Top

Korea’s Legislative Research Body Suggests Expanding Blind Trust System to Include Crypto

Policy & Regulation·September 20, 2023, 4:49 AM

The National Assembly Research Service (NARS) of South Korea last Friday issued a report emphasizing the need to broaden the scope of the country’s blind trust system for public officials. Currently, this system primarily covers traditional stocks, but the report highlights the necessity of extending its coverage to include cryptocurrencies.

Photo by O-seop Sim on Pexels

 

Public Service Ethics Act

Under the existing Public Service Ethics Act, public officials holding a rank of 4 or higher within the finance department of the Ministry of Economy and Finance and the Financial Services Commission are mandated to either divest themselves of stocks linked to their official duties and responsibilities or transfer them into a blind trust if the total value of these stocks exceeds KRW 30 million (about $23,000).

 

Blind trust

A blind trust is a mechanism through which a public official transfers their stock holdings to a trustee. Subsequently, the trustee handles these entrusted stocks by exchanging them for other assets and overseeing their management, administration, and disposition. Importantly, the original owner of the stock, who is the public official, is barred from participating in these aspects of the trust and is also kept uninformed about the trust property’s status or details.

 

Debate over expansion

The current policy confines the blind trust framework exclusively to stocks. Nevertheless, there is an ongoing debate advocating for the inclusion of other assets, such as virtual assets and real estate, within its scope. The rationale behind this argument is that these types of assets can also potentially give rise to conflicts of interest. However, counterarguments have been raised, expressing concerns that extending the blind trust to these assets could excessively limit the property rights of public officials. Consequently, as of now, this broader application has not been implemented.

 

Comparison with the US

The Korean blind trust system was inspired by the United States’ Ethics in Government Act of 1978, which does not limit the types of assets that can be included in a blind trust. In the US, a blind trust can encompass not only stocks but also bonds, mutual funds, virtual assets, and real estate. In light of this, the report recommends the expansion of the blind trust system to encompass virtual assets and real estate. This step is proposed to prevent conflicts of interest among public officials pertaining to a wider array of asset types.

 

Enhancing trustee discretion

Meanwhile, NARS also argued for broadening the trustee’s discretion in trust management to render the system more reasonable. This stems from the concern that the existing uniform property sale approach could lead public servants to incur losses. NARS has proposed potential solutions, such as extending the time limit for property sales or mandating the sale of only a portion of the assets, as viable options to address this issue.

More to Read
View All
Web3 & Enterprise·

Nov 11, 2023

UBS extends crypto ETF access to clients in Hong Kong

UBS extends crypto ETF access to clients in Hong KongMultinational investment bank UBS Group AG has followed suit with competitors like HSBC, enabling its wealthy clients in Hong Kong to engage in the trading of select crypto-linked exchange-traded funds (ETFs).Photo by Pierre Borthiry — Peiobty on UnsplashRegulatory approval to offer three ETFsThis move, reported by Bloomberg on Thursday, aligns with Hong Kong’s efforts to establish itself as a prominent digital asset hub. Citing an undisclosed source, Bloomberg outlined that three crypto ETFs, namely the Samsung Bitcoin Futures Active, CSOP Bitcoin Futures and CSOP Ether Futures, have received approval from the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) and will be available on UBS’s Hong Kong platform starting this Friday.The inclusion of these ETFs allows UBS clients to diversify their investment portfolios, offering exposure to the dynamic crypto market. Educational materials will also be accessible to clients, aiding in their understanding of associated risks. While UBS declined to comment on this development, it marks a strategic move by the Swiss bank to tap into the growing demand for crypto-related investment products.In June, Hong Kong’s largest bank, HSBC, moved to expand its offering to include crypto ETFs. It has made available the very same crypto ETFs as UBS is about to offer.Hong Kong’s crypto credentialsHong Kong introduced a comprehensive digital asset regulatory regime on June 1, aiming to safeguard investors while fostering the Chinese autonomous territory’s emergence as a digital financial center. The SFC permits retail investors to trade major tokens on licensed exchanges under these regulations.Despite these regulatory advancements, Hong Kong faced setbacks, notably with the recent issues surrounding the unlicensed JPEX exchange, which led to increased scrutiny. The establishment of a joint task force between the SFC and the police aims to monitor and prevent suspicious activities within the crypto industry.Globally, financial institutions remain cautious about compliance risks in the crypto sector. However, signs of increased engagement are emerging. DBS, Singapore’s largest bank, has expressed its intention to seek a license to offer crypto services to Hong Kong customers. ZA Bank, the largest virtual bank in Hong Kong, plans to provide token-to-fiat currency conversions over licensed platforms. Furthermore, SEBA Bank, backed by the Julius Baer Group, has obtained a license for its unit to offer crypto services in Hong Kong.Unlocking ETF potentialA report published by the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in April claimed that crypto ETFs possess the potential to unlock the next phase of digital asset expansion in Asia. Earlier this week, it emerged that regulators were open to the notion of allowing retail access to spot crypto ETFs in Hong Kong, provided that the necessary regulatory approvals and checks were in place.The inclusion of the CSOP Bitcoin Futures and CSOP Ether Futures funds on UBS’s platform highlights the gradual recovery of the crypto sector from the market rout experienced in 2022. Despite the previous market challenges and collapses, the prospect of the U.S. allowing its first spot Bitcoin ETFs has contributed to a resurgence in the largest token’s price this year. The move by UBS aligns with the broader trend of financial institutions cautiously embracing the crypto economy, indicating a shifting attitude toward these digital assets in the financial mainstream.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Sep 08, 2023

