OKX relaunches in the United States

Politician Responds as Buterin Questions Hong Kong’s Crypto CredentialsIn a measured response on Friday, Johnny Ng, a member of Hong Kong’s Legislative Council, addressed the comments made by Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin concerning Hong Kong’s future stance on cryptocurrencies.Photo by Florian Wehde on UnsplashInvitation extendedNg extended an invitation to Buterin to visit Hong Kong, allowing him to gain a more nuanced understanding of the region’s dynamics. Ng also expressed his intent to collaborate with relevant institutions and enterprises to provide Buterin with insights into Hong Kong’s current situation.Vitalik Buterin had voiced his concerns at the Web3 Transition Summit in Singapore on Thursday. Buterin stated:“If any crypto project wants to make Hong Kong their home, they would want to have some confidence — not just that it’s friendly now but that it will continue to be friendly years from now when all kinds of unknown, regulatory and political and other kinds of events are going to happen.”He acknowledged that he did not possess an in-depth understanding of Hong Kong’s intricacies, particularly in light of recent developments in its relationship with mainland China. Buterin emphasized the need for crypto projects to have confidence not only in Hong Kong’s current crypto-friendliness but also in its ability to maintain this stance amidst unforeseen regulatory, political, and other events.In response to Buterin’s remarks, Ng reassured him that Hong Kong’s crypto-related policies were not prone to sudden changes. He highlighted that these policies had been formulated with broad social consensus and underwent comprehensive procedural assessments. Ng asserted: “Therefore, I can tell Mr. Vitalik that Hong Kong’s policies are very stable.”He further elaborated on Hong Kong’s legislative process, emphasizing the stages of government policy drafting, public consultation, discussions within multiple committees of the Legislative Council, and the General Assembly’s review.Best-prepared crypto jurisdictionIn a separate development, Hong Kong has maintained its position as the best-prepared jurisdiction for widespread cryptocurrency adoption in 2023, according to a recently published study. The Chinese autonomous territory secured the top rank for the second consecutive year.This recognition is based on a crypto readiness score (CRS) that takes into account factors such as the presence of crypto ATMs, the regulatory environment, accessibility, and legality.In contrast, the United States slipped to third place, experiencing a 6.5% drop in its CRS score from the previous year. Switzerland emerged as the second-best-prepared jurisdiction, with its CRS score surging by over 9%.The Dutch demonstrated the highest per capita interest in crypto, while Hong Kong stood out for having the most crypto ATMs per square foot due to its smaller landmass. Within the United States, New York became the most crypto-ready state, boasting a CRS of 9.80, owing to a robust legislative environment and a thriving crypto and blockchain industry.Chainalysis crypto adoption reportMeanwhile, India emerged as the global leader in crypto adoption in 2023, according to a recently compiled Chainalysis report. The report also highlighted other lower middle-income nations, such as Nigeria and Thailand, ranking prominently in crypto adoption. India’s crypto market has surged to become the second-largest globally by raw estimated transaction volume.Johnny Ng’s response to Vitalik Buterin’s comments is indicative of the measured and informed approach of Hong Kong’s leadership regarding cryptocurrencies. With a stable and consensus-driven regulatory framework, Hong Kong remains a key player in the evolving landscape of digital currencies.

