Nod to Gender Diversity as ZORIXchange Appoints Female CEO

FTX, the failed cryptocurrency exchange founded by Sam Bankman-Fried, has taken legal action by filing a lawsuit against four former employees of Salameda, a Hong Kong-based affiliate closely linked to the exchange’s former CEO.According to a Delaware bankruptcy court filing in the United States on Thursday, the lawsuit alleges that five individuals exploited their personal connections to prioritize their asset withdrawals from FTX during a period of uncertainty regarding the exchange’s stability. The defendants in question are Salameda’s former employees — Michael Burgess, Matthew Burgess, Kevin Nguyen, and Darren Wong — as well as Michael and Matthew’s mother, Lesley Burgess, and two companies: 3Twelve Ventures and BDK Consulting.Photo by Bermix Studio on Unsplash Preference period clawbackThe critical withdrawals occurred within the 90-day period leading up to FTX’s bankruptcy filing on November 11, commonly referred to as the “Preference Period.” Under US law, customers who withdrew their crypto assets during this timeframe could potentially face lawsuits from the exchange’s creditors seeking to recover these funds, a process known as a “clawback” under bankruptcy regulations.The total value of these suspicious transfers is estimated at $157.3 million, with more than $123 million of that sum withdrawn after November 7, 2022. Michael Burgess is alleged to have received around $73 million of these illicit withdrawals.The lawsuit claims that the individuals leveraged their connections within FTX Group to ensure preferential treatment over other customers. In a specific accusation, Matthew Burgess is said to have engaged other FTX Group employees to expedite certain withdrawal requests from his FTX US exchange accounts while falsely representing the accounts as his own. 11th hour withdrawalsIn this way, Burgess and the other four defendants managed to get funds out when most other FTX customers couldn’t. The final withdrawals were executed only hours before FTX.com suspended all withdrawals on November 8, 2022, according to the lawsuit. As one commentator on X put it, “FTX employees were manually reviewing large withdrawals & pushing some ahead.”The legal filing also delves into the significant profits the defendants reportedly accrued from trading cryptocurrencies in the months leading up to FTX’s collapse. Even after their apparent departure from the FTX Group, Michael Burgess, Nguyen, and Wong actively traded through entities such as 3Twelve and BDK, with monthly trading volumes ranging from $100 million to $400 million.A noteworthy aspect of this activity is that their trading capital was allegedly derived from the FTX Group. The court filing goes on to claim that “Burgess, Nguyen and Wong received substantial transfers of digital assets and fiat currency from exchange accounts associated with FTX Group entities, including approximately 13.1 million FTT sent to Darren Wong, more than 1 million SOL sent to Michael Burgess, and nearly $4 million USD for ‘bonuses’ between Michael Burgess, Nguyen and Wong.” Retail clawback riskThis legal battle and the allegations against the former Salameda employees are being watched closely by other FTX bankruptcy stakeholders. The FTX Debtor has suggested that it will pursue clawbacks vigorously. That has concerned former retail customers who managed to withdraw assets in the final days before the platform collapsed. Equally, it is a worry for current FTX creditors who may have withdrawn some but not all of their assets before the exchange was shuttered.

Chinese Official Gets Life Sentence on Crypto Mining-Related Corruption ChargesA former Chinese government official, Xiao Yi, has been handed a life sentence for engaging in illicit business activities connected to a $329 million Bitcoin mining venture, together with other unrelated acts of corruption, according to Cointelegraph.The Intermediate People’s Court of Hangzhou City declared the verdict on Tuesday, finding Xiao Yi guilty of corruption and abuse of power.Yi, previously associated with the Jiangxi Provincial Political Consultative Conference Party Group and holding the position of Vice Chairman, faced charges stemming from a range of offenses. The corruption allegations dated back to 2008 and extended till 2021, involving instances of bribery.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashAdditional abuse of power chargesSimultaneously, the abuse of power accusations spanned from 2017 to 2021 and centered around providing financial and electricity incentives to Jiumu Group Genesis Technology, a company headquartered in Fuzhou that once managed over 160,000 Bitcoin mining machines.Prosecutors contended that Yi took deliberate steps to conceal the extent of the mining operation. He was said to have directed relevant departments to falsify statistical reports and manipulate electricity consumption classifications. During the period between 2017 and 2020, the energy consumption attributed to Jiumu amounted to 10% of Fuzhou’s overall electricity usage.Moreover, Xiao Yi’s involvement in facilitating crypto mining activities as a Party Secretary of Fuzhou city between 2017 and 2021 led to significant losses to public property, national interests, and people’s interests. This underscores the broader consequences associated with his actions and their impact on the community.The court ruling disclosed: “Yi pleaded guilty and repented, actively returned the stolen funds, and all the bribes and their profits have been seized.”Crypto mining and trading prohibitionIn the context of China’s current cryptocurrency regulatory stance, all forms of cryptocurrency transactions, exchange operations, and fiat-to-crypto onboarding, together with crypto mining, are prohibited. However, direct ownership of cryptocurrencies is not explicitly banned. In a recent development on August 3, a Chinese court declared a $10 million Bitcoin lending contract null and void based on the nation’s Bitcoin restrictions, without the possibility of legal debt recovery.Another incident on August 14 led to the sentencing of a Chinese national to nine months in prison for facilitating the acquisition of Tether (USDT) by an acquaintance, earning a profit from the transaction.Xiao Yi’s case reflects the Chinese government’s ongoing efforts to enforce its stringent stance on cryptocurrency-related activities, including Bitcoin mining, which has garnered increasing attention due to its energy consumption and potential economic implications.Bitcoin mining was outlawed in China in 2021. Many of its miners left the country, establishing operations in places like Kazakhstan and in North America. However, it’s understood that there is still a significant level of mining activity ongoing in China despite the ban.The life sentence serves as a stark warning against illegal Bitcoin mining and financial misconduct, aligning with the Chinese government’s intention to maintain control over its financial sector and prevent unauthorized financial activities. The detailed revelations about Yi’s role in facilitating crypto mining activities highlight the broader implications of his actions on the public and national interests.

Korean Assembly Mandates Crypto Disclosure Amidst Lawmaker’s ScandalThe Korean National Assembly’s plenary session passed amendments to a couple of acts today that mandate lawmakers and senior government officials to report their cryptocurrency assets, according to news agency News1.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashAmendments to two actsIn an afternoon session, the National Assembly passed two amendments: one to the National Assembly Act and another to the Public Service Ethics Act.The amendment to the National Assembly Act, which had been approved by the Special Committee on Political Reform on Monday, specifically addresses the issue of cryptocurrencies and their potential conflict of interest for lawmakers. Likewise, the amendment to the Public Service Ethics Act, which had been approved by the Public Administration and Security Committee on Monday, imposes a requirement on lawmakers and high-level civil servants to disclose their cryptocurrency holdings.Mandatory crypto disclosureConsequently, starting from the 22nd National Assembly, lawmakers will be obligated to disclose their cryptocurrency assets. Additionally, the current 21st National Assembly will be required to disclose the cryptocurrencies they held and traded between the beginning of their term and May 31 of this year, with the disclosure deadline set for the end of June.A lawmaker’s crypto scandalThese legislative actions were prompted by allegations surrounding lawmaker Kim Nam-kuk, who was purportedly in possession of 800,000 WEMIX tokens from January to February of last year, potentially valued at up to 6 billion KRW (around $4.5 million). Concerns were raised regarding possible insider trading and conflicts of interest due to Kim’s ownership of these tokens.