Top

Bitget withdraws from Hong Kong crypto market

Web3 & Enterprise·November 15, 2023, 3:12 AM

Seychelles-incorporated cryptocurrency derivatives platform Bitget has made a decision to permanently exit the Hong Kong market, discontinuing its efforts to obtain a virtual asset trading platform (VATP) license.

Photo by SHUJA OFFICIAL on Unsplash

 

BitgetX platform shutdown

The decision comes only months after it had introduced its BitgetX platform to comply with local regulations. The company, which bases its operations out of Singapore, is a well-known entity in the crypto space, renowned as the operator of the 12th-largest cryptocurrency exchange globally in terms of 24-hour trading volume. It made this revelation on Monday, citing what it referred to as “business and market-related considerations.”

In a published statement, the company said:

”With a heavy heart, we regret to inform you that due to business and market related considerations, we have decided not to pursue a Virtual Asset Trading Platform (VATP) license in Hong Kong. As a result of this decision, the BitgetX website (www.BitgetX.hk) will cease its operations effective December 13, 2023. At the same time, Bitgetx.hk will permanently exit the Hong Kong market.”

While outlining that BitgetX will close its doors, the firm urged users to withdraw their assets beforehand. Bitget is among a handful of exchanges that had publicly expressed their intent to secure a license following Hong Kong’s proactive push over the course of the past year to embrace the virtual asset sector.

 

Broader challenges

The decision to abandon the pursuit of a VATP license echoes the broader challenges faced by the cryptocurrency industry in Hong Kong. Despite the city’s recent enthusiastic regulatory embrace of the virtual asset sector, a number of stumbling blocks remain.

High compliance costs and the lingering aftermath of the JPEX financial scandal have hindered Hong Kong’s aspirations to establish itself as a leading crypto hub. A report back in June identified the major cost implications of acquiring a license in Hong Kong. At the time, it was estimated that the required spend to obtain a VATP license could range from $2.55 million to $25.5 million.

Banking crypto companies has also become a major bottleneck. In June, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) urged banks such as HSBC, Standard Chartered and the Bank of China to bank the crypto sector, having identified a reluctance amongst them to do so.

 

Limited interest

The forthcoming closure of BitgetX adds to a growing trend of limited interest in Hong Kong’s new licensing scheme. Only five companies, all local, have submitted applications for virtual asset licenses to the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC). This list began publication in response to the JPEX scandal, which significantly damaged public trust in virtual assets.

The challenges faced by the industry go beyond regulatory hurdles. The damaged public trust, coupled with the high-profile exit of JPEX, has contributed to the hesitancy of international crypto platforms in pursuing licenses in Hong Kong. The abrupt withdrawal of Bitget raises questions about the viability of Hong Kong as a central player in the cryptocurrency industry and underscores the complexities faced by exchanges navigating the evolving landscape of the digital asset sector.

More to Read
View All
Web3 & Enterprise·

Aug 04, 2023

Raon Whitehat Enables College Students to Hone Skills Through Metaverse

Raon Whitehat Enables College Students to Hone Skills Through MetaverseRaon Whitehat, a blockchain-based service provider of South Korean tech security firm RaonSecure, is set to launch Raon Metademy, a cutting-edge metaverse-powered professional training platform, for universities.Inviting beta testersToday, Raon Whitehat announced the successful completion of the beta version of Raon Metademy, developed in collaboration with edtech company Globepoint. The company is now inviting beta testers from university departments and educational institutions to participate.Interested universities can apply on the Raon Metademy website, with beta testing planned until the end of August. During this period, Raon Whitehat will gather valuable feedback to further enhance the platform. The official launch is scheduled for September 1 to support university classes.Effective remote practicesRaon Metademy boasts a metaverse-based training approach, offering users access to a virtual campus where they can attend lectures and practice essential skills. The platform’s highly immersive user experience allows students to create personalized avatars, explore the campus, access announcements, have a look at training courses, and utilize the training room. With vivid 3D visuals and realistic video-based exercises, students can effectively practice their skills from remote locations.Additionally, users can set up private labs to address their weaknesses, engage in discussions, and build a community similar to a physical campus environment. Among the confirmed beta testers are Chung-Ang University and Seoul Women’s University, and the application window for other institutions will remain open until mid-August. The initial beta service will focus on nursing skills, physical therapy, and security practices, with plans to expand the content to include caregiving practices and more.Photo by Nhia Moua on UnsplashDigital credentials and NFTsRaon Metademy aims to provide certificates of completion and awards of excellence in the form of digital badges, simplifying the process of submitting credentials to universities and other organizations. The platform will also introduce non-fungible tokens (NFTs) to benefit content providers, facilitating secure trading of educational materials among students.Leveraging RaonSecure’s cutting-edge technologies, including blockchain and NFTs, Raon Metademy aims to become a versatile platform open to content providers, educational institutions, and individuals alike. This will enable students to access a diverse range of captivating lessons from anywhere and give lecturers the ability to earn income by delivering high-quality hands-on training with minimal equipment and material costs.

