 price surge had a discernible impact on housing values. According to Yu Jung-suk, a professor at Dankook University, apartments in Seoul's affluent Gangnam district are particularly sensitive to fluctuations in Bitcoin and the KOSDAQ index. He noted that high-profile property acquisitions by young crypto investors, even if few in number, can significantly sway market sentiment. Professor Yu suggested that regulators may need more comprehensive tools to manage the risks connecting different asset classes. The government's new measures also seek to cool the capital's housing market, where prices have continued to rise despite a slowdown in growth. In contrast, prices in areas outside Seoul have been declining since 2022. To address the supply-demand imbalance, officials plan to begin construction of 1.35 million new homes in the Seoul metropolitan area between 2026 and 2030. Stablecoin regulation and CBDC trials advanceBeyond real estate, officials are developing a formal regulatory structure for stablecoins. The Presidential Commission on Policy Planning is reportedly considering a model where a consortium of banks and fintech firms would be granted rights to issue a won-pegged stablecoin. Supervision for this new system would fall to a proposed Financial Stability Council, a body intended to serve as a central coordinator for financial policy, comprising the finance ministry, the Bank of Korea, and other regulators. The initiative aims to combine the stability of the traditional banking sector with the innovation of non-bank financial companies. The evolving regulatory environment is attracting attention from global industry leaders. Executives from Tether, the issuer of the USDT stablecoin, met with Shinhan Financial Group CEO Jin Ok-dong in Seoul on Sept. 8. While Tether representatives stated they were monitoring the regulatory climate, they confirmed no specific business plans were discussed. Separately, the Bank of Korea is moving forward with digital currency experiments. In partnership with government agencies and six major commercial banks, the central bank will launch a pilot program to test the use of a digital currency for distributing state subsidies and vouchers. 

Study Places Hong Kong as Leader in Crypto ReadinessHong Kong, according to a recent study conducted by Forex Suggest, has emerged as the leading jurisdiction worldwide in terms of its readiness for cryptocurrencies. The study evaluated various factors such as the number of blockchain startups per 100,000 people and the density of crypto ATMs in relation to the population.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashZero capital gains taxThe attractiveness of Hong Kong for investors in the crypto space stems from its advantageous tax policies. The study noted that Hong Kong does not levy capital gains taxes on cryptocurrency, making it an appealing destination for crypto enthusiasts. The United States and Switzerland secured the second and third positions, respectively, in the rankings of the most crypto-ready countries.In recent times, Hong Kong has actively embraced investments from digital asset companies and is poised to implement new regulations for the industry. Effective from June 1, the city’s new rules aim to establish Hong Kong as a global hub for digital assets. These regulations permit licensed cryptocurrency trading platforms to offer services to retail investors while incorporating measures to safeguard individual traders.Global crypto firms are gearing up for that new licensing approach, carving out separate corporate entities in order to meet the regulatory requirements which the Hong Kong regulator, the Securities Futures Commission (SFC), has set. Another Hong Kong regulator, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), is also opening up to embrace digital asset innovation through a pilot project implicating the tokenization of real world assets.Regarding the number of blockchain startups, Hong Kong boasts three startups per 100,000 individuals, securing the second position globally. Topping the list is Switzerland, with an impressive count of 12.9 blockchain startups per 100,000 residents, amounting to a total of 1,128.The study also highlighted that countries such as Hong Kong, Switzerland, Panama, Portugal, Germany, Malaysia, and Turkey impose the lowest taxes on cryptocurrencies. These nations exempt individuals from capital gains taxes on profits derived from cryptocurrency trading.Crypto ATM proliferationWhen considering the prevalence of crypto ATMs, Hong Kong ranks third globally, with two ATMs per 100,000 people, totaling 149 ATMs. The United States takes the top spot with nearly 34,000 crypto ATMs, but when normalized to the population, it has 10.1 ATMs per 100,000 individuals.Regressive measures in USIn contrast to Hong Kong’s favorable environment, regulators in the United States have intensified their efforts to tighten regulations on cryptocurrency exchanges, leading many within the industry to advocate for clearer guidelines. Consequently, several exchanges are exploring jurisdictions that offer more favorable conditions.Forex Suggest emphasized that the report’s findings were based on extensive data analysis, taking into account factors such as tax regulations, legislation, the presence of blockchain startups, and the level of interest in cryptocurrencies. Each jurisdiction received a normalized score out of 10 for each factor, and the overall rankings were determined by averaging these scores.Hong Kong’s position as the most crypto-ready jurisdiction in the world showcases its commitment to fostering innovation and becoming a global leader in the digital asset space. With its advantageous tax policies, growing number of blockchain startups, and forthcoming regulations, the autonomous Chinese territory is solidifying its position as an attractive destination for businesses and investors in the cryptocurrency space.

