First Digital to Introduce USD-Backed USD Stablecoin

CME Group Expands Crypto Reference Rates to Asian MarketsUS derivatives marketplace CME Group is making strides in its efforts to cater to the Asian cryptocurrency market. In collaboration with crypto indices provider CF Benchmarks, the company is set to launch new reference rates for Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH) aimed specifically at the Asia Pacific (APAC) region.Photo by Pierre Borthiry — Peiobty on UnsplashGoing live next monthThat’s according to a press release published by the company on Wednesday. These new rates, the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate APAC and CME CF Ether-Dollar Reference Rate APAC, are scheduled to become available on September 11, according to a joint announcement.This move comes in response to the growing demand from Asian investors and institutions for accurate pricing data during their local trading hours. Currently, a substantial portion of CME Group’s crypto volume, about 37%, occurs outside of US trading hours, with approximately 11% of trades originating from the APAC region. The new reference rates will be published daily at 4 p.m. Hong Kong time, allowing APAC-based participants to align their crypto price risk management more closely with their portfolio strategies.Building upon past effortsCME Group’s efforts to provide accurate and timely reference rates have been ongoing. The company initially introduced its Bitcoin Reference Rate (BRR) in 2016, followed by the Ether Reference Rate in 2018. The BRR calculates the US dollar price of one Bitcoin as of 4 p.m. London time. It leverages the trade flow data from major Bitcoin spot exchanges within a one-hour window to provide an average of volume-weighted medians across 12 five-minute intervals during that period.Notably, the newly announced Asia-focused reference rates will provide a variant to the existing rates tailored for London and New York. Giovanni Vicioso, CME Group’s Global Head of Cryptocurrency Products, emphasized that these APAC reference rates will facilitate more precise risk management for institutional clients utilizing Bitcoin and Ether futures products in their active portfolios or structured products like ETFs.Focusing on AsiaCME Group’s expansion into the APAC region aligns with a broader trend of institutional interest in cryptocurrencies in Asia. The region has seen regulatory developments aimed at providing clarity to crypto businesses over the course of the past twelve months while a lack of regulatory clarity currently prevails in the United States. This move also coincides with the company’s push to further engage with the global crypto derivatives market, which accounts for around 75% of the overall crypto trading volume.CME’s decision to launch Asia-focused reference rates is a strategic move to tap into the growing interest in cryptocurrencies from the Asia Pacific region. By offering accurate pricing information during APAC trading hours, the company aims to provide institutions and investors with better tools to manage their cryptocurrency price risks effectively. From the perspective of crypto market participants more broadly, the move is encouraging given that it comes from the world leader in derivatives markets.

