Binance Headlines List of Japan FSA Warning Letter Recipients

North Korea Using DeFi for Money LaunderingThe United States Treasury issued a warning on Thursday where it identifies North Korea as a user of DeFi services for money laundering. According to the Treasury, both North Korea and criminal organizations have been using DeFi platforms to launder dirty money.©Pexels/PixabayWhile DeFi has been praised for its potential to democratize finance and provide greater financial freedom to users, it has also been criticized for its lack of regulatory oversight. According to the Treasury, this lack of oversight has made DeFi platforms an attractive target for money launderers and other criminal organizations.In its warning, the Treasury noted that North Korea has been using DeFi platforms to launder money and evade international sanctions. The country is believed to have developed a sophisticated system for laundering money through cryptocurrency exchanges, and it is now turning its attention to DeFi platforms.Illicit money movementCriminal organizations are also using DeFi services for money laundering, according to the Treasury. These groups are said to be using DeFi platforms to move money around the world, in order to avoid detection and to launder the proceeds of their illicit activities.The use of DeFi for money laundering poses a significant challenge for law enforcement agencies, as these platforms operate outside of the traditional banking system and are often difficult to track. The Treasury has urged DeFi platforms to implement strong anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) policies, in order to prevent their services from being used for criminal activities.The warning from the Treasury comes at a time when DeFi is becoming increasingly popular among investors and users. According to data from DeFi Pulse, the total value locked in DeFi protocols recently surpassed $100 billion, indicating a significant level of interest and investment in the sector.Calls for greater regulationHowever, the lack of regulatory oversight and the potential for DeFi to be used for money laundering and other criminal activities have raised concerns among regulators and policymakers. Some have called for greater regulation of the sector, in order to prevent its abuse by criminal organizations.Despite these concerns, many proponents of DeFi argue that the sector has the potential to transform the financial industry and provide greater financial freedom to users. They point to the benefits of decentralized systems, such as greater transparency, lower fees, and faster transaction times.The use of DeFi for money laundering is a complex issue that requires a multifaceted approach. While regulators and policymakers must work to implement strong AML and KYC policies, users and investors must also take responsibility for ensuring that they are using DeFi platforms in a responsible and legal manner.Ultimately, the future of DeFi will depend on how the sector is able to balance innovation and regulation. While DeFi has the potential to transform the financial industry, it must also be subject to appropriate oversight and accountability in order to prevent its abuse by criminal organizations.By working together, regulators, policymakers, and industry stakeholders can help to ensure that DeFi is used for its intended purpose — to provide greater financial freedom and empowerment to users around the world.

Earlier this month Metaplanet, a Japanese Bitcoin treasury company, said that it was targeting 10,000 Bitcoin in 2025 but the company has raised the bar once again, planning on an acquisition of 21,000 Bitcoin by 2026. On Jan. 5, Metaplanet CEO Simon Gerovich set out a number of objectives for 2025. Among them was a goal for the company to acquire 10,000 Bitcoin in 2025. Gerovich explained that the firm intended to utilize “the most accretive capital market tools available” in order for Metaplanet to meet that target.Photo by André François McKenzie on Unsplash2025-2026 Bitcoin PlanAbout three weeks after the Metaplanet CEO announced that ambition, the company published a press release on Jan. 28 detailing its 2025-2026 Bitcoin Plan, which goes much further.  The plan outlines that 10,000 Bitcoin remains the target for 2025 but that the company has adopted the strategy to accumulate 21,000 Bitcoin by 2026. Gerovich stated that since Metaplanet embraced the Bitcoin Standard on April 8, 2024, the company has experienced exponential growth. Gerovich added: “The market has recognized Metaplanet as Tokyo’s preeminent Bitcoin company, and we are seizing this momentum to solidify our position as a global leader. Our vision is to lead the Bitcoin renaissance in Japan and emerge as one of the largest corporate Bitcoin holders globally. This plan is our commitment to that future.” Adopting MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin playbookMetaplanet has adopted the Bitcoin playbook first pioneered by U.S. business intelligence company turned Bitcoin development firm MicroStrategy. In short, that playbook involves financing Bitcoin purchases with debt. In this way, the company can capitalize on Bitcoin’s historical trend of positive returns over time, using convertible notes and equity to facilitate that.  The practice also creates a feedback loop in so far as MicroStrategy buys Bitcoin, resulting in the Bitcoin unit price increases. The MicroStrategy stock price goes up. Demand for MicroStrategy’s stock and debt goes up, enabling the company to buy more Bitcoin. In its press release, Metaplanet looked back on what had been achieved in terms of its Bitcoin strategy in 2024. In Q4 2024, the company achieved a Bitcoin yield of 309.82%, following on from a 41.7% Bitcoin yield in Q3.  At the close of the year, the Japanese Bitcoin treasury company held 1,761 Bitcoin, purchased at an average Bitcoin unit price of 11.85 million yen ($76,411). Shareholder growth has seen the company surpass 50,000 shareholders. Meanwhile, share trading volume has increased 430x, year-on-year. Since the firm adopted the Bitcoin Standard in April 2024, the company’s market capitalization has grown by 7,000%. Last month, the company celebrated the milestone of having reached a $1 billion market cap. Asia’s largest equity capital raise for BitcoinThe company has dubbed its new plan “The 21 Million Plan.” It will comprise the issuance of 21 million shares by means of moving strike warrants. Gerovich confirmed on X that at $750 million, the plan will involve Asia’s largest-ever public equity capital raise to buy Bitcoin.

Korean Lawmakers Complete First Rough Draft of Virtual Asset User Protection BillKorean lawmakers have completed the first rough draft of the virtual asset user protection bill at a National Policy Committee meeting held later last month.©Pexels/Matthias ZomerAgreeing on term usage ‘virtual assets’So far, 18 bills have been proposed to regulate cryptocurrencies, and the lawmakers and the Financial Services Commission (FSC) agreed to use the term “virtual assets” to encompass similar terms such as digital assets and crypto assets.Phased enactment of billsThe bills are likely to be reviewed under the title “Virtual Asset User Protection Act.” The bipartisan group agreed to enact the bills in phases, introducing the user protection bill in the first phase and the virtual asset listing and issuance bill in the second phase.Meanwhile, there were mixed opinions on the content of the bills. In particular, there was debate over whether the bills should stipulate that the central bank digital currency (CBDC) is excluded from virtual assets, and whether the bills should include a standard for determining if a virtual asset is a security.Debate over stipulating CBDC’s statusThe stipulation of excluding CBDC from virtual assets was the most divisive topic since it would lead to defining the conditions for other assets such as non-fungible tokens. Moreover, the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information, which currently regulates virtual asset service providers (VASPs), does not contain any stipulation on CBDC. Some raised concerns that such discrepancies could later cause confusion. In the end, assembly members decided to discuss the matter again in April after consulting with the Bank of Korea and the Ministry of Government Legislation.Criteria for classifying virtual assets as securitiesRegarding whether to include criteria for classifying virtual assets as securities, the lawmakers and financial regulators took different sides.Lee Yong-woo, a member of the Democratic Party of Korea, underlined that a clear statement of the relationship between the issuer and the recipient of virtual assets in a whitepaper can determine their security status. He added that such provisions should be included in the bills.Park Min-woo, an FSC official, on the other hand, commented on a cautious note that in case virtual assets fall under the category of securities, they may not be applicable to the virtual asset act. He explained that VASPs might deal with both securities and virtual assets, and in such cases, there could be a misunderstanding that VASPs are not subject to the virtual asset act simply because they trade securities.