news
Web3 & Enterprise·

Sep 09, 2023

Ant Group Targets Web3 Developers With New Brand Launch

Ant Group Targets Web3 Developers With New Brand LaunchChina’s Ant Group, the powerhouse firm behind the world’s largest mobile payment platform, Alipay, has made a strategic move by introducing its new blockchain-focused sub-brand, ZAN.The initiative signals Ant Group’s intention to carve out a specific niche in the blockchain sector while simultaneously preparing for a potential initial public offering (IPO) that is free from its affiliations with Web3.Photo by Denys Nevozhai on UnsplashOffering a suite of solutionsZAN’s unveiling, which was announced in an official press release via Business Wire on Friday, heralds a comprehensive suite of technical solutions and services catering to both institutional players and individual developers in the Web3 ecosystem. At its core, ZAN offers a solution that enables Web3 companies to seamlessly issue and manage real-world assets (RWAs) while adhering to local regulatory frameworks.But ZAN’s ambitions don’t stop there. The brand aspires to revolutionize the Web3 landscape with a suite of technical offerings, including cutting-edge tools for electronic Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures, anti-money laundering (AML) measures, and Know Your Transaction (KYT) checks, all purpose-built with a view towards achieving the highest levels of compliance.Focus on dAppsMoreover, ZAN will also focus its attention on decentralized applications (dApps) through its provision of smart contract reviews and node services. These services, including remote procedure calls (RPCs), are poised to empower developers, offering them the essential tools they need to craft innovative dApps that can thrive within the Web3 ecosystem.ZAN’s journey has already seen notable partnerships, with HashKey DID, a decentralized identity data aggregator in the Web3 space, announcing its adoption of ZAN’s electronic KYC solution during the Hong Kong Web3 Festival in April.This move by Ant Group aligns with its reported intention to segregate its blockchain subsidiary from its core entity. In July it emerged that the company was restructuring with implications for its blockchain activities having been envisaged at the time. Given the size of the enterprise, the adoption of blockchain by Ant Group thus far has played a pivotal role in furthering blockchain use and implementation within Mainland China.IPO and further expansionThis separation is expected to be a pivotal step for the company in securing a financial holding license in China, further underscoring Ant Group’s interest in pursuing compliance and regulatory alignment.Ant Group had ambitious plans for a $30 billion initial public offering (IPO) in Hong Kong and Shanghai in 2020, with a staggering $226 billion valuation at the time. It’s evident that the financial giant remains resolute in its pursuit of expansion and diversification, although it has faced regulatory obstacles in its endeavors to do so.While the IPO was thwarted by the Chinese government, it is promising for the development of blockchain within China to see that the firm is once again making strategic moves in the blockchain sector, spearheaded in this instance through ZAN.

news
Policy & Regulation·

Oct 26, 2023

The Legal Future of South Korea’s Crypto Industry: Necessary Legislation and Systems

