SBI and TradeFinex establish 'SBI XDC Network APAC'

India’s HPCL Embraces Blockchain Tech to Streamline Purchase OrdersHindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL) has forged a partnership with Zupple Labs, an Indian Web3 startup, to upgrade its purchase order processes through blockchain.Photo by Zbynek Burival on UnsplashTamper-proof documentationAccording to local media publication Business Today, the collaboration leverages blockchain technology to issue tamper-proof digital purchase orders via LegitDoc, ensuring instant verification on the NEAR blockchain. The move is a significant step toward enhancing transparency and efficiency in the purchase order system, addressing long-standing challenges in the industry.Notably, HPCL has awarded purchase orders worth $52 billion in the past five years, making these orders economically significant. Until now, automating purchase order verification for third-party requests outside of HPCL proved to be particularly challenging, resulting in substantial manual labor to process external verification requests.With the implementation of LegitDoc, historically fraud-prone purchase orders can be seamlessly issued to the relevant stakeholders. This breakthrough empowers participants to verify the authenticity of these orders with a simple click, reducing the risk of forgery and expediting the verification process.HPCL’s use of blockchain technology in partnership with Zupple Labs serves multiple purposes. It aims to combat purchase order forgery, simplify vendor access to trade finance through collateralization, and provide evidence of turnover, ultimately facilitating participation in public procurement processes. The facility will soon be accessible to both the public and vendors, with the launch set for October.Neil Martis, the founder of LegitDoc, expressed his enthusiasm about HPCL’s adoption of their technology. He noted:“It’s exciting to see an oil conglomerate such as HPCL use our technology LegitDoc, to secure billions of dollars’ worth of purchase orders. This serves as a testament to the confidence that businesses and governments have placed in our blockchain platform over the years in protecting important documents.”Utilizing two blockchainsThe approach taken in this instance relies on the use of two parallel blockchains which act as settlement layers: the NEAR public blockchain and permissioned private blockchain Hyperledger Fabric. As of mid-October, 3,000 purchase orders had been issued using blockchain.HPCL’s move to digitize and secure its purchase order system not only benefits the corporation but also has industry-wide implications. By promoting digital automation and trust, it sets a precedent for transparency and efficiency in the oil and gas sector. This adoption of blockchain technology aligns with a global trend of enhancing digital trust and streamlining operations across various sectors.Further application of blockchain techIt’s worth noting that this isn’t the first instance of Zupple Labs’ blockchain technology-based solutions being employed by the government in India. LegitDoc has previously been adopted by the administration of Gadchiroli, Maharashtra, for issuing tribal caste certificates in 2022, in that instance by way of the Polygon blockchain.Moreover, the technology played a pivotal role in issuing COVID-19 vaccine certificates in Maharashtra in 2021, while over 100,000 degree certificates were issued in 2022. These instances underscore the versatility and growing acceptance of blockchain technology in modern governance and business processes.

