Top

Amber Group calls for crypto project transparency & accountability

Web3 & Enterprise·August 06, 2024, 6:51 AM

At the end of last month, social derivatives trading platform ZKX, a protocol that runs on the Ethereum-centric Starknet layer-2 network, shut down blindsiding the project’s stakeholders. That event has led to Singapore-headquartered digital assets firm Amber Group speaking out, calling for cryptocurrency projects to be more accountable and transparent going forward.

 

Not economically viable

News of the project shutdown emerged when ZKX founder Eduard Jubany Tur took to X on July 30 to outline the discontinuation of the protocol. Tur claimed that the project was “unable to find an economically viable path for the protocol.” In a long-form post, the ZKX founder outlined that user engagement had been minimal, resulting in disappointing trading volumes. By extension, Tur claimed that revenues didn’t come anywhere close to covering cloud server expenses. “The market is undervaluing the work done and infrastructure built by appchains and dApps coming from ecosystems like ours,” Tur added.

 

Pseudonymous blockchain sleuth ZachXBT had a different take on the matter, claiming that the shutdown represented a rug pull. Amber Group chimed in on the subject on X on Aug. 3. Amber suggested that it wouldn’t break any contractual non-disclosure obligations it had with regard to ZKX but that aside, the firm took the opportunity to share its perspective more broadly in an effort to promote transparency.

https://asset.coinness.com/en/news/f6af5b8e78ed4419f39f198aba4a6e2c.webp
Photo by Markus Spiske on Pexels

Amber Group criticism

Amber Group criticized the ZKX team on the basis of a lack of transparency. It stated:

 

“The last update we received was on July 30, when the project announced the cessation of operations. This decision was made without prior communication, highlighting the importance of transparency in our industry.”

 

Staying with that theme, it claimed that clear communication and transparency are essential for fostering trust and collaboration within the crypto community, and that such principles would guide future projects.

 

Amber Group had acted as a market maker relative to the ZKX project. It borrowed and purchased ZKX tokens in support of the launch of the token and in an effort to support token liquidity post-launch. It had secured two million ZKX tokens from the open market, with its overall holding totaling three million ZKX tokens.

 

Project investor HashKey Capital also took to the X social media platform on the subject. Like Amber Group it too criticized the ZKX project for its lack of accountability and transparency. It described the project’s reluctance to communicate as “disappointing,” while it asserted that Tur’s handling of the situation had been “regrettable.”

 

Ye Su, founding partner at ArkStream Capital, expressed a similar complaint, stating on X that “when ZKX shut down, as investors, we got zero heads-up.” He also singled out Tur, claiming that “Edward took the money from early supporters without any communication, showing no moral standards and losing his right to future entrepreneurship in the industry.”




