Hong Kong’s HashKey Adds AVAX Trading

A legislator in the Philippines has put forward a bill that, if passed and enacted, would see the Southeast Asian country establish a Bitcoin reserve consisting of 10,000 BTC. The proposed bill was filed with the House of Representatives as House Bill 421. Its proposer is Congressman Miguel Luis Villafuerte, a representative of Camarines Sur’s 5th district since 2022. Villafuerte also served as governor of the same province on two occasions, gaining recognition for becoming the youngest individual to assume the governorship in the Philippines.Photo by Michael Förtsch on UnsplashDrawing on developments overseasPrefacing the bill with an explanatory note, Villafuerte draws on developments related to Bitcoin in the United States. He drew attention to U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell having referred to Bitcoin as “digital gold,” while pointing to a bill in the U.S. proposed by Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis to create a strategic Bitcoin reserve in the U.S., with the support of U.S. President Donald Trump. The bill itself, if passed and enacted, would provide a mandate to Banko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), the country’s central bank, to acquire 2,000 BTC on an annual basis over a period of five years. According to Villafuerte’s proposal, that would result in the Philippines amassing a reserve of 10,000 BTC. 20-year minimum holding periodFollowing the achievement of this accumulation, the bill sets out that the leading digital asset would be locked in trust for a period of 20 years for the benefit of the country. A provision is included to establish a procedure that would enable the purchase schedule to be adjusted if a need arose to do so due to prevailing market conditions. Upon completion of the 20-year holding period, the proposed legislation calls on the central bank to present a report to Congress with recommendations as to whether Bitcoin should continue to be held or if some of the holdings should be sold off on a gradual basis. Following the expiration of that initial 20-year period, the governor of the central bank cannot recommend the selloff of more than 10% of the holding over any two-year period. Proof of reservesIn terms of sovereign nations, an early mover with regard to Bitcoin has been El Salvador. It became the first nation to establish Bitcoin as legal tender, while also establishing a Bitcoin reserve. However, the Central American nation has been criticized with regard to a lack of transparency surrounding that reserve. In the case of Villafuerte’s bill, the proposed legislation includes a requirement for the central bank governor to establish a system of quarterly proof of reserve attestations. It calls for attestations to be performed by an independent third-party auditor with expertise in auditing digital assets.The proposal comes as a number of nations are understood to be exploring the establishment of a strategic Bitcoin reserve. In April, a parliamentarian in Sweden proposed adding Bitcoin to the Nordic nation’s foreign exchange reserves. The Swedish parliament is set to debate the notion of a Bitcoin reserve next month. Meanwhile, Switzerland’s central bank has reportedly gained exposure to Bitcoin through a $253 million shareholding in Bitcoin treasury firm Strategy.

Taiwanese prosecutors have expanded their inquiry into ACE Exchange, urging the detention of Chenhuan Wang, the platform's president and partner at Chien Yeh Law Offices. The Taipei District Prosecutors Office disclosed to The Block that Wang, alongside four other suspects, was summoned after police raids in Northern Taiwan earlier this month. Subsequent to the interrogation, prosecutors sought Wang's detention and restrictions on visitation rights, alleging his involvement in money laundering and fraud linked to the activities orchestrated by the detained founder, David Pan. Chien Yeh Law Offices has moved to distance itself from its partner’s activities, stating that the matter is a personal investment of Wang’s. It stated:”Ace Digital Innovation Co., Ltd. is the personal external investment affairs of lawyer Wang Chenhuan and has nothing to do with the firm.”Photo by Thomas Tucker on UnsplashMisleading advertisingPan, along with colleague Lin Nan, is accused of a three-year collaboration, utilizing misleading social media advertisements to deceive investors into acquiring worthless cryptocurrencies, including MOCT. The inclusion of Wang in the investigation now requires a court determination on potential detention. ACE Exchange responded to Pan's arrest earlier, asserting that Pan had ceased daily operations in 2022, with Wang assuming the presidency in September 2023. Wang claimed to have initiated efforts to delist controversial coins, with ACE assuring cooperation with investigations as a witness. The exchange affirmed the normalcy of trading and operational conditions, emphasizing the security of user assets and smooth cryptocurrency and New Taiwan dollar deposit and withdrawal services. Established in 2018, ACE Exchange ranks among Taiwan's prominent crypto exchanges, alongside BitoGroup and MaiCoin. In spite of alleged wrongdoing relative to key actors within the business, the platform has outlined its commitment to legal principles, stating zero tolerance for any misconduct within its management team. Regulatory focus on offshore exchangesIn the broader context of Taiwan's crypto landscape, the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) plans to impose restrictions on offshore cryptocurrency exchanges operating within its jurisdiction, unless they secure required registration. In September last year, the FSC drafted guiding principles for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). These guidelines aim to fortify information disclosure, set review standards for virtual asset listing and delisting and ensure the secure separation of companies' and customers' assets. The FSC intends to strictly prohibit illegal business solicitation by foreign crypto firms, mandating registration and compliance declarations with anti-money laundering regulations. Failure to comply will result in the prohibition of business solicitation within Taiwan or from domestic residents by foreign VASPs. As Taiwanese prosecutors intensify their efforts, the ACE Exchange case unfolds as a critical episode in the evolving regulatory landscape, prompting both legal scrutiny and a reevaluation of the country's approach to crypto oversight.  

Korea’s FSC Opposes Other Agencies’ Involvement in Virtual Asset BillAhead of the National Assembly’s passage of the virtual asset bill, the Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC) has repeatedly opposed the involvement of the Bank of Korea (BOK) and the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) in regulating cryptocurrencies, according to the Korean newspaper Kukmin Ilbo.©Pexels/LukasFSC’s oppositionIn a document submitted to the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee, the FSC opposed stipulating the BOK’s right to request documents in the virtual asset bill. The agency argued that the bill is indirectly related to the BOK’s monetary and credit policy and that explicitly mentioning monetary and credit policy in the bill could lead to the misinterpretation of virtual assets as possessing the characteristics of currencies.The FSC also objected to stipulating the FSS’s right to inspect crypto enterprises. According to law, the purpose of the FSC is to inspect and supervise financial institutions. Explicitly stating the FSS’s right to inspect crypto enterprises could cause confusion to the public that they are financial entities.However, there are growing concerns about the FSC’s perceived intention to dominate virtual asset jurisdiction.At a small meeting held under the National Policy Committee last month, Lawmaker Yoon Han-hong of the ruling People Power Party expressed the view that the FSC should consider incorporating the BOK and the FSS in the virtual asset bill for crypto regulations. During the meeting, the FSC objected to the inclusion of a stipulation that excludes central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) from the definition of virtual assets. Meanwhile, the BOK agreed to include such a stipulation.Allowing class action suitsAccording to an internal document obtained by Kukmin Ilbo, the FSC also intends to allow class action suits for crypto investors. It seeks to add cryptocurrencies to a bill proposed for class action suits, which also deal with securities. Class action suits provide a means for victims to receive redress in cases where a representative is successful in winning the lawsuit against the offender.The FSC stated that it will follow the majority on the issue of whether the purpose of the virtual asset bill should include the phrase “to contribute to the development of the nation’s economy,” although it left a cautionary note that some might raise objections to this, considering the speculative nature of virtual assets.