Matrixport’s Market Sentiment Index Points Towards Bullish Momentum

Atomic Wallet Hacker Uses Lazarus Crypto MixerThe stolen cryptocurrency from the recent $35 million hack of Atomic Wallet is already being moved to a crypto mixer favored by North Korea’s notorious cyber-hacking group.Photo by Micha Brändli on UnsplashSinbad.ioAccording to UK-based crypto compliance analysis firm Elliptic, the funds have made their way to a crypto mixer used by Lazarus Group, a notorious hacker group that focuses on crypto heists which is believed to have direct ties with the North Korean government.On June 5, Elliptic’s Investigations Team revealed that it had traced the funds from the Atomic Wallet hack to the crypto mixer Sinbad.io. Lazarus had previously used the mixer to launder over $100 million in stolen crypto assets.While the exact amount sent to the mixer was not specified, Elliptic noted that the stolen funds were being exchanged for Bitcoin before undergoing obfuscation through the mixer. Additionally, Elliptic reported that Sinbad.io is likely a rebranded version of Blender.io, another mixer extensively used to launder funds by the Lazarus Group. Blender.io has been sanctioned by the US Treasury.Atomic Wallet hackThe hack of several user accounts on Atomic Wallet occurred on June 3, resulting in losses of up to $35 million. News of the issue broke with the following tweet from the project team (which has subsequently been deleted): “We have received reports of wallets being compromised. We are doing all we can to investigate and analyze the situation. As we have more information, we will share it accordingly.”In a follow-up tweet the next day, the team confirmed that it was investigating the matter with the assistance of a number of “leading security companies.”However, Atomic Wallet later downplayed the incident, stating that less than 1% of its monthly active users were affected. The project team was castigated by users for trying to present the hack as a minor incident. One user took to Twitter to call out the Atomic Wallet team for “having the nerve to come to the networks and say that only 1% of wallets were affected.”The Atomic Wallet project is based out of Tallinn, Estonia, having been founded in 2017. It claims to provide a non-custodial decentralized multi-currency crypto wallet. The product supports over fifty coins and two hundred tokens. It also offers atomic swaps between digital assets, while also supporting integrations with instant exchanges such as Changelly, ShapeShift, and others.Roland Säde, the Chief Marketing Officer of Atomic Wallet, assured users that the team is working tirelessly to recover the stolen funds. He emphasized the need to complete the investigation to develop a concrete plan.Despite the ongoing efforts, Säde urged victims to track the illicit transfers and report them to popular crypto exchanges. By doing so, it was thought that may hinder the scammers from exchanging the funds.Crypto hacking menaceLazarus Group hackers have been the bane of the crypto space in recent years. Elliptic released a report last month that identified Japan as having been the country most adversely affected by the North Korean hackers. It’s understood that the estimated $721 million in stolen crypto from Japan-based entities amounts to nearly nine times the value of North Korea’s exports based on 2021 data.While Atomic Wallet is directly reporting the incidents, Säde believes that having more individuals monitoring the hackers’ activities will make it more challenging for them to move the funds undetected. Unfortunately, Elliptic’s recent findings suggest that for many victims, it may already be too late to prevent further misuse of their stolen cryptocurrency.

