Turkey considers limited tax on crypto transactions, not profits

$100M Pyramid Scheme Linked to Prominent Chinese Filecoin ProjectA courtroom showdown currently playing out in the People’s Court of Pingnan County in northeastern Fujian province in China is laying bare an intricate pyramid scheme entwined with one of China’s flagship ventures in the Filecoin ecosystem.The lawsuit thrusts five defendants into the spotlight, alleging their orchestration of an expansive pyramid scheme under the guise of their enterprise, Shenzhen Space-Time Cloud Company. The operation is purported to have siphoned off millions of dollars, leaving in its wake a trail of financial wreckage.Photo by Traxer on UnsplashAggressive project marketingAccording to a local media report published on Monday, the saga began in June 2018 when Lai Mouhang and Lai Moujun established the Space-Time Cloud Company. Subsequently, co-defendants Hu and Liang joined the ranks in the following months. However, it wasn’t until September 2019 that Lai Mouhang escalated the company’s operations, leveraging the ipfs.cn domain to aggressively market and peddle investments linked to distributed storage technology and Filecoin’s intricate economic model.Central to Filecoin’s model is its block reward system, where miners validating new blocks receive Filecoin tokens (FIL) as a reward. In a stunning revelation, the prosecution claims that Lai Mouhang and his accomplices crafted a scheme mirroring this economic structure.Their brainchild, the filpool.io platform, served as a conduit for joint mining, masquerading as a storage server vending operation for FIL mining. This platform, intrinsically linked to Space-Time Cloud Company, allegedly formed the epicenter of the defendants’ fraudulent maneuvers.Almost 60,000 usersThe gravity of the scheme becomes evident when considering the staggering numbers: a reported 57,122 members registered on the filpool.io platform and an additional 143 partners on the bpool.io platform, a sibling project of Space-Time Cloud Company. These platforms collectively amassed a jaw-dropping RMB 607 million ($83 million), alongside RMB 62 million in diverse cryptocurrencies.The modus operandi of the defendants was rooted in enticing participants with rosy prospects of exponential profits. By acquiring a minimum of 8 terabytes of cloud computing power, individuals could attain bronze membership status or higher, unlocking the ability to further recruit participants. Unsurprisingly, the magnitude of returns correlated directly with the size of investments and the recruitment spree — classic hallmarks of a pyramid scheme.The prosecution contends that the defendants exploited these platforms as bait for participants, perpetuating the myth of high returns. This alleged deception led to substantial financial losses for many unsuspecting victims. Furthermore, these actions purportedly sowed discord and upheaval in both economic and social spheres, potentially transgressing criminal law boundaries.As the investigation into this convoluted case unfurls, its implications resonate far beyond China’s territorial confines. The intertwining of cryptocurrency, blockchain, and pyramid schemes punctuates the ever-evolving narrative of financial crime. The case highlights the importance of vigilance and regulatory scrutiny in an innovative industry that has more than its fair share of bad actors.

