Top

HKMA Issues Warning Against Crypto Firm Misrepresentation

Policy & Regulation·September 19, 2023, 1:02 AM

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), the central bank for the Chinese autonomous territory, has taken a stand against cryptocurrency businesses that falsely present themselves as “banks” and market their products as “deposits,” issuing a public advisory to raise awareness about the issue.

Photo by Marcel Eberle on Unsplash

 

Banking ordinance violations

In a press release published to its website on Friday, the HKMA said that instances had arisen where crypto firms had labeled themselves as “crypto banks,” “crypto asset banks,” and “digital trading banks.” The regulatory authority underscored that such misrepresentations could be in violation of the Banking Ordinance in Hong Kong.

In addition to adopting misleading bank-related titles, these crypto firms have been advertising “savings plans” as “low risk” with “high return,” potentially misleading the public into believing that these entities are authorized banks in Hong Kong, where they can securely deposit their funds.

The HKMA stressed that only entities such as licensed banks, restricted license banks, and deposit-taking companies, collectively referred to as “authorized institutions” and holding a license granted by the HKMA, are legally permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong.

Furthermore, funds held on crypto exchanges are not covered by Hong Kong’s Deposit Protection Scheme. “Under the Banking Ordinance, only licensed banks, restricted license banks and deposit-taking companies, which have been granted a license by the HKMA can carry out banking or deposit-taking business in Hong Kong,” the HKMA stated.

 

Misuse of banking terms

Any entity using the term “bank” in its business name or implying that it offers banking services in Hong Kong is committing an offense, according to the central bank. The same rule applies to any entity engaging in deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong or soliciting the public to make deposits.

It’s important to note that crypto firms not officially recognized as banks in Hong Kong are not subject to the oversight of the HKMA.

The HKMA advised the public to exercise caution. In cases of uncertainty regarding an entity claiming to be a bank or soliciting deposits in Hong Kong, individuals are encouraged to consult the register of authorized institutions on the HKMA’s website, and if doubts persist, it suggests that they should contact the authority via its Public Enquiry Service hotline.

According to section 97 of the Banking Ordinance, only a bank or a central bank can use the term “bank” or its derivatives in its business name in Hong Kong without the written consent of the HKMA.

Additionally, sections 11 and 12 of the Banking Ordinance stipulate that only entities possessing a valid banking license or recognized as authorized institutions are permitted to engage in banking or deposit-taking activities in Hong Kong. As per section 92 of the Banking Ordinance, only an authorized institution is authorized to issue advertisements inviting the public to make deposits, with certain exceptions.

The HKMA’s advisory serves as a stern reminder to the crypto industry that regulatory compliance and transparency are essential, particularly when using terms associated with traditional banking, to protect the interests of the public.

