NVT Ratio Signals Overvalued BTC

Turkey, a significant player in the global cryptocurrency market, has been anticipated to introduce comprehensive crypto-related legislation in 2024. Despite initial announcements suggesting an early rollout, the specifics of the anticipated regulatory framework remain pending, leaving stakeholders in anticipation. Currently, Turkey operates with limited crypto regulations. While some measures exist, such as those imposed by the Central Bank and the Ministry of Finance’s financial intelligence unit, others remain informal, such as guidance from the Capital Markets Board. These regulations primarily focus on prohibiting certain activities and implementing anti-money laundering (AML) measures.Photo by Dima Rogachevskiy on UnsplashAnticipated reforms and their purposeThe forthcoming legislation is expected to address various aspects of the crypto market, including licensing requirements for exchanges, investor protection measures and taxation. The aim is to align with international standards, potentially aiding Turkey in exiting the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF) "gray list." The regulations aim to enhance investor protection, especially in light of past incidents like the collapse of the Thodex exchange, while also providing a legal framework for crypto taxation. Timing of implementationDespite expectations for an early introduction, the exact timeline for the enactment of the crypto legislation remains uncertain. Industry observers speculate potential connections between the legislation's timing and Turkey's efforts to exit the FATF's "gray list." While some anticipate a release by mid-year, others suggest a delay until later in the year, underscoring the complexity and importance of the regulatory reforms for Turkey's crypto ecosystem. 

Singapore’s MAS gears up for live CBDC pilotThe Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has unveiled plans to initiate a live central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilot for wholesale interbank settlement in 2024.Photo by Sergio Sala on UnsplashMoving beyond simulationThis pilot will move beyond simulation, involving the actual utilization of a live wholesale CBDC for settling payments between commercial banks. Furthermore, MAS indicated that upcoming pilots may extend to leveraging wholesale CBDCs for the settlement of cross-border securities trade.MAS Managing Director Ravi Menon expressed the significance of this move, stating:“The ‘live’ issuance of central bank digital money for use as a common settlement asset in payments is a significant milestone in MAS’ digital money journey that began in 2016. The issuance of wholesale CBDC reinforces the role that central bank money plays in facilitating safe and efficient payments.”Orchid BlueprintThis announcement is a key component of the Orchid Blueprint, a comprehensive plan detailing the infrastructure essential for facilitating the pilot and future developments. In addition to the wholesale CBDC initiative, the Orchid Blueprint outlines the expansion of trials to encompass tokenized bank liabilities and regulated stablecoins, solidifying Singapore’s commitment to fostering innovation in the digital finance space.As part of the Orchid Blueprint, MAS is set to create a settlement ledger to record digital money transfers. This ledger will incorporate features like programmability and atomic settlement of digital tokens. To enhance user experience, a “Name Service” for customer-friendly wallet addresses and name identifiers is on the agenda. Additionally, a tokenization bridge will be developed to connect existing account-based settlement systems with ledgers compatible with tokenized forms of digital money.Purpose-bound moneyThe Orchid Blueprint introduces a “programmability protocol” based on the concept of “purpose-bound money” (PBM). PBM, a concept considered by the MAS in a whitepaper that it published earlier this year, allows for the specification of certain conditions for the use of digital money, enabling automation of transactions and predefined conditions for settlement. This innovative approach empowers centralized planners to define the conditions for usage, bringing a new level of flexibility to the digital financial landscape.This development aligns with the broader trend of increasing institutional interest in digital currencies and blockchain technology. The move towards live CBDC pilots, tokenization and stablecoins underscores Singapore’s commitment to staying at the forefront of financial innovation. As the Orchid Blueprint unfolds, it sets the stage for a dynamic and technologically advanced financial ecosystem, reinforcing Singapore’s position as a leader in the global digital finance arena.In a related move within the region, crypto firm Paxos recently announced plans to launch a new USD-backed stablecoin in Singapore, receiving in-principle approval from MAS to issue the stablecoin. Meanwhile, International Monetary Fund (IMF) Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva outlined in a keynote speech at the Singapore FinTech Festival earlier this week that CBDCs not only could replace cash but also improve financial inclusion.These concurrent developments indicate the growing convergence of traditional financial systems with the expanding digital currency landscape.

According to India’s Finance Ministry, Binance and a number of other virtual asset service providers (VASPs) are not tax-compliant in India. Cases of tax evasion detectedNews of this matter emerged via written answers, published on Dec. 2, provided in response to parliamentary questions which had been put to India’s Finance Minister, Pankaj Chaudhary. The minister confirmed that a “few cases of evasion of Goods and Services Tax (GST) by cryptocurrency exchanges and investors” had been detected. The document goes on to list 17 crypto entities who are currently being investigated on that basis, with Binance being the most well-known among them. Notable Indian exchanges listed include WazirX, CoinDCX and CoinSwitch. Chaudhary included details of cases booked against these exchanges. In Binance’s case, it was required to pay 722 crore Indian rupees, which amounts to around $85.2 million. While Binance doesn’t appear to have incurred penalties, in the case of WazirX, the exchange had an assessed tax shortfall of 40.51 crore Indian rupees ($4.78 million), but after fees and interest, it was provided with a demand for 49.19 crore Indian rupees ($5.8 million). CoinDCX and CoinSwitch were also assessed with a demand for 20.86 crore Indian rupees ($2.46 million) and 19.38 crore Indian rupees ($2.28 million), inclusive of penalties and interest. In the case of WazirX, CoinDCX and CoinSwitch, the exchanges have had to pay an additional 21%, 24% and 37% respectively in fees and interest over and above their original tax liabilities.Photo by Naveed Ahmed on UnsplashPrevious tax and regulatory issuesTo date, the Finance Ministry has recovered 122.3 crore rupees ($14.4 million) as part of these investigations. Binance has as yet not paid the funds demanded by the authorities. It emerged in August that India’s Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (DGGI) had imposed an $86 million tax demand on the company, with Binance contesting the assessment. The global crypto exchange platform had previously paid a $2.5 million fine for having engaged with Indian customers despite not having been approved by the authorities to trade within the country. After a number of months during which it didn’t trade within the Indian market, in August Binance regularized its standing and gained approval to trade. In a request for comment on the matter from Cointelegraph, a Binance representative stated: “We continue to work closely with regulatory authorities and attend necessary hearings to address any concerns and questions. Binance remains responsive and cooperative and is committed to addressing all necessary tax inquiries.” The company recently hired UK-based accounting and business advisory firm Grant Thornton to assist with accounting, tax and audit preparedness. In the case of WazirX, a spokesperson said that “GST law on cryptocurrencies was not clear in India,” and that on this basis, the company found itself being assessed for non-payment of the applicable taxes.