UAE Issues New Guidance on Crypto AML MeasuresUnder new guidance issued by the Central Bank of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), crypto businesses will be subject to strengthened anti-money laundering (AML) and countering the financing of terrorism (CFT) measures.Photo by Joshua Miranda on PexelsTightening AML regulationThe guidance, first compiled in February but released on Wednesday, which takes into account the recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), has been introduced to enhance the supervisory and regulatory frameworks and combat financial crimes. The rules are set to come into effect within a month.The Central Bank’s guidance specifically targets Licensed Financial Institutions (LFIs) in the UAE, encompassing banks, finance companies, exchange houses, payment service providers, registered hawala providers, insurance companies, agents, and brokers. These entities will now be required to comply with the new regulations to prevent money laundering and terrorism financing activities.Firm foundationsIn a written statement, His Excellency Khaled Mohamed Balama, Governor of the UAEs Central Bank, expressed the importance of the new guidance in strengthening efforts to combat financial crimes. He emphasized the commitment to protecting the financial and monetary system’s soundness and stability, aligning with the FATF standards.The issuance of the guidance comes as the UAE aims to attract crypto businesses to the region by offering a welcoming but effective regulatory framework. In March, Dubai unveiled a dedicated agency responsible for virtual asset regulation, signaling its commitment to fostering a favorable environment for crypto-related activities. Its Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) has also taken action against what it deems to be unregulated activity in the crypto space recently.That action together with the approaches taken by Abu Dhabi and at a national level the UAE itself with respect to digital asset licensing is indicative of a territory that is setting out the right foundation upon which to develop the innovative sector. The approach taken by regulators in the UAE has garnered praise from major crypto firms, including Coinbase, who have applauded the region’s proactive stance on regulation.The strengthened regulatory framework is expected to contribute significantly to the UAE’s ongoing efforts to prevent money laundering and the financing of terrorism. By implementing these measures, the UAE aims to safeguard the integrity and stability of its financial and monetary systems while fostering a secure environment for crypto businesses to thrive.Global regulatory effortsThe UAE’s AML guidance comes amid ongoing efforts globally to come to terms with virtual assets. Tomorrow Japan will implement its adherence to the FATF travel rule regulation relative to digital assets. Crypto businesses like bitFlyer are already adjusting to that eventuality, while also implementing a similar standard in international markets.As the UAE continues to position itself as a leading hub for the crypto industry, the introduction of these new AML rules demonstrates its proactive approach to regulation. The collaboration between the Central Bank and other global regulatory bodies, such as the FATF, showcases the UAE’s commitment to international cooperation and the sharing of knowledge and best practices in the ever-evolving crypto landscape.

Huobi Falls Foul of Malaysian RegulatorMalaysia’s Securities Commission, the regulator responsible for investor protection and market integrity in the South East Asian country, has closed down the Malaysian operations of Seychelles-headquartered global crypto exchange Huobi.Photo by Zukiman Mohamad on PexelsThe regulator announced the shutdown via a press release published to its website on Monday. The Commission outlined that it has taken action against both the exchange, Huobi Global Limited, and its CEO Leon Li. It cites “operating illegally in Malaysia,” given that it was operating as an unregistered digital asset exchange (DAX) as the rationale for the decision.With the enforcement action has come an order to Huobi from the regulator to “cease circulating, publishing or sending any advertisements, whether in email or on social media platforms, to Malaysian investors, and to stop its operations in the country, including to disable its website and mobile application on several platforms such as Apple Store, Google Play and any other digital application platform.”Compliance concernsThe Securities Commission is putting the onus on the Huobi Global CEO to ensure that this order is complied with. The regulator said that it had concerns about the platform’s compliance with local regulatory requirements. It further outlined that it is an offense in Malaysia to operate a DAX without having completed registration with the Commission as a Recognized Market Operator (RMO) under Section 7 (1) of the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007.The Malaysian regulator also took the opportunity to warn citizens that they should only seek to trade on platforms that are registered RMOs and that for right now, those that have funds on the Huobi platform should withdraw their assets and cease trading on the platform.Expected newsHuobi doesn’t seem to have made an official statement relative to the Malaysian Security Commission’s decision via its official media channels. However, it did provide the following response to CoinTelegraph on Monday:“In response to recent reports, we would like to clarify that the situation outlined pertains to the previous Huobi entity and former shareholders. This is not associated with the current Huobi platform, which adheres to strict regulatory compliance globally.”Taking that response at face value, the company doesn’t seem to be particularly bothered about the enforcement action. It seems as if Huobi were already prepared for this eventuality, by starting a new corporate entity from scratch.In August 2022, the Malaysian regulator issued Huobi Global with a lesser enforcement action by adding the company to its investor alert list. It chastised the firm for operating without regulatory approval.Malaysia hasn’t been a hotbed of activity where crypto and digital assets have been concerned and certainly doesn’t compare with Asian centers like Hong Kong and Singapore who are actively chasing crypto business. However, in March of last year, the country’s Deputy Minister of Communications and Multimedia, Zahidi Zainul, said that the Southeast Asian country should recognize crypto assets like Bitcoin as legal tender.In 2021, Malaysia’s central bank joined a Bank of International Settlements (BIS)-led trial to explore the proof of concept of a central bank digital currency (CBDC), in order to enhance technical and policy capabilities should there ever be a need to issue one.