More to Read
View All
Policy & Regulation·

Sep 15, 2023

Singapore’s Regulator Imposes 9-Year Ban on 3AC Founders

Singapore’s Regulator Imposes 9-Year Ban on 3AC FoundersSingapore’s central bank and financial regulator, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), has handed down a nine-year prohibition order to Kyle Davies and Su Zhu, co-founders of the failed crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC).Photo by Swapnil Bapat on UnsplashSevere restrictionsThe penalty relates to alleged violations of the city-state’s securities laws. The prohibition order came into effect on Wednesday, carrying severe restrictions for Davies and Zhu.During this nine-year period, Davies and Zhu are prohibited from engaging in any regulated activities in Singapore. They are also barred from managing, serving as directors, or holding substantial shares in any capital market services business within the territory of Singapore.Loo Siew Yee, the Assistant Managing Director of Policy, Payments, and Financial Crime at MAS, emphasized the seriousness of the violations in a statement released by the central bank on Thursday. Yee stated:“MAS takes a serious view of Mr. Zhu’s and Mr. Davies’ flagrant disregard of MAS’ regulatory requirements and dereliction of their directors’ duties.” She further asserted that MAS would take action against senior managers who engage in such misconduct.Securities law violationsMAS’s decision to impose these sanctions on the 3AC co-founders was based on its findings of further securities law violations during investigations into 3AC and its founders. The regulatory authority accused Davies and Zhu of failing to inform MAS when 3AC hired a new business representative, providing false information to the regulator, and neglecting to establish an appropriate risk management framework.3AC’s troubles stemmed from the crypto market crash that occurred last year, triggered by the Terra ecosystem’s collapse. The hedge fund’s leveraged crypto positions exposed it to billions in loan defaults, resulting in significant financial losses. Its lack of risk management had a cascading effect in crypto. Lenders like Celsius and BlockFi had exposure to 3AC, leading to further collapses later in 2022 as a consequence.3AC’s creditors claim that the firm owes as much as $3.5 billion, and liquidators are now seeking to recover approximately $1.3 billion from Zhu and Davies, who allegedly incurred the debt when the firm was already insolvent.Regulatory reprimandsThis action by MAS follows last June’s reprimand of 3AC, which occurred just before the hedge fund filed for bankruptcy amid widely reported insolvency issues. At that time, MAS had criticized 3AC for providing false information, failing to report directorship changes involving Zhu and Davies, and exceeding the legal assets under management threshold.It’s just the latest reprimand the duo have received from a regulator this year, though. Zhu and Davies have been busy in trying to get another start-up off the ground. Earlier this year, they launched OPNX, a crypto bankruptcy claims trading platform. The venture is based out of Dubai, and the firm reported in April that it had gotten significant VC backing.Many of those that the company claimed were backing the venture disassociated themselves from those claims. The following month, the Dubai regulator, the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), reprimanded the OPNX founders, having issued an investor alert relative to the firm a few weeks prior to that. VARA's complaint was that the business had been operating without having acquired the appropriate licensing.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Aug 04, 2023

Hong Kong Lawmaker Explores Digital Asset Links With Mainland

Hong Kong Lawmaker Explores Digital Asset Links With MainlandIn a move aimed at bolstering its position as a rising global Web3 hub, Hong Kong Legislative Council member Johnny Ng has expressed his aspiration to foster greater collaboration between digital asset platforms in Hong Kong and a Shanghai-based exchange.Photo by Simon Zhu on UnsplashDigital asset exchange interconnectivityAs Hong Kong continues to position itself as a key player in the emerging Web3 landscape, Ng envisions a future where licensed virtual asset exchanges in Hong Kong could be interconnected with their counterparts in Shanghai.Ng’s remarks came during an interview with Chinese media outlet The Paper. Drawing a parallel with the established Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect program that seamlessly connects the stock markets of both cities, Ng raised the question of whether a similar connection could be established for licensed digital asset exchanges. Ng’s idea hinges on the potential to bridge appropriate platforms in Shanghai with those licensed in Hong Kong for virtual asset trading.Interconnected talent poolThe lawmaker’s enthusiasm for interconnectivity also extends to the talent pool. He expressed his desire for more Web3 talent exchanges between Hong Kong and the mainland, recognizing Shanghai’s status as a financial hub boasting numerous exceptional financial enterprises.Hong Kong’s approach to the Web3 landscape stands in contrast to mainland China’s stringent cryptocurrency regulations. While China banned cryptocurrency transactions in 2021, Hong Kong has embraced crypto firms, even encouraging partnerships between these firms and local banks.This year, Hong Kong authorities unveiled a series of cryptocurrency-related policy statements, aimed at fortifying its stature as a global financial center. A significant step followed in December, when the Hong Kong Legislative Council passed an amendment introducing a comprehensive licensing framework for virtual asset service providers (VASPs).In a recent development underscoring Hong Kong’s pro-crypto stance, HashKey and OSL have become the pioneering recipients of licenses for retail trading under the new regulatory regime, which commenced on June 1.Differing policy approachesPeople following developments in crypto and Web3 in China and East Asia have been speculating if the strategic positive shift in Hong Kong towards developing as a regional hub relative to the sector is indicative of a softening in the approach of mainland China towards the industry. It appears that Hong Kong’s pursuit of crypto business has been sanctioned by Beijing.Commentators have been monitoring the emergence of further encouraging signals. In May, Chinese state television featured a segment that covered cryptocurrency and in particular Bitcoin. Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) was sufficiently encouraged by the development to suggest that it was “a big deal,” although the clip was later removed from the broadcaster’s website.Ng’s proposal aligns with the broader narrative of Hong Kong’s ambitious push into the Web3 landscape, capitalizing on its favorable regulatory environment to attract crypto-related ventures. As discussions evolve around the potential interconnectivity between Hong Kong and Shanghai’s digital asset exchanges, the global cryptocurrency community watches with interest to see if there are any emerging signs that Beijing will reciprocate positively.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Dec 31, 2024

