Korean government to seize crypto for unpaid child support

Non-Fiat Crypto Exchanges in Korea Urge Banks for Real-Name AccountsThe Virtual Asset Exchange Association (VXA) made an announcement today regarding its recent due diligence request sent to 12 South Korean banks, as reported by local news outlet Digital Today. These banks have not yet entered into contracts to provide real-name deposit and withdrawal accounts to cryptocurrency exchanges.VXA is a group comprised of representatives from ten non-fiat crypto trading platforms in the country. Among its members, eight exchanges–Aprobit, Probit, BTX, Foblgate, GDAC, Flata Exchange, Flybit, and High Block (previously known as Huobi Korea)–participated in the request.Photo by Eduardo Soares on UnsplashPartnerships with banksThe objective of the request is to urge the banks to consider establishing partnerships with competent non-fiat exchanges. The requesters argued that such collaborations would promote fair trading in the market and provide customers with more options. They highlighted the growing presence of the virtual asset trading sector in the capital market.Uneven crypto marketAn official from VXA emphasized the key role played by real-name bank account issuers in creating a healthy environment that addresses the existing monopoly in the Korean crypto market. According to a March report published by the Financial Services Commission, non-fiat crypto trading platforms accounted for only 3 percent of the total Korean crypto market capitalization during the second half of 2022. The remaining 97 percent was attributed to fiat-supporting crypto exchanges.The official further explained that allowing more exchanges to support the trading of the Korean won currency would contribute to shaping a free market while bolstering transparency and investor protection.Legal requirementsEarlier this month, VXA also sought fair due diligence from five Korean banks that have already formed partnerships with fiat-supporting crypto exchanges. In Korea, crypto trading platforms are required by law to obtain real-name accounts from banks in order to provide cash deposit and withdrawal services.

The local government of Busan, the second-largest city in South Korea, announced in a press release that it held the 3rd Busan Blockchain Regulation-free Zone Steering Committee (Committee) meeting at the Busan Eurasia Platform, a community center located near Busan Station.  The meeting took place last Thursday at 15:00 (KST), attended by 12 Committee members, including Busan’s Vice Mayor for Economic Affairs Kim Kwang-hee, Busan Technopark Chairman Kim Hyung-gyun, Busan International Finance Agency Chairman Lee Myung-ho and Busan Information Industry Promotion Agency Chairman Kim Tae-yeol.Photo by Finn on UnsplashThe meeting was intended to discuss strategies to revitalize the blockchain regulation-free zone (blockchain zone) and to attract new blockchain businesses to the region. Busan has been recently struggling with developing and attracting blockchain technology companies to the region, which has cast doubt on the city’s ability to retain its status as the regulatory sandbox zone.   New 24 members, new commitment to invigorating blockchain zone Established in October last year, the 3rd Committee comprises 24 new members who have expertise in blockchain technology. The Committee aims to raise awareness of the blockchain zone’s potential and foster the blockchain industry within the region.  Kim Sang-min, Vice CEO of healthcare company Erom, was appointed Committee Chairman at the meeting. Known as an expert in the blockchain ecosystem, Kim currently serves as a blockchain policy advisor for Busan and has experience in taking the lead in establishing the Busan Digital Asset Exchange (BDX) last year.  More meetings in store to become a blockchain hub The meeting focused on creating subcommittees in an effort to facilitate the Committee’s seamless operation. Moreover, members reached a consensus on holding meetings at any time when warranted, in both online and in-person formats.  During the meeting, Busan Vice Mayor Kim said the newly launched Committee will contribute to identifying innovative businesses with great potential that require both cutting-edge blockchain technologies and a regulatory sandbox environment. 

Korea's Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) plans to re-request the Financial Services Commission (FSC) for an authoritative interpretation of spot Bitcoin ETFs in June, seeking the legal interpretation of such products, according to The Korea Economic Daily.  The FSC currently does not classify virtual assets as financial investment products, as they do not function as underlying assets for ETFs as stipulated by the Capital Market Act. Thus, the issuance and listing of spot cryptocurrency ETFs have not been permitted in the country, limiting trading opportunities for Korean investors. Photo by Pixabay on PexelsDespite the situation, interest around the spot Bitcoin ETFs has surged in South Korea following the approval of such ETFs in the United States and recently in Hong Kong. This heightened expectation of spot Bitcoin ETF approval has coincided with the 22nd general election held on April 10.  DPK’s attempts to keep its promise The DPK’s decision to seek clarification on spot Bitcoin ETFs from the financial regulator comes after the party’s landslide win at the general election, securing a total of 175 seats out of 300 in the National Assembly. Among the party’s key pledges were to allow the trade of spot BTC ETFs and ease regulations on crypto products.  In the run-up to the election, the DPK and the ruling People Power Party (PPP) vied for introducing pro-crypto pledges to win votes from young Koreans in their 20s and 30s, who make up a significant portion of crypto investors within the country.  Bold move to amend Capital Market ActThe spokesperson of the DPK said the party will first seek an authoritative interpretation regarding spot Bitcoin ETFs from the FSC and continue to closely monitor how the situation unfolds. The prevailing view from experts, however, is that the agency is likely to remain sturdy in its view.  If the FSC insists on its current stance on spot BTC ETFs, the party would go as far as to amend the Capital Market Act, the spokesperson said, which would take at least a number of months to follow all due processes.