South Korean Banks Adopt Blockchain for Streamlined Civil Servant LoansSouth Korea’s state-run financial organizations and banks are embracing blockchain technology to streamline the loan process for government employees and enhance loan management for banks.Photo by Shubham Dhage on UnsplashBlockchain-aided loan servicesIn a collaboration announced today at the Korea Federation of Banks (KFB) in Seoul, the Korea Financial Telecommunications and Clearings Institute (KFTC), the Government Employees Pension Service (GEPS), and four local banks are coming together to introduce blockchain technology in providing loan services specifically tailored for civil servants. The four participating banks are NongHyup Bank, Hana Bank, DGB Daegu Bank, and Gwangju Bank.Easier applicationAt present, civil servants are required to acquire a physical loan recommendation letter from the GEPS in order to apply for a bank loan. However, with the implementation of the new loan system, the GEPS will have the capability to issue blockchain-based letters, which can be obtained by civil servants either in-person or remotely at banks. This innovative approach will significantly simplify the verification process for these letters.Easier managementFurthermore, the manual exchange of loan-related information, such as repayment history and retirement details, between banks and the GEPS will be replaced by a more efficient system. The KFTC will take on the role of mediator, ensuring that any changes to this information are immediately reflected in real time. This streamlined approach will significantly enhance loan management for lenders.The launch of this service is scheduled for November this year, bringing about improved accessibility to loans for government employees. As the project progresses, other financial institutions are expected to join in, further enhancing the convenience of public servants. Additionally, these collaborating organizations will explore joint services aimed at providing the necessary support to stabilize the livelihoods of civil servants.

The Philippines Forging Crypto Reg. Path US Could Learn FromThe Philippines has demonstrated best practice in operating a sensible regulatory framework relative to cryptocurrency while the United States has erred by engaging in regulation via enforcement while responding after the horse has bolted in relation to a string of crypto company collapses. That’s according to Robert De Guzman, Head of Legal Compliance at Philippines-based cryptocurrency exchange Coins.ph.©Unsplash/C BuezaIn an opinion piece published in Forkcast News on Tuesday, De Guzman lays out his view as to what’s required in terms of regulation, while drawing comparisons between the application of regulation relative to crypto in both jurisdictions.The need for “sensible” regulationDe Guzman believes that the crypto industry’s recent failures are a wake-up call for the whole sector. Losses of billions of dollars affected Celsius Network, BlockFi, Voyager Digital, Genesis, and FTX, and led to Silvergate, Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), and Signature banks’ collapse in a week. To maintain consumers’ trust, he believes that sensible regulation is necessary for the crypto exchanges dealing with digital assets.The legal compliance expert cites the FTX collapse. FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried’s empire was among the largest collapses. FTX pretended to support regulation, but its true nature was an offshore exchange for global clients. Nonetheless, some businesses act on their regulation support by acquiring licenses and complying with central bank audits in the countries of operation.State-level and industry-level regulationThe crypto industry being open to self regulation is one element of the solution, he says. Regulators must proactively protect their consumers from scams and business failures, not just clean up the mess after millions of people have been harmed.Regulatory failuresDe Guzman points the finger at reactionary regulatory action. Regulators filed charges against crypto industry founders after their collapse. Previously, they missed the problems of the largest companies. FTX, based in the Bahamas, was mismanaged, and American regulators only responded after customer issues. Regulations by enforcement, preferred in several countries, wait for failure to happen before taking action. Over-regulation through enforcement pushes platforms offshore, where Wild West-type environments thrive, with clear consequences.Regulators in some countries focus on surface-level questions, like which tokens should be considered securities, while others, like in the Philippines, prioritize execution-level details to protect consumers. Anti-money laundering measures and custody are core issues, with the G-7’s Financial Action Task Force’s Travel Rule likely to be more strictly applied. Active regulation and audits are needed to ensure financial platforms act responsibly with customer deposits. Basic rules need to be put in place through a licensing regime, followed by regulation of market practices like commingling of assets, self-dealing, and trading against customers.The Philippines sensible approach to regulationThe Coins.ph legal guru holds out his home country as exemplary in terms of its approach to regulation. The Philippines’ regulatory regime requires a virtual asset service provider (VASP) license to operate a crypto exchange, as well as additional licenses for other services. The country’s central bank, BSP, directly regulates all crypto exchanges and expands its crypto regulations to adapt to market needs. KYC processes in the Philippines require recognition of valid ID documents from across 82 provinces.Additionally, the BSP expects the industry to cooperate in quarterly audits where they share balance sheet information and disclose digital assets in hot and cold wallets. Regulators in the Philippines are proactive and knowledgeable about the crypto space, which sets a sensible framework based on customer protection.