The Legal Future of South Korea’s Crypto Industry: Necessary Legislation and SystemsA recent National Assembly symposium organized by South Korea’s Digital Asset Policy Forum brought experts together to discuss the challenges and prospects of the implementation of the Virtual Asset User Protection Act at the National Assembly Members’ Office Building in Seoul on Tuesday.Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on UnsplashInternational modelsReferences were made to global examples, such as the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) — the world’s first standalone virtual asset legislation enacted in the EU — which ensures transparency, disclosure, authorization, and supervision of crypto-asset transactions. However, unlike the capital market, MiCA does not impose regular disclosure reporting requirements or corrections on them. Firms in Japan, on the other hand, are asked to provide disclosure under autonomous regulation through the Japan Virtual and Crypto Assets Exchange Association (JVCEA).Notably, in its recent Policy Recommendations for Crypto and Digital Asset Markets Consultation Report, the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) states that it is “seeking to encourage optimal consistency in the way crypto-asset markets and securities markets are regulated within individual IOSCO jurisdictions, in accordance with the principle of ‘same activities, same risks, same regulatory outcomes’.” This principle refers to the concept that any crypto-asset activity that has a similar function and poses similar risks to those in the traditional financial system — such as operating a trading platform or providing custody services — is subject to regulation that ensures equivalent outcomes, as defined by the UK Parliament.The IOSCO report also suggests that crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) should disclose information regarding ownership and control of crypto-assets, issuer and business-related information, issuer management teams, transaction history and operational description of crypto-assets, token ownership concentration, transfer protocols, and a given CASP’s treatment of the client crypto-assets and their respective rights and entitlements during events like hard forks and airdrops.Hurdles to overcomeExperts at the forum reflected these considerations in their sentiments. Han Suh-hee, a lawyer at Barun Law Firm, emphasized that it is important to determine what kind of information should be disclosed. She argued that it is necessary to discuss to what extent information about virtual asset issuers should be disclosed and whether mandating firms to disclose their financial and business conditions is efficient.In particular, Han underlined the need to consider the differences between virtual assets and stocks when establishing a framework for the disclosure of virtual assets holdings. Unlike stocks, virtual assets possess distinctive characteristics like their borderless and decentralized nature, unclear issuer backgrounds, and the ability to conduct peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions.Lee Han-jin, a lawyer at Kim & Chang Law Firm, added that the enactment of Korea’s Virtual Asset User Protection Act was aimed at establishing a system directly targeted at regulating virtual assets and virtual asset service operators (VASPs) — a significant development from the Financial Transaction Reporting Act, which had until now been the only legal framework responsible for regulating VASPs along with other entities like casino business operators. Virtual assets are now subject to a more systematized regulatory approach.However, he said that the Virtual Asset User Protection Act still has its setbacks because it is undergoing a two-stage legislative process. Lee criticized the fact that the same definition of VASPs outlined in the Financial Transaction Reporting Act had been brought over, which limits their identity to transaction intermediaries, wallet operators, and custodians while overlooking their other roles like crypto management, crypto deposits, and crypto collective investments.Lee also pointed out another weakness: the scope of prohibition on using undisclosed information and market manipulation is broader in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act than in the Capital Markets Act. He argued that enforcement decrees should stipulate the definition of insiders and exceptional cases when deliberating on the prohibition of insider virtual asset trading.Lee thus emphasized the need for a clear definition of virtual assets in the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, as it is yet unclear whether they are objects or assets. All things considered, he believes there must be a law that can encompass blockchain-based decentralization, outline the similarities and differences between digital assets and financial products, and accommodate new services that utilize smart contracts.“We are in the process of creating a regulatory system similar to those being adopted in other countries based on their respective markets,” said Lee Seok-ran, head of the Financial Innovation Bureau at the Financial Services Commission (FSC). “Unlike the stock market, which is equipped with regulations to prevent fraudulent transactions and misconduct, virtual assets are traded on multiple exchanges, so we are considering how to interpret unfair trading activities and conduct market surveillance.”She explained that the commission is prioritizing user protection measures and subordinate regulations. “I believe we will be able to create a system for subordinate regulations on disclosure once an overall global trajectory is established. But before that happens, we are working on guidelines for defining unfair trading activities with regulators and the Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA).” Unfair trading activities associated with virtual assets include not only those conducted on exchanges but also under other circumstances.The FSC officer said that the financial authority is set to establish legal criteria to distinguish cases such as false statements in white papers of crypto projects. She added that enforcement decrees will define both the conditions for restricting deposits and withdrawals on crypto exchanges and the corresponding limits.

news
Loading