More to Read
View All
Web3 & Enterprise·

Oct 19, 2023

OSL Parent Company Denies Sale Plans

OSL Parent Company Denies Sale PlansBC Technology Group, a Hong Kong-based investment holding company, has firmly denied recent reports suggesting it is exploring the sale of its licensed digital asset business, OSL, for up to HK$1 billion (US$137.3 million).Photo by Nextvoyage on PexelsCompany stock plummetsThis comes in response to a report that emerged via Bloomberg on Monday. The news of the possible sale had a significant impact on the company’s stock, which plummeted by over 22% to HK$3.35 the following day.BC Technology Group, which has been listed on the Hong Kong stock exchange since 2012, is the parent company of OSL. The reports hinted at the possibility of selling off parts of the business, citing undisclosed sources.In response to these rumors, BC Technology Group issued a formal statement to clarify the situation, deeming the article “factually inaccurate and highly misleading.” It vehemently refuted any intention to sell OSL, a key player in the cryptocurrency exchange sector.First licensed exchangeOSL was the first cryptocurrency exchange to be licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) in Hong Kong in 2020, initially operated under a voluntary scheme and was limited to serving professional investors. However, the recent licensing requirement broadened its scope, allowing it to cater to retail investors as well, including popular cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum.Both OSL and HashKey had their licenses upgraded this year, enabling them to serve retail investors as per the new policy. However, the reception to this new regulatory framework has been somewhat lukewarm, with only five local exchanges applying for the new virtual asset trading platform (VATP) license. The SFC had to publish a list of applicants following a financial scandal involving the JPEX crypto exchange, which led to over 2,500 complaints and losses totaling approximately HK$1.5 billion.The backdrop of this unfolding situation is Hong Kong’s efforts to establish itself as a significant virtual asset hub. The city announced its ambition to transform into a hub for digital assets a year ago, drawing considerable attention from cryptocurrency exchanges. These efforts included implementing new regulations in June that mandated licensing for cryptocurrency exchanges.Several companies with connections to Hong Kong and mainland China have expressed their intent to obtain a license, potentially taking advantage of Hong Kong’s favorable stance toward virtual assets when compared to mainland China’s strict regulations.High compliance costsNonetheless, high compliance costs in Hong Kong continue to pose a barrier, potentially preventing the city from becoming the primary base of operations for crypto businesses. Industry insiders estimate that the cost of compliance from start to finish can be as high as HK$60 million for a company. Firms have reported that obtaining a trading license in Hong Kong can involve an outlay of between HK$20 million and HK$200 million.As per BC Technology Group’s mid-year report, the company reported a net loss of HK$94.7 million in the first half of 2023. This marked a notable improvement compared to the HK$312.1 million in losses during the same period the previous year. OSL remains a significant source of income for the company.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Jun 07, 2023

Atomic Wallet Hacker Uses Lazarus Crypto Mixer

Atomic Wallet Hacker Uses Lazarus Crypto MixerThe stolen cryptocurrency from the recent $35 million hack of Atomic Wallet is already being moved to a crypto mixer favored by North Korea’s notorious cyber-hacking group.Photo by Micha Brändli on UnsplashSinbad.ioAccording to UK-based crypto compliance analysis firm Elliptic, the funds have made their way to a crypto mixer used by Lazarus Group, a notorious hacker group that focuses on crypto heists which is believed to have direct ties with the North Korean government.On June 5, Elliptic’s Investigations Team revealed that it had traced the funds from the Atomic Wallet hack to the crypto mixer Sinbad.io. Lazarus had previously used the mixer to launder over $100 million in stolen crypto assets.While the exact amount sent to the mixer was not specified, Elliptic noted that the stolen funds were being exchanged for Bitcoin before undergoing obfuscation through the mixer. Additionally, Elliptic reported that Sinbad.io is likely a rebranded version of Blender.io, another mixer extensively used to launder funds by the Lazarus Group. Blender.io has been sanctioned by the US Treasury.Atomic Wallet hackThe hack of several user accounts on Atomic Wallet occurred on June 3, resulting in losses of up to $35 million. News of the issue broke with the following tweet from the project team (which has subsequently been deleted): “We have received reports of wallets being compromised. We are doing all we can to investigate and analyze the situation. As we have more information, we will share it accordingly.”In a follow-up tweet the next day, the team confirmed that it was investigating the matter with the assistance of a number of “leading security companies.”However, Atomic Wallet later downplayed the incident, stating that less than 1% of its monthly active users were affected. The project team was castigated by users for trying to present the hack as a minor incident. One user took to Twitter to call out the Atomic Wallet team for “having the nerve to come to the networks and say that only 1% of wallets were affected.”The Atomic Wallet project is based out of Tallinn, Estonia, having been founded in 2017. It claims to provide a non-custodial decentralized multi-currency crypto wallet. The product supports over fifty coins and two hundred tokens. It also offers atomic swaps between digital assets, while also supporting integrations with instant exchanges such as Changelly, ShapeShift, and others.Roland Säde, the Chief Marketing Officer of Atomic Wallet, assured users that the team is working tirelessly to recover the stolen funds. He emphasized the need to complete the investigation to develop a concrete plan.Despite the ongoing efforts, Säde urged victims to track the illicit transfers and report them to popular crypto exchanges. By doing so, it was thought that may hinder the scammers from exchanging the funds.Crypto hacking menaceLazarus Group hackers have been the bane of the crypto space in recent years. Elliptic released a report last month that identified Japan as having been the country most adversely affected by the North Korean hackers. It’s understood that the estimated $721 million in stolen crypto from Japan-based entities amounts to nearly nine times the value of North Korea’s exports based on 2021 data.While Atomic Wallet is directly reporting the incidents, Säde believes that having more individuals monitoring the hackers’ activities will make it more challenging for them to move the funds undetected. Unfortunately, Elliptic’s recent findings suggest that for many victims, it may already be too late to prevent further misuse of their stolen cryptocurrency.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Sep 16, 2025

