Binance Takes P2P Service Measures in Response to Sanctioned Russian Banks

In the aftermath of the massive $235 million hack of the WazirX cryptocurrency exchange on July 18, users and stakeholders are grappling with its devastating consequences. The breach, which compromised a significant portion of the exchange’s reserves, has led to a series of legal, financial and security-related challenges, leaving millions of users uncertain about the future of their funds. The hack and its aftermathWazirX, once a leading Indian cryptocurrency exchange, lost approximately $235 million due to a breach in one of its multi-signature wallets. This included significant amounts of Shiba Inu (SHIB), Ethereum (ETH) and other assets. The hack crippled the exchange, forcing it to temporarily shut down operations and seek a restructuring process under Singapore's insolvency laws. The WazirX hacker has since begun laundering the stolen assets through Tornado Cash, a crypto mixer known for obscuring transaction details. According to blockchain security firm Cyvers, the hacker transferred over 5,000 ETH (approximately $12 million) to a new wallet and laundered $10 million in Ethereum through Tornado Cash. This mirrors the tactics of the North Korea-backed Lazarus Group, which has used similar methods in past high-profile crypto thefts. Photo by GuerrillaBuzz on UnsplashUsers seeking redress and government interventionAs the victims of the hack face uncertainty, over 4 million active WazirX users are expected to suffer a loss of at least 43% of their funds due to the restructuring process. Frustrated by the lack of action from Indian authorities, many users have sought help from Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who was visiting Singapore at the time. Users took to social media to air their grievances and demand justice, urging the government to intervene. WazirX co-founder Nischal Shetty, who is based in Dubai, added to the confusion by stating that he does not know who is responsible for safeguarding user crypto funds on the platform. His statement has fueled outrage among users, who feel abandoned by the exchange’s management. Legal and ownership disputesAmid the chaos, WazirX is also battling a legal dispute over its ownership with Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange. Shetty has repeatedly claimed that Binance acquired WazirX, granting it significant control over the platform's operations. However, Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) refuted these claims in 2022, stating that the acquisition deal was never completed. The uncertainty surrounding the ownership of WazirX has further aggravated users, many of whom are demanding a clear statement from Binance. So far, Binance has remained silent, neither confirming nor denying its involvement. This ambiguity has intensified calls for clarification, with users fearing that a lack of transparency may worsen their chances of recovering their funds. Partial withdrawals and restructuring effortsIn response to the crisis, WazirX has initiated phased withdrawals for users, allowing them to access 66% of their Indian Rupee (INR) token balances. Initially set for September 9, the withdrawal window was moved forward, offering some relief to users. However, many are dissatisfied with the partial access to their funds and are questioning when full crypto withdrawals will resume. WazirX’s legal team has indicated that users may recover only 55% to 57% of their crypto holdings, sparking further discontent. Meanwhile, the exchange has filed a moratorium application in the Singapore High Court, seeking a six-month reprieve from legal actions as it works on a restructuring plan. Looking aheadAs the WazirX saga unfolds, the future of the exchange and its users remains uncertain. The legal battles, ownership disputes and the ongoing laundering of stolen assets pose significant challenges to the platform's recovery. For now, users can only hope that the restructuring process will bring them closer to recovering their lost funds and that authorities will step in to provide clarity and resolution. 