Bithumb and Korbit Struggle to Gain Traction Despite Zero Trading FeesSouth Korean cryptocurrency exchanges Bithumb and Korbit have recently eliminated trading fees, but their bold decision hasn’t yielded much results. Bithumb was the first to implement this change and attracted users for about a week, but it is now seeing a loss in market share. Korbit, following Bithumb’s example, is also struggling to achieve meaningful outcomes.Photo by Alexander Grey on UnsplashLimited impactLocal media outlet Chosun Biz used data from crypto data platform CoinGecko to draw this conclusion. On October 26, Korbit’s daily trading volume represented 0.19% of the total trading volume among South Korea’s top five crypto exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit, and Gopax). This figure marked a 0.14 percentage point increase compared to the 0.05% recorded on October 19. Korbit had implemented a zero trading fee policy at 9 a.m. (KST) on October 20. Additionally, they launched a promotion offering KRW 5,000 ($3.69) worth of bitcoin to users who transferred virtual assets totaling KRW 1 million or more from Travel Rule-compliant exchanges to Korbit. While the promotion did contribute to Korbit’s market share, it still remains below 1%.Bithumb’s performance showed some improvement, albeit briefly. As of October 26, Bithumb’s market share stood at 18%, marking a 4.7 percentage point increase from its 13.3% share on October 3, the day before it eliminated trading fees. However, it’s worth noting that its market share had reached almost 30% shortly after the promotion’s launch. This indicates that its strategy is losing efficacy over time.The less-than-enthusiastic results from their daring marketing endeavors can be attributed to their inability to draw in retail investors. To begin with, Upbit, the leading player in the market, had already been providing a relatively low fee of 0.05%. Furthermore, adapting to new user interfaces on these exchanges posed a challenge. Zero trading fees weren’t attractive enough for crypto investors to leave their current platforms.Trading volume mattersIn the case of Korbit, its lower trading volume was a disadvantage when it came to attracting users. On crypto exchanges, a higher trading volume typically translates to faster trade executions. As a result, users of Korbit might experience delays in executing trades at their preferred price.Jeong Hye-won, a research associate at crypto data analytics platform Xangle, told Chosun Biz that users on exchanges with lower trading volumes tend to experience slippages due to slower transaction speeds and sparsely populated order books. A slippage means the difference between the initially placed order price and the executed order price. Jeong further explained that Korbit’s zero trading fee policy didn’t have a significant impact because it offers fewer listed tokens compared to Upbit and Bithumb.There is speculation that the free-trading fee promotions introduced by Bithumb and Korbit, despite their revenue sacrifices, might conclude sooner than initially anticipated due to their perceived ineffectiveness. Bithumb derives 99.95% of its revenue from trading fees, while Korbit relies on trading fees for 99.79% of its income. An industry insider has commented that trading fees play a vital role in an exchange’s revenue, and given Bithumb’s reported loss in earnings during the second quarter, there are concerns about their capacity to sustain this strategy.

Banking Difficulties Remain in Hong Kong for Crypto Start-UpsWhile Hong Kong has demonstrated a very clear crypto-friendly stance over the course of the past six months, crypto start-ups are still struggling with banking in the Chinese autonomous territory.Photo by Manson Yim on UnsplashLicensing backlogAll the signs are that Hong Kong is striving to develop itself as a regional hub for crypto and blockchain related business. Encouraged by that stance, against a background of the United States becoming openly hostile to crypto over that very same time frame, applications are streaming in from international firms to be licensed to operate their businesses in the city.In discussion with crypto start-up applicants, CoinDesk has established that the issue extends to firms that have already obtained a license to operate. To compound matters, the Hong Kong regulator, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), has a shortage of manpower, with just eight officials currently working on the applications of eighty crypto firms.Speaking to that backlog, Amy Yu, APAC CEO for Swiss crypto financial services company, SEBA Bank, stated: “This probably would have been a different story six or nine months ago.”A known problemIt appears that both the SFC and its regulatory peer, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) were aware of the issue and tried to get out ahead of it. Late last month, both regulators convened a meeting with bank officials and virtual asset service providers (VASPs).The objective was to try to forge a path forward such that banks could amend their approach, enabling greater facilitation and acceptance of crypto businesses such that the banks would be more inclined to approve bank account applications from those fledgling businesses.Arthur Yuen, Deputy CEO of the HKMA addressed the matter in a blog post published to the regulator’s website on April 27. Yuen was clear in calling on the banks to enable banking for VASPs:“With the implementation of the regulatory regime for VA [virtual assets] activities in Hong Kong and the strengthening of supervisory regimes in different jurisdictions according to the international standards, and as the banking industry develops a better understanding of the VA industry over time, we expect that regulated virtual asset service providers (VASPs) will be able to successfully apply for a bank account through a reasonable process.”Banker resistanceElaborating on the matter further, it’s clear that Yuen and his colleagues understand the importance of banking in enabling this nascent business sector such that the broader strategy of a pro-crypto business environment is affected in Hong Kong. “To attract businesses from new markets, it is crucial to have high quality financial services, while enhancing corporate access to bank accounts would be one of the key priorities,”he stated.An attendee at that regulator-organized round-table last month said that “It was more like a wish list from the regulator,” and that “whether the banks fully embrace it is another matter.” The issue remains as a major impediment to the ability of crypto start-up companies to operate, Some are being forced to try and work around the stumbling block, relying instead on overseas banking partners.