Unprecedented surge in trading volumes on HashKey exchange

South Korea is ramping up its scrutiny on cryptocurrency exchanges, with the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of the Financial Services Commission (FSC) announcing its intention yesterday to remove platforms that lack the necessary qualifications, according to the Korea Economic Daily.Unqualified exchangesIn its announcement yesterday, the FIU revealed its aim to block unqualified virtual asset service providers (VASPs) from facilitating trades in Korean won, the currency of the country. Those currently providing Korean won trading services will be eliminated from the market unless they can demonstrate they meet the required standards. With many exchanges set to renew their registrations in the latter half of this year, the FIU is gearing up for thorough evaluations through June to identify and remove unqualified VASPs. The FIU's assessments will focus on determining whether VASPs have adequate measures in place for user protection and are safeguarded against risks of money laundering. To bolster its efforts in preventing money laundering risks, the FIU intends to establish a framework where lawyers and accountants participate in crypto oversight activities.Photo by Andrea Piacquadio on PexelsExamining majority shareholder of VASPThe financial watchdog is also looking to propose amendments to the Financial Transaction Reports Act, aiming to raise the standards for VASP registration by introducing more stringent requirements. Beyond the current assessments of a VASP operator and its executives, the new regulations will involve close examination of its majority shareholder. This additional layer of scrutiny will evaluate the credibility of the major parties related to the VASP, taking into account factors such as their history of loan defaults. The FIU is set to create a system for analyzing cryptocurrency transactions and will strengthen its communication channels, not just with financial institutions but also with prosecutors and police forces. Furthermore, the agency is reviewing the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF) recommendation for freezing transactions in cases of suspicious activities. Once implemented, this will enable the FIU to temporarily halt suspicious transactions before bringing the issue to prosecutors.

Growing Concerns about Single Crypto Exchange Listings in KoreaAccording to Yonhap Infomax, there is increasing concern about single crypto exchange listings in the Korean market, following the recent arrest of two former Coinone employees.©Pexels/RODNAE ProductionsCrypto listing briberyThe individuals were detained by the Seoul prosecution for allegedly accepting about 3 billion KRW (equivalent to over $2.2 million) in bribes to list a certain cryptocurrency on the exchange.Prosecutors are investigating if these suspects were also involved in the listing of the Puriever token, which is reportedly connected to the kidnapping and murder of a woman in her forties in Gangnam, Seoul.Single exchange-listed cryptosA recent report by the Financial Services Commission (FSC) revealed that 389 cryptocurrencies were listed on a single Korean exchange in the second half of last year, a decrease from the previous year’s 403. Despite the decrease, the trend of single exchange listings continued. Exchanges often exclusively list specific cryptocurrencies to gain a competitive edge, as investors typically prefer larger exchanges with greater liquidity.However, these cryptocurrencies may lack proper review and management and are often highly volatile. The FSC report showed that 34% of cryptocurrencies listed on a single exchange had a market cap of less than 100 million KRW (~$76,000). The Financial Intelligence Unit also warned investors about price fluctuations and liquidity shortages.High volatile cryptocurrencies are attractive to exchanges, as they can lead to increased transaction fee profits.Transparent listingTo address this issue, experts advocate for a transparent listing process.One lawyer in the crypto industry noted that there is a global trend of regulating cryptocurrencies as securities, and if relevant bills pass in Korea, their issuance and disclosure will be regulated. Clear guidelines on disclosures could resolve the issues of single crypto exchange listings, the legal advisor added.Another industry insider has called for investor caution, stressing the need to consider the potential delisting of these crypto assets.

Korean Supreme Court acquits Dunamu Chairman Song Chi-hyungThe Supreme Court of South Korea, in a significant ruling on Thursday (local time), acquitted Song Chi-hyung, chairman and principal stakeholder of Dunamu, of fraud and forgery charges, according to a report by local news agency Yonhap. This ruling is particularly noteworthy because Dunamu is the operator of the nation’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, Upbit.This decision, led by Justice Oh Kyung-mi, marks the culmination of a legal battle that began with Song’s indictment in Dec. 2018, and it extends to the acquittal of the company’s Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and the head of the Data Value Team, who were jointly indicted.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashBackground of the caseSong Chi-hyung and his colleagues were alleged to have fabricated an account on Upbit between September and November 2017. They had been accused of feigning the deposit of assets valued at KRW 122.1 billion and then employing these fictitious funds to enable transactions among actual members.The prosecution also leveled fraud charges against them, claiming that the fabricated account was utilized to sell 11,550 bitcoins to 26,000 members, thereby generating KRW 149.1 billion.The Seoul Southern District Court, acting as the court of first instance, found them not guilty. The court reasoned that the evidence presented by the prosecution was insufficient to establish that the defendants actually deposited the assets in the account.Issues with the prosecution’s evidence gatheringThe Seoul High Court, serving as the appellate court, identified problems with the evidence provided by the prosecution, determining that part of it lacked credibility due to improper collection methods. Notably, the court observed that the prosecution had directed Dunamu employees to access their Amazon cloud server to download the account’s transaction history. However, since this remote server was not included in the search and seizure warrant, the court highlighted the illegitimacy of the evidence.The appellate court also pointed out another issue with the evidence: documents stored on the CFO’s USB drive. The prosecution did not follow the legitimate search process, which requires them to extract only data related to the allegations. Moreover, the prosecutors did not present a warrant when confiscating the laptop of the Data Value Team’s lead, further undermining the credibility of their evidence.The court further stated that even if the remaining evidence provided by the prosecution was considered viable, it was still insufficient to substantiate the prosecution’s accusations.The prosecution, disagreeing with the decision of the appeals court, had escalated the case to the Supreme Court. However, the highest court in the nation sided with the ruling of the appeals court, effectively upholding the decision made at the appellate level.