Kazakhstan setback for Coinbase as government blocks website accessIn alignment with the Law on Digital Assets legislation which was enacted in February, Kazakhstan’s Ministry of Culture and Information has officially confirmed that access to the Coinbase website has been blocked within the country.The development follows the enforcement of regulations prohibiting the issuance and trading of unsecured digital currencies, according to local news media.Photo by Kai Pilger on UnsplashAccusation of regulatory violationThe authorities in Kazakhstan initiated the blocking of local IP addresses from accessing Coinbase as early as September. The action was taken in response to a request from the Ministry of Digital Development. The Ministry of Digital Development accused Coinbase of violating the Law on Digital Assets, resulting in the restriction of access to the platform.The Law on Digital Assets, introduced earlier in 2023, stipulates that the issuance and circulation of unsecured digital assets are prohibited. The exception to this rule is within the Astana International Financial Center (AIFC), a designated economic zone in Kazakhstan. Permits to operate crypto trading platforms within the AIFC are issued by the Astana Financial Services Authority (AFSA).Several cryptocurrency exchanges have already received approval from the AFSA. Notable names among these approved exchanges include Binance, Bybit, CaspianEx, Biteeu, ATAIX, Upbit and Xignal&MT.Reports of access issues to the Coinbase website initially emerged in September, with the local Telegram media outlet Finance.kz referring to it as the “great Kazakh investment firewall.” This firewall was not limited to Coinbase. It also affected access to other major international crypto exchanges such as Kraken.Stringent regulationKazakhstan’s approach to crypto regulation has been notably stringent, particularly concerning its significant mining sector, which ranks among the world’s largest. In October, eight leading cryptocurrency mining operators wrote an open letter to President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, expressing concerns about the challenging conditions faced by the crypto-mining industry.Those entities included BCD Company, TT Tech Limited, Green Power Solution, Kinur Invest, KZ Systems, AI Solutions and VerCom. High energy prices for miners were cited as a significant issue, leading to what was described as a “very distressful situation” in the sector.Mining got off on the wrong footing in Kazakhstan. Following the banning of crypto mining activities in China in May 2021, there was a sudden influx of miners into Kazakhstan. As that development wasn’t planned for, it led to major stresses being placed on the country’s electricity grid. As a consequence, blackouts occurred.While this development in Kazakhstan is unwelcome news for Coinbase, the company has experienced more positive outcomes elsewhere. Last week it emerged that the U.S. crypto exchange had outperformed Q3 revenue estimates. That said, it also emerged that the exchange’s trading volumes had declined for the second consecutive quarter in a row.Kazakhstan’s move to block Coinbase access underlines the country’s determination to enforce its digital asset regulations, contributing to a growing trend of governments worldwide seeking to bring crypto-related activities under regulatory oversight.

Hong Kong Says No to Light Touch RegulationThe CEO of the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has said that while the autonomous territory will allow innovation to develop in the crypto space, that will not mean light touch regulation.Photo by Ruslan Bardash on UnsplashLowering guard railsAfter a three year hiatus, the Bloomberg Wealth Asia Summit returned to Hong Kong on Tuesday. Speaking at the conference, Eddie Yue, the CEO of the HKMA, Hong Kong’s regulatory body, outlined that the territory intends to enable innovation relative to crypto businesses that establish themselves in Hong Kong.“We will let the industry develop and innovate, we will let them create an ecosystem here,” he said. However, he added the following caveat: “But that doesn’t mean light touch regulation. If any participant thinks that the regulation is too tight, they’re welcome to go elsewhere.”Yue outlined that over the course of the past three years, guardrails relative to the operation of crypto-related activities were excessively high. Yue alluded to a new approach that sees those guard rails dropped to a level whereby innovation will be enabled in the digital assets space. However, he followed up by underlining the fact that the Authority has no intention of following a light touch regulatory approach.No safeguards not an optionAlthough acknowledging that Hong Kong may have been excessively crypto unfriendly relative to digital asset regulation in the recent past, he believes that Hong Kong has now got it right. “Our guardrails are lower, to a reasonable and sustainable level,” Yue said.The HKMA regulator flagged jurisdictions that provide little or no guardrails at all as the ones that will run into difficulties. “If you look elsewhere, there are no guardrails in some places, the guardrails are very low and there you see problems”, Yue clarified.He cited FTX as a stand out example of a basic lack of internal controls. FTX International was based in the Bahamas. While customers of FTX International find themselves in a difficult position, those of subsidiary companies FTX Japan and FTX Europe are having their funds returned as a direct consequence of much better regulatory safeguards in those regions.“All those wrongdoings by the platforms that we saw in the last one or two years will not happen in Hong Kong,” Yue claimed.A continuing trendWhile many commentators and critics from the conventional world have described bitcoin and crypto as a ponzi or a passing fad, Yue pointed out that digital assets are not going anywhere and that the trend towards digital assets will continue. Expanding further, he articulated that the overarching digital assets sector encompasses much more than just crypto: “Virtual assets or crypto is actually a very broad term. It’s not really about crypto, you’re talking about stablecoins or tokenized assets in the future.”A mere $0.3 trillion of illiquid real world assets have been tokenized thus far. It’s anticipated that this level of tokenization will climb to $16 trillion by 2030.