OKX maintains robust asset reserves with 103% BTC backing

Huobi Aims for Hong Kong License Within 6–12 MonthsAccording to Justin Sun, the founder of layer one blockchain Tron and advisor to Huobi, the cryptocurrency exchange could have obtained a crypto trading license in Hong Kong by the end of the year.Photo by Pixabay on PexelsApplication submissionIn an interview with CoinDesk TV on Friday, Sun revealed that Huobi recently submitted an application to become a virtual asset service provider (VASP) in Hong Kong. While the approval process typically takes up to 18 months, Sun expressed optimism that a decision could be reached within the next six to twelve months.A legacy Chinese cryptocurrency exchange was driven out of the country a few years ago following the implementation of a crypto trading ban, and is now a Seychelles-headquartered company which currently has offices in Singapore, Japan, South Korea, and the United Kingdom.It had been previously understood that at least 10 companies with Chinese founders, including OKX, Bybit, and Huobi, had either announced or were known to be planning to announce their bid for licenses in Hong Kong. Sun’s comments today add clarity to the matter.Sun highlighted that during this grace period, which spans the next 18 months, the specific details of regulations will be developed. This includes guidelines on compliance with customer withdrawals and anti-money laundering requirements. He further explained that with the approval, Huobi Hong Kong will be able to operate, onboard customers, establish banking relationships, and serve its user base effectively.In a strategic move, Huobi relocated its headquarters from Singapore to Hong Kong, driven by the city’s aspirations to become a leading virtual asset hub as early as this summer. The exchange’s decision to establish a presence in Hong Kong positions it favorably to leverage the emerging opportunities in the region.Expectations of more applicantsWhile it’s not entirely clear who else has applied, Sun speculated that five to six other major players could follow suit. Among the potential contenders mentioned were OKX, Gate.io, Bitget, and ByBit. This suggests a potential wave of interest in Hong Kong as a regulatory-friendly jurisdiction for virtual asset trading.When asked about Huobi’s plans to enter the Canadian market and compete with established players like Coinbase and Kraken, Sun made it clear that Huobi has no immediate intentions to operate in Canada. He emphasized the importance of prioritizing friendly jurisdictions, with a specific focus on regions like the Caribbean, Hong Kong, and Japan.Hong Kong’s regulatory approach towards cryptocurrencies and virtual asset service providers has gained attention in recent months. The city’s commitment to establishing a robust framework for digital asset trading and ensuring compliance with international standards has drawn interest from industry players seeking regulatory clarity and stability.As Huobi progresses through the application process and awaits a decision on its VASP license, the outcome will have significant implications not only for the exchange itself but also for the broader crypto ecosystem in Hong Kong. The successful acquisition of a license by Huobi could set a positive precedent, attracting more exchanges to establish a presence in the region and further solidifying Hong Kong’s position as a leading virtual asset hub in Asia.The developments in Hong Kong’s regulatory landscape will be closely monitored by industry participants as they shape the future of virtual asset trading in the city.

Chinese authorities have apprehended an individual suspected of identity forgery in connection with the StarkNet (STRK) airdrop. The suspect, identified as Lan Mou, allegedly assumed the identities of others to submit false Early Community Member Program (ECMP) airdrop forms. Through this scheme, the suspect claimed over 40,000 STRK tokens that originally belonged to the victims. After successfully claiming the tokens, the suspect transferred them to an OKX wallet. Subsequently, the tokens were converted into over $91,000 worth of Tether, as reported by local media on April 30. Lan Mou was apprehended by police in Guangdong Province on April 25. Authorities seized a computer and two mobile phones during the arrest.Photo by Tamara Gak on UnsplashUnprecedented scale of identity theftWhile cryptocurrency scams and phishing attacks are prevalent, the scale of identity theft observed in this case is unprecedented. The suspect's method involved claiming airdrops using stolen identities, marking a novel approach to fraudulent activity in the cryptocurrency space. A crypto airdrop is a method used to distribute new cryptocurrency tokens, typically targeting early users who engage with a specific protocol. In the case of the StarkNet Foundation's airdrop, which launched on Feb. 20, a total of 700 million STRK tokens were distributed to various participants, including Ethereum solo and liquid stakers, Starknet developers, users, external projects and developers within the Web3 ecosystem. Concerns raised by developerFollowing the StarkNet airdrop, concerns were raised by pseudonymous Yearn.finance developer Banteg regarding the eligibility criteria. Banteg warned that the eligibility list mainly consisted of airdrop squatters, individuals who exploit airdrop opportunities for financial gain. These individuals often control multiple addresses to maximize their rewards. This incident is not the first instance of airdrop exploitation. In March 2023, it was revealed that airdrop hunters consolidated $3.3 million worth of tokens from the Arbitrum (ARB) airdrop into just two wallets, highlighting the prevalence of such fraudulent activities within the cryptocurrency community. 

