Kakao Games affiliate Metabora Singapore announces partnership with Oasys

Taiwan to review crypto ETFs amid developments overseasThe Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) in Taiwan has disclosed its close examination of foreign cryptocurrency futures products and exchange-traded funds (ETFs), signaling a potential shift in its regulatory approach.According to a report in Chinese-language financial newspaper, Taiwan’s Commercial Times, the FSC aims to gradually ease restrictions, aligning its stance with global market conditions.Photo by bordercollie 1712 on UnsplashResponding to crypto ETF activity internationallyThe Taiwanese regulator is carrying out this exploration against the backdrop of significant global developments. The possibility of the Federal Reserve cutting interest rates and the upcoming review by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of the spot bitcoin ETF in January next year are key factors influencing the FSC’s considerations.The anticipation surrounding the Bitcoin halving in April, combined with speculation that a spot bitcoin ETF approval is imminent in the U.S., have contributed to a 145% surge this year in Bitcoin’s unit price, adding momentum to that regulatory contemplation in Taiwan. There has been speculation that BlackRock, the world’s largest fund manager, is already preparing for the approval of its iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF.Recognizing the potential impact of a Bitcoin index stock fund, contingent on SEC approval and subsequent public investment permission, the FSC is closely monitoring global trends.Closer to home, it emerged last month that Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) is actively exploring the possibility of permitting retail participation in a spot crypto ETF. Domestic investment banks in Taiwan, attuned to these developments, have expressed longstanding interest in introducing similar crypto products.The FSC draws parallels with global counterparts, citing the proliferation of cryptocurrency futures products and ETFs in various markets.Cautious regulatory reviewAdopting a phased approach, the FSC emphasizes self-discipline and standards in relaxing regulations around crypto ETFs. This cautious strategy aligns with Taiwan’s historical prudence, previously observed in the delayed approval of cryptocurrency ETFs and blockchain ETFs due to concerns over volatility and speculative nature.As Taiwan contemplates a significant move into the cryptocurrency ETF domain, industry players remain cautiously optimistic. While some had considered private placements for overseas cryptocurrency ETFs, challenges such as tightened regulatory supervision and concerns over errors and price lags prompted a reevaluation.Earlier this month, ETF issuer ProShares launched its short Ether-linked ETF product on the New York Stock Exchange’s Arca, using the ticker symbol SETH. Spot bitcoin ETFs have been launched in Canada, Germany, Australia and Brazil. The products have also been made available via tax havens such as the Cayman Islands, Jersey, Liechtenstein and Guernsey.The regulator in Taiwan hints at a potential strategy involving “cryptocurrency concept ETFs.” These funds could invest in cryptocurrency-related software and hardware vendors, offering investors exposure to the industry without direct linkage to cryptocurrency price fluctuations.

In a move to enhance the oversight of cross-border wire transfers involving virtual assets, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), the central bank of the Philippines, is fortifying the implementation of regulations relative to crypto transfers.Photo by C Bueza on UnsplashTravel rule clarificationsLocal news outlet, the English language newspaper The Philippine Star reported that central bank memorandum 2023-042 provides clarifications on the travel rule for virtual asset service providers (VASPs). The travel rule requires financial institutions to pass on information to the next institution where a transaction takes place. The BSP aims to bring greater clarity to several aspects, including the applicability of the P50,000 transaction threshold and expectations regarding transactions involving jurisdictions without travel rules. Additionally, further interpretation is being provided concerning the extension of the Philippine travel rule to non-custodial VASPs and regulatory expectations surrounding transactions with unhosted wallets or crypto wallets controlled directly by their owners, rather than managed by third-party service providers. FATF compliance ambitionThis regulatory move is in response to the directives from the Paris-based Financial Action Task Force (FATF). In 2021 the Philippines came under greater scrutiny from the intergovernmental organization, when it was included on its "gray list," making it a candidate for increased monitoring. The FATF has called upon the Philippines to establish guidelines for the travel rule to prevent terrorists and criminals from exploiting virtual asset transfers for the unrestricted movement of their assets and to detect and prevent misuse effectively.BSP-supervised financial institutions (BSFIs) are now mandated to scrutinize specific details of virtual asset transfers, including the originator's name, account number used in the transaction, originator's physical address or national identity and the beneficiary's name and account number. International moves towards complianceThis latest move by the Philippine central bank is not unusual. In recent months, a plethora of similarly motivated central banks around the world have tightened up on crypto regulation as it relates to the FATF directives. Being on the FATF's "gray list" is bad for a country’s reputation. It has the potential to result in loss of investor confidence and lead to higher compliance costs and greater monitoring. Additionally, it may have an impact on trade relations and damage a country’s ability to access international finance.  Turkey has also found itself on the organization’s gray list. Working towards repairing that situation, Turkey is in the process of establishing a crypto regulatory framework that will be FATF compliant.In May, Pakistan went a step further in banning cryptocurrency. At the time, its Minister of State for Finance and Revenue, Aisha Ghaus Pasha, stated that the ban had been a requirement for Pakistan’s removal from the FATF gray list. A tightening of crypto regulations has also occurred in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and in Hong Kong more recently, as those territories work towards ensuring FATF compliance. The BSP emphasizes that transactions not surpassing the P50,000 threshold or its equivalent in foreign currency must include the names and account numbers of both the originator and beneficiary. Both originating and beneficiary VASPs are required to establish and adhere to robust sanction screening procedures, ensuring compliance with sanctions lists and preventing transactions involving sanctioned individuals, entities, or jurisdictions.