The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), an independent statutory body that regulates Hong Kong’s securities and futures markets, has alerted investors to 33 suspicious websites which appear to be masquerading as HashKey, one of the Chinese autonomous territory’s first licensed virtual asset exchanges.Photo by Dan Freeman on UnsplashAlert listThe regulator flagged the websites by publishing their domain names to its alert list. Hong Kong’s SFC first published its alert list relative to suspicious crypto-related entities in November 2021. In terms of both suspicious trading platforms and suspicious crypto-related web links, the regulator has found 91 instances to date. Remarks added to the listing confirm that a HashKey company, Hash Blockchain Limited, had reported the websites to the regulator as fraudulent websites. The web domain links have been slightly modified when compared to official links to the HashKey website, in an effort to mislead HashKey customers. A little less than two weeks ago, HashKey published a statement to its website, making service users aware of the fraudulent links and websites. It stated: “Fraudulent websites will appear under different domain names or with slight modifications or variations of the official HashKey Exchange website address www.hashkey.com by adding a combination of letters, numbers or symbols.” The company added that it has no connection with these websites, that no affiliation exists with HashKey Exchange, and consequently the company doesn’t accept any liability for any matters relating to these fraudulent websites and links. As well as the regulator, HashKey has also reported the matter to the Hong Kong Police Force. Tackling crypto-related fraudBoth law enforcement and regulators in Hong Kong have been more proactive in tackling any signs of crypto-related fraud or potential scams following an episode of fraud involving an unlicensed Dubai-headquartered crypto exchange, JPEX, in 2023. At that time, the authorities within the Chinese autonomous territory received in excess of 2,369 complaints from Hong Kong residents who had been duped by the unregulated exchange. Overall, victims were out of pocket to the tune of $166 million. Some commentators had likened the JPEX scandal as being an “FTX moment” for Hong Kong, referring to the high profile collapse of Bahamas-headquartered crypto exchange FTX in November 2022. However, Hong Kong investors also suffered as a result of the FTX collapse.  In fact, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) and the SFC were listed as FTX creditors in 2023. The statutory bodies appeared on the FTX creditor list alongside 50 Hong Kong institutions. Towards the end of 2023, the agency issued a public warning regarding HongKongDAO and BitCuped, entities that were accused of misinformation. In February 2024, the SFC issued a reminder to investors within the Chinese autonomous territory to ensure that they’re only engaging with licensed cryptocurrency platforms. To date, the regulator has awarded crypto trading licenses to seven virtual asset trading platforms (VATPs). Earlier this month, the regulator extended use of its swift licensing process to all new applicants in an effort to fast-track the approval of more licensed platforms.

Hong Kong’s HashKey Adds AVAX TradingHashKey Hong Kong, the Chinese autonomous territory’s first licensed retail crypto exchange, has unveiled an addition to its platform with the launch of Avalanche (AVAX) trading.According to an announcement published to its website on Wednesday, HashKey has listed Avalanche on Thursday with the caveat that access to AVAX trading will be reserved for professional investors, as defined by Hong Kong’s Securities & Futures Commission (SFC).Photo by Wance Paleri on UnsplashAccessible to professional investorsTo meet the criteria as a professional investor in Hong Kong, individuals must possess an investment portfolio valued at a minimum of 8 million Hong Kong dollars, roughly equivalent to $1 million. This decision sets AVAX apart from other widely traded cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin and Ether, which remain accessible to retail investors in Hong Kong. While Tether (USDT) enjoys retail status, the majority of altcoins on HashKey will remain the preserve of professional investors.This move is a direct result of the SFC’s proactive stance on regulating the rapidly expanding crypto market in Hong Kong. Since the introduction of regulated retail crypto trading in the Chinese autonomous territory in August, the SFC has imposed rigorous requirements on exchanges. HashKey mandates users to deposit a minimum of 10,000 Hong Kong dollars or $1,500 into their exchange accounts as part of the Know Your Customer (KYC) verification process.Low trading volumeAmid these regulatory challenges, HashKey Hong Kong currently reports a 24-hour trading volume of approximately $5.3 million, significantly lower than its global peers. This lower trading volume suggests that stringent regulations may be affecting the exchange’s ability to attract retail investors effectively.The path to regulatory compliance in Hong Kong has been anything but smooth for crypto exchanges. Reports indicate that these platforms have collectively invested over $25 million in establishing the requisite infrastructure for obtaining a Hong Kong Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) license. It was reported earlier this year that crypto firms are forking out between $2.55 million and $25.5 million in order to secure a VASP trading license.Despite the challenges, HashKey is looking at various avenues in bringing its offering forward. Earlier this month the firm signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with insurer OneDegree. That collaboration could be significant as it should lead to the assets of HashKey users being protected and insured on the platform. That would solve a major issue for participants in the crypto space amid the backdrop of ongoing platform failures and hacks.JPEX collapseEven as regulatory efforts intensify, the crypto industry in Hong Kong has not been impervious to bad actors. The recent collapse of the JPEX crypto exchange earlier this month serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing risks associated with the industry. Described as the largest financial fraud in Hong Kong’s history, JPEX faced allegations of embezzling over $178 million of investors’ funds. Notably, JPEX was operating without SFC registration at the time of the alleged embezzlement.In response to such incidents, the SFC has taken proactive measures by publishing a warning list of crypto exchanges considered non-compliant within the Chinese autonomous territory.