MARBLEX Token to Be Listed on Japanese Crypto Exchange Zaif Next Week

OKX Entering Indian Market With a Focus on Web3Cryptocurrency exchange OKX is gearing up to make its presence felt in the Indian market.Local recruitmentThat’s according to a discussion between a company executive and CoinDesk, as explained by the publication in a report published on Friday. The firm plans on recruiting local employees in its endeavor to conquer the market within the world’s most populous nation.OKX intends to rely on local employees who will spearhead its initiatives in the country. Haider Rafique, Chief Marketing Officer at OKX explained:“We’re trying to identify who’s who in the zoo and what is their contribution. There’s a large developer community. How do we help them? Build a relationship with them.”He believes that adopting a community-centric approach will pave the way for a successful entry into the local market. Rafique emphasized:“We’re going to learn about the community. We’re going to work with local folks — figure out where we can add value.”Photo by Naveed Ahmed on UnsplashFocusing on Web3 applicationsThe company also intends to take on the challenge by placing emphasis on the use of Web3 applications. Rafique revealed the company’s ambitious plans to scale up its wallet services “exponentially” by engaging with India’s developer community. Currently, there are approximately 200,000 OKX Wallet users in India, accounting for just 5% of the country’s Web3 user base.In a recent collaboration, OKX partnered with the blockchain platform Neo for an APAC Hackathon held in Bengaluru, a city in southern India. Rafique described this move as a strategic test to validate assumptions, understand the local culture, and support the burgeoning Web3 ecosystem.The global exchange already has a physical presence in world centers such as Hong Kong, Singapore, Dubai, and the Bahamas.Indian crypto environmentTrading cryptocurrencies is currently legal in India, albeit with no established regulatory framework by a central authority. Ironically India has been very active in working towards the establishment of global regulatory standards relative to crypto while coming in for criticism from its Supreme Court recently for the government’s failure to provide regulatory clarity at home.Cryptocurrencies are used and traded at the investor’s risk in India and do not hold legal tender status for banking purposes. Additionally, a 30% tax is imposed on cryptocurrency transactions in the country.Rafique believes that Indian regulators are gradually distinguishing Web3 from centralized finance (CeFi). He remarked: “They’re more concerned about venues that have fiat on-ramps, which we do but don’t offer it in India.” He expressed a readiness for the company to become a front-runner once India establishes a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies.It’s interesting to note that while OKX embarks on expanding its footprint within the Indian market, Indian crypto market incumbents have been looking to downsize. Indian cryptocurrency exchanges like CoinSwitch and CoinDCX have faced layoffs amid the current market downturn.Notwithstanding current market conditions, it’s likely that OKX is taking a long-term view and positioning itself for future success in what should be a very important crypto asset marketplace in the future.Ryan Selkis, CEO and Founder of crypto market intelligence firm Messari expressed this view, stating: “I love to see companies like OKX expanding in India. The largest democracy in the world should be a haven for crypto innovation in the years to come.”