Legislator calls for Bitcoin reserve in Hong Kong

In an interview with local media, Hong Kong legislator Johnny Ng called for the Chinese autonomous territory to implement a national Bitcoin reserve. Ng made the comments in a discussion with Hong Kong-based state-owned Chinese language media outlet, Wenweipo. The legislator believes that there is an opportunity for Hong Kong to take advantage of China’s “one country, two systems” approach to governance, which gives it the freedom to implement such a reserve despite mainland China remaining much less enthusiastic where Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are concerned.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashSpot Bitcoin ETF impactThe Hong Kong Legislative Council member suggested that as a first step, Hong Kong needs to assess the impact that spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the United States have had. Spot Bitcoin ETFs were launched in the U.S. in January. The leading spot Bitcoin ETF, IBIT, provided by asset manager BlackRock, has achieved a growth rate five times faster than any other ETF launched in the past. El Salvador and the Kingdom of Bhutan are examples of nations that have made Bitcoin a significant component within their national reserves. A recent report suggests that El Salvador currently holds 6,000 Bitcoin which it purchased at an average price of $45,465. In November, Arkham Intelligence reported that Bhutan was holding Bitcoin with a dollar value which had exceeded $1 billion at that time. Ng also referred to a move by individual states in the U.S. towards holding Bitcoin as a reserve asset. In August, the state of Wisconsin increased its holdings of shares in BlackRock’s spot Bitcoin ETF, IBIT. Last month, the state of Pennsylvania introduced a bill to make Bitcoin a strategic asset. Ohio has proposed similar legislation while Alabama’s State Auditor, Andrew Sorrell, has suggested that his state should establish a Bitcoin reserve. Reducing price volatilityNg believes that furthering the Chinese autonomous territory’s dealings relative to Bitcoin could prove beneficial, given that Bitcoin has the potential to play a role in attracting more talent and investment to Hong Kong. Additionally, he feels that the development of Bitcoin reserves at state level could help in reducing the price volatility of the asset as it goes through the process of global adoption. The Hong Kong lawmaker also believes that there is an opportunity for the Chinese antonymous territory to benefit from first mover advantage, stating that “the value of Bitcoin will be more stable, causing more and more other countries to follow suit and reduce their holdings of traditional assets.” Ng's latest interview follows a similar comment he made on X in July, where he suggested that Bitcoin is worth considering as an official financial reserve for a country. David Bailey, CEO of Bitcoin Magazine, took to X stating: “Hong Kong making moves, SBR here we go. President Trump must make the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve his top priority the day he enters the White House.”In recent days, soundings from Japan and Russia suggested that neither of these countries was prepared to establish Bitcoin reserves. However, just like with the advent of the Bitcoin ETF in the U.S., following Trump’s expression of interest in the establishment of a strategic Bitcoin reserve, the level of consideration of the matter has increased considerably among governments around the world.

news
Loading