Cake Group co-founder files application to wind up company in SingaporeChua U-Zyn, the co-founder and Chief Technology Officer of crypto firm Cake Group, has officially applied to the Singapore High Court to initiate the winding-up process for the company.A winding-up notice appeared in Singapore’s The Straits Times on Thursday. U-Zyn is being represented by law firm Rajah & Tann on the matter. The court will now decide whether to grant this application, which was filed on Dec. 1.Photo by Kelvin Zyteng on UnsplashFinancial strugglesCake Group is the parent company of the crypto platform Bake, which made headlines last month for announcing significant staff reductions affecting 30% of its workforce. Bake is an automated market maker (AMM) and decentralized exchange (DEX) that revolves around Binance’s BNB Smart Chain (BSC).In existence for some five years, the platform claims to have over 1 million users worldwide, retaining over $1 billion in customer assets and having achieved reward payouts to date of $411 million.Cake Group’s financial struggles have been evident, with its revenue plummeting by over half to $266 million in 2022, while profits experienced a fivefold decrease to $23.5 million during the same period. The company generates income through transaction fees.A hearing for creditors or opposing parties is scheduled for Dec. 22, providing an opportunity for stakeholders to voice concerns or contest the winding-up process.Internal disputeWhile the specifics behind U-Zyn’s winding-up application remain unclear, the decline in financial performance and the recent layoffs are undoubtedly contributing factors.It’s understood that CEO Julian Hosp learned about the filing on Dec. 6 and has since emphasized that the company is actively working with legal counsel to challenge the application. Hosp will challenge this request in court, asserting that the company’s finances are strong and unrelated to the dispute.Taking to the X social media platform on Thursday, Hosp wrote:”Disappointed to see U-Zyn filing a request on December 1st” . . . “For me, it’s selfish that he’s prioritizing his own interests over those of our customers, employees, and partners, instead of resolving it internally.”Hosp added that U-Zyn’s application is unrelated to the company’s finances and that the firm is financially solvent.Former employees, speaking anonymously to Tech in Asia, expressed surprise at the escalating situation, describing the co-founders as emotionally charged and seemingly unable to safeguard their investment.U-Zyn opposed to layoffsThe court filing under Section 125(1)(i) of the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act of 2018 adds an element of uncertainty. Unlike other sections that typically specify reasons for winding up, this particular section allows for liquidation if “the Court is of the opinion that it is just and equitable that the company be wound up.”Hosp clarified that the application is not based on Cake Group’s inability to pay its debts, emphasizing that day-to-day operations continue at full capacity.It’s understood that the ongoing dispute between U-Zyn and Hosp stems from internal disagreements, particularly related to cuts within the company’s engineering division. Chua claimed Hosp excluded him from decisions, especially concerning the recent layoffs.Despite the internal discord, Hosp stressed the company’s commitment to resolving the dispute swiftly and maintaining its operational capabilities. Undeterred by his fellow co-founder’s actions, he published a blog post on Thursday, outlining his vision for the Cake Group moving forward.