Top

Regulatory clarity spurs traditional brokerages’ interest in Hong Kong

Policy & Regulation·February 21, 2024, 5:37 AM

In less than a year since Hong Kong regulators gave the green light to crypto exchanges, there's been a noticeable surge of interest among traditional financial institutions and brokerages eager to secure their digital asset licenses for trading.

https://asset.coinness.com/en/news/f497817c606ec3a8736ff7b1091bf3a5.webp
Photo by Florian Wehde on Unsplash

Tiger Brokers

Tiger Brokers, a Beijing-headquartered one-stop trading brokerage with nine million international customers, offers one such example. The firm upgraded its Type 1 Hong Kong Securities & Futures Commission (SFC) license in January to include crypto trading for professional investors and financial institutions based in Hong Kong. The move followed an uptick in interest from mainland China-based firms in Q4, 2023.

In a recent interview with Cointelegraph, John Fei Zeng, the CFO and director of Tiger Brokers, revealed that the firm currently boasts 865,500 funded accounts in Hong Kong, managing $18.9 billion in assets. Zeng stated:

 

"Residents of Hong Kong will be able to trade virtual assets such as Bitcoin and Ethereum alongside stocks, options, futures, funds, and ETFs [Through Tiger Trade]." He explained that as part of the firm's expansion plans, additional digital assets will be evaluated.

 

HKMA guidance on crypto custody

As a testament to the regulatory clarity that has attracted firms like Tiger Brokers, on Tuesday Hong Kong's central bank issued guidance for authorized institutions interested in offering custody services for digital assets. The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) outlined comprehensive risk assessment procedures and emphasized the importance of robust policies, oversight, and resource allocation to manage custodial activities effectively.

 

Notably, the HKMA's guidance seeks to address concerns stemming from recent industry mishaps, including the collapse of FTX, Terra and Three Arrows Capital (3AC), by mandating stringent safeguards to protect clients' digital assets from theft, fraud or misappropriation. Key requirements include independent systems audits, secure storage practices and transparent record-keeping, underscoring the regulator's commitment to fostering trust and stability in the digital asset ecosystem.

 

Victory Securities

In a similar move to that of Tiger Brokers, Victory Securities, another Hong Kong brokerage, secured a license from the SFC last November to offer crypto trading services for retail investors. The company reported a significant surge in virtual asset transactions and new customer acquisitions, prompting plans to introduce trading discounts to incentivize compliant and safe virtual asset trading services.

 

Moreover, OSL, a licensed Hong Kong crypto exchange, joined forces with Interactive Brokers in November 2023, enabling the latter to offer bitcoin and ether trading to retail investors through its platform. Further underscoring the evolving regulatory landscape, crypto exchange Bybit submitted a retail trading license application in Hong Kong, indicative of the sector's continued growth and maturity.

 

Nevertheless, navigating the regulatory framework isn't without its challenges. Web3 firms eyeing Hong Kong may need to invest up to $25 million in corporate infrastructure and compliance to secure licensing approval, reflecting the stringent requirements imposed by regulators.

 

As Hong Kong continues to refine its regulatory framework and enhance investor protections, the stage is set for further collaboration between traditional financial institutions and emerging crypto players within the Chinese autonomous territory.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Aug 26, 2023