HashKey Enhances User Security with Exchange Insurance Partnership

HashKey Enhances User Security with Exchange Insurance PartnershipHong Kong-based cryptocurrency exchange HashKey has taken a step towards bolstering its users’ security by signing a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with fintech firm OneDegree to provide insurance coverage for digital assets held on the platform.Photo by Manson Yim on UnsplashIndustry-wide significanceThat’s according to a report in local news media on Wednesday. The move represents a positive development not only for HashKey users, as it extends protection to both hot wallets and cold storage addresses, but for the overall crypto space.After the trail of destruction left by a series of high-profile crypto collapses in 2022, the overarching crypto space has been crying out for adequate solutions that reassure crypto market participants that their funds are safe when placed on centralized crypto platforms. In the traditional banking world, in most jurisdictions there are insurance-based schemes that guarantee a certain percentage or level of depositors funds. In many cases, these schemes are backed by the central government.Asian crypto market participants have been hit harder than most due to these collapses having nothing in place in terms of deposit safeguards. In Singapore, crypto lenders Vauld and Hodlnaut failed, leaving deposit shortfalls. The city-state’s residents were particularly hard hit when it came to FTX as many Singaporeans had opted to use the exchange given that the authorities had banned Binance from trading there.Xiaoqi Weng, the Chief Operating Officer of HashKey, emphasized the company’s commitment to fortifying its financial, technical, and service infrastructure to offer customers comprehensive protection. The goal is not only to enhance user security but also to contribute to the overall development of Hong Kong’s digital asset ecosystem.Mitigating riskYanlin Guo, Co-founder of OneDegree, underscored the importance of establishing a robust framework for cryptocurrencies that includes insurance to identify and mitigate potential risks effectively. This collaboration between HashKey and OneDegree aims to provide added peace of mind to cryptocurrency investors who entrust their assets to the exchange.HashKey achieved a significant milestone on August 3 when it became the first cryptocurrency exchange to receive regulatory licensing from the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission, enabling it to offer services to retail investors. Subsequently, on August 28, the exchange launched its trading services, albeit with relatively low trading volumes.Currently, HashKey Hong Kong supports the trading of Bitcoin and Ethereum, with no options for margin trading or cryptocurrency derivatives. Nevertheless, the exchange accepts fiat deposits in both US dollars and Hong Kong dollars from authorized financial institutions worldwide.The issue of user insurance has been a contentious topic in the cryptocurrency industry, with various exchanges offering different levels of protection. Some exchanges provide no insurance beyond a contractual claim to users’ assets in the event of bankruptcy. Others offer insurance solely for fiat deposits, while a select few, such as Binance and Bitget, extend coverage to crypto-related incidents.HashKey has answered a market need by integrating this insurance product into its trading service. It’s likely that other platforms will follow suit in the not-too-distant future.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Oct 20, 2023

Regulatory Caution Among Asian Nations Amid Reports of Illicit Financing

Regulatory Caution Among Asian Nations Amid Reports of Illicit FinancingWith a plethora of reports of crypto-related terrorist financing having been published in recent weeks, it’s understood that Asian nations may be looking to exercise caution when it comes to the current ongoing process of establishing regulatory guidelines for crypto.That’s according to a report published by the South China Morning Post (SCMP) on Thursday. The use of cryptocurrency by Hamas to fund its attack on Israel is being seen as the catalyst that may drive authorities in various Asian nations to take a more cautious approach to regulating digital currencies, according to analysts cited by the publication.Raj Kapoor, the founder of India Blockchain Alliance (IBA), commented on these recent developments, stating:”It is a kick on the backside for most governments. All regulatory bodies will take a closer look at crypto regulation. Governments will need to start implementing new rules and regulations.”At the recent G20 summit held in New Delhi, a joint declaration called for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of crypto assets, among other measures. The declaration emphasized the importance of supporting “a coordinated and comprehensive policy and regulatory framework.”Kapoor stressed the importance of revisiting the declaration and developing solutions to implement its objectives.Photo by Adolfo Félix on UnsplashRenewed scrutinyEvents in Palestine in recent weeks have led to renewed scrutiny when it comes to monitoring illicit financing activity via cryptocurrency. Only days following the recent Hamas attack, Israeli authorities moved to freeze specified crypto accounts.That scrutiny has continued in recent days, with more accounts having been frozen on crypto platforms such as Binance, while more still have been identified as suspicious, with requests for further information having been submitted in respect of over 200 additional accounts.On Wednesday it emerged that the United States Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) had sanctioned a Gaza-based crypto platform.Potential over-reactionWhile crypto-related terrorist financing has been widely publicized, blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis warned on Wednesday that crypto’s role in this illicit activity has likely been overstated. In its blog post on the subject, the firm stated:“Although terrorism financing is a very small portion of the already very small portion of cryptocurrency transaction volume that is illicit, some terrorist organizations raise, store, and transfer funds using cryptocurrency.”Additionally, Chainalysis stated that it had seen “overstated metrics and flawed analyses of these terrorist groups’ use of cryptocurrency.” Peter Van Valkenburgh, Director of Research at non-profit crypto advocacy group Coin Center, also believes that reporting on the matter is not balanced. Taking to X, he stated:“Sensational early reporting on the scale of Hamas crypto fundraising significantly misstated the amounts involved.”Coin Center’s Director of Communications, Neeraj Agrawal, highlighted an article which claimed that crypto “fueled Hamas’ terror attack on Israel” in its title, only to reveal within the body of the article that “cryptocurrency is still far from the largest funding source for terrorism.”Anndy Lian, a Singapore-based author and inter-governmental blockchain adviser, noted that while some countries may consider banning cryptocurrencies as a solution, this could merely drive illicit financing underground and make it more challenging to trace and halt. Lian argued that cryptocurrencies are traceable and trackable, unlike traditional fiat currencies like US dollars.

news
Loading