SBI–Zodia venture to shut down amid Japan crypto regulatory hurdles

SBI Zodia Custody is discontinuing operations two years after its launch, Bloomberg reported. The joint venture was formed by Tokyo-based SBI Holdings and Zodia Custody, an institutional digital-asset platform backed by Standard Chartered, with ownership split 51% and 49% respectively.Photo by Haotian Zheng on UnsplashStrategic realignment behind exitAccording to people at the companies involved, the decision reflected shifting priorities at both partners. Zodia Custody chief executive Julian Sawyer described the move as a mutual alignment of strategy and said the company had prepared materials to seek local registration with Japan’s Financial Services Agency but had not filed an application before opting to exit. An SBI Holdings spokesperson said the dissolution did not signal a withdrawal from crypto custody or the company’s broader Asia strategy, describing the step instead as an effort to generate greater collective impact across SBI’s digital ecosystem. Security breaches shape regulatory climateThe retreat comes as overseas crypto businesses continue to face a cautious regulatory environment in Japan, a market shaped by several high-profile security breaches. Industry analyses have repeatedly noted that three of the largest crypto hacks targeted Japanese exchanges: Mt. Gox in 2014, Coincheck in 2018, and DMM Bitcoin in 2024. Mt. Gox lost about 850,000 BTC, now worth roughly $98 billion, and began making creditor repayments in July 2024 after years of legal proceedings. The repayment deadline was later extended to Oct. 31, 2025, and initial distributions totaled about 59,000 BTC, or just over 41% of the roughly 141,686 BTC earmarked for repayment, to an estimated 127,000 creditors. Coincheck’s 2018 breach involved what was then about $534 million in NEM tokens. Despite that episode, the company secured approval from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in November 2024 for a Nasdaq debut through a merger with Thunder Bridge. The transaction generated roughly $31.6 million in gross proceeds for the combined company. Moving forward, Coincheck is entering Europe through the acquisition of Aplo, a French-licensed digital asset brokerage. The most recent breach involved DMM Bitcoin, which had suspended operations after a May 2024 theft of more than 4,502.9 BTC. Its accounts and assets were transferred in March 2025 to SBI VC Trade, a cryptocurrency exchange owned by SBI Holdings, which said it would support 14 tokens previously listed on DMM that were not available on its own platform. Policy uncertainty as leadership shiftsAt the policy level, uncertainty is growing over Japan’s stance on crypto and blockchain following Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba’s Sept. 7 announcement that he will step down. Ishiba, who took office in October 2024, has advocated for digital assets, with his latest remarks delivered at the WebX2025 event. There, he pledged greater state support for Web3 initiatives, describing the sector as a driver of innovation that could help address demographic decline and support broader economic change. Last month, Finance Minister Katsunobu Katō, seen as a potential contender to succeed Ishiba, said cryptocurrency could play a role in a diversified investment portfolio, noting its growing user base in Japan. While recent surveys show Sanae Takaichi and Shinjiro Koizumi as the leading preferences for the next Liberal Democratic Party leader, Katō has emphasized the need to foster a stable trading environment for digital asset stakeholders, balancing investor protection with industry innovation. Within this policy climate, SBI Zodia Custody’s shutdown underscores the operational and licensing challenges facing foreign-linked crypto ventures in Japan. 

news
Loading