Binance Takes P2P Service Measures in Response to Sanctioned Russian Banks

Binance Takes P2P Service Measures in Response to Sanctioned Russian BanksGlobal crypto exchange Binance has removed the option for users to conduct transactions via sanctioned Russian banks on its peer-to-peer (P2P) platform, a decision that comes on the heels of a Wall Street Journal exposé published earlier this week, shedding light on the platform’s involvement in facilitating the movement of funds for Russian users.Previously, Binance’s peer-to-peer service featured five Russian banks under sanctions as a method for ruble transfers between users. However, the company swiftly acted to address potential compliance concerns. Fittingly, this latest news was also broken by the Wall Street Journal on Friday.Dmitry Sidorov on PexelsSailing too close to the windWhen approached regarding the omission of these banks, a Binance spokesperson stated: “We regularly update our systems to ensure compliance with local and global regulatory standards. When gaps are pointed out to us, we seek to address and remediate them as soon as possible.”The Wall Street Journal’s article outlined how Binance’s peer-to-peer platform facilitated ruble-to-crypto trades that frequently involved the sanctioned Russian banks, with Rosbank and Tinkoff Bank being prominent examples.These trades often utilized layers of intermediaries to convert funds from these banks into Binance balances, as detailed by various company resources, user screenshots, and messages in official chat groups. Despite these revelations, Binance’s exchange had continued to handle significant volumes of ruble trading, according to data compiled by digital asset research firm CCData.US DoJ probeBinance’s activities in Russia could potentially contribute to its ongoing legal challenges in the United States. The US Justice Department (DoJ) has been probing the company’s actions for potential violations of American sanctions on Russia. In response to such concerns, the Binance spokesperson emphasized:“Binance aims to diligently comply with the global sanctions rules and enforces sanctions on people, organizations, entities, and countries that have been blacklisted by the international community, denying such actors access to the Binance platform.”WorkaroundsTraders, however, had reportedly found workarounds to the bank removals, as observed in the official Telegram chat group for Russian clients. Many shared that they could still engage with sanctioned banks by selecting alternative payment methods and then manually inputting their Rosbank or Tinkoff bank details.Earlier this year, an investigative report by CNBC alleged that employees of the company had told it that Binance staff regularly helped Chinese customers to bypass Know Your Customer (KYC) controls in order to access the platform. More recently, another report, once again by the Wall Street Journal, found that business in China was booming, which surprised many given that China banned crypto trading within the country in 2021.It’s apparent that the company is reacting to regulatory and legal pressures in taking the decision to make these changes to its P2P service. Perennial crypto critic US Senator Elizabeth Warren took to X (formerly Twitter) on Friday, stating:“I rang the alarm about sanctions evasion by Russia using the crypto platform Binance — and urged [the DoJ] to investigate potentially false statements it made to Congress. We need stronger crypto regulations to rein in illicit finance.“

news
Policy & Regulation·

Apr 11, 2023

Thai Opposition Party Offers Election Crypto Sweetener

Thai Opposition Party Offers Election Crypto SweetenerThailand’s opposition party, the Pheu Thai Party (PTP), has made a controversial move ahead of next month’s general election by offering 10,000 baht (approximately $300) in digital assets to citizens above 16 years old in exchange for their votes.©Unsplash/Markus WinklerThe stated intention of the policy is to spread the use of blockchain-based assets and attract international digital currencies, as well as to distribute products made in Thailand abroad using blockchain technology. Prommin Lertsuridej, who runs the party’s economic policy committee has claimed that 55 million Thai citizens will benefit from the measure if the PTP wins the election.Populist policiesThe plan will cost $15 billion and it is claimed that it will serve to revive the country’s struggling economy while providing relief to those struggling with debt. Additionally other populist measures will be pursued including an increase in the minimum wage and a minimum monthly household income guarantee.The policy has been met with mixed reactions from citizens, with some welcoming the extra cash and others accusing the party of blatant, cynical manipulation. The PTP has tried to sidestep accusations of manipulation by stating that the money will be limited to spending on local economic stimulus projects. Additionally, it cannot be used for gambling or debt repayment, and must be spent within a four-kilometer radius. The party’s chief adviser on public participation and innovation, Paetongtarn Shinawatra, called this policy an attempt to draw the attention of international currencies to Thailand.New crypto regulationsThis policy announcement comes just two months after the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of Thailand issued new regulations for crypto service providers. The regulations were implemented to prevent a situation similar to the recent FTX collapse and hack, which resulted in the loss of millions of dollars’ worth of digital assets. The SEC has required service providers to establish a digital wallet management system to ensure efficient custody and to have a contingency plan in case of a security breach.Unintended consequencesWhile the PTPs policy has been met with criticism, it has also been seen as a bold move towards promoting the use of blockchain-based assets and digital currencies in Thailand. By offering citizens an incentive to use digital assets, the policy may encourage more people to explore this emerging market, which has the potential to create new opportunities for investment and economic growth.Populist politics and policy comes with a heavy longer term cost. The PTPs policy may be successful in achieving its intended goals, or it could ultimately lead to unintended consequences. Regardless of the outcome, the PTPs policy is a significant development in Thailand’s growing digital asset market and may set a precedent for other countries seeking to promote the use of blockchain-based assets and digital currencies.From an international perspective, even if the move backfires economically within Thailand, ever greater use and normalization of digital assets as in this case can only lead to greater overall adoption.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Oct 06, 2023