KDIC Seizes Crypto from Debtors Linked to Losses at Financial FirmsDuring the first half of this year, the Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation (KDIC) tracked the cryptocurrency holdings of 1,075 individuals and debtors responsible for causing losses at financial entities, including savings banks, according to documents obtained by local news outlet Herald Economy, from the office of lawmaker Kim Han-kyu, a member of the National Assembly’s National Policy Committee. From this scrutiny, KDIC identified 29 wrongful cases and proceeded to confiscate cryptocurrencies in 16 of those instances.KDIC is a semi-state body that has been instrumental in tracing and recovering assets from culpable employees at troubled financial firms and debtors in arrears. Meanwhile, methods for hiding wealth have become more sophisticated, typically unfolding behind the curtain.Photo by Georg Bommeli on UnsplashFirst crypto seizureOut of these individuals, 900 had taken out loans of at least KRW 3 billion ($2.2 million) from beleaguered financial institutions, while the remaining 175 were employees of these institutions, held responsible for their failures. This occasion represents the KDIC’s first seizure of virtual assets.Until recently, the KDIC struggled to reclaim hidden assets funneled into cryptocurrency exchanges, given their limited authority to seek documentation. KDIC’s purview mainly extended to requesting information from public institutions, banks, insurance companies, and securities firms. However, KDIC has now found a way to seize crypto assets by investigating the bank accounts linked to these exchanges. In Korea, crypto exchanges facilitating Korean won trades are legally mandated to secure real-name accounts from banks.Call for expanding KDIC’s authorityGiven the evidence of using cryptocurrencies to conceal wealth, many suggest that amendments to the Depositor Protection Act are necessary, enabling KDIC to directly request relevant data from exchanges and recover more hidden assets effectively.Furthermore in August KDIC secured a court order allowing them to liquidate these assets. Following this successful confiscation, the debtors’ cryptocurrencies have been frozen in their wallets, rendering them unresponsive to any market shifts. Discussions are now underway regarding the method of liquidating the debtors’ cryptocurrencies at market value on exchanges. This includes deliberations on whether KDIC will assume ownership of the cryptocurrencies and directly proceed with their sale.In a chat with Herald Economy, Lawmaker Kim emphasized the need for KDIC to have the authority to access information from virtual asset service providers. This would enable them to more effectively retrieve assets from responsible debtors. Kim further stated that such steps would enhance both the efficiency of debt collection and overall market fairness.

Regulatory crackdown as Hong Kong authorities act against crypto entitiesIn a recent move, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong has issued a public warning against suspected virtual asset-related frauds involving HongKongDAO and BitCuped, marking a significant crackdown on deceptive practices in the crypto space.The action taken by the SFC in conjunction with the Hong Kong Police Force was outlined in a notice published on Wednesday. The notice stated:“The SFC suspects HongKongDAO may be disseminating false and misleading information about itself and its business through online channels.”In relation to BitCuped, it stated: “The SFC notes that BitCuped claims on its website that ‘Laura Cha’ and ‘Nicolas Aguzin’ serve as its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer respectively, when in fact none of them has any affiliations with BitCuped.”Photo by Teodor Kuduschiev on UnsplashHongKongDAO’s alleged misinformationOperating under the name “Hong Kong Digital Research Institute,” HongKongDAO has faced accusations of disseminating false and misleading information. The SFC expressed concerns about the claims made by HongKongDAO, including assertions of licensing by the SFC, engagement in regulated activities since July 2020, and bids for a “Hong Kong Digital Currency Exchange Licence” related to the government’s stablecoins framework.The SFC contends that these claims are unfounded and could potentially mislead the public into believing that HongKongDAO’s services are officially sanctioned and legitimate.HongKongDAO seems to manage at least two Telegram groups, one in Chinese with over 10,000 members and the other in English with over 1,700 members. Within these groups, there appears to be a promotion of the purported “market” price and future market value of the HKD token, enticing investors to make purchases.Allegations of BitCuped false affiliationsSimultaneously, BitCuped has been accused of making fraudulent claims to enhance the credibility of its operations. The company falsely asserted affiliations with prominent figures Laura Cha and Nicolas Aguzin, claiming them as its chairman and CEO, respectively. However, the SFC has refuted these affiliations. Laura Cha is the Chairman of Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX), while Nicolas Aguzin is the Executive Director and CEO of HKEX.Taking proactive measures, the SFC has requested the Hong Kong Police Force to block access to the websites of both HongKongDAO and BitCuped. Cease and desist letters have also been issued to the operators of these websites, demanding the cessation of the sale of HKD Tokens offered by HongKongDAO.Series of crypto scamsFollowing the JPEX fraud allegations in September, Hong Kong faced another cryptocurrency exchange scandal involving Hounax in November. With at least 145 police reports filed and a sum of over HK$148 million ($19 million) involved, affected investors expressed frustration at what they deemed a slow response from regulatory bodies.These incidents have reignited discussions about the need for more robust cryptocurrency regulations in Hong Kong. The city’s aspiration to become a global hub for crypto innovation and adoption faces challenges due to a lack of clear and consistent regulation, leaving investors vulnerable to fraud and manipulation.In light of these developments, the SFC emphasized the importance of public caution regarding investment opportunities that seem too good to be true. The regulator urged vigilance against social media and instant messaging platforms where individuals, not investment professionals, might lure unsuspecting investors.