Bitget withdraws from Hong Kong crypto market

Ant Group, a Chinese financial services conglomerate and affiliate of the Alibaba Group, has plans to acquire stablecoin licenses across Asian markets and further afield. Its Singapore-headquartered global digital payments and financial technology subsidiary, Ant International, plans to file an application for a stablecoin license in Singapore and in Hong Kong once the Chinese autonomous territory implements its stablecoin regulation later this summer.  That’s according to a report published by Bloomberg on June 12, citing unnamed sources familiar with the matter. Beyond the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region, Ant International also plans to seek a stablecoin license in Luxembourg.Photo by Ban Daisy on Unsplash2 Hong Kong stablecoin license applicationsIn a statement, Ant International stated: “We plan to apply for the fiat-referenced stablecoins (FRS) issuer's license once the process is open after the [Hong Kong] Stablecoins Ordinance takes effect on August 1.”Additionally, Bian Zhuoqun, president of Ant Digital Technologies, another Ant Group subsidiary focused on applying digital technologies, confirmed that it too will be applying for stablecoin licensing in Hong Kong.  Zhuoqun told reporters that the company has already opened dialogue with the regulator in Hong Kong, while also participating in a regulatory sandbox. While the company wasn’t a named participant within Hong Kong’s stablecoin sandbox, it had previously participated in Project Ensemble, an initiative run by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) aimed at establishing a tokenization ecosystem in the city. Exploring stablecoin applicationsOn June 10, Ant International and German multinational investment bank Deutsche Bank announced a strategic partnership geared towards establishing integrated cross-border payment solutions to global merchants.  The two firms stated that they would explore tokenized bank deposits while also looking into stablecoin applications for global payments. It highlighted the potential use of stablecoins within Ant companies, facilitating real-time cross-border treasury management, reserve management and on-ramp and off-ramp services. Back in November, Singapore-headquartered StraitsX, a stablecoin-based payments startup, launched a cross-border payments product in association with AliPay+, Ali International’s offshore digital payments platform. A key component of the product offering is the use of the XSGD stablecoin. Hong Kong passed its stablecoin bill last month. Last week, the city’s government outlined that the effective date for the resultant Stablecoin Ordinance has been set for Aug. 1. Under the Ordinance, only licensed institutions are authorized to offer fiat-referenced stablecoins in Hong Kong, while the issuer of such a stablecoin must be licensed in order for it to be offered to a retail investor. Last month, multinational banking and financial services group HSBC launched Hong Kong’s first blockchain-based settlement service, utilizing tokenized deposits for swift transactions. The company collaborated with Ant International, which became the first client of the service. Entering the financial mainstreamA Financial Times report published on June 12 asserted that stablecoins are entering the financial mainstream, a development that “could have profound implications for the global financial system.” Earlier this week, the South China Morning Post (SCMP) reported that Hong Kong’s stablecoin law could lead to a boom in digital assets.Daniel Tse, managing director of Hong Kong brokerage firm Futu Securities, told the SCMP: “We’re seeing a significant trend in investments related to stablecoins on our platform, which highlights the growing importance of this sector.” 

A United Nations (UN) report published on Monday pointed fingers at USDT for its alleged role in money laundering and scams in Southeast Asia, prompting the stablecoin’s issuer, Tether, to respond.Photo by DrawKit Illustrations on UnsplashFighting backThe stablecoin issuer finds itself under the spotlight once again, facing intense scrutiny over its association with illicit activities, according to the UN report. Responding by way of a blog post, Tether expressed disappointment and pushed back against the accusations. The firm asserted that the report disproportionately focuses on USDT's alleged connection to illicit activities, neglecting to acknowledge the positive impact it has had on developing economies in emerging markets. Collaborating with law enforcementTether defended its position by highlighting its collaborative efforts with global law enforcement agencies, such as the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the recently onboarded United States Secret Service (USSS). The company expressed disappointment with the UN's assessment and stressed that its monitoring measures surpass those of traditional banking systems, historically implicated in money laundering cases. Having frozen over $300 million in recent months to combat the criminal use of crypto assets, Tether emphasized the traceability of its tokens and its established track record of collaboration with law enforcement. In its blog post, Tether urged the UN to shift the conversation from concentrating solely on risks to discussing how centralized stablecoins like USDT could contribute to the fight against financial crimes. The UN Office for Drugs and Crime (UNODC) division responsible for Southeast Asia and the Pacific released the report, specifically highlighting USDT as a significant instrument for money laundering in the region, notably on the Tron blockchain. Tether's response came soon after the release of the UNODC report, where the company emphasized the need for a broader discussion with the UN on addressing financial crimes within blockchain platforms. Tether acknowledged that there are still numerous opportunities to combat financial crimes on blockchain platforms and encouraged the UN to engage with the industry to comprehend and implement contemporary strategies. The company expressed a willingness to collaborate on initiatives aimed at enhancing the understanding of blockchain technology and its potential in fighting financial crime. A perennial controversyTether has been the subject of a perennial controversy inside and outside the crypto space over the years. Its critics have long accused the company of not having the asset backing to reflect the U.S. dollar stablecoins it issues. The issue has been compounded by Tether’s inability to produce fully fledged audits as opposed to attestation reports to verify its holdings. Speaking on the edges of the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, on Tuesday, Howard Lutnick, CEO of leading global financial services firm Cantor Fitzgerald spoke positively about Tether. He said that his firm has held and managed large quantities of Tether’s assets. Lutnick confirmed that “they have the money they say they have.” Off the back of Lutnick’s comments, Nic Carter, partner at venture capital and private equity firm Castle Island Ventures, outlined that Tether’s critics have been proven wrong. Carter wrote: “Tether truthers spent 6 years trying to convince everyone tether would collapse and drag down the industry. it didn't. . . . Not sure anyone has ever been more wrong about anything.”

Polymesh’s APAC Digital Asset Regulation Report Highlights ChallengesThe project team behind Polymesh, an institutional-grade permissioned blockchain built specifically for regulated assets, released a report on digital asset regulation within the Asia Pacific (APAC) region on Tuesday, highlighting several challenges that regulators are attempting to overcome.In a press release, the company outlined that the report covers recent regulatory developments in South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong, and the broader APAC region.Photo by Jéan Béller on UnsplashProgressive regulatory effortsRegulators within the APAC region are currently striving to introduce legislation for digital assets, while several centers within the region are vying to establish themselves as hubs for digital asset-related business.The report explores the individual efforts of regulators in various APAC nations as they work towards crafting regulatory frameworks tailored to their jurisdictions. Those efforts encompass implementation, investigation, and enforcement of legislation in a borderless industry.Regulators in South Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong have all embarked on formulating rules for emerging asset categories, albeit using different terminologies such as “digital assets,” “digital payment tokens,” and “virtual assets.” Their focus lies in striking a balance between consumer protection, market integrity, and industry development.Additionally, all three regulators adhere to the principle of “same activity, same regulations, same risks” when it comes to tokenized securities. They argue that regulatory requirements do not significantly differ solely because a security is in tokenized form. Each state has been actively engaged in local and global activities surrounding security tokens, including state involvement in the advancement of security token technology and cross-border transactions.Main findingsThe report’s main findings emphasize that while regulators in the APAC region are making strides in introducing digital asset legislation, the road ahead will not be without challenges.Legislating a cross-border industry poses difficulties that necessitate harmonization to foster a robust and interconnected ecosystem. Digital assets originating in Asia can be traded globally and vice versa. Merely identifying the asset’s place of origin is no longer sufficient.Although the report delves into the efforts of individual regulators, it emphasizes the need for long-term collaboration to establish a unified vision and practical implementation of regulations for this borderless phenomenon.Regulatory challengesThe regulatory challenges faced by South Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong in driving the growth of digital assets in the APAC region are multifaceted. They include the intricacies of legislating an inherently cross-border industry. In turn, that can lead to the potential violation of legislation from other jurisdictions.The lack of harmonization among different jurisdictions, and variations in regulatory approaches among the three regulators are likely to be problematic. Furthermore, there are push-pull dynamics between the industry and regulators, with even the regulators themselves not always in agreement.However, despite these challenges, all three regulators have initiated the formulation of rules for new asset categories, with a strong emphasis on safeguarding consumer interests, maintaining market integrity, and fostering industry development.