Korean Police Establishes Task Force to Tackle Virtual Asset-Related Crimes

Korean Police Establishes Task Force to Tackle Virtual Asset-Related CrimesIn response to the recent increase in virtual asset-related crimes in South Korea, the country’s police agency is establishing a dedicated task force to combat these illegal activities, according to local media outlet News1. This action by the National Police Agency comes as virtual asset legislation gained momentum and as prosecutors launched a joint virtual asset investigation division. Additionally, the police are considering establishing a new regional investigation unit focused on virtual asset-related investigations in the future.Photo by Sungho Song on PixabayMulti-divisional approachDuring this month, the police will consolidate various functions related to virtual asset investigations within its headquarters to establish the task force. This group will convene monthly meetings to exchange information on ongoing investigations and will also extend invitations to on-site investigators for the purpose of studying the most effective investigative methods and staying updated on the latest trends in virtual asset-related crimes.The task force will be jointly overseen by the heads of the Cyber Investigation Bureau and the Investigation Bureau and will consist of members from several divisions, including the Cyber Investigation Planning Division, Economic Crime Investigation Division, Cybercrime Investigation Division, Cyber Terrorism Response Division, Narcotic and Organized Crime Investigation Division, and National Security Investigation Command Division.Escalation of virtual asset crimesBy the end of the first half of this year, the global crypto market value reached $1.17 trillion, coinciding with a notable uptick in crypto-related criminal activities. In 2021, there were 427 instances of domestic fraud cases linked to cryptocurrencies, resulting in the arrest of 1,717 individuals. However, in 2022, these numbers increased to 628 cases involving 2,123 people. Furthermore, from January to July of the current year, the police have apprehended 1,146 individuals in connection with 327 cases related to cryptocurrency crimes.However, responding to virtual asset-related crimes presents a significant challenge due to their diverse nature and wide-ranging applications. For example, incidents involving crypto hacking typically fall under the jurisdiction of the Cybercrime Investigation Division. On the other hand, cases related to fraudulent crypto investment schemes are typically handled by the Economic Crime Investigation Division, while the Narcotic and Organized Crime Investigation Division concentrates on instances of drug trading conducted using cryptocurrencies.Paving the way for specialized expertiseFurthermore, as part of the task force’s efforts, the police will seek input and feedback regarding the potential establishment of a new department focused exclusively on investigating virtual assets in the future. A police official mentioned that the creation of such a dedicated unit is seen as a desirable step that could facilitate the development of specialized expertise among on-site officers. Looking ahead, the police are also contemplating the formation of a regional investigation unit specifically dedicated to cryptocurrency-related investigations, a unit akin to the existing Financial Crimes Investigation Unit.Upcoming law implementationThe police’s decision to form a working group is seen as a proactive step in preparation for the forthcoming Virtual Asset User Protection Act, slated to take effect in July next year. This legislation is designed to enable legal action against unfair trading practices related to virtual assets, including the misuse of undisclosed information, market manipulation, and illicit transactions. It parallels the regulatory framework applied to financial investment products.In August, public prosecutors took action by launching a joint cryptocurrency investigation division at the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office in collaboration with several key agencies, including the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS), Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), National Tax Service (NTS), Korea Customs Service (KCS), Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation (KDIC), and Korea Exchange (KRX). Moreover, in light of the growing importance of legal issues related to cryptocurrencies, prominent law firms have been swiftly mobilizing to establish specialized teams dedicated to handling crypto legal cases.This trend is not limited to South Korea alone; it is also unfolding in other countries. For instance, in a parallel development, the Hong Kong Police Force and the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) have recently instituted a working group to monitor and address suspicious activities linked to virtual asset trading platforms (VATPs).

news
Loading