North Korean Hackers Take Off With $100M Atomic Wallet HoneypotHaving reported last week on a $35 million hack of Atomic Wallet users’ funds, an update on the matter reveals that the situation is much worse than originally thought, with losses now exceeding $100 million.Photo by Kenny Eliason on Unsplash5,500 wallets compromisedThe attack has sent shockwaves throughout the crypto community, raising concerns about the security of decentralized wallets. Atomic Wallet, an Estonia-based project known for its non-custodial approach where users take full responsibility for storing their assets securely, has been hit hard by this unforeseen breach.Elliptic, a crypto compliance analysis company, published an update on the situation on Tuesday. According to that blog article, it estimates that approximately 5,500 crypto wallets have been compromised, meaning that losses have risen to more than $100 million, highlighting the severity of the attack.Despite the significant impact on users, Atomic Wallet has yet to provide an explanation regarding the root cause of these substantial losses. Users have taken to social media in frustration, demanding clarification from the company. Surprisingly, the company’s last direct update on Twitter dates back to June 7, leaving users feeling even more anxious.User frustrationOne user, Ezra Carlson, expressed frustration, questioning why Atomic Wallet didn’t warn users when they were aware of the ongoing hack. Carlson tweeted: “@AtomicWallet why won’t AM give me a straight answer about why they didn’t warn me, knowing full well that they were being hacked, that it was not safe to use AM last week before I made a transfer to my wallet that was then hacked.”Another user, “Real Deal Crypto,” criticized Atomic Wallet’s lack of updates, stating: “Your last update was five days ago — SERIOUSLY?!?!”Although Atomic Wallet acknowledged reports of compromised wallets on June 3, downplaying the impact by claiming that less than 1% of users were affected, the staggering sum of losses indicates a significant breach. Its last communication on the matter came on June 11 when, in responding to a user, the firm said that it continued to investigate and to await Twitter updates on the matter.Hack tied to North Korea’s Lazarus GroupElliptic has connected this heist to the notorious Lazarus Group, a cyber-criminal organization with ties to the North Korean regime, responsible for stealing over $2 billion in crypto assets through various thefts. This attribution marks the first time a significant crypto heist has been openly linked to the Lazarus Group since their $100 million exploit of Horizon Bridge in June 2022.In response to the heist, Elliptic has been collaborating with international investigators and exchanges, mobilizing resources to recover the stolen assets. Their efforts have reportedly led to the freezing of over $1 million worth of funds. However, the thief has adapted its behavior in response to the freezing of assets, turning to the Russia-based Garantex exchange to launder the stolen assets, as noted by Elliptic.This recent attack adds to a series of notable breaches in the crypto industry. Jimbos Protocol experienced an exploit resulting in a loss of $7.5 million, and Tornado Cash faced a malicious proposal that seized control of its governance in May. According to a report by Chainalysis, crypto hackers made off with an estimated $3.8 billion in 2022, with North Korea being responsible for a significant portion of the attacks.

South Korean financial regulators have decided, at least for the time being, to maintain the current policy requiring cryptocurrency exchanges to partner with only one bank, according to a report from the Seoul Economic Daily.Photo by POURIA 🦋 on UnsplashDominance and money laundering concernsA government official cited concerns that allowing multiple banking relationships could potentially strengthen market dominance by leading platforms and increase money laundering risks. Regulators plan to revisit the issue after monitoring new developments following upcoming regulations that will permit institutional participation in the crypto market. This decision runs counter to a recent proposal put forward by the People Power Party (PPP) ahead of the presidential election that seeks to eliminate the one-bank-per-exchange requirement. Bizwatch reported that while the crypto industry initially supported the removal of this restriction unanimously, opinions have recently diverged among market participants. Divided industryMajor exchanges offering Korean won-based trading are mostly against the potential policy change. Except for Upbit, the country's largest platform, competitors express concern that modifying the rules could weaken their existing banking relationships if more financial institutions choose to partner with the market leader. Conversely, crypto-only exchanges, which cannot offer Korean won trading services, generally favor eliminating banking restrictions. These platforms believe relaxed regulations could create more opportunities to establish banking partnerships. Under current rules, virtual asset service providers must secure real-name accounts from a local bank to offer Korean won trading, placing those without such accounts at a competitive disadvantage. Banks also want changeKorean commercial banks align with crypto-only exchanges in supporting the easing of banking regulations. Jung Jin-wan, CEO of key financial institution Woori Bank, recently called for allowing multiple banks to serve individual crypto exchanges. He argues that the current one-bank-per-exchange system not only undermines systemic stability but also limits customer choice. While an official from a crypto-to-fiat exchange acknowledged the need for eventual reform of the one-bank-per-exchange system to improve customer options and market development, they also pointed out that industry stakeholders hold different views depending on their position in the market. The official said that dominant platforms perceive minimal practical benefits from permitting multiple banking relationships.