Mt. Gox edging closer to BTC payouts sparks market fears

Binance Takes P2P Service Measures in Response to Sanctioned Russian BanksGlobal crypto exchange Binance has removed the option for users to conduct transactions via sanctioned Russian banks on its peer-to-peer (P2P) platform, a decision that comes on the heels of a Wall Street Journal exposé published earlier this week, shedding light on the platform’s involvement in facilitating the movement of funds for Russian users.Previously, Binance’s peer-to-peer service featured five Russian banks under sanctions as a method for ruble transfers between users. However, the company swiftly acted to address potential compliance concerns. Fittingly, this latest news was also broken by the Wall Street Journal on Friday.Dmitry Sidorov on PexelsSailing too close to the windWhen approached regarding the omission of these banks, a Binance spokesperson stated: “We regularly update our systems to ensure compliance with local and global regulatory standards. When gaps are pointed out to us, we seek to address and remediate them as soon as possible.”The Wall Street Journal’s article outlined how Binance’s peer-to-peer platform facilitated ruble-to-crypto trades that frequently involved the sanctioned Russian banks, with Rosbank and Tinkoff Bank being prominent examples.These trades often utilized layers of intermediaries to convert funds from these banks into Binance balances, as detailed by various company resources, user screenshots, and messages in official chat groups. Despite these revelations, Binance’s exchange had continued to handle significant volumes of ruble trading, according to data compiled by digital asset research firm CCData.US DoJ probeBinance’s activities in Russia could potentially contribute to its ongoing legal challenges in the United States. The US Justice Department (DoJ) has been probing the company’s actions for potential violations of American sanctions on Russia. In response to such concerns, the Binance spokesperson emphasized:“Binance aims to diligently comply with the global sanctions rules and enforces sanctions on people, organizations, entities, and countries that have been blacklisted by the international community, denying such actors access to the Binance platform.”WorkaroundsTraders, however, had reportedly found workarounds to the bank removals, as observed in the official Telegram chat group for Russian clients. Many shared that they could still engage with sanctioned banks by selecting alternative payment methods and then manually inputting their Rosbank or Tinkoff bank details.Earlier this year, an investigative report by CNBC alleged that employees of the company had told it that Binance staff regularly helped Chinese customers to bypass Know Your Customer (KYC) controls in order to access the platform. More recently, another report, once again by the Wall Street Journal, found that business in China was booming, which surprised many given that China banned crypto trading within the country in 2021.It’s apparent that the company is reacting to regulatory and legal pressures in taking the decision to make these changes to its P2P service. Perennial crypto critic US Senator Elizabeth Warren took to X (formerly Twitter) on Friday, stating:“I rang the alarm about sanctions evasion by Russia using the crypto platform Binance — and urged [the DoJ] to investigate potentially false statements it made to Congress. We need stronger crypto regulations to rein in illicit finance.“