Japan and China are moving in different directions on digital finance. In Japan, senior officials are signaling a push to bring cryptocurrencies further into the mainstream financial system. In China, regulators are doubling down on limits for private-sector tokenization even as the central bank expands a state-led digital currency model.Photo by Nat on UnsplashTraditional exchanges to anchor crypto pushSpeaking at the Tokyo Stock Exchange on Jan. 5, Japanese Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama framed 2026 as “the inaugural year of digital” in her New Year’s address, according to local outlet CoinPost. She said she expects cryptocurrency adoption to broaden as commodity and stock exchanges take on a larger role, arguing that established market infrastructure will be key to realizing the benefits of blockchain-based assets. Pointing to the U.S., she noted that exchange-traded funds are commonly used as an inflation hedge, and suggested Japan could move in a similar direction. Katayama also struck an upbeat tone on the wider economy, saying she expects Japanese stocks to hit new record highs this year. She cast 2026 as a potential turning point as Japan seeks to move beyond a long stretch of deflation, and called for responsible but proactive fiscal policy alongside targeted investment in growth sectors. Her comments come as Tokyo considers a major overhaul of how crypto gains are taxed. Under a government proposal, profits from cryptocurrencies would be taxed at a flat 20%, aligning them more closely with levies on stocks and foreign-exchange trading. The framework would also cover crypto-linked ETFs and derivatives. Currently, crypto gains are treated as miscellaneous income, leaving investors subject to progressive rates that can climb to roughly 55% once local taxes are included. The proposed reforms would bring crypto assets under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. While the package is slated for discussion during the upcoming ordinary Diet session, which is scheduled to begin on Jan. 23, officials do not expect it to take effect before 2028, given the scope of the required legal and regulatory changes. Industry groups flag RWA tokenization risksChina, by contrast, continues to take a restrictive stance toward private digital-asset activity. Seven major financial industry associations—including the National Internet Finance Association of China, the Banking Association, and the Securities Association—issued a joint statement warning that the tokenization of real-world assets (RWAs) is illegal and amounts to a “risky business model,” according to Wu Blockchain, citing a WeChat post published last month. The associations argued that RWA tokenization still functions as a form of unauthorized fundraising barred under existing securities laws. They also warned of risks tied to both the projects and their underlying assets, including fraud, operational failures, and speculative hype, adding that even when the assets themselves are legitimate, token structures remain unreliable and could pose spillover risks to other parts of the financial system. The statement added that such activities have not received regulatory approval. The warning fits with Beijing’s broader, state-led approach to digital finance. Last month, Lu Lei, a deputy governor of the People’s Bank of China (PBOC), warned that unchecked private-sector innovation could pose challenges for monetary policy, arguing that the rapid growth of digital assets and stablecoins risks weakening central banks’ control over money flows. Against that backdrop, Lu said the PBOC has rolled out a new operational framework for its central bank digital currency that took effect on Jan. 1. The move places the digital yuan in a deposit-like role within the commercial banking system under a two-tier structure, with the central bank overseeing rules and infrastructure and commercial banks handling wallets, payments, and compliance. By late November 2025, the digital yuan network had processed 3.48 billion transactions totaling 16.7 trillion yuan ($2.3 trillion), underscoring how China is channeling digital finance through a centrally controlled system. The system includes about 230 million personal wallets and 18.84 million corporate wallets.