Korean Crypto Exchanges Promote Horizontal Cultures to Attract Job Seekers

Korea to Ban Virtual Asset Deposit Services from Next JulyDuring a recent criminal law seminar held at the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office, Park Min-woo, Director of the Capital Markets Bureau at the South Korean Financial Services Commission (FSC), underscored that starting next year, virtual asset service providers (VASPs) will no longer be permitted to offer deposit and management services for virtual assets. That’s according to a report by local crypto news outlet Digital Asset.This is seen as a response to the suspension of virtual asset deposits and withdrawals carried out by virtual asset yield platforms Haru Invest and Delio a few months ago.Photo by Mathew Schwartz on UnsplashLegal backgroundDirector Park referred to Article 7, Paragraph 2 of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, clarifying that the intention behind this provision is to ensure that VASPs have the ability to fulfill asset withdrawal requests, even in the scenario where all their customers make such requests. This Act is scheduled to go into effect in July of next year, and Article 7 prohibits VASPs from entrusting customer assets to third parties.Deposit service providers receive cryptocurrency deposits and then distribute the resulting yields to their customers. In a bull market, these entities can manage yields on their own. However, in a flat or bear market, these asset managers may face challenges in paying yields unless they can generate profits by handing over customer assets to external custodians.Signs of giving upIn fact, centralized finance (CeFi) company HeyBit made an announcement last month, stating that it will discontinue its virtual asset deposit service starting from October 2. They cited this specific provision as the reason for their decision.Fraud chargesBoth Haru and Delio have been indicted by the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office on fraud charges.As an unregistered VASP, Haru suspended its deposit and withdrawal services on multiple occasions in June, causing substantial financial losses to numerous investors. This suspension was triggered by significant losses incurred at B&S Holdings, another unregistered entity to which Haru had entrusted virtual assets.Similarly, Delio, although registered, entrusted a considerable amount of virtual assets to Haru and Traum Info Tech but was unable to recover them.

A Korean Lawmaker’s Crypto Holdings Worth $4.5M Spark ControversySouth Korean lawmaker Kim Nam-kuk, a member of the opposition party Democratic Party of Korea (DPK), has recently come under scrutiny due to his reported possession of 800,000 WEMIX tokens from January to February last year, as reported by the Maeil Business Newspaper. These tokens were worth approximately 6 billion KRW or $4.5 million at the time. While Korean lawmakers are obligated to disclose their wealth, virtual assets are an exception. The disclosure of Kim’s ownership of these tokens has ignited controversy, as it unveiled a wealth magnitude significantly greater than previously understood.Photo by Karolina Grabowska on PexelsTravel Rule regulationA central issue in the unfolding dispute is the source of Kim’s investment in the WEMIX tokens. It has been reported that he purchased a significant amount of these tokens between January and February last year and withdrew the entire sum between February and March before the crypto exchange implemented measures to comply with the Travel Rule regulation. This rule requires that financial authorities be informed of transactions over 10 million KRW ($7,500). After the crypto exchange reported the transactions to the Financial Intelligence Unit of the Financial Services Commission, the government agency requested a warrant to search Kim’s account due to the transactions’ abnormality. However, the court dismissed the request.Jeonse deposit to LG Display sharesIn response to the controversy, Kim took to a YouTube channel on Tuesday to explain his WEMIX token investments. He stated that he had retrieved 600 million KRW ($450,000) after his jeonse contract expired and used the money to purchase LG Display shares. Jeonse a housing rental system in Korea where tenants put up a lump-sum refundable deposit on a rental space for a two-year stay. Kim claims that these LG Display shares later rose in value to 985.7 million KRW ($744,000) in January 2021 and that he used this sum to purchase the tokens.Account balance and WEMIX tokensDespite his explanation, there are still questions surrounding Kim’s sudden increase in his bank account balance. His account balance reportedly increased from 100 million KRW ($76,000) at the end of 2020 to 1.12 billion KRW ($850,000) by the end of 2021, which raised suspicions. If Kim had directed all the money withdrawn from the LG Display shares to WEMIX tokens, it is unclear where the additional $774,000 in his account came from. Kim has reportedly explained to his party’s leadership that he retrieved the principal amount of his investment due to the increase in the WEMIX token price. However, this explanation has not satisfied some critics.Insufficient explanationIn an attempt to address these concerns, Kim shared part of his bank transaction records on Monday. However, this disclosure has fallen short of addressing all the questions that have been raised, such as the precise amount invested in the tokens and their purchase prices. There is still significant public scrutiny and skepticism surrounding Kim’s explanation for his crypto holdings, and it remains to be seen if further disclosures will be made.Kim apologized to the Korean public via Facebook for any disappointment caused, especially amid challenging economic conditions. However, he denied accusations of using undisclosed information or unlawfully acquiring wealth. Kim maintained that all transactions were transparently made using only his own wallets through his real-name bank accounts.Potential insider trading and conflict of interestNevertheless, the public’s acceptance of his explanation is yet to be seen, as questions about his $4.5 million virtual assets persist, particularly given his reported total wealth of around $1.1 million. There are concerns surrounding the possibility of insider trading. Furthermore, Kim’s participation in proposing a bill to defer tax implementation on digital assets has triggered suspicions of a potential conflict of interest.Call for an impartial third partyRecent updates indicate that the prosecution is considering requesting a warrant against Kim in relation to the controversy surrounding his crypto holdings. The Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission is also examining if his participation in proposing the bill constitutes a conflict of interest. It is evident that an impartial third party will need to investigate and analyze all relevant information to resolve this dispute. Until a thorough and unbiased investigation takes place, the public’s concerns and questions are likely to continue.

The Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), the financial regulatory agency of the Dubai International Financial Center (DIFC), a special economic zone, has approved two stablecoins under its crypto regulatory framework. The two stablecoins, USD Coin (USDC) and EURC, are both issued by blockchain-focused financial services firm Circle. While USDC is a U.S. dollar-backed stablecoin, EURC is a euro-backed stablecoin. In a press release published on the Circle website on Feb. 24, the company announced details regarding the approval. The stablecoins are the first to be recognized and approved by the DFSA.Photo by Christoph Schulz on UnsplashStablecoin integrationThe development means that firms based in the DIFC are now free to integrate either stablecoin into digital asset applications and products focused on areas such as payments and treasury management. A number of Circle executives took to social media to comment on the development. Circle Co-founder and CEO Jeremy Allaire outlined on X that the approval means that financial institutions in Dubai “are now able to transact in markets with USDC and EURC.” In legally recognizing the two stablecoins, Allaire pointed out that the DFSA had joined regulators in the European Union (EU) and Canada.  Last Summer, Allaire announced that Circle’s stablecoins complied with the EU’s Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) regulation. In December, Circle became the first stablecoin issuer to meet Canadian listing regulations. Dante Disparte, Circle’s chief strategy officer and head of global policy, pointed out that a trend is emerging requiring the pre-clearing of stablecoins prior to them entering into circulation or gaining regulatory approval. “In always-on finance, reciprocity is key,” he added.  Meanwhile, the firm’s EU Strategy & Policy Director, Patrick Hansen, underscored the significance of the approval. Hansen pointed to the fact that the DIFC is home to 6,000 registered entities, including 800 authorized financial firms. An ‘edge’ over TetherEugene Cheung, Chief Institutional Business Officer at Hong Kong-based digital asset platform OSL, said that the approval was “massive for institutional adoption,” while giving Circle an “edge” over Tether within the $157 billion stablecoin market. While Circle has always taken a regulatory-compliant approach, competitor Tether has struggled with compliance. In Europe, 10 companies have been approved to issue stablecoins under MiCA regulations, but Tether is not among them. This has led to a number of exchanges delisting Tether’s USDT in Europe. The DIFC was first established in 2004. The economic free-zone caters to firms operating within the Middle East, South Asian and African regions. The number of businesses registered within the free zone has increased by 25% since 2023. In November 2022, the DIFC recognized Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH) and Litecoin (LTC). The following year, it added Toncoin (TON) and Ripple’s XRP, together with ZETA, the native token of the ZetaChain network. In 2024, the DFSA amended its crypto regulations to allow foreign funds to invest in recognized crypto tokens, while enabling domestic qualified investor funds to invest in unrecognized tokens.Although the regulatory approach taken by the authorities in Dubai accommodates stablecoins, algorithmic stablecoins are prohibited.