Blockchain.com Secures License to Expand Operations in Singapore

Hong Kong SFC CEO Prioritizes Investor Protection in Crypto RegulationsAccording to a report by Chinanews, Julia Leung, Chief Executive Officer of the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), participated in a seminar organized by the Hong Kong Academy of Finance (AoF). During the event, she emphasized the importance of investor protection in the formulation of guidelines for operators of virtual asset trading platforms.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashDevelopment of crypto in Hong KongAt the seminar yesterday, Leung discussed the development of virtual assets in the special administrative region of China. She recalled the pushback the SFC received in 2018 when it first proposed regulations for virtual asset trading platforms. Critics argued that the licensing system, demanding applicants to comply with stringent internal control and investor protection standards, might compel fintech companies to relocate their operations to other jurisdictions, such as Singapore.Market recognition of crypto regulationsDespite initial criticism, the market came to appreciate the importance of these regulatory standards, especially after witnessing the bankruptcy of several overseas cryptocurrency organizations.The guidelines for operators of virtual asset trading platforms in Hong Kong are set to take effect in June. Leung mentioned that these guidelines match market expectations and place emphasis on protecting investors. They encompass regulations for virtual asset custody, the segregation of client assets, and the avoidance of conflicts of interest. She also expressed satisfaction with the SFC’s role as a leading regulator in the virtual asset space.Crypto exchange ratingMeanwhile, Chinese blockchain news media Jinse Finance reported today the official establishment of the Hong Kong Virtual Asset Consortium (HKVAC), a private entity that rates virtual assets.It has also launched a virtual asset index and will introduce a virtual asset exchange rating system. The HKVAC Large Market Cap Cryptocurrency Index comprises the 30 leading cryptocurrencies by market capitalization. The index will be reviewed quarterly on the last day of each quarter (March, June, September, and December). The Virtual Asset Exchange Rating System will assess the credibility of trading platforms and enhance transparency and accountability in the virtual asset trading market.HKVAC was established by a team of industry experts and professional rating agencies. It brings together key stakeholders in the virtual asset industry, such as big data firms, exchanges, and institutional investors, along with the city’s licensed rating agencies. HKVAC aims to cultivate a secure environment for crypto investments and enhance the public’s understanding of virtual assets.

During a National Policy Committee audit, South Korean lawmakers pressed financial regulators on their oversight of the domestic crypto market, focusing on Binance’s acquisition of local exchange Gopax, risks from order-book sharing with foreign platforms, and weaknesses in anti–money laundering (AML) controls.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashQuestions over Gopax compensationAccording to Kuki News, Democratic Party lawmaker Min Byeong-dug has urged regulators to reach out to Binance for details on its plan to compensate Gopax creditors following its acquisition of the local exchange. One of the nation’s five fiat-to-crypto exchanges, Gopax suspended withdrawals from its GoFi service, a yield-bearing product, in November 2022 after the collapse of the Bahamas-based FTX crypto exchange and the bankruptcy of Genesis, a U.S.-based crypto financial services firm. Citing investor losses estimated at 10 billion to 50 billion won (about $7 million–$35 million), Min said Binance had agreed to cover the shortfall as part of its cashless acquisition of Gopax, but full repayment to Korean users remains unresolved. He noted that the deal had faced delays due to concerns raised by the Financial Services Commission’s (FSC) Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) over Binance’s eligibility as a major shareholder, and urged the FSC and FIU to ensure a clear and timely resolution for affected investors. Concerns over order-book sharingPeople Power Party (PPP) lawmaker Lee Heon-seung raised additional concerns about order-book sharing tied to the Binance–Gopax deal, warning it could create regulatory blind spots. According to Dailian, he asked the FIU about risks such as possible gaps in AML oversight at foreign exchanges and the potential exposure of Korean user data. FIU head Park Gwang said inadequate AML systems at overseas platforms can hinder fund tracing. He noted that separate approval is required before a domestic exchange can share its order book with a foreign platform, adding that no such request was under discussion. Park said the FIU would closely examine the matter and ensure protection of personal data. Lee also questioned how effectively regulators can supervise the crypto market given its scale, pointing to the Bithumb exchange as an example, where he had raised similar concerns about order-book sharing. Bithumb serves about 3.8 million users and records roughly 605 trillion won (approximately $426 billion) in annual trading volume. He said order-book sharing with major global exchanges such as Binance could complicate AML compliance, data protection, and regulatory oversight, and called for stronger enforcement. In response, Park said that the agency would ensure proper supervision to address these risks. Allegations of AML loopholes and illicit useAnother PPP lawmaker, Kim Jae-sub, flagged a potential AML loophole involving Binance, saying the exchange had allegedly been used by Cambodia’s Prince Group, which is linked to fraudulent schemes to conceal illicit funds. Last week, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a civil forfeiture complaint to seize roughly 127,271 Bitcoin linked to Prince Group’s operations, marking the largest seizure in its history. Kim also cited past allegations connecting Binance to illicit transactions involving Hamas and North Korea, and said the exchange’s founder faces related charges. He urged the FSC to conduct a thorough examination to determine the extent of any involvement if the claims prove accurate. As the parliamentary audit continues, lawmakers from both parties are pressing regulators to clarify standards, tighten oversight, and prioritize investor protection while maintaining fair and predictable rules for market participants. 

Korean Prosecutors Say Do Kwon and His Colleagues Knew Terra Was Unviable from the BeginningKorean prosecutors claimed that Terraform Labs founder Do Kwon and the key members behind the Terra-LUNA crash were aware of the project’s unviability from the beginning, according to a file issued by the Seoul Southern District Court.©Terraform LabsTerraform Labs founders misleading Korean investorsTerraform Labs founders Do Kwon and Daniel Shin attracted 280,000 investors in Korea alone, claiming that the Terra stablecoin is a means of transaction, even though the company leaders had been notified by the financial authority that Terra-accepting businesses were impermissible. It is reported that during a search and seizure of the company, Korean prosecutors collected evidence that its employees shared such knowledge on their internal messaging system.Terra’s cross trading on crypto exchangesKnowing their cryptocurrency’s unviability, Terra executives registered its sister token LUNA for listing on major Korean crypto exchanges in May 2019. According to the Korean prosecution, they used a bot to create a trade volume of more than 800 million won in three domestic crypto exchanges by cross trading between 2019 and early last year.Cross trading is illegal in the stock market, as it is considered as an act of price manipulation, but LUNA was traded in crypto exchanges and it hasn’t been determined whether their token is a security or not. Under current Korean law, the court has to accept it as a security to punish those behind the Terra collapse.Shin’s denial of allegationsMeanwhile, Daniel Shin denied the prosecution’s allegations and argued that they had never received such a notice from the financial regulator.