South Korea: Crypto Exchange Execs Indicted on Manipulation ChargesA number of executives at Coinone, one of South Korea’s leading cryptocurrency exchanges, have been indicted on charges related to market manipulation.That’s according to a report published by South Korean news outlet, The JoongAng, on Monday. The complaint details no less than forty-six coins that are alleged to have been the subject of manipulation in some form. That represents one in four of the total number of coins that the exchange has enabled for trading on the platform.Photo by Burak The Weekender on PexelsFour executives indictedThe indictment lists four Coinone executives, Mr. Jeon, Mr. Kim, Mr. Ko, and Mr. Hwang. The four have been charged with employing illegal mechanisms to manipulate coin listings, resulting in the four executives profiting to the tune of 2.98 billion Korean Won, which amounts to $2.26 million dollars according to current fx exchange rates.The complaint specifies that these offenses were committed between December 2019 and November 2022. South Korean prosecutors further allege that prior to various projects obtaining a token listing on Coinone, company executives made them sign third-party market-making contracts. That in and of itself is not unusual.One of the key aspects of a new coin listing (and an ongoing listing for that matter), is the need to have sufficient liquidity in place to ensure that the coin can be traded without being susceptible to market manipulation. Low liquidity conditions open the door to bad actors moving the market relative to a particular token.Cross tradingThe indictment is far more specific in calling out illegal cross trading activity. It’s likely that these key Coinone employees would have been expecting such an indictment to land at their doors. Last week, it emerged that LUNA tokens associated with Terraform Labs’ failed Terra USD (TUSD) algorithmic stablecoin project, had been illegally cross traded on three South Korean crypto exchanges: Bithumb, GoPax and Coinone.Cross trading is the practice of trading an asset on an exchange without recording the transaction transparently on the exchange. Strictly speaking, the activity can be legitimate although most exchanges prohibit the practice as it can be used to affect market manipulation.A cross trade could be permitted in a scenario where the price is deemed to be competitive at the time that the trade takes place. While this can more easily be determined in conventional markets as the practice is covered by specific regulation, that’s not the case in most jurisdictions right now where digital asset trading is concerned. By extension, there’s a complete lack of transparency and a lack of reporting.As other market participants don’t have visibility of this type of trading activity, they are unaware as to whether a better price is available on the market or not. In an unregulated state, the practice undermines trust.In the case of Coinone, the executives enabled the practice in order to provide an illusion with regard to trading activity. That meant that trading volumes claimed were inaccurate, misleading ordinary traders and exchange users. Along with trading volume in these coins being artificially boosted, so too were token prices.In the indictment, prosecutors explicitly alleged that cross trading was being employed in an illegal manner:“This price manipulation causes misunderstandings about the trading volume and market price among general members of the exchange, and induces [service users] to participate in the coin transaction and buy the coin.”

HashKey Gears Up to Offer Trading Service to Retail TradersHashKey is gearing up to launch its services to retail traders in Hong Kong with the intention of offering them Bitcoin and Ether trading products initially.The Hong Kong-based digital asset management platform received full licensing approval from the local regulator, the Securities Futures Commission (SFC), earlier this month. It’s anticipated that the platform will launch to retail on August 28.That’s according to a report from a local media source earlier this week. Financial publication Investing.com stated: “General investors in the period can only trade Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), because these two currencies currently account for most of the trading volume in the market.“It’s worth noting, however, that investors will be subject to a cap, permitted to allocate only up to 30% of their net worth into the realm of cryptocurrencies while utilizing the platform.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashServing retail clientsIt’s a significant milestone for both HashKey and the regulator, given that Hong Kong has been making huge efforts to further the development of digital asset innovation within the Chinese autonomous territory over the course of the past twelve months. Hashkey, alongside brokerage and exchange business OSL (also successful in obtaining a license), has been collaborating with regulators from an early stage in the lead-up to both receiving full licensing.HashKey got to this point by focusing on two pivotal licenses offered by the SFC. The first of these licenses, known as Type 1, paved the way for HashKey to initiate a virtual asset trading platform, aligning seamlessly with the regulatory framework laid out under Hong Kong’s securities laws. The second license, Type 7, empowers the crypto platform to furnish automated trading services to both institutional and retail clientele.Nurturing digital asset innovationHong Kong has maintained a resolute focus on cultivating a crypto-friendly environment within its borders in 2023. Echoing this sentiment, Financial Secretary Paul Chan asserted the government’s and regulatory bodies’ determination to incubate a robust crypto and fintech ecosystem throughout the year.By March, over 80 crypto enterprises signaled their intent to establish a presence in Hong Kong, with several major players in the crypto industry among them. In April, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) issued a call to banks, urging them to extend their services to cryptocurrency companies.Banking remains a difficulty in Hong Kong for crypto businesses despite the HKMA’s efforts. However, in the case of both HashKey and OSL, both are being banked by Hong Kong’s largest virtual bank, ZA Bank.In May, the HKMA unveiled a comprehensive licensing framework tailored for crypto platforms, imposing a deadline of June 1 for compliance. As August rolled in, a select few crypto platforms clinched the green light to offer crypto trading services to an eclectic client base encompassing both retail and institutional participants.This regulatory framework, designed to safeguard the interests of investors, is playing a large part in Hong Kong’s recent success in developing the sector. In this particular instance, it will mean that retail traders will be granted access to Bitcoin and Ethereum exclusively. This curtailed selection provides a good starting point for retail trading, and it’s likely that we will see HashKey’s trading offering being extended to cover additional digital assets as soon as local regulators permit it.