Japan’s PM holds off on supporting Bitcoin as reserve asset

Hodlnaut to proceed to liquidationCryptocurrency lender Hodlnaut, based in Singapore, is set to undergo liquidation, according to former interim judicial managers, Aaron Lee and Angela Ee.The High Court of Singapore has lifted the protection order it had put in place in respect of the business and efforts to restructure it in August 2022. The decision, formalized with a winding-up order filed on Friday in the High Court, follows a period of trading in 2022 when the company incurred losses of approximately $189 million due to the collapse of the Terra ecosystem in May 2022.The liquidators, tasked with providing regular updates to the more than 17,000 creditors, will oversee the process. Hodlnaut’s crypto assets, amounting to $13.3 million, were locked on FTX before the exchange froze withdrawals and declared bankruptcy last November. Despite a rejected restructuring plan earlier this year, the creditors opted for liquidation, deeming it more favorable to their interests. Aaron Lee and Angela Ee will now act as the appointed liquidators, overseeing the winding-up process under the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act of 2018.Photo by Hu Chen on UnsplashCreditors favored liquidationAt an early stage, Hodlnaut founders Simon Lee and Zhu Juntao were in favor of a business sale as a preferable alternative to liquidation. Back in February, there appeared to be some potential of a sale, with several buyers having indicated an interest in the business. The identity of these interested parties was never revealed and the interim judicial managers of the restructuring process later confirmed that no “white knight” had emerged to buy out the business.It became clear in April of this year that creditors preferred liquidation as opposed to attempting to restructure the business. The Algorand Foundation is a leading creditor, with a $35 million exposure to Hodlnaut. In a court filing in April, the Algorand Foundation, alongside other leading creditors Samtrade Custodian Limited and S.A.M. Fintech Pte Ltd., were noted as being opposed to a restructuring.OPNX bidIn August it emerged that controversial crypto claims trading platform OPNX, owned by Three Arrows Capital’s (3AC) Kyle Davies and Su Zhu alongside Mark and Leslie Lamb from CoinFLEX, was mounting a bid for Hodlnaut.OPNX had proposed to provide a capital injection of $30 million. The proposal outlined that this investment would be made in the form of FLEX tokens, the native token of the CoinFLEX platform.Following consideration by the interim judicial managers overseeing Hodlnaut’s restructuring process, it decided not to take up the offer. It was decided that the FLEX tokens had a speculative value and that they were highly illiquid.Additionally, no clear timeline had been provided by OPNX in respect of the repayment of creditors’ debts. Furthermore, the proposal was found to be scant on detail, particularly with regard to payments which were limited to 30% of liabilities. In August the FLEX token experienced a large drop, falling 90% in value.

Several Japanese companies, including Remixpoint and Metaplanet, have been increasing their Bitcoin (BTC) holdings, underscoring the growing institutional interest in cryptocurrencies in the region.Photo by Kanchanara on UnsplashRemixpoint, an energy consulting firm listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange, recently announced an additional purchase of 32.83 BTC valued at 500 million yen ($3.4 million), according to local news outlet CoinPost. This acquisition took place on May 13 at an average price of 15.23 million yen ($104,270) per BTC, bringing the company's total BTC holdings to 648.82 BTC. Remixpoint's crypto portfolio, including BTC, is now valued at 11.1 billion yen ($76 million) and also comprises Ethereum (ETH), Solana (SOL), XRP and Dogecoin (DOGE). The firm began actively accumulating BTC late last year, motivated by multiple factors, including the positive price trend following the latest Bitcoin halving event, increased market activity after the latest U.S. presidential election and the growth in institutional participation, particularly after the approval of spot crypto ETFs in the U.S. Metaplanet becomes a major BTC holderAnother notable player, Metaplanet, a publicly traded Japanese company specializing in Bitcoin investment, has positioned itself as one of the largest BTC holders globally. As of May 12, Metaplanet’s Bitcoin yield reached 170%, with total holdings of 6,796 BTC. This places it as the 11th largest Bitcoin holder worldwide and the largest in Asia, surpassing El Salvador, which currently holds 6,177 BTC, according to data from Arkham. Metaplanet's ongoing Bitcoin accumulation aligns with CEO Simon Gerovich's advocacy for Bitcoin. In a March podcast, Gerovich said he encourages his friends to allocate "100% of their net worth into Bitcoin." The company’s strategic goal is to amass 10,000 BTC by the end of 2025 and 21,000 BTC by 2026. Reinforcing its influence, Metaplanet appointed Eric Trump, the second son of pro-crypto U.S. President Donald Trump, to its newly formed Strategic Board of Advisors in January. Evolving crypto policies, including national reservesBefore Trump's second term, Gerovich expressed his expectation that other countries would follow the U.S. once it established a national Bitcoin strategic reserve—a move formalized by President Trump through an executive order in March. In a related development, Ukraine is reportedly drafting a bill to create a similar reserve in collaboration with Binance. Meanwhile, in Taiwan, lawmaker Ko Ju-Chun has been advocating for adding Bitcoin to the country's national reserves. In a similar trend, another Japanese firm, Value Creation, disclosed plans last month to acquire 100 million yen ($660,000) worth of Bitcoin, further reflecting the growing interest among Japanese companies in crypto investments. Complementing this corporate adoption trend, Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA) has been shaping its regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. The agency aims to redefine digital assets as financial products under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, a move viewed as an attempt to balance innovation with investor protection. Building on this approach, an FSA discussion paper released on April 10, which remained open for public feedback until May 10, proposed classifying crypto assets into two categories: those used for fundraising and business activities, and those that are not—such as BTC and ETH. This regulatory evolution, alongside increasing corporate investment in BTC, reflects Japan's efforts to adapt to the evolving global crypto landscape.

Korea’s Legislative Research Body Suggests Expanding Blind Trust System to Include CryptoThe National Assembly Research Service (NARS) of South Korea last Friday issued a report emphasizing the need to broaden the scope of the country’s blind trust system for public officials. Currently, this system primarily covers traditional stocks, but the report highlights the necessity of extending its coverage to include cryptocurrencies.Photo by O-seop Sim on PexelsPublic Service Ethics ActUnder the existing Public Service Ethics Act, public officials holding a rank of 4 or higher within the finance department of the Ministry of Economy and Finance and the Financial Services Commission are mandated to either divest themselves of stocks linked to their official duties and responsibilities or transfer them into a blind trust if the total value of these stocks exceeds KRW 30 million (about $23,000).Blind trustA blind trust is a mechanism through which a public official transfers their stock holdings to a trustee. Subsequently, the trustee handles these entrusted stocks by exchanging them for other assets and overseeing their management, administration, and disposition. Importantly, the original owner of the stock, who is the public official, is barred from participating in these aspects of the trust and is also kept uninformed about the trust property’s status or details.Debate over expansionThe current policy confines the blind trust framework exclusively to stocks. Nevertheless, there is an ongoing debate advocating for the inclusion of other assets, such as virtual assets and real estate, within its scope. The rationale behind this argument is that these types of assets can also potentially give rise to conflicts of interest. However, counterarguments have been raised, expressing concerns that extending the blind trust to these assets could excessively limit the property rights of public officials. Consequently, as of now, this broader application has not been implemented.Comparison with the USThe Korean blind trust system was inspired by the United States’ Ethics in Government Act of 1978, which does not limit the types of assets that can be included in a blind trust. In the US, a blind trust can encompass not only stocks but also bonds, mutual funds, virtual assets, and real estate. In light of this, the report recommends the expansion of the blind trust system to encompass virtual assets and real estate. This step is proposed to prevent conflicts of interest among public officials pertaining to a wider array of asset types.Enhancing trustee discretionMeanwhile, NARS also argued for broadening the trustee’s discretion in trust management to render the system more reasonable. This stems from the concern that the existing uniform property sale approach could lead public servants to incur losses. NARS has proposed potential solutions, such as extending the time limit for property sales or mandating the sale of only a portion of the assets, as viable options to address this issue.