BOK Staffers Assess Crypto Market Vulnerabilities and Their ImplicationsOn Thursday, the Bank of Korea’s (BOK) staff members published an assessment of the vulnerabilities in the cryptocurrency market and their potential implications. Here is the summary of the report.Photo by D Tan on Unsplash2022 crypto winterThroughout 2022, the worldwide crypto market faced a series of adverse occurrences, such as significant drops in the prices of major crypto-assets and the collapse of prominent crypto companies. These events shed light on the vulnerabilities that had accumulated during the rapid growth of the market.The first major event occurred in May 2022 when the algorithmic stablecoin TerraUSD experienced a sharp decline, resulting in substantial losses and bankruptcies for numerous retail investors and crypto firms. This incident significantly eroded confidence in the overall crypto market. The subsequent bankruptcies of prominent crypto lender Celsius and hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) further highlighted the realization of risks commonly associated with traditional financial markets, such as multiple collateral loans and maturity and liquidity mismatches, within the crypto market.In November 2022, the well-known crypto exchange FTX filed for bankruptcy, demonstrating that the activities of a large crypto company can propagate risks through moral hazard and excessive profit-seeking behavior when it operates outside the realm of regulatory oversight.Similarities with TradFiThese negative events that unfolded in the global crypto market in 2022 share similarities with issues previously observed in financial markets, such as unsustainable business models, liquidity risk, leverage, and lack of transparency in financial conditions. These parallels suggest that if the crypto markets were subjected to comparable levels of regulation as traditional financial markets, it is plausible that the triggering of these risks could have been avoided altogether, or at the very least, the resulting damage could have been mitigated to some extent.Implications for the Korean marketAt present, it is deemed unlikely that events akin to those witnessed in overseas crypto markets will transpire in the Korean market. The Korean crypto-asset market has primarily evolved through exchanges, with limited influence from other enterprises such as crypto issuers and decentralized lending platforms. In addition, Korean crypto exchanges are subject to regulation under the Act on Reporting and Using Specified Financial Transaction Information. This mandates the separation of customer deposits from exchange assets and the strict management of custodial crypto-assets through secure wallets. Additionally, Korean exchanges are prohibited from listing their own tokens on their platforms.However, there remains a dearth of information regarding the business structures of crypto companies that offer services similar to those in the traditional financial industry. This lack of information poses challenges in accurately assessing risk and providing adequate investor protection. Meanwhile, there is a potential for a deeper integration between the crypto market and users’ daily lives, particularly through major technology companies, gaming companies, and security tokens.SuggestionsIt is vital to ensure that crypto-assets are regulated based on the principle of “same activity, same risk, same regulation” through the ongoing development of crypto-asset-related legislation. The Financial Stability Board, an international body monitoring the global financial system, explained this principle in a 2022 paper: “Where crypto-assets and intermediaries perform an equivalent economic function to one performed by instruments and intermediaries of the traditional financial sector, they should be subject to equivalent regulation.”Additionally, it is necessary to stay aligned with major countries in terms of the speed and comprehensiveness of regulatory measures to prevent regulatory discrepancies across borders due to the global nature of crypto risks.Enhancing the effectiveness and efficiency of regulation requires the establishment and maintenance of a close cooperation system between authorities. This collaborative effort should encompass various aspects, including monitoring, information gathering, and supervision of the crypto-asset market. Notably, the widespread adoption of stablecoins can affect the stability of the overall financial system, including monetary systems and payment and settlement systems. Hence, it is necessary to strengthen the involvement of central banks in the monitoring and supervision framework for crypto-assets, including stablecoins, as demonstrated by legislative approaches adopted by major economies like the EU. Furthermore, imposing disclosure requirements, external audits, and documentation submission obligations